SharpLink Gaming Ltd.
SharpLink Gaming Ltd. SBET Peers
See (SBET) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBET | $11.95 | -10.89% | 710.1M | 0.89 | $13.39 | N/A |
| FLUT | $271.78 | +0.64% | 48B | 93.39 | $2.91 | N/A |
| LVS | $41.74 | -2.51% | 29.5B | 23.06 | $1.81 | +2.10% |
| DKNG | $38.12 | +0.69% | 18.9B | -46.49 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| MGM | $33.58 | -2.11% | 9.1B | 14.99 | $2.24 | N/A |
| WYNN | $87.28 | -1.49% | 9.1B | 23.34 | $3.74 | +1.12% |
| LNW | $86.25 | +2.41% | 7.3B | 23.06 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CHDN | $98.34 | +0.97% | 7.1B | 17.69 | $5.56 | +0.42% |
| BYD | $75.24 | +0.66% | 6.1B | 12.33 | $6.10 | +0.93% |
| MTN | $155.26 | -0.09% | 5.8B | 19.68 | $7.89 | +5.72% |
Stock Comparison
SBET vs FLUT Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 48B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while FLUT trades at $271.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 93.39. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs LVS Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while LVS trades at $41.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs DKNG Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while DKNG trades at $38.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -46.49. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs MGM Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while MGM trades at $33.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 14.99. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs WYNN Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while WYNN trades at $87.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs LNW Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while LNW trades at $86.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 23.06. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs CHDN Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while CHDN trades at $98.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs BYD Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while BYD trades at $75.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs MTN Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while MTN trades at $155.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs CZR Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while CZR trades at $26.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -24.05. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs SGMS Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs SGHC Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while SGHC trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs HGV Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while HGV trades at $39.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 123.28. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs RSI Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while RSI trades at $13.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 154.22. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs IGT Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while IGT trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 138.45. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs RRR Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while RRR trades at $50.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 19.43. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs PENN Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while PENN trades at $16.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -27.00. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs VAC Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while VAC trades at $68.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 11.63. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs PLYA Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs MCRI Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while MCRI trades at $83.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 21.11. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs EVRI Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while EVRI trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 88.88. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs BVH Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs NGMS Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs ACEL Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 948.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while ACEL trades at $11.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs MLCO Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 860.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while MLCO trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 44.86. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs GDEN Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 739.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while GDEN trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 65.02. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs TPGH-UN Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs AGS Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while AGS trades at $12.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs GAMB Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 421.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while GAMB trades at $11.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 12.34. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs BALY Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 371.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while BALY trades at $9.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs CDRO Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 358.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while CDRO trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 87.22. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs INSE Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 201.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while INSE trades at $7.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.07. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs MSC Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 137.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while MSC trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -5.70. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs FLL Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while FLL trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs GAN Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs CPHC Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 88.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while CPHC trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 109.38. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs CNTY Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while CNTY trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs CDROW Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while CDROW trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs LTRYW Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 29.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs LTRY Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while LTRY trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.53. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs SLNA Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs SLNAW Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs GMBL Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 275K. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while GMBL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs GMBLP Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 47.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while GMBLP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs EBET Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs GMBLZ Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs GMBLW Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while GMBLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.
SBET vs GNOG Comparison
SBET plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBET stands at 710.1M. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBET is priced at $11.95, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBET currently has a P/E ratio of 0.89, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, SBET's ROE is -1.44%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBET is more volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBET.