Rentokil Initial plc
Rentokil Initial plc RTO Peers
See (RTO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTO | $23.35 | +0.43% | 11.74B | 28.83 | $0.81 | +2.50% |
| CTAS | $221.66 | +0.28% | 89.50B | 51.43 | $4.31 | +0.96% |
| TRI | $194.17 | -0.51% | 87.47B | 40.79 | $4.76 | +1.17% |
| RBA | $108.59 | +0.59% | 20.11B | 53.49 | $2.03 | +1.05% |
| GPN | $75.72 | -0.04% | 18.47B | 12.25 | $6.18 | +1.31% |
| ULS | $71.02 | -0.73% | 14.24B | 42.53 | $1.67 | +0.71% |
| BIPI | $16.04 | -0.39% | 12.75B | N/A | N/A | +5.99% |
| ARMK | $38.90 | -0.12% | 10.19B | 29.92 | $1.30 | +1.05% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.34B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
| MMS | $73.68 | -0.01% | 4.15B | 14.76 | $4.99 | +1.62% |
Stock Comparison
RTO vs CTAS Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 89.50B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while CTAS trades at $221.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 51.43. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs TRI Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 87.47B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while TRI trades at $194.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 40.79. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs RBA Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 20.11B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while RBA trades at $108.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 53.49. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs GPN Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 18.47B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while GPN trades at $75.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ULS Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 14.24B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while ULS trades at $71.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 42.53. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs BIPI Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 12.75B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while BIPI trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ARMK Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.19B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while ARMK trades at $38.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs IAA Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.34B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs MMS Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 4.15B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while MMS trades at $73.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs CBZ Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 3.93B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while CBZ trades at $72.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 62.31. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs UNF Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 3.30B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while UNF trades at $184.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ABM Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while ABM trades at $51.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 40.44. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs FA Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 3.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while FA trades at $17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -18.17. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs LZ Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.73B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while LZ trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 56.24. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs BV Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while BV trades at $15.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas BV's P/E ratio is -798.00. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs VVI Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VVI's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SP Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs TDCX Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs PRSU Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 770.54M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while PRSU trades at $27.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -13.98. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs TH Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 755.17M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while TH trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas TH's P/E ratio is 17.67. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs CASS Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 567.93M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while CASS trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 28.15. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs KODK Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 482.78M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while KODK trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ACTG Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 352.95M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while ACTG trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -33.36. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SPIR Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 350.55M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while SPIR trades at $11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -2.92. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -6.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs RHLD Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 302.16M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while RHLD trades at $35.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs CVEO Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 280.90M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while CVEO trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -13.38. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs PFMT Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.72M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs QUAD Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 266.22M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while QUAD trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QUAD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs PFSW Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.59M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ARC Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.66M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs YSXT Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 129.24M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while YSXT trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 34.44. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs TISI Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 94.90M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while TISI trades at $21.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.86. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TISI's ROE of -11.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs DLHC Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 72.08M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while DLHC trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is 13.18. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DLHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs PMEC Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 44.95M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while PMEC trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -8.36. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SST Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 38.07M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while SST trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SST's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs OMEX Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 29.30M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while OMEX trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is 3.60. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OMEX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs NTIP Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 28.33M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while NTIP trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SGRP Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 27.20M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while SGRP trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -8.92. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGRP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SFHG Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 18.25M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while SFHG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -44.95. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs WHLM Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 16.24M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while WHLM trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 25.38. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs ATTO Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.84M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs SMX Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 6.33M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while SMX trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs LICN Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 4.15M. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while LICN trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LICN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs THWWW Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252316.00. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to THWWW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.
RTO vs GPAK Comparison
RTO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RTO stands at 11.74B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 7674.00. Regarding current trading prices, RTO is priced at $23.35, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RTO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.83, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RTO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RTO is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RTO.