Rentokil Initial plc
Rentokil Initial plc RTO Peers
See (RTO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTO | $23.23 | -0.98% | 11.7B | 28.33 | $0.82 | +2.52% |
| CTAS | $220.42 | -0.41% | 89B | 51.14 | $4.31 | +0.97% |
| TRI | $195.96 | -0.04% | 88.3B | 41.17 | $4.76 | +1.16% |
| RBA | $104.62 | -0.30% | 19.4B | 51.54 | $2.03 | +1.10% |
| GPN | $76.14 | +0.18% | 18.6B | 12.32 | $6.18 | +1.31% |
| ULS | $70.84 | +0.28% | 14.2B | 42.42 | $1.67 | +0.72% |
| BIPI | $16.33 | +0.59% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +5.86% |
| ARMK | $40.14 | +1.77% | 10.5B | 30.88 | $1.30 | +1.02% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
| MMS | $69.15 | -0.14% | 3.9B | 13.86 | $4.99 | +1.73% |
Stock Comparison
RTO vs CTAS Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 89B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while CTAS trades at $220.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 51.14. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs TRI Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while TRI trades at $195.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 41.17. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs RBA Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while RBA trades at $104.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 51.54. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs GPN Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while GPN trades at $76.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ULS Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while ULS trades at $70.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 42.42. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs BIPI Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while BIPI trades at $16.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ARMK Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while ARMK trades at $40.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 30.88. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs IAA Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs MMS Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while MMS trades at $69.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 13.86. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs CBZ Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while CBZ trades at $68.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 61.17. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs UNF Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while UNF trades at $183.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs FA Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while FA trades at $17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -17.97. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ABM Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while ABM trades at $44.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs LZ Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while LZ trades at $8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 50.29. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs BV Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while BV trades at $15.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas BV's P/E ratio is -778.00. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs VVI Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VVI's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SP Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs TDCX Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs PRSU Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 772.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while PRSU trades at $27.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -14.02. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs TH Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 703.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while TH trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TH's P/E ratio is 16.47. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs CASS Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 556.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while CASS trades at $41.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 27.60. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs KODK Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 473.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while KODK trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ACTG Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 351.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while ACTG trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -33.23. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SPIR Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 315.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while SPIR trades at $10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -2.63. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -6.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs CVEO Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 303.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while CVEO trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs RHLD Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 287M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while RHLD trades at $33.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs PFMT Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs QUAD Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 277.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while QUAD trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is -15.22. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QUAD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs PFSW Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SST Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 160.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while SST trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SST's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ARC Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs YSXT Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 117.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while YSXT trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 31.35. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs TISI Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 88.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while TISI trades at $19.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TISI's ROE of -11.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs DLHC Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 78.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while DLHC trades at $5.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DLHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs PMEC Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 43M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while PMEC trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs OMEX Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 42M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while OMEX trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMEX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs NTIP Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 29.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while NTIP trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -11.64. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SGRP Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 24.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while SGRP trades at $1.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGRP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SMX Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while SMX trades at $4.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs WHLM Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while WHLM trades at $3.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SFHG Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while SFHG trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -34.40. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ATTO Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs LICN Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while LICN trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs THWWW Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THWWW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs GPAK Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs PAE Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs RRD Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ALJJ Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs PAEWW Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.7B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.23, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.33, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.