RB Global, Inc.
RB Global, Inc. RBA Peers
See (RBA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBA | $103.89 | -0.98% | 19.2B | 51.18 | $2.03 | +1.12% |
| CTAS | $224.78 | -0.13% | 90.8B | 52.15 | $4.31 | +0.95% |
| TRI | $196.39 | -0.06% | 88.5B | 41.35 | $4.75 | +1.16% |
| GPN | $75.84 | +1.13% | 18.5B | 12.27 | $6.18 | +1.32% |
| ULS | $71.05 | -0.77% | 14.2B | 42.54 | $1.67 | +0.71% |
| BIPI | $16.35 | +1.40% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +5.89% |
| RTO | $23.70 | -0.17% | 11.9B | 28.90 | $0.82 | +2.47% |
| ARMK | $40.16 | +0.15% | 10.5B | 30.89 | $1.30 | +1.02% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
| MMS | $72.08 | -0.78% | 4.1B | 14.44 | $4.99 | +1.66% |
Stock Comparison
RBA vs CTAS Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 90.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while CTAS trades at $224.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 52.15. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs TRI Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 88.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while TRI trades at $196.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 41.35. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs GPN Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while GPN trades at $75.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs ULS Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while ULS trades at $71.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 42.54. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs BIPI Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while BIPI trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs RTO Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while RTO trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs ARMK Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while ARMK trades at $40.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs IAA Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs MMS Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while MMS trades at $72.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs CBZ Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while CBZ trades at $72.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 63.29. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs UNF Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while UNF trades at $188.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs ABM Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while ABM trades at $52.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 41.15. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs FA Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while FA trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -17.73. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs LZ Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while LZ trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 53.53. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs BV Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while BV trades at $15.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas BV's P/E ratio is -780.00. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs VVI Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VVI's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs SP Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs TDCX Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs PRSU Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 812.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while PRSU trades at $28.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs TH Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 724.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while TH trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas TH's P/E ratio is 16.95. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs CASS Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 571.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while CASS trades at $42.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs KODK Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 476.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while KODK trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs ACTG Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 368.3M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while ACTG trades at $3.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -34.82. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs SPIR Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 331M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while SPIR trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -2.77. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -6.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs QUAD Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 300.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while QUAD trades at $5.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is -16.50. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QUAD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs RHLD Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 293.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while RHLD trades at $34.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs CVEO Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 293M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while CVEO trades at $21.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -13.96. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs PFMT Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs PFSW Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs ARC Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs YSXT Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 134.4M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while YSXT trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 35.82. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs TISI Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while TISI trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TISI's ROE of -11.58%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs DLHC Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 72.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while DLHC trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs PMEC Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while PMEC trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -8.46. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs SST Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 33.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while SST trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SST's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs NTIP Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while NTIP trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs OMEX Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 26.2M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while OMEX trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is 3.22. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMEX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs SGRP Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while SGRP trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -7.81. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGRP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs SFHG Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while SFHG trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -43.52. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs WHLM Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 16M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while WHLM trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs ATTO Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs SMX Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while SMX trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs LICN Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while LICN trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs THWWW Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THWWW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs GPAK Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs PAE Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs PAEWW Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs ALJJ Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.
RBA vs RRD Comparison
RBA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBA stands at 19.2B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBA is priced at $103.89, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBA currently has a P/E ratio of 51.18, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, RBA's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBA is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBA.