SilverBow Resources, Inc.
SilverBow Resources, Inc. SBOW Peers
See (SBOW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBOW | $36.82 | -2.41% | 940.37M | 4.69 | $7.85 | N/A |
| COP | $85.20 | -1.08% | 107.55B | 10.80 | $7.89 | +3.64% |
| CNQ | $31.04 | +0.71% | 65.16B | 12.17 | $2.55 | +5.06% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63.00B | 13.33 | $20.22 | N/A |
| EOG | $110.21 | -0.52% | 60.15B | 10.20 | $10.80 | +3.41% |
| CEO | $121.76 | N/A | 53.21B | 10.59 | $11.50 | N/A |
| OXY-WT | $20.15 | +1.72% | 41.17B | N/A | N/A | +2.18% |
| OXY | $41.31 | +0.55% | 40.65B | 16.72 | $2.47 | +2.18% |
| HES | $131.36 | +1.03% | 40.63B | 18.22 | $7.21 | +1.48% |
| FANG | $135.86 | -0.32% | 39.69B | 8.45 | $16.08 | +3.84% |
Stock Comparison
SBOW vs COP Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 107.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while COP trades at $85.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CNQ Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 65.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CNQ trades at $31.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs PXD Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs EOG Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 60.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EOG trades at $110.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 10.20. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CEO Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 53.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs OXY-WT Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 41.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while OXY-WT trades at $20.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs OXY Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 40.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while OXY trades at $41.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs HES Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 40.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while HES trades at $131.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs FANG Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 39.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while FANG trades at $135.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs EQT Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 33.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EQT trades at $55.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 91.16. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs TPL Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 29.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while TPL trades at $1,272.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 63.84. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs EXE Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 27.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EXE trades at $115.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is -19.96. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EXE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs WDS Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 26.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while WDS trades at $13.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs DVN Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 20.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while DVN trades at $31.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CTRA Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 18.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CTRA trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.34. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs COG Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs MRO Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 15.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs AR Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 12.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while AR trades at $39.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 51.29. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CHK Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.70B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs RRC Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while RRC trades at $39.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 35.59. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CHKEW Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs OVV Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 9.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while OVV trades at $35.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 15.19. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs PR Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 8.91B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PR trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 7.76. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CHKEZ Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CHKEL Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs SWN Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SWN's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CRK Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 6.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CRK trades at $23.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is -21.02. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs APA Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while APA trades at $16.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs MTDR Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 5.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MTDR trades at $43.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CPG Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CHRD Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 5.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CHRD trades at $89.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs VIST Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 4.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VIST trades at $49.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CNX Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CNX trades at $31.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is -15.97. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CNX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs OAS Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs DEN Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs BCEI Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CDEV Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs ERF Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs MGY Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MGY trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 10.73. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CRC Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 3.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CRC trades at $42.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 6.99. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs VRN Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs GPOR Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GPOR trades at $194.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPOR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs MUR Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MUR trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 7.98. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs ESTE Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs BSM Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while BSM trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 14.67. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CRGY Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CRGY trades at $8.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs NOG Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while NOG trades at $26.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs SM Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SM trades at $23.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CIVI Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CIVI trades at $27.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.17. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CPE Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs NEXT Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while NEXT trades at $7.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -10.91. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs STRDW Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs BKV Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 1.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while BKV trades at $21.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BKV's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs KRP Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while KRP trades at $13.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 327.00. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs MNR Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MNR trades at $13.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 8.45. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs HHRS Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs TALO Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 1.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while TALO trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is 36.09. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TALO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs DMLP Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while DMLP trades at $27.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs BTE Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while BTE trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 5.67. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CLMT Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CLMT trades at $14.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -3.51. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs FLMN Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs HPK Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 1.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while HPK trades at $9.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs VET Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 985.59M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VET trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -42.57. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs SBR Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 969.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SBR trades at $66.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SBR's ROE of +6.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs TELL Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 892.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs TXO Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 837.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while TXO trades at $15.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs VTS Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 803.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VTS trades at $20.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs KOS Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 779.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while KOS trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -54.37. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs GRNT Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 727.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GRNT trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 61.61. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs ROCC Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs VTLE Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 590.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VTLE trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -4.52. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs PVAC Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs REPX Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 564.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while REPX trades at $25.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 5.48. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs OBE Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 364.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while OBE trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to OBE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs SD Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 353.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SD trades at $9.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 5.53. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs GPRK Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 349.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GPRK trades at $6.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs EGY Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 332.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EGY trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs SJT Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 320.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while SJT trades at $6.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is 344.00. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SJT's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs PNRG Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 318.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PNRG trades at $191.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs GFR Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 296.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GFR trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 2.26. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs INR Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 261.93M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while INR trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs KGEI Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 229.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while KGEI trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs WTI Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 204.50M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while WTI trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WTI's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs BRY Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 193.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while BRY trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs GTE Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 166.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while GTE trades at $4.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -10.73. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs PHX Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 163.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PHX trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.68. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs REI Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 163.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while REI trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to REI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs EPSN Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 157.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EPSN trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 35.80. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs EPM Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 147.52M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EPM trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -107.50. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs EP Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 136.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while EP trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -7.96. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs AMPY Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 108.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while AMPY trades at $2.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 6.74. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs IMPP Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 95.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while IMPP trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs IMPPP Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 85.38M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while IMPPP trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -62.70. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs HPKEW Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, HPKEW has a market cap of 76.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while HPKEW trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas HPKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to HPKEW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is less volatile compared to HPKEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs MVO Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, MVO has a market cap of 66.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while MVO trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas MVO's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to MVO's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to MVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs CRT Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, CRT has a market cap of 62.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while CRT trades at $10.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas CRT's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CRT's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to CRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs PED Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 57.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PED trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 3.29. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs PVL Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, PVL has a market cap of 52.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while PVL trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas PVL's P/E ratio is 17.56. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PVL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to PVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.
SBOW vs VOC Comparison
SBOW plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBOW stands at 940.37M. In comparison, VOC has a market cap of 49.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SBOW is priced at $36.82, while VOC trades at $2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBOW currently has a P/E ratio of 4.69, whereas VOC's P/E ratio is 4.73. In terms of profitability, SBOW's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VOC's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, SBOW is more volatile compared to VOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBOW.