Rollins, Inc.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while SCI trades at $75.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 7.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while HRB trades at $57.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 7.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while BFAM trades at $121.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 44.04. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while FTDR trades at $53.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, BYDGF has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while BYDGF trades at $149.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas BYDGF's P/E ratio is 132.07. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BYDGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to BYDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while DSEY trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, MCW has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while MCW trades at $7.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas MCW's P/E ratio is 31.04. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MCW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to MCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while ROVR trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to ROVR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, CVSGF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while CVSGF trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas CVSGF's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CVSGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to CVSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, PRRWF has a market cap of 655.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while PRRWF trades at $19.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas PRRWF's P/E ratio is -91.33. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PRRWF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to PRRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 651.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while CSV trades at $41.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, CRLKP has a market cap of 456.62M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while CRLKP trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas CRLKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CRLKP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to CRLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 140.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while MED trades at $12.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -19.95. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 115.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while EM trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -106.50. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, WOSSF has a market cap of 95.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while WOSSF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas WOSSF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WOSSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to WOSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, EDEMY has a market cap of 81.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while EDEMY trades at $68.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas EDEMY's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EDEMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to EDEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, MNLXF has a market cap of 75.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while MNLXF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas MNLXF's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MNLXF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to MNLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.52M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while XSPA trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to XSPA's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 48.96M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while YYGH trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 46.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while RGS trades at $19.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to RGS's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 31.36M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while WW trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to WW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, KVIL has a market cap of 30.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while KVIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas KVIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to KVIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to KVIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 19.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while EJH trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to EJH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, GDDFF has a market cap of 10.31M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while GDDFF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas GDDFF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GDDFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to GDDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 6.72M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while MRM trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to MRM's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 6.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while TRNR trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -13.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 4.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while XWEL trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to XWEL's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 3.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while IVP trades at $1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to IVP's ROE of -32.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, GDET has a market cap of 89921.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while GDET trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas GDET's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to GDET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to GDET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, BZRT has a market cap of 53492.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while BZRT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas BZRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to BZRT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to BZRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, AIOM has a market cap of 34000.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while AIOM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas AIOM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AIOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to AIOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, PTTL has a market cap of 25350.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while PTTL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas PTTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PTTL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to PTTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, AMIH has a market cap of 19500.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while AMIH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas AMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to AMIH's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to AMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, PNGB has a market cap of 4902.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while PNGB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas PNGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PNGB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to PNGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, OBDP has a market cap of 652.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while OBDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas OBDP's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to OBDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to OBDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, PXRB has a market cap of 82.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while PXRB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas PXRB's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PXRB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to PXRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, CVSC has a market cap of 17.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while CVSC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas CVSC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CVSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to CVSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, VLBI has a market cap of 11.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while VLBI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas VLBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to VLBI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to VLBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, CPLT has a market cap of 2.00. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while CPLT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas CPLT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to CPLT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to CPLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, STON comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while STON trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, SPRJ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while SPRJ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas SPRJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to SPRJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to SPRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, NEBCU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, PLWN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while PLWN trades at $590.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas PLWN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to PLWN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is more volatile compared to PLWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.

ROL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ROL stands at 27.49B. In comparison, TMX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ROL is priced at $56.72, while TMX trades at $37.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ROL currently has a P/E ratio of 57.29, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, ROL's ROE is +0.36%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ROL is less volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ROL.