Loading...

SharpLink Gaming Ltd.

SBETNASDAQ
Consumer Cyclical
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
$21.48
$4.42(25.91%)

SharpLink Gaming Ltd. SBET Peers

See (SBET) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.

Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry

Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.

SymbolPriceChange %Market CapP/E RatioEPSDividend Yield
SBET$21.48+25.91%1.2B0.39$47.28N/A
FLUT$289.94+1.26%51.2B99.17$2.92N/A
LVS$49.87+0.52%35.7B28.22$1.79+2.18%
DKNG$43.17+0.86%22.1B-54.37-$0.82N/A
WYNN$111.25+1.06%11.7B29.94$3.74+1.12%
MGM$38.17+1.26%10.6B17.34$2.24N/A
LNW$97.86-3.21%8.5B27.01$3.74N/A
CHDN$105.79+0.39%7.7B19.01$5.62+0.38%
BYD$80.61-4.16%7B13.78$6.20+0.82%
CZR$30.15+1.89%6.6B-28.65-$1.10N/A
Showing 1 to 10 of 49 results
1

Stock Comparison

Select a stock to compare (requires JavaScript). Showing default comparison.

SBET vs FLUT Comparison

SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 1.2B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $21.48, while FLUT trades at $289.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.39, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 99.17. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.

Stock Price Comparison

Loading...

Frequently Asked Questions

;