Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TIMKEN.NS's competitors and their performance on the NSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TIMKEN.NS and its NSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIMKEN.NS | ₹2,962.80 | -5.40% | 226.8B | 53.90 | ₹55.95 | +0.17% |
| BHEL.NS | ₹433.60 | -3.32% | 1.5T | 61.19 | ₹7.06 | +0.44% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹432.80 | -3.59% | 1.5T | 61.50 | ₹7.00 | +0.44% |
| ABB.BO | ₹6,776.25 | -3.40% | 1.5T | 89.70 | ₹75.47 | +1.76% |
| ABB.NS | ₹6,780.00 | -3.21% | 1.4T | 93.33 | ₹72.54 | +1.76% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹4,825.15 | -0.92% | 1.3T | 54.81 | ₹86.84 | +1.37% |
| CUMMINSIND.NS | ₹4,830.00 | -0.87% | 1.3T | 54.18 | ₹87.50 | +1.37% |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,600.00 | -5.37% | 1.3T | 63.52 | ₹57.35 | +0.50% |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,595.00 | -5.22% | 1.3T | 87.92 | ₹41.39 | +0.50% |
| SUZLON.NS | ₹37.60 | -1.93% | 500.7B | 22.03 | ₹1.65 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (NSE: BHEL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs BHEL.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹433.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 61.19. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BSE: BHEL.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs BHEL.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹432.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 61.50. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
ABB India Limited (BSE: ABB.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ABB.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ABB.BO trades at ₹6,776.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 89.70. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ABB.BO's competition here
ABB India Limited (NSE: ABB.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ABB.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ABB.NS trades at ₹6,780.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ABB.NS's competition here
Cummins India Limited (BSE: CUMMINSIND.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹4,825.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 54.81. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
Cummins India Limited (NSE: CUMMINSIND.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs CUMMINSIND.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹4,830.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 54.18. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here
Siemens Limited (BSE: SIEMENS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,600.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 63.52. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
Siemens Limited (NSE: SIEMENS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,595.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 87.92. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
Suzlon Energy Limited (NSE: SUZLON.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SUZLON.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, SUZLON.NS has a market cap of 500.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while SUZLON.NS trades at ₹37.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas SUZLON.NS's P/E ratio is 22.03. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUZLON.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to SUZLON.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SUZLON.NS's competition here
Suzlon Energy Limited (BSE: SUZLON.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs SUZLON.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, SUZLON.BO has a market cap of 500.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while SUZLON.BO trades at ₹37.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas SUZLON.BO's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUZLON.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to SUZLON.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SUZLON.BO's competition here
GE T&D India Limited (NSE: GET&D.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs GET&D.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
Thermax Limited (NSE: THERMAX.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs THERMAX.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 353.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹3,256.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 65.50. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
Thermax Limited (BSE: THERMAX.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs THERMAX.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 352B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹3,256.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 53.51. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
AIA Engineering Limited (NSE: AIAENG.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs AIAENG.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 349.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,737.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
AIA Engineering Limited (BSE: AIAENG.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs AIAENG.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 349.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,735.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 27.50. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
Voltas Limited (NSE: VOLTAS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 341.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,033.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 81.84. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
Voltas Limited (BSE: VOLTAS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 339.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,039.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 90.80. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited (BSE: KIRLOSENG.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 315.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹2,209.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 64.64. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited (NSE: KIRLOSENG.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 314.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 65.64. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
Blue Star Limited (NSE: BLUESTARCO.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 312.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,574.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 57.32. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
Blue Star Limited (BSE: BLUESTARCO.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs BLUESTARCO.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.BO has a market cap of 311.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while BLUESTARCO.BO trades at ₹1,572.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas BLUESTARCO.BO's P/E ratio is 57.36. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLUESTARCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.BO's competition here
Craftsman Automation Limited (NSE: CRAFTSMAN.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 262.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹10,183.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 52.08. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here
Craftsman Automation Limited (BSE: CRAFTSMAN.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 262.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹10,178.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 52.68. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here
MTAR Technologies Limited (NSE: MTARTECH.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 241.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹7,781.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 180.86. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
MTAR Technologies Limited (BSE: MTARTECH.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 240.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹7,792.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 180.18. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
Jyoti CNC Automation Limited (NSE: JYOTICNC.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 229.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹999.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 68.24. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
Timken India Limited (BSE: TIMKEN.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs TIMKEN.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, TIMKEN.BO has a market cap of 227.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while TIMKEN.BO trades at ₹2,962.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas TIMKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 54.29. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIMKEN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to TIMKEN.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TIMKEN.BO's competition here
Azad Engineering Limited (NSE: AZAD.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs AZAD.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 186.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹2,910.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 131.74. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
Lakshmi Machine Works Limited (BSE: LAXMIMACH.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
INOX India Limited (NSE: INOXINDIA.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,056.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 72.44. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
Lakshmi Machine Works Limited (NSE: LAXMIMACH.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
Elgi Equipments Limited (NSE: ELGIEQUIP.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 182.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹583.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 41.27. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
Elgi Equipments Limited (BSE: ELGIEQUIP.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 181.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹583.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
LMW Limited (BSE: LMW.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs LMW.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 174.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while LMW.BO trades at ₹16,119.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 99.97. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LMW.BO's competition here
LMW Limited (NSE: LMW.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs LMW.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 174.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while LMW.NS trades at ₹16,133.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 92.79. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LMW.NS's competition here
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 164.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹511.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.26. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
Triveni Turbine Limited (BSE: TRITURBINE.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 163.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹511.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.29. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
BEML Limited (NSE: BEML.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs BEML.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, BEML.NS has a market cap of 159.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while BEML.NS trades at ₹1,894.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas BEML.NS's P/E ratio is 44.01. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEML.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to BEML.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BEML.NS's competition here
Tega Industries Limited (BSE: TEGA.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs TEGA.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 147.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,934.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 72.39. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
Tega Industries Limited (NSE: TEGA.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs TEGA.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,935.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 72.36. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
Action Construction Equipment Limited (BSE: ACE.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ACE.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ACE.BO has a market cap of 140.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ACE.BO trades at ₹1,175.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ACE.BO's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACE.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to ACE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ACE.BO's competition here
Action Construction Equipment Limited (NSE: ACE.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ACE.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ACE.NS has a market cap of 140.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ACE.NS trades at ₹1,176.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ACE.NS's P/E ratio is 33.64. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACE.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to ACE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ACE.NS's competition here
KSB Limited (NSE: KSB.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KSB.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 135.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KSB.NS trades at ₹784.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 55.06. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KSB.NS's competition here
KSB Limited (BSE: KSB.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KSB.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 135B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KSB.BO trades at ₹784.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 55.00. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KSB.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Brothers Limited (NSE: KIRLOSBROS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 132.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,690.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 37.48. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
Kirloskar Brothers Limited (BSE: KIRLOSBROS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 132B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,690.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 35.33. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
Lloyds Engineering Works Limited (NSE: LLOYDSENGG.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 129.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 68.21. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
Lloyds Engineering Works Limited (BSE: LLOYDSENGG.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 129.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹94.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 80.09. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
Ingersoll-Rand (India) Limited (NSE: INGERRAND.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹4,026.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 46.47. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
Ingersoll-Rand (India) Limited (BSE: INGERRAND.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 125.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹4,028.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 46.43. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
Inox Wind Limited (NSE: INOXWIND.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs INOXWIND.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, INOXWIND.NS has a market cap of 107.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while INOXWIND.NS trades at ₹66.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas INOXWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INOXWIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to INOXWIND.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check INOXWIND.NS's competition here
Inox Wind Limited (BSE: INOXWIND.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs INOXWIND.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, INOXWIND.BO has a market cap of 107.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while INOXWIND.BO trades at ₹66.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas INOXWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 23.76. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INOXWIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to INOXWIND.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check INOXWIND.BO's competition here
Elecon Engineering Company Limited (NSE: ELECON.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ELECON.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 93.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹416.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 39.82. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
Elecon Engineering Company Limited (BSE: ELECON.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ELECON.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹416.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 39.78. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
KRN Heat Exchanger & Refrigeration Ltd. (NSE: KRN.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KRN.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KRN.NS has a market cap of 92.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KRN.NS trades at ₹1,386.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KRN.NS's P/E ratio is 92.27. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRN.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KRN.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KRN.NS's competition here
Dynamatic Technologies Limited (NSE: DYNAMATECH.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs DYNAMATECH.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 90.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹13,321.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 214.29. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here
Dynamatic Technologies Limited (BSE: DYNAMATECH.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs DYNAMATECH.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹13,311.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 213.79. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Limited (NSE: KIRLPNU.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹667.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 16.56. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Limited (BSE: KIRLPNU.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹665.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 16.69. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
Vesuvius India Limited (BSE: VESUVIUS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 82.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹407.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
Vesuvius India Limited (NSE: VESUVIUS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹409.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.67. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
Standard Engineering Technology Limited (NSE: SETL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SETL.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 82.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while SETL.NS trades at ₹387.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 95.25. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SETL.NS's competition here
BEML Limited (BSE: BEML.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs BEML.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, BEML.BO has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while BEML.BO trades at ₹1,893.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas BEML.BO's P/E ratio is 44.01. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEML.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to BEML.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BEML.BO's competition here
Hero Motors Limited (BSE: HEROMOTORS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs HEROMOTORS.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, HEROMOTORS.BO has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while HEROMOTORS.BO trades at ₹158.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas HEROMOTORS.BO's P/E ratio is 171.30. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEROMOTORS.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to HEROMOTORS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HEROMOTORS.BO's competition here
Hero Motors Limited (NSE: HEROMOTORS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs HEROMOTORS.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, HEROMOTORS.NS has a market cap of 74.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while HEROMOTORS.NS trades at ₹158.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas HEROMOTORS.NS's P/E ratio is 171.20. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HEROMOTORS.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to HEROMOTORS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HEROMOTORS.NS's competition here
HMT Limited (BSE: HMT.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs HMT.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, HMT.BO has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while HMT.BO trades at ₹55.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas HMT.BO's P/E ratio is -15.08. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HMT.BO's competition here
HMT Limited (NSE: HMT.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs HMT.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, HMT.NS has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while HMT.NS trades at ₹54.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas HMT.NS's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to HMT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HMT.NS's competition here
AJAX Engineering Limited (BSE: AJAXENGG.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs AJAXENGG.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.BO has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while AJAXENGG.BO trades at ₹571.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas AJAXENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 29.01. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AJAXENGG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to AJAXENGG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AJAXENGG.BO's competition here
AJAX Engineering Limited (NSE: AJAXENGG.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs AJAXENGG.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.NS has a market cap of 65.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while AJAXENGG.NS trades at ₹570.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas AJAXENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 28.62. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AJAXENGG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to AJAXENGG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AJAXENGG.NS's competition here
GMM Pfaudler Limited (BSE: GMMPFAUDLR.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 60.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹1,294.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 82.63. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
GMM Pfaudler Limited (NSE: GMMPFAUDLR.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 60.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹1,299.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 82.23. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
Shakti Pumps (India) Limited (BSE: SHAKTIPUMP.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹419.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 24.61. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
Shakti Pumps (India) Limited (NSE: SHAKTIPUMP.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
Diamond Power Infrastructure Limited (NSE: DIAPOWER.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
Lloyds Steels Industries Limited (NSE: LSIL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs LSIL.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
Greaves Cotton Limited (BSE: GREAVESCOT.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹207.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 49.20. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
Greaves Cotton Limited (NSE: GREAVESCOT.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹207.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 47.55. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
Texmaco Rail & Engineering Limited (BSE: TEXRAIL.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹111.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
Texmaco Rail & Engineering Limited (NSE: TEXRAIL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 43.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹110.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
Shanthi Gears Limited (BSE: SHANTIGEAR.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹565.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 66.85. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
Shanthi Gears Limited (NSE: SHANTIGEAR.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹562.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 67.03. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
WPIL Limited (BSE: WPIL.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs WPIL.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹429.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
WPIL Limited (NSE: WPIL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs WPIL.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, WPIL.NS has a market cap of 41.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while WPIL.NS trades at ₹430.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas WPIL.NS's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WPIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to WPIL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check WPIL.NS's competition here
Pitti Engineering Limited (BSE: PITTIENG.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹1,023.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 32.42. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
Pitti Engineering Limited (NSE: PITTIENG.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 39.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹1,023.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 32.36. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
John Cockerill India Ltd. (BSE: COCKERILL.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs COCKERILL.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, COCKERILL.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while COCKERILL.BO trades at ₹7,729.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas COCKERILL.BO's P/E ratio is -259.53. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COCKERILL.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to COCKERILL.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check COCKERILL.BO's competition here
Jash Engineering Limited (NSE: JASH.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs JASH.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while JASH.NS trades at ₹560.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 41.28. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check JASH.NS's competition here
HLE Glascoat Limited (NSE: HLEGLAS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹423.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 85.93. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
HLE Glascoat Limited (BSE: HLEGLAS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹423.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 85.92. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
The Anup Engineering Limited (NSE: ANUP.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ANUP.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 30B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,488.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 27.38. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
The Anup Engineering Limited (BSE: ANUP.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ANUP.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,486.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
Kilburn Engineering Limited (BSE: KLBRENG-B.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹503.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 28.81. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
Prince Pipes and Fittings Limited (NSE: PRINCEPIPE.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹248.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 26.26. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here
Prince Pipes and Fittings Limited (BSE: PRINCEPIPE.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.BO has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while PRINCEPIPE.BO trades at ₹249.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas PRINCEPIPE.BO's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.BO's competition here
Standard Glass Lining Technology Ltd. (NSE: SGLTL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SGLTL.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
Kabra Extrusiontechnik Limited (BSE: KABRAEXTRU.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KABRAEXTRU.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KABRAEXTRU.BO has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KABRAEXTRU.BO trades at ₹801.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KABRAEXTRU.BO's P/E ratio is 5336.78. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KABRAEXTRU.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KABRAEXTRU.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KABRAEXTRU.BO's competition here
Kabra Extrusiontechnik Limited (NSE: KABRAEXTRU.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KABRAEXTRU.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, KABRAEXTRU.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while KABRAEXTRU.NS trades at ₹795.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas KABRAEXTRU.NS's P/E ratio is 5321.26. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KABRAEXTRU.NS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KABRAEXTRU.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KABRAEXTRU.NS's competition here
Ador Welding Limited (BSE: ADOR.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ADOR.BO Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,484.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
Ador Welding Limited (NSE: ADOR.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ADOR.NS Comparison October 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 226.8B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹2,962.80 on the NSE, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,479.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 53.90, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ADOR.NS's competition here