Super Group (SGHC) Limited
Super Group (SGHC) Limited SGHC Peers
See (SGHC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGHC | $11.79 | -1.67% | 5.9B | 45.31 | $0.26 | +1.95% |
| FLUT | $289.58 | +1.14% | 51.2B | 99.17 | $2.92 | N/A |
| LVS | $50.52 | +1.83% | 35.7B | 28.22 | $1.79 | +2.18% |
| DKNG | $44.57 | +4.14% | 22.1B | -54.37 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $111.93 | +1.68% | 11.7B | 29.94 | $3.74 | +1.12% |
| MGM | $38.84 | +3.05% | 10.6B | 17.34 | $2.24 | N/A |
| LNW | $101.00 | -0.11% | 8.5B | 27.01 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CHDN | $106.80 | +1.35% | 7.7B | 19.01 | $5.62 | +0.38% |
| BYD | $85.37 | +1.50% | 7B | 13.78 | $6.20 | +0.82% |
| CZR | $31.51 | +6.49% | 6.6B | -28.65 | -$1.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SGHC vs FLUT Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while FLUT trades at $289.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 99.17. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs LVS Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while LVS trades at $50.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 28.22. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs DKNG Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while DKNG trades at $44.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -54.37. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs WYNN Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while WYNN trades at $111.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs MGM Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while MGM trades at $38.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 17.34. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs LNW Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while LNW trades at $101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs CHDN Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while CHDN trades at $106.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs BYD Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while BYD trades at $85.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs CZR Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while CZR trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -28.65. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs MTN Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while MTN trades at $169.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 21.65. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs SGMS Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs HGV Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while HGV trades at $47.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 149.84. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs RSI Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while RSI trades at $15.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 170.33. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs RRR Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while RRR trades at $57.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 22.05. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs IGT Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs PENN Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while PENN trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -31.66. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs VAC Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while VAC trades at $83.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 14.25. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs PLYA Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs MCRI Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while MCRI trades at $89.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs EVRI Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs MLCO Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while MLCO trades at $8.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 58.67. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs SBET Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while SBET trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.39. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs ACEL Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while ACEL trades at $12.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs BVH Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs NGMS Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs GDEN Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 859.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while GDEN trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 73.93. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs TPGH-UN Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs AGS Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs BALY Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while BALY trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.94. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs GAMB Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 428.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while GAMB trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs CDRO Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 382.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while CDRO trades at $8.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 93.22. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs INSE Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 240.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while INSE trades at $8.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs MSC Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 225.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while MSC trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -9.36. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs FLL Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 160.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while FLL trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -4.06. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs CPHC Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 99.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while CPHC trades at $18.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 122.69. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs GAN Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs CNTY Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while CNTY trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs CDROW Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 47M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while CDROW trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs LTRY Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs LTRYW Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 25.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs SLNA Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs SLNAW Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs GMBL Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 398.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while GMBL trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs GMBLP Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 48.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while GMBLP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs GMBLW Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs EBET Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs GMBLZ Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.
SGHC vs GNOG Comparison
SGHC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SGHC stands at 5.9B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SGHC is priced at $11.79, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SGHC currently has a P/E ratio of 45.31, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, SGHC's ROE is +0.23%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SGHC is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SGHC.