Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TRITURBINE.NS's competitors and their performance on the NSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TRITURBINE.NS and its NSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRITURBINE.NS | ₹470.05 | +0.10% | 149.4B | 41.20 | ₹11.41 | +0.90% |
| ABB.NS | ₹6,413.00 | -1.79% | 1.4T | 88.41 | ₹72.54 | +1.86% |
| ABB.BO | ₹6,403.00 | -1.94% | 1.4T | 84.84 | ₹75.47 | +1.86% |
| BHEL.NS | ₹387.60 | -3.57% | 1.3T | 47.04 | ₹8.24 | +0.49% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹387.35 | -3.63% | 1.3T | 47.24 | ₹8.20 | +0.49% |
| CUMMINSIND.NS | ₹4,452.60 | -1.39% | 1.2T | 50.89 | ₹87.50 | +1.48% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹4,450.00 | -1.55% | 1.2T | 51.24 | ₹86.84 | +1.48% |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,303.00 | -1.87% | 1.2T | 79.80 | ₹41.39 | +0.54% |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,285.00 | -2.92% | 1.2T | 57.28 | ₹57.35 | +0.54% |
| SUZLON.NS | ₹33.90 | -7.86% | 466B | 20.50 | ₹1.65 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ABB India Limited (NSE: ABB.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs ABB.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while ABB.NS trades at ₹6,413.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 88.41. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check ABB.NS's competition here
ABB India Limited (BSE: ABB.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs ABB.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while ABB.BO trades at ₹6,403.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 84.84. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check ABB.BO's competition here
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (NSE: BHEL.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs BHEL.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹387.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 47.04. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BSE: BHEL.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs BHEL.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹387.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 47.24. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
Cummins India Limited (NSE: CUMMINSIND.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs CUMMINSIND.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹4,452.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here
Cummins India Limited (BSE: CUMMINSIND.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹4,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 51.24. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
Siemens Limited (NSE: SIEMENS.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,303.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 79.80. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
Siemens Limited (BSE: SIEMENS.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,285.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 57.28. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
Suzlon Energy Limited (NSE: SUZLON.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs SUZLON.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, SUZLON.NS has a market cap of 466B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while SUZLON.NS trades at ₹33.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas SUZLON.NS's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUZLON.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to SUZLON.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check SUZLON.NS's competition here
Suzlon Energy Limited (BSE: SUZLON.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs SUZLON.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, SUZLON.BO has a market cap of 466B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while SUZLON.BO trades at ₹33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas SUZLON.BO's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SUZLON.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to SUZLON.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check SUZLON.BO's competition here
GE T&D India Limited (NSE: GET&D.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs GET&D.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
Thermax Limited (NSE: THERMAX.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs THERMAX.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 350.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹3,112.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 64.96. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
Thermax Limited (BSE: THERMAX.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs THERMAX.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 347.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹3,112.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 53.06. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
Voltas Limited (BSE: VOLTAS.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 340.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,028.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 90.49. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
Voltas Limited (NSE: VOLTAS.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 340.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,028.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 81.52. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
AIA Engineering Limited (NSE: AIAENG.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs AIAENG.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 335.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,595.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
AIA Engineering Limited (BSE: AIAENG.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs AIAENG.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 335.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,591.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 26.39. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
Blue Star Limited (NSE: BLUESTARCO.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 334.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,627.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 61.43. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
Blue Star Limited (BSE: BLUESTARCO.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs BLUESTARCO.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.BO has a market cap of 334.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while BLUESTARCO.BO trades at ₹1,633.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas BLUESTARCO.BO's P/E ratio is 61.62. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BLUESTARCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.BO's competition here
Craftsman Automation Limited (NSE: CRAFTSMAN.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 266B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹10,271.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 52.77. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here
Craftsman Automation Limited (BSE: CRAFTSMAN.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 266B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹10,288.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 53.93. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited (BSE: KIRLOSENG.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 262.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹1,799.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 53.78. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited (NSE: KIRLOSENG.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 261.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,796.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 54.51. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs TIMKEN.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, TIMKEN.NS has a market cap of 214.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while TIMKEN.NS trades at ₹2,852.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas TIMKEN.NS's P/E ratio is 50.97. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TIMKEN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to TIMKEN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check TIMKEN.NS's competition here
Timken India Limited (BSE: TIMKEN.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs TIMKEN.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, TIMKEN.BO has a market cap of 214.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while TIMKEN.BO trades at ₹2,852.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas TIMKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TIMKEN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to TIMKEN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check TIMKEN.BO's competition here
MTAR Technologies Limited (NSE: MTARTECH.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 210.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹6,838.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 157.56. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
MTAR Technologies Limited (BSE: MTARTECH.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 210.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹6,837.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 157.61. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
Jyoti CNC Automation Limited (NSE: JYOTICNC.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 206B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹905.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 61.19. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
Lakshmi Machine Works Limited (BSE: LAXMIMACH.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
Lakshmi Machine Works Limited (NSE: LAXMIMACH.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
LMW Limited (NSE: LMW.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs LMW.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 169.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while LMW.NS trades at ₹15,892.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 79.25. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check LMW.NS's competition here
LMW Limited (BSE: LMW.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs LMW.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 169.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while LMW.BO trades at ₹15,873.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 82.68. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check LMW.BO's competition here
INOX India Limited (NSE: INOXINDIA.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 168.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,860.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 65.91. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
BEML Limited (NSE: BEML.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs BEML.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, BEML.NS has a market cap of 165.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while BEML.NS trades at ₹1,988.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas BEML.NS's P/E ratio is 45.79. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BEML.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to BEML.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check BEML.NS's competition here
Elgi Equipments Limited (NSE: ELGIEQUIP.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 160.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹509.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 36.28. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
Elgi Equipments Limited (BSE: ELGIEQUIP.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 160.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹509.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
Azad Engineering Limited (NSE: AZAD.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs AZAD.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 157.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹2,445.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 111.71. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
Triveni Turbine Limited (BSE: TRITURBINE.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 149.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹470.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 41.24. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
Ingersoll-Rand (India) Limited (BSE: INGERRAND.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 127.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹4,035.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 46.87. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Brothers Limited (NSE: KIRLOSBROS.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,601.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 36.01. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
Kirloskar Brothers Limited (BSE: KIRLOSBROS.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,602.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
Ingersoll-Rand (India) Limited (NSE: INGERRAND.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 127.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹4,028.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 46.79. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
Tega Industries Limited (BSE: TEGA.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs TEGA.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 126.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,682.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 62.16. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
Tega Industries Limited (NSE: TEGA.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs TEGA.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 126.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,683.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 62.20. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
Lloyds Engineering Works Limited (NSE: LLOYDSENGG.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹83.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 58.95. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
Lloyds Engineering Works Limited (BSE: LLOYDSENGG.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 122B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹83.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 69.20. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
Action Construction Equipment Limited (NSE: ACE.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs ACE.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, ACE.NS has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while ACE.NS trades at ₹994.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas ACE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.36. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ACE.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check ACE.NS's competition here
Action Construction Equipment Limited (BSE: ACE.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs ACE.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, ACE.BO has a market cap of 118.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while ACE.BO trades at ₹995.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas ACE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ACE.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check ACE.BO's competition here
KSB Limited (NSE: KSB.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs KSB.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 113.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while KSB.NS trades at ₹651.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 46.16. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check KSB.NS's competition here
KSB Limited (BSE: KSB.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs KSB.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while KSB.BO trades at ₹650.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 46.13. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check KSB.BO's competition here
Inox Wind Limited (NSE: INOXWIND.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs INOXWIND.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, INOXWIND.NS has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while INOXWIND.NS trades at ₹55.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas INOXWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INOXWIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to INOXWIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check INOXWIND.NS's competition here
Inox Wind Limited (BSE: INOXWIND.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs INOXWIND.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, INOXWIND.BO has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while INOXWIND.BO trades at ₹55.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas INOXWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 21.22. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INOXWIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to INOXWIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check INOXWIND.BO's competition here
Elecon Engineering Company Limited (NSE: ELECON.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs ELECON.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹419.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 40.09. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
Elecon Engineering Company Limited (BSE: ELECON.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs ELECON.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹419.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 40.10. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
BEML Limited (BSE: BEML.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs BEML.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, BEML.BO has a market cap of 82.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while BEML.BO trades at ₹1,987.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas BEML.BO's P/E ratio is 45.76. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BEML.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to BEML.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check BEML.BO's competition here
Standard Engineering Technology Limited (NSE: SETL.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs SETL.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 79B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while SETL.NS trades at ₹395.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 92.34. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check SETL.NS's competition here
Dynamatic Technologies Limited (BSE: DYNAMATECH.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs DYNAMATECH.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 78.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹11,603.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 185.72. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here
Dynamatic Technologies Limited (NSE: DYNAMATECH.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs DYNAMATECH.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 78.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹11,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 185.63. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here
KRN Heat Exchanger & Refrigeration Ltd. (NSE: KRN.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs KRN.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, KRN.NS has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while KRN.NS trades at ₹1,147.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas KRN.NS's P/E ratio is 74.83. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRN.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to KRN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check KRN.NS's competition here
Vesuvius India Limited (NSE: VESUVIUS.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹360.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
Vesuvius India Limited (BSE: VESUVIUS.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 72.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹360.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 28.06. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Limited (NSE: KIRLPNU.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹538.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 13.25. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Limited (BSE: KIRLPNU.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹538.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
HMT Limited (BSE: HMT.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs HMT.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, HMT.BO has a market cap of 62.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while HMT.BO trades at ₹52.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas HMT.BO's P/E ratio is -14.16. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HMT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check HMT.BO's competition here
HMT Limited (NSE: HMT.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs HMT.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, HMT.NS has a market cap of 62B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while HMT.NS trades at ₹51.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas HMT.NS's P/E ratio is -13.67. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HMT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check HMT.NS's competition here
AJAX Engineering Limited (NSE: AJAXENGG.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs AJAXENGG.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.NS has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while AJAXENGG.NS trades at ₹535.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas AJAXENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 26.83. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AJAXENGG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to AJAXENGG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check AJAXENGG.NS's competition here
AJAX Engineering Limited (BSE: AJAXENGG.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs AJAXENGG.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.BO has a market cap of 61.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while AJAXENGG.BO trades at ₹535.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas AJAXENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 27.18. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AJAXENGG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to AJAXENGG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check AJAXENGG.BO's competition here
GMM Pfaudler Limited (NSE: GMMPFAUDLR.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹1,215.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 79.52. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
GMM Pfaudler Limited (BSE: GMMPFAUDLR.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹1,213.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 79.57. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
Hero Motors Limited (BSE: HEROMOTORS.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs HEROMOTORS.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, HEROMOTORS.BO has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while HEROMOTORS.BO trades at ₹124.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas HEROMOTORS.BO's P/E ratio is 58.79. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HEROMOTORS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to HEROMOTORS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check HEROMOTORS.BO's competition here
Hero Motors Limited (NSE: HEROMOTORS.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs HEROMOTORS.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, HEROMOTORS.NS has a market cap of 56.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while HEROMOTORS.NS trades at ₹124.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas HEROMOTORS.NS's P/E ratio is 57.43. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HEROMOTORS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to HEROMOTORS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check HEROMOTORS.NS's competition here
Diamond Power Infrastructure Limited (NSE: DIAPOWER.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
Lloyds Steels Industries Limited (NSE: LSIL.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs LSIL.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
HD Fire Protect Limited (BSE: HDFIRE.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs HDFIRE.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, HDFIRE.BO has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while HDFIRE.BO trades at ₹267.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas HDFIRE.BO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HDFIRE.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to HDFIRE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check HDFIRE.BO's competition here
HD Fire Protect Limited (NSE: HDFIRE.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs HDFIRE.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, HDFIRE.NS has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while HDFIRE.NS trades at ₹266.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas HDFIRE.NS's P/E ratio is 40.04. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HDFIRE.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to HDFIRE.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check HDFIRE.NS's competition here
Greaves Cotton Limited (BSE: GREAVESCOT.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹199.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 46.37. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
Greaves Cotton Limited (NSE: GREAVESCOT.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 46.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹199.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 44.81. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
Shakti Pumps (India) Limited (NSE: SHAKTIPUMP.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹353.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
Shakti Pumps (India) Limited (BSE: SHAKTIPUMP.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹353.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.21. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
WPIL Limited (NSE: WPIL.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs WPIL.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, WPIL.NS has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while WPIL.NS trades at ₹409.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas WPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.60. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WPIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to WPIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check WPIL.NS's competition here
WPIL Limited (BSE: WPIL.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs WPIL.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹409.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
Texmaco Rail & Engineering Limited (NSE: TEXRAIL.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹98.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
Texmaco Rail & Engineering Limited (BSE: TEXRAIL.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 40B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹98.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
Shanthi Gears Limited (NSE: SHANTIGEAR.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹469.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 62.05. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
Shanthi Gears Limited (BSE: SHANTIGEAR.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹467.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 61.87. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
Pitti Engineering Limited (NSE: PITTIENG.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹853.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 25.89. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
Pitti Engineering Limited (BSE: PITTIENG.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹851.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
Jash Engineering Limited (NSE: JASH.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs JASH.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 30.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while JASH.NS trades at ₹483.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 35.24. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check JASH.NS's competition here
Prince Pipes and Fittings Limited (BSE: PRINCEPIPE.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.BO has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while PRINCEPIPE.BO trades at ₹256.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas PRINCEPIPE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.01. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.BO's competition here
Prince Pipes and Fittings Limited (NSE: PRINCEPIPE.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹256.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here
HLE Glascoat Limited (BSE: HLEGLAS.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹402.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 77.48. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
HLE Glascoat Limited (NSE: HLEGLAS.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹403.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 77.67. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
Windsor Machines Limited (NSE: WINDMACHIN.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹266.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -593.22. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
Standard Glass Lining Technology Ltd. (NSE: SGLTL.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs SGLTL.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
The Anup Engineering Limited (NSE: ANUP.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs ANUP.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,313.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
The Anup Engineering Limited (BSE: ANUP.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs ANUP.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,312.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
Jain Irrigation Systems Limited (BSE: JISLDVREQS.BO)
TRITURBINE.NS vs JISLDVREQS.BO Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.BO has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while JISLDVREQS.BO trades at ₹19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas JISLDVREQS.BO's P/E ratio is -26.49. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JISLDVREQS.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.BO's competition here
Jain Irrigation Systems Limited (NSE: JISLDVREQS.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs JISLDVREQS.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.NS has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while JISLDVREQS.NS trades at ₹19.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas JISLDVREQS.NS's P/E ratio is -26.32. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JISLDVREQS.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is less volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.NS's competition here
Kabra Extrusiontechnik Limited (NSE: KABRAEXTRU.NS)
TRITURBINE.NS vs KABRAEXTRU.NS Comparison November 2026
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TRITURBINE.NS stands at 149.4B. In comparison, KABRAEXTRU.NS has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRITURBINE.NS is priced at ₹470.05 on the NSE, while KABRAEXTRU.NS trades at ₹695.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TRITURBINE.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 41.20, whereas KABRAEXTRU.NS's P/E ratio is 586.67. In terms of profitability, TRITURBINE.NS's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KABRAEXTRU.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRITURBINE.NS is more volatile compared to KABRAEXTRU.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRITURBINE.NS.Check KABRAEXTRU.NS's competition here