BEML Limited
BEML Limited (BEML.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BEML.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Conglomerates Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEML.BO | ₹1,834.60 | -0.67% | 76.4B | 51.71 | ₹35.48 | +0.58% |
| TIINDIA.BO | ₹2,801.50 | -4.73% | 542.2B | 85.05 | ₹32.94 | +0.12% |
| GODREJIND.NS | ₹1,153.15 | +7.45% | 388.4B | 39.65 | ₹29.08 | N/A |
| GODREJIND.BO | ₹1,152.00 | +7.45% | 388B | 40.27 | ₹28.61 | N/A |
| 3MINDIA.BO | ₹31,290.85 | +0.91% | 352.5B | 93.59 | ₹334.34 | +1.72% |
| 3MINDIA.NS | ₹31,195.00 | +0.40% | 351.4B | 93.18 | ₹334.80 | +1.72% |
| NAVA.NS | ₹703.60 | +1.51% | 199.1B | 22.36 | ₹31.47 | +1.28% |
| NAVA.BO | ₹703.40 | +1.50% | 199.1B | 22.36 | ₹31.46 | +1.28% |
| CARBORUNIV.BO | ₹1,038.10 | +0.83% | 197.7B | 80.22 | ₹12.94 | +0.39% |
| CARBORUNIV.NS | ₹1,037.35 | +0.39% | 197.6B | 80.29 | ₹12.92 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
BEML.BO vs TIINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, TIINDIA.BO has a market cap of 542.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while TIINDIA.BO trades at ₹2,801.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas TIINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 85.05. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TIINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to TIINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check TIINDIA.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs GODREJIND.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, GODREJIND.NS has a market cap of 388.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while GODREJIND.NS trades at ₹1,153.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas GODREJIND.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GODREJIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to GODREJIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check GODREJIND.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs GODREJIND.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, GODREJIND.BO has a market cap of 388B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while GODREJIND.BO trades at ₹1,152.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas GODREJIND.BO's P/E ratio is 40.27. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GODREJIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to GODREJIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check GODREJIND.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs 3MINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, 3MINDIA.BO has a market cap of 352.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while 3MINDIA.BO trades at ₹31,290.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas 3MINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 93.59. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3MINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to 3MINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check 3MINDIA.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs 3MINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, 3MINDIA.NS has a market cap of 351.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while 3MINDIA.NS trades at ₹31,195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas 3MINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 93.18. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to 3MINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to 3MINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check 3MINDIA.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs NAVA.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NAVA.NS has a market cap of 199.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while NAVA.NS trades at ₹703.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas NAVA.NS's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAVA.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to NAVA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check NAVA.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs NAVA.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NAVA.BO has a market cap of 199.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while NAVA.BO trades at ₹703.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas NAVA.BO's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NAVA.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to NAVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check NAVA.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs CARBORUNIV.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, CARBORUNIV.BO has a market cap of 197.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while CARBORUNIV.BO trades at ₹1,038.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas CARBORUNIV.BO's P/E ratio is 80.22. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CARBORUNIV.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to CARBORUNIV.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check CARBORUNIV.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs CARBORUNIV.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, CARBORUNIV.NS has a market cap of 197.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while CARBORUNIV.NS trades at ₹1,037.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas CARBORUNIV.NS's P/E ratio is 80.29. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CARBORUNIV.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to CARBORUNIV.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check CARBORUNIV.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs JSWHL.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, JSWHL.BO has a market cap of 138.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while JSWHL.BO trades at ₹12,514.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas JSWHL.BO's P/E ratio is 97.01. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JSWHL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to JSWHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check JSWHL.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs JSWHL.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, JSWHL.NS has a market cap of 138.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while JSWHL.NS trades at ₹12,483.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas JSWHL.NS's P/E ratio is 96.69. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JSWHL.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to JSWHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check JSWHL.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs SWANCORP.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SWANCORP.NS has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while SWANCORP.NS trades at ₹323.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas SWANCORP.NS's P/E ratio is -83.54. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWANCORP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to SWANCORP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check SWANCORP.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs SWANCORP.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SWANCORP.BO has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while SWANCORP.BO trades at ₹323.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas SWANCORP.BO's P/E ratio is -83.53. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SWANCORP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to SWANCORP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check SWANCORP.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs MMTC.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, MMTC.BO has a market cap of 96.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while MMTC.BO trades at ₹64.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas MMTC.BO's P/E ratio is 36.57. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMTC.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to MMTC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check MMTC.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs CYIENT.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, CYIENT.BO has a market cap of 96.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while CYIENT.BO trades at ₹873.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas CYIENT.BO's P/E ratio is 22.63. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYIENT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to CYIENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check CYIENT.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs CYIENT.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, CYIENT.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while CYIENT.NS trades at ₹871.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas CYIENT.NS's P/E ratio is 23.03. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CYIENT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to CYIENT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check CYIENT.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs MMTC.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, MMTC.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while MMTC.NS trades at ₹64.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas MMTC.NS's P/E ratio is 36.46. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MMTC.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to MMTC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check MMTC.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs NESCO.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NESCO.BO has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while NESCO.BO trades at ₹1,240.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas NESCO.BO's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NESCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to NESCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check NESCO.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs NESCO.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NESCO.NS has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while NESCO.NS trades at ₹1,240.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas NESCO.NS's P/E ratio is 21.40. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NESCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to NESCO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check NESCO.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs BEML.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BEML.NS has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while BEML.NS trades at ₹1,833.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas BEML.NS's P/E ratio is 61.24. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BEML.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to BEML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check BEML.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs SINDHUTRAD.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SINDHUTRAD.BO has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while SINDHUTRAD.BO trades at ₹23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas SINDHUTRAD.BO's P/E ratio is -93.00. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SINDHUTRAD.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to SINDHUTRAD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check SINDHUTRAD.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs SINDHUTRAD.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SINDHUTRAD.NS has a market cap of 35.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while SINDHUTRAD.NS trades at ₹23.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas SINDHUTRAD.NS's P/E ratio is -145.25. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SINDHUTRAD.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to SINDHUTRAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check SINDHUTRAD.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs BALMLAWRIE.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BALMLAWRIE.BO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while BALMLAWRIE.BO trades at ₹194.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas BALMLAWRIE.BO's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALMLAWRIE.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to BALMLAWRIE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check BALMLAWRIE.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs BALMLAWRIE.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BALMLAWRIE.NS has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while BALMLAWRIE.NS trades at ₹194.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas BALMLAWRIE.NS's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BALMLAWRIE.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to BALMLAWRIE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check BALMLAWRIE.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs MSTCLTD.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, MSTCLTD.NS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while MSTCLTD.NS trades at ₹426.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas MSTCLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MSTCLTD.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to MSTCLTD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check MSTCLTD.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs MSTCLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, MSTCLTD.BO has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while MSTCLTD.BO trades at ₹426.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas MSTCLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 13.84. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MSTCLTD.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to MSTCLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check MSTCLTD.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs SBC.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SBC.NS has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while SBC.NS trades at ₹33.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas SBC.NS's P/E ratio is 88.05. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBC.NS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to SBC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check SBC.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs SBC.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SBC.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while SBC.BO trades at ₹33.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas SBC.BO's P/E ratio is 88.00. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SBC.BO's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to SBC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check SBC.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs NIBE.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NIBE.NS has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while NIBE.NS trades at ₹998.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas NIBE.NS's P/E ratio is -207.51. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NIBE.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to NIBE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check NIBE.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs KRYSTAL.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, KRYSTAL.NS has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while KRYSTAL.NS trades at ₹602.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas KRYSTAL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KRYSTAL.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to KRYSTAL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check KRYSTAL.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs ZUARIIND.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ZUARIIND.BO has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while ZUARIIND.BO trades at ₹255.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas ZUARIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 6.42. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZUARIIND.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check ZUARIIND.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs ZUARIIND.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ZUARIIND.NS has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while ZUARIIND.NS trades at ₹254.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas ZUARIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 6.41. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZUARIIND.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check ZUARIIND.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs PVP.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, PVP.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while PVP.NS trades at ₹27.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas PVP.NS's P/E ratio is -86.06. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PVP.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to PVP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check PVP.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs PVP.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, PVP.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while PVP.BO trades at ₹27.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas PVP.BO's P/E ratio is -85.87. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to PVP.BO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to PVP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check PVP.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs STCINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, STCINDIA.BO has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while STCINDIA.BO trades at ₹116.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas STCINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STCINDIA.BO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to STCINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check STCINDIA.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs STCINDIA.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, STCINDIA.NS has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while STCINDIA.NS trades at ₹116.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas STCINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 1.09. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STCINDIA.NS's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to STCINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check STCINDIA.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs CAREERP.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, CAREERP.NS has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while CAREERP.NS trades at ₹377.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas CAREERP.NS's P/E ratio is 11.39. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAREERP.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to CAREERP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check CAREERP.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs CAREERP.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, CAREERP.BO has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while CAREERP.BO trades at ₹376.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas CAREERP.BO's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CAREERP.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to CAREERP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check CAREERP.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs JPASSOCIAT.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, JPASSOCIAT.NS has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while JPASSOCIAT.NS trades at ₹2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas JPASSOCIAT.NS's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPASSOCIAT.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to JPASSOCIAT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check JPASSOCIAT.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs JPASSOCIAT.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, JPASSOCIAT.BO has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while JPASSOCIAT.BO trades at ₹2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas JPASSOCIAT.BO's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to JPASSOCIAT.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to JPASSOCIAT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check JPASSOCIAT.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs KOTHARIPRO.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, KOTHARIPRO.NS has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while KOTHARIPRO.NS trades at ₹73.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas KOTHARIPRO.NS's P/E ratio is 2.99. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KOTHARIPRO.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to KOTHARIPRO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check KOTHARIPRO.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs KOTHARIPRO.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, KOTHARIPRO.BO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while KOTHARIPRO.BO trades at ₹72.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas KOTHARIPRO.BO's P/E ratio is 2.96. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to KOTHARIPRO.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to KOTHARIPRO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check KOTHARIPRO.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs ROSSELLIND.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ROSSELLIND.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while ROSSELLIND.NS trades at ₹55.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas ROSSELLIND.NS's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROSSELLIND.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to ROSSELLIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check ROSSELLIND.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs ROSSELLIND.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ROSSELLIND.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while ROSSELLIND.BO trades at ₹55.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas ROSSELLIND.BO's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROSSELLIND.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO and ROSSELLIND.BO have similar daily volatility (2.96).Check ROSSELLIND.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs SORILINFRA.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SORILINFRA.NS has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while SORILINFRA.NS trades at ₹65.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas SORILINFRA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SORILINFRA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to SORILINFRA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check SORILINFRA.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs GILLANDERS.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, GILLANDERS.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while GILLANDERS.BO trades at ₹94.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas GILLANDERS.BO's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GILLANDERS.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to GILLANDERS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check GILLANDERS.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs GILLANDERS.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, GILLANDERS.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while GILLANDERS.NS trades at ₹93.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas GILLANDERS.NS's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to GILLANDERS.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to GILLANDERS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check GILLANDERS.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs IPRINGLTD.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, IPRINGLTD.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while IPRINGLTD.BO trades at ₹119.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas IPRINGLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 161.62. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IPRINGLTD.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to IPRINGLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check IPRINGLTD.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs SIGIND.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SIGIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while SIGIND.BO trades at ₹51.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas SIGIND.BO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SIGIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to SIGIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check SIGIND.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs EXCEL.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, EXCEL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while EXCEL.BO trades at ₹1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas EXCEL.BO's P/E ratio is 103.00. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXCEL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to EXCEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check EXCEL.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs EXCEL.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, EXCEL.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while EXCEL.NS trades at ₹1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas EXCEL.NS's P/E ratio is 102.00. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EXCEL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to EXCEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check EXCEL.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs LANDSMILL.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, LANDSMILL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while LANDSMILL.NS trades at ₹0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas LANDSMILL.NS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LANDSMILL.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to LANDSMILL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check LANDSMILL.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs LANDSMILL.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, LANDSMILL.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while LANDSMILL.BO trades at ₹0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas LANDSMILL.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LANDSMILL.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to LANDSMILL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check LANDSMILL.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs INM.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, INM.NS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while INM.NS trades at ₹170.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas INM.NS's P/E ratio is 9.93. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to INM.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to INM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check INM.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs ROLLT.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ROLLT.BO has a market cap of 585.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while ROLLT.BO trades at ₹2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas ROLLT.BO's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROLLT.BO's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to ROLLT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check ROLLT.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs ROLLT.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ROLLT.NS has a market cap of 572.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while ROLLT.NS trades at ₹2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas ROLLT.NS's P/E ratio is 3.42. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROLLT.NS's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to ROLLT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check ROLLT.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs MSRINDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, MSRINDIA.BO has a market cap of 307.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while MSRINDIA.BO trades at ₹4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas MSRINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 163.00. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MSRINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to MSRINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check MSRINDIA.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs BFFL.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, BFFL.BO has a market cap of 304.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while BFFL.BO trades at ₹63.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas BFFL.BO's P/E ratio is 50.36. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BFFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to BFFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check BFFL.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs ASINPET.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ASINPET.BO has a market cap of 225.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while ASINPET.BO trades at ₹9.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas ASINPET.BO's P/E ratio is 131.43. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ASINPET.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to ASINPET.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check ASINPET.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs SFSL.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, SFSL.BO has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while SFSL.BO trades at ₹95.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas SFSL.BO's P/E ratio is 69.93. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SFSL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to SFSL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check SFSL.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs AMBIT.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, AMBIT.BO has a market cap of 74.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while AMBIT.BO trades at ₹12.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas AMBIT.BO's P/E ratio is 46.07. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to AMBIT.BO's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to AMBIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check AMBIT.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs LEXORAA.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, LEXORAA.BO has a market cap of 70.3M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while LEXORAA.BO trades at ₹17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas LEXORAA.BO's P/E ratio is -45.85. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to LEXORAA.BO's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to LEXORAA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check LEXORAA.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs VASUDHAGAM.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, VASUDHAGAM.BO has a market cap of 51.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while VASUDHAGAM.BO trades at ₹1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas VASUDHAGAM.BO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to VASUDHAGAM.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to VASUDHAGAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check VASUDHAGAM.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs ALCHEM.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ALCHEM.NS has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while ALCHEM.NS trades at ₹3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas ALCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ALCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to ALCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check ALCHEM.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs ZSARVAMA.BO Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ZSARVAMA.BO has a market cap of 13.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while ZSARVAMA.BO trades at ₹52.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas ZSARVAMA.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZSARVAMA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is more volatile compared to ZSARVAMA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check ZSARVAMA.BO's competition here
BEML.BO vs ZUARIGLOB.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, ZUARIGLOB.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while ZUARIGLOB.NS trades at ₹145.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas ZUARIGLOB.NS's P/E ratio is -12.18. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ZUARIGLOB.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to ZUARIGLOB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check ZUARIGLOB.NS's competition here
BEML.BO vs NBVENTURES.NS Comparison May 2026
BEML.BO plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BEML.BO stands at 76.4B. In comparison, NBVENTURES.NS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BEML.BO is priced at ₹1,834.60, while NBVENTURES.NS trades at ₹200.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BEML.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 51.71, whereas NBVENTURES.NS's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, BEML.BO's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NBVENTURES.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BEML.BO is less volatile compared to NBVENTURES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BEML.BO.Check NBVENTURES.NS's competition here