Sterling Bancorp, Inc.

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 191.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while HDB trades at $75.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check HDB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 117.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while IBN trades at $32.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check IBN's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while MFG trades at $6.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check MFG's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while PNC trades at $188.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check PNC's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while USB trades at $44.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check USB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while DB trades at $34.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 12.81. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check DB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 69.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while USB-PS trades at $18.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check USB-PS's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while USB-PP trades at $23.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check USB-PP's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while USB-PA trades at $828.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 237.36. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check USB-PA's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 68.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while USB-PH trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check USB-PH's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 68B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while ITUB trades at $6.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check ITUB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 65.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while LYG trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check LYG's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 55.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while TFC trades at $43.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check TFC's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while HBANL trades at $25.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check HBANL's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while BSBR trades at $4.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check BSBR's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while HBANM trades at $22.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 29.69. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check HBANM's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while KB trades at $83.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check KB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while MTB trades at $185.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check MTB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while BBDO trades at $2.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.65. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check BBDO's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while BBD trades at $2.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check BBD's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while TFC-PO trades at $21.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.77. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check TFC-PO's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FITB trades at $41.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FITB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while KEY-PL trades at $24.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check KEY-PL's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while TFC-PI trades at $20.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check TFC-PI's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while HBANP trades at $17.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check HBANP's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while USB-PR trades at $16.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check USB-PR's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while TFC-PR trades at $19.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check TFC-PR's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while SHG trades at $49.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 7.87. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check SHG's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while USB-PQ trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.33. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check USB-PQ's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FCNCA trades at $1,848.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FCNCA's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FCNCP trades at $21.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.38. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FCNCP's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FCNCO trades at $23.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.41. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FCNCO's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while HBAN trades at $16.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check HBAN's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while RF-PF trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check RF-PF's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while RF trades at $24.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.65. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check RF's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while RF-PC trades at $24.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check RF-PC's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while CFG trades at $46.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check CFG's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while BAP trades at $242.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 12.49. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check BAP's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while KEY trades at $17.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -220.12. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check KEY's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while KEY-PJ trades at $22.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check KEY-PJ's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while KEY-PK trades at $22.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.06. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check KEY-PK's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while KEY-PI trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check KEY-PI's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FITBI trades at $25.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FITBI's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FITBP trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.98. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FITBP's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while RF-PE trades at $17.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.30. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check RF-PE's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check CFG-PD's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 14.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while BCH trades at $27.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check BCH's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while VLYPN trades at $25.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check VLYPN's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while WF trades at $54.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check WF's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FITBO trades at $20.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.79. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FITBO's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FHN-PB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FHN-PC trades at $25.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.98. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FHN-PC's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FHN-PE trades at $25.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FHN-PE's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while CFG-PH trades at $26.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check CFG-PH's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while CIB trades at $45.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check CIB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while BSAC trades at $23.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check BSAC's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FHN trades at $21.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT and FHN have similar daily volatility (1.85).Check FHN's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while CUBI-PE trades at $326.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 31.25. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check CUBI-PE's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while WBS trades at $56.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check WBS's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while SSB trades at $93.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check SSB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FHN-PF trades at $18.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FHN-PF's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FHN-PD's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while WAL trades at $77.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check WAL's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while CMA trades at $66.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 12.83. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check CMA's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while CFG-PE trades at $19.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check CFG-PE's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while UMBF trades at $110.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check UMBF's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while WTFC trades at $125.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 11.72. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check WTFC's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while ONBPP trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 28.16. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check ONBPP's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while ONB trades at $20.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check ONB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while ONBPO trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 28.17. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check ONBPO's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while CBSH trades at $60.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check CBSH's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while GGAL trades at $53.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 7.64. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check GGAL's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while CFR trades at $123.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check CFR's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while BPOP trades at $114.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.16. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check BPOP's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while ZION trades at $51.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check ZION's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check BSMX's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while PNFP trades at $89.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check PNFP's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while SNV trades at $47.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.24. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check SNV's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while SNV-PD trades at $25.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check SNV-PD's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while BOKF trades at $101.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check BOKF's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while PB trades at $66.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check PB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while CADE trades at $34.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 12.38. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check CADE's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while HOMB trades at $27.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 12.65. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check HOMB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while OZK trades at $47.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check OZK's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FNB trades at $14.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 11.59. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FNB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while VLY trades at $9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check VLY's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check BXS's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while GBCI trades at $43.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check GBCI's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while VLYPO trades at $25.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.64. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check VLYPO's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while VLYPP trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check VLYPP's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while UBSI trades at $35.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check UBSI's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while COLB trades at $23.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.56. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check COLB's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while HWC trades at $58.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.75. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check HWC's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while HWCPZ trades at $23.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check HWCPZ's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check NYCB-PA's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FFIN trades at $34.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FFIN's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while FLG trades at $11.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -7.92. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check FLG's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while AX trades at $85.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check AX's competition here

SBT plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBT stands at 253.1M. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBT is priced at $4.84, while ABCB trades at $66.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBT currently has a P/E ratio of 121.00, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 11.85. In terms of profitability, SBT's ROE is +0.01%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBT is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBT.Check ABCB's competition here