Quality RO Industries Limited

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ABB.BO trades at ₹6,853.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 82.35. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ABB.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ABB.NS trades at ₹6,873.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 86.84. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ABB.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹5,078.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 63.39. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹5,088.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 63.37. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,339.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 71.57. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,339.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 71.55. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 991.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹285.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 121.67. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check BHEL.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 991.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹286.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 121.65. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check BHEL.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 435.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,330.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 86.84. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 435.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,329.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 86.52. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹3,773.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 60.36. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 410.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹3,800.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 60.29. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check GET&D.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 352.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,763.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 30.30. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 352.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,789.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 347.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,720.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 70.50. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 261.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,820.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 65.71. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 261.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,831.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 63.05. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, SCHNEIDER.NS has a market cap of 241.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while SCHNEIDER.NS trades at ₹1,006.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas SCHNEIDER.NS's P/E ratio is 98.16. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SCHNEIDER.NS's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SCHNEIDER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check SCHNEIDER.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 214.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹1,487.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 39.46. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 214.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,490.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 39.47. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 186.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹706.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 0.76. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 162B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹521.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 161.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹521.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 155.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KSB.NS trades at ₹915.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 57.59. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KSB.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 155.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KSB.BO trades at ₹917.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KSB.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 146.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹459.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 42.69. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 146.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹461.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.69. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 146B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while LMW.BO trades at ₹13,409.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 127.10. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check LMW.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 145.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while LMW.NS trades at ₹13,483.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 126.51. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check LMW.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 144.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹923.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 66.42. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 144.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹922.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 66.42. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 129.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,684.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 58.44. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check TEGA.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 129.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,687.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 57.48. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check TEGA.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹4,331.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 201.67. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 128.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹4,335.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 200.76. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,618.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 126.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,634.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.60. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 122.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹3,940.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 46.49. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 122.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹3,936.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 47.34. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,392.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 47.75. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 110.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹1,711.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 87.11. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check AZAD.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹417.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ELECON.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 94.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹417.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 19.52. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ELECON.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 93.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹458.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 35.38. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 93.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹457.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 35.38. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 78.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,222.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 41.05. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 78.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,220.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 40.11. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹1,019.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 22.17. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 73.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹1,015.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹136.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is 69.32. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹137.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 69.24. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹497.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹498.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 60B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹49.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 42.27. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 59.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹49.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 42.25. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, BALUFORGE.BO has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while BALUFORGE.BO trades at ₹459.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas BALUFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BALUFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to BALUFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check BALUFORGE.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check LSIL.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹911.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 234.50. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 41B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹909.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 237.43. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹96.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹97.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.35. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹406.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 33.46. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check WPIL.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,934.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 33.31. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ANUP.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,919.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 32.76. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ANUP.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹460.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 42.94. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹461.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 42.85. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹151.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 33.91. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹151.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 32.57. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while SETL.NS trades at ₹132.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 35.27. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check SETL.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹485.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while JASH.NS trades at ₹398.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 46.71. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check JASH.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check GMM.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹265.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -808.78. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹266.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -806.72. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹160.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check PENIND.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹161.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check PENIND.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,152.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,150.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 21.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹1,765.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 63.26. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check KMEW.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹301.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 30.73. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹302.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹1,928.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 44.88. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,441.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 18.10. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,445.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 18.07. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,622.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 36.74. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check THEJO.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹12,150.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 33.36. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹899.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ADOR.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 15.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹888.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 23.42. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ADOR.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹282.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, ADORWELD.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while ADORWELD.BO trades at ₹852.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas ADORWELD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADORWELD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check ADORWELD.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.BO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while JYOTISTRUC.BO trades at ₹12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas JYOTISTRUC.BO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check JYOTISTRUC.BO's competition here

QRIL.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QRIL.BO stands at 123.5M. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, QRIL.BO is priced at ₹48.45, while JYOTISTRUC.NS trades at ₹12.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QRIL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 6.39, whereas JYOTISTRUC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.09. In terms of profitability, QRIL.BO's ROE is +0.17%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, QRIL.BO is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QRIL.BO.Check JYOTISTRUC.NS's competition here