Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See TIMKEN.NS's competitors and their performance on the NSE and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for TIMKEN.NS and its NSE peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIMKEN.NS | ₹3,124.20 | -1.91% | 235B | 55.84 | ₹55.95 | +0.16% |
| ABB.BO | ₹7,235.20 | +1.49% | 1.6T | 95.87 | ₹75.47 | +1.64% |
| ABB.NS | ₹7,270.50 | +1.96% | 1.5T | 100.23 | ₹72.54 | +1.64% |
| BHEL.NS | ₹439.90 | +2.49% | 1.5T | 62.31 | ₹7.06 | +0.43% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹434.00 | +1.40% | 1.5T | 62.00 | ₹7.00 | +0.43% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹5,100.00 | +1.59% | 1.4T | 58.73 | ₹86.84 | +1.29% |
| CUMMINSIND.NS | ₹5,099.50 | +1.58% | 1.4T | 58.28 | ₹87.50 | +1.29% |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,913.90 | +4.00% | 1.4T | 82.17 | ₹47.63 | +0.46% |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,822.80 | +1.40% | 1.4T | 66.66 | ₹57.35 | +0.46% |
| SUZLON.BO | ₹43.30 | +1.76% | 593.6B | 25.58 | ₹1.69 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
ABB India Limited (BSE: ABB.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ABB.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ABB.BO trades at ₹7,235.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 95.87. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ABB.BO's competition here
ABB India Limited (NSE: ABB.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ABB.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ABB.NS trades at ₹7,270.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 100.23. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ABB.NS's competition here
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (NSE: BHEL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs BHEL.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹439.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 62.31. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BSE: BHEL.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs BHEL.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹434.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
Cummins India Limited (BSE: CUMMINSIND.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹5,100.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 58.73. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
Cummins India Limited (NSE: CUMMINSIND.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs CUMMINSIND.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹5,099.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 58.28. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here
Siemens Limited (NSE: SIEMENS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,913.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 82.17. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
Siemens Limited (BSE: SIEMENS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,822.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 66.66. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
Suzlon Energy Limited (BSE: SUZLON.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs SUZLON.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, SUZLON.BO has a market cap of 593.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while SUZLON.BO trades at ₹43.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas SUZLON.BO's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUZLON.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SUZLON.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SUZLON.BO's competition here
Suzlon Energy Limited (NSE: SUZLON.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SUZLON.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, SUZLON.NS has a market cap of 592.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while SUZLON.NS trades at ₹43.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas SUZLON.NS's P/E ratio is 26.09. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SUZLON.NS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SUZLON.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SUZLON.NS's competition here
Thermax Limited (NSE: THERMAX.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs THERMAX.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 400.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹3,551.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 60.26. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
Thermax Limited (BSE: THERMAX.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs THERMAX.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 398.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹3,550.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 60.54. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
GE T&D India Limited (NSE: GET&D.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs GET&D.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
Voltas Limited (BSE: VOLTAS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 372.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,131.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 99.56. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
AIA Engineering Limited (NSE: AIAENG.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs AIAENG.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 371.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹3,973.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 29.27. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
AIA Engineering Limited (BSE: AIAENG.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs AIAENG.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 371.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹3,971.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
Voltas Limited (NSE: VOLTAS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 367.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,110.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 88.10. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
Blue Star Limited (BSE: BLUESTARCO.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs BLUESTARCO.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.BO has a market cap of 319.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while BLUESTARCO.BO trades at ₹1,559.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas BLUESTARCO.BO's P/E ratio is 58.84. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLUESTARCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited (BSE: KIRLOSENG.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 315B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹2,160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 64.55. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
Blue Star Limited (NSE: BLUESTARCO.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 314.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,531.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 57.80. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
Kirloskar Oil Engines Limited (NSE: KIRLOSENG.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 314.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹2,160.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 65.56. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
Craftsman Automation Limited (NSE: CRAFTSMAN.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 291.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹11,138.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 57.79. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here
Craftsman Automation Limited (BSE: CRAFTSMAN.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.BO has a market cap of 291B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while CRAFTSMAN.BO trades at ₹11,158.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas CRAFTSMAN.BO's P/E ratio is 58.49. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.BO's competition here
Jyoti CNC Automation Limited (NSE: JYOTICNC.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 238.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹1,049.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 70.93. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
Timken India Limited (BSE: TIMKEN.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs TIMKEN.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, TIMKEN.BO has a market cap of 234.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while TIMKEN.BO trades at ₹3,119.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas TIMKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 56.01. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TIMKEN.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to TIMKEN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TIMKEN.BO's competition here
MTAR Technologies Limited (BSE: MTARTECH.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 221.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹7,201.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 166.01. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
MTAR Technologies Limited (NSE: MTARTECH.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 221.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹7,202.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 165.94. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
Elgi Equipments Limited (BSE: ELGIEQUIP.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 192.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹609.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
Elgi Equipments Limited (NSE: ELGIEQUIP.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 192.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹609.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 43.45. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
INOX India Limited (NSE: INOXINDIA.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 190.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹2,098.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 74.56. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
LMW Limited (BSE: LMW.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs LMW.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 190B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while LMW.BO trades at ₹17,784.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 119.71. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LMW.BO's competition here
LMW Ltd. (NSE: LMW.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs LMW.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 189.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while LMW.NS trades at ₹17,759.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 200.51. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LMW.NS's competition here
Lakshmi Machine Works Limited (BSE: LAXMIMACH.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
Lakshmi Machine Works Limited (NSE: LAXMIMACH.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
Triveni Turbine Limited (BSE: TRITURBINE.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 181.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹572.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 50.24. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
Triveni Turbine Limited (NSE: TRITURBINE.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 180.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹567.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 49.76. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
Azad Engineering Limited (NSE: AZAD.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs AZAD.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 180.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹2,790.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 127.47. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
BEML Limited (NSE: BEML.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs BEML.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, BEML.NS has a market cap of 177.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while BEML.NS trades at ₹2,135.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas BEML.NS's P/E ratio is 49.16. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEML.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to BEML.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BEML.NS's competition here
Tega Industries Ltd (BSE: TEGA.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs TEGA.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 146.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,945.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 71.88. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
Tega Industries Limited (NSE: TEGA.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs TEGA.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 146B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,943.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 71.80. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
Kirloskar Brothers Limited (BSE: KIRLOSBROS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 144.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,815.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 38.61. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Brothers Limited (NSE: KIRLOSBROS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 143.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,811.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 37.13. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
Action Construction Equipment Limited (NSE: ACE.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ACE.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ACE.NS has a market cap of 143.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ACE.NS trades at ₹1,229.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ACE.NS's P/E ratio is 34.38. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACE.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ACE.NS's competition here
Action Construction Equipment Limited (BSE: ACE.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ACE.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ACE.BO has a market cap of 143.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ACE.BO trades at ₹1,229.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ACE.BO's P/E ratio is 34.37. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ACE.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ACE.BO's competition here
KSB Limited (NSE: KSB.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KSB.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 141.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while KSB.NS trades at ₹813.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 73.72. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KSB.NS's competition here
KSB Limited (BSE: KSB.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KSB.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 141.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while KSB.BO trades at ₹812.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 36.27. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of -4.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KSB.BO's competition here
Inox Wind Limited (NSE: INOXWIND.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs INOXWIND.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, INOXWIND.NS has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while INOXWIND.NS trades at ₹76.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas INOXWIND.NS's P/E ratio is 29.22. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INOXWIND.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to INOXWIND.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check INOXWIND.NS's competition here
Ingersoll-Rand (India) Limited (NSE: INGERRAND.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 131.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹4,155.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 48.27. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
Ingersoll-Rand (India) Limited (BSE: INGERRAND.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 130.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹4,159.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 48.31. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
Inox Wind Limited (BSE: INOXWIND.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs INOXWIND.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, INOXWIND.BO has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while INOXWIND.BO trades at ₹74.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas INOXWIND.BO's P/E ratio is 28.50. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INOXWIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to INOXWIND.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check INOXWIND.BO's competition here
Lloyds Engineering Works Limited (NSE: LLOYDSENGG.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 110.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹82.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 58.46. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
Lloyds Engineering Works Limited (BSE: LLOYDSENGG.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 110.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹82.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 68.71. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
KRN Heat Exchanger & Refrigeration Ltd. (NSE: KRN.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KRN.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, KRN.NS has a market cap of 94.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while KRN.NS trades at ₹1,446.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas KRN.NS's P/E ratio is 94.34. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRN.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KRN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KRN.NS's competition here
Elecon Engineering Company Limited (NSE: ELECON.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ELECON.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 94.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹421.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 40.23. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
Elecon Engineering Company Limited (BSE: ELECON.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ELECON.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 94.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹421.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 40.22. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Limited (NSE: KIRLPNU.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 90.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹698.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
Kirloskar Pneumatic Company Limited (BSE: KIRLPNU.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 90.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹698.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
BEML Limited (BSE: BEML.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs BEML.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, BEML.BO has a market cap of 88.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while BEML.BO trades at ₹2,134.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas BEML.BO's P/E ratio is 49.14. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BEML.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to BEML.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check BEML.BO's competition here
Vesuvius India Limited (NSE: VESUVIUS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 82.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹405.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.62. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
Vesuvius India Limited (BSE: VESUVIUS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 82.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹404.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.53. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
Dynamatic Technologies Limited (NSE: DYNAMATECH.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs DYNAMATECH.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹12,061.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 193.01. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here
Dynamatic Technologies Limited (BSE: DYNAMATECH.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs DYNAMATECH.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 81.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹12,054.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 192.94. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here
Standard Engineering Technology Limited (NSE: SETL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SETL.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 81.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while SETL.NS trades at ₹402.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 100.59. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SETL.NS's competition here
HMT Limited (BSE: HMT.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs HMT.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, HMT.BO has a market cap of 74.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while HMT.BO trades at ₹61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas HMT.BO's P/E ratio is -16.62. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HMT.BO's competition here
HMT Limited (NSE: HMT.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs HMT.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, HMT.NS has a market cap of 73.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while HMT.NS trades at ₹61.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas HMT.NS's P/E ratio is -16.27. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HMT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to HMT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HMT.NS's competition here
Gmm Pfaudler Ltd. (BSE: GMMPFAUDLR.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 66.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹1,469.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 90.39. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
GMM Pfaudler Limited (NSE: GMMPFAUDLR.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 66B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹1,467.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 90.00. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
AJAX Engineering Limited (BSE: AJAXENGG.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs AJAXENGG.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.BO has a market cap of 65.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while AJAXENGG.BO trades at ₹560.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas AJAXENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 28.87. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AJAXENGG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to AJAXENGG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AJAXENGG.BO's competition here
AJAX Engineering Ltd (NSE: AJAXENGG.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs AJAXENGG.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, AJAXENGG.NS has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while AJAXENGG.NS trades at ₹559.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas AJAXENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 28.39. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AJAXENGG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to AJAXENGG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AJAXENGG.NS's competition here
Shakti Pumps (India) Limited (BSE: SHAKTIPUMP.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 57.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹461.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
Shakti Pumps (India) Limited (NSE: SHAKTIPUMP.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 56.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹460.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 26.66. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
Shanthi Gears Limited (BSE: SHANTIGEAR.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 54.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹700.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 84.30. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
Shanthi Gears Limited (NSE: SHANTIGEAR.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 53.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹700.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 84.24. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
Diamond Power Infrastructure Limited (NSE: DIAPOWER.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
Lloyds Steels Industries Limited (NSE: LSIL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs LSIL.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
Texmaco Rail & Engineering Limited (NSE: TEXRAIL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹114.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.59. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
Texmaco Rail & Engineering Limited (BSE: TEXRAIL.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹114.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.57. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
Greaves Cotton Limited (BSE: GREAVESCOT.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹197.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 45.90. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
Greaves Cotton Limited (NSE: GREAVESCOT.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 46B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹197.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
Pitti Engineering Limited (NSE: PITTIENG.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹1,146.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 34.78. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
WPIL Limited (BSE: WPIL.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs WPIL.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹433.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 24.99. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
Pitti Engineering Limited (BSE: PITTIENG.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹1,144.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 34.75. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
John Cockerill India Ltd. (BSE: COCKERILL.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs COCKERILL.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, COCKERILL.BO has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while COCKERILL.BO trades at ₹8,174.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas COCKERILL.BO's P/E ratio is 421.59. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COCKERILL.BO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to COCKERILL.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check COCKERILL.BO's competition here
The Anup Engineering Limited (BSE: ANUP.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ANUP.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,640.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 29.80. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
The Anup Engineering Limited (NSE: ANUP.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ANUP.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,638.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 29.94. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
Jash Engineering Limited (NSE: JASH.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs JASH.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while JASH.NS trades at ₹521.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 38.02. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check JASH.NS's competition here
HLE Glascoat Limited (NSE: HLEGLAS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹446.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 86.11. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
HLE Glascoat Limited (BSE: HLEGLAS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹446.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 85.93. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
Prince Pipes and Fittings Limited (BSE: PRINCEPIPE.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.BO has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while PRINCEPIPE.BO trades at ₹270.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas PRINCEPIPE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.53. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.BO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.BO's competition here
Prince Pipes and Fittings Limited (NSE: PRINCEPIPE.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 29.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹269.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here
Standard Glass Lining Technology Ltd. (NSE: SGLTL.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs SGLTL.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
Ador Welding Limited (BSE: ADOR.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs ADOR.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,591.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
Ador Welding Limited (NSE: ADOR.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs ADOR.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,592.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
Jain Irrigation Systems Limited (BSE: JISLDVREQS.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs JISLDVREQS.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while JISLDVREQS.BO trades at ₹21.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas JISLDVREQS.BO's P/E ratio is -66.25. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JISLDVREQS.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.BO's competition here
Jain Irrigation Systems Limited (NSE: JISLDVREQS.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs JISLDVREQS.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, JISLDVREQS.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while JISLDVREQS.NS trades at ₹20.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas JISLDVREQS.NS's P/E ratio is -65.44. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JISLDVREQS.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to JISLDVREQS.NS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check JISLDVREQS.NS's competition here
Windsor Machines Limited (BSE: WINDMACHIN.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹300.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -834.58. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
Kilburn Engineering Limited (BSE: KLBRENG-B.BO)
TIMKEN.NS vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹471.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 27.22. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
Windsor Machines Limited (NSE: WINDMACHIN.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹300.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -666.78. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
Thejo Engineering Limited (NSE: THEJO.NS)
TIMKEN.NS vs THEJO.NS Comparison September 2026
Timken India Limited (NSE: TIMKEN.NS) plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance on the NSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 235B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,124.20 on the NSE, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹2,199.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 55.84, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 48.44. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.15%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check THEJO.NS's competition here