Quad/Graphics, Inc.
Quad/Graphics, Inc. QUAD Peers
See (QUAD) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUAD | $5.65 | +0.00% | 287.5M | -15.78 | -$0.36 | +4.38% |
| TRI | $201.13 | +0.00% | 90.8B | 42.37 | $4.76 | +1.12% |
| CTAS | $222.87 | +0.00% | 90.6B | 52.04 | $4.31 | +0.95% |
| GPN | $80.04 | +0.00% | 20B | 13.27 | $6.18 | +1.22% |
| RBA | $106.19 | +0.00% | 19.6B | 52.17 | $2.03 | +1.36% |
| ULS | $72.86 | +0.00% | 14B | 41.74 | $1.67 | +0.72% |
| BIPI | $16.27 | +0.00% | 13B | N/A | N/A | +5.84% |
| RTO | $24.00 | +0.00% | 12.3B | 29.61 | $0.82 | +2.42% |
| ARMK | $41.87 | +0.00% | 11.1B | 32.64 | $1.30 | +0.97% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
QUAD vs TRI Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 90.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while TRI trades at $201.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 42.37. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs CTAS Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 90.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while CTAS trades at $222.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 52.04. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs GPN Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while GPN trades at $80.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs RBA Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while RBA trades at $106.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 52.17. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs ULS Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while ULS trades at $72.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 41.74. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs BIPI Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while BIPI trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs RTO Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while RTO trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs ARMK Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while ARMK trades at $41.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 32.64. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs IAA Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs MMS Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while MMS trades at $70.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs CBZ Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while CBZ trades at $71.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 62.40. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs UNF Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while UNF trades at $188.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 23.65. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs FA Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while FA trades at $16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -17.80. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs ABM Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while ABM trades at $47.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 38.02. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs LZ Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while LZ trades at $8.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 52.94. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs BV Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while BV trades at $16.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas BV's P/E ratio is -842.00. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs VVI Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to VVI's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs SP Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs TDCX Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs PRSU Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 826.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while PRSU trades at $28.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -15.01. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs TH Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 715.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while TH trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas TH's P/E ratio is 16.74. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs CASS Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 605.5M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while CASS trades at $43.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs KODK Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 482.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while KODK trades at $5.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs ACTG Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 353.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while ACTG trades at $3.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -33.45. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs SPIR Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 351.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while SPIR trades at $11.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -2.93. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -6.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs CVEO Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 311.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while CVEO trades at $23.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -14.84. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs PFMT Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs RHLD Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 277.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while RHLD trades at $31.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs PFSW Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs ARC Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs YSXT Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 119.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while YSXT trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs TISI Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 84.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while TISI trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to TISI's ROE of -11.58%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs DLHC Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 84.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while DLHC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to DLHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs PMEC Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while PMEC trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs SST Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while SST trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SST's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs OMEX Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while OMEX trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is 4.27. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to OMEX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs NTIP Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 28.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while NTIP trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs SGRP Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while SGRP trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -7.54. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SGRP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs SFHG Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while SFHG trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -38.90. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs WHLM Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while WHLM trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs ATTO Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs SMX Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while SMX trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs LICN Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while LICN trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs THWWW Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to THWWW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs GPAK Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 7.7K. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs PAE Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs RRD Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs ALJJ Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.
QUAD vs PAEWW Comparison
QUAD plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, QUAD stands at 287.5M. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QUAD is priced at $5.65, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
QUAD currently has a P/E ratio of -15.78, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, QUAD's ROE is -0.25%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QUAD is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QUAD.