KRN Heat Exchanger & Refrigeration Ltd. (KRN.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KRN.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KRN.NS | ₹1,230.50 | +1.29% | 80.5B | 113.41 | ₹10.85 | N/A |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹5,578.80 | +1.97% | 1.5T | 64.24 | ₹86.84 | +0.96% |
| ABB.BO | ₹7,070.10 | +1.73% | 1.5T | 93.68 | ₹75.47 | +0.56% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹387.45 | +1.03% | 1.3T | 79.20 | ₹4.89 | +0.13% |
| BHEL.NS | ₹387.50 | +1.02% | 1.3T | 78.60 | ₹4.93 | +0.13% |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,571.60 | +1.00% | 1.3T | 74.36 | ₹48.03 | N/A |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,570.50 | +0.90% | 1.3T | 62.26 | ₹57.35 | N/A |
| THERMAX.NS | ₹4,736.50 | +2.80% | 533.6B | 80.36 | ₹58.94 | +0.42% |
| THERMAX.BO | ₹4,733.85 | +2.63% | 532.7B | 80.32 | ₹58.94 | +0.42% |
| AIAENG.NS | ₹4,813.00 | +1.23% | 449.2B | 35.29 | ₹136.38 | +0.33% |
Stock Comparison
KRN.NS vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹5,578.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 64.24. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs ABB.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ABB.BO trades at ₹7,070.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 93.68. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ABB.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs BHEL.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹387.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 79.20. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs BHEL.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹387.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 78.60. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,571.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 74.36. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,570.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 62.26. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs THERMAX.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 533.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹4,736.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 80.36. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs THERMAX.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 532.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹4,733.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 80.32. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs AIAENG.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 449.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹4,813.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs AIAENG.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 449.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹4,811.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 425B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,284.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 113.07. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 424.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,284.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 113.03. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs GET&D.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 329.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹2,265.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 68.76. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 329.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹2,266.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 67.73. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs BLUESTARCO.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.BO has a market cap of 328.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while BLUESTARCO.BO trades at ₹1,598.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas BLUESTARCO.BO's P/E ratio is 61.48. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLUESTARCO.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 328.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,597.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 52.18. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs CRAFTSMAN.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, CRAFTSMAN.NS has a market cap of 237.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while CRAFTSMAN.NS trades at ₹9,097.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas CRAFTSMAN.NS's P/E ratio is 54.41. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to CRAFTSMAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check CRAFTSMAN.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs KAYNES.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 225.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,359.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 61.04. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs KAYNES.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 225.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,358.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 61.03. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 216.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹7,047.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 230.29. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 216.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹7,044.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 230.21. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 206.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹649.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 56.91. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 206.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹649.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 57.01. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 186.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹592.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 42.21. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 186.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹591.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 46.61. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 183.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹1,174.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 76.69. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 182.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹1,175.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 77.02. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 175.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹770.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 52.07. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 170B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,872.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 65.25. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs LMW.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 168.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while LMW.NS trades at ₹15,778.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 178.14. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check LMW.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs LMW.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 168.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while LMW.BO trades at ₹15,766.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 117.51. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check LMW.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs KSB.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 162.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KSB.BO trades at ₹934.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KSB.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs KSB.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 162.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KSB.NS trades at ₹934.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KSB.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 148.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,874.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 39.86. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 148.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,875.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 39.87. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs AZAD.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 145.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹2,246.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 114.56. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS and AZAD.NS have similar daily volatility (5.30).Check AZAD.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 140.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹4,453.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 51.73. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 140.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹4,451.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 51.70. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs TEGA.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 125.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,665.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 61.53. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs TEGA.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 124.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,663.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 61.48. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 121.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹90.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 73.48. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 121.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹90.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 75.27. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 120.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,848.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 46.01. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 120.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,848.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 45.50. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs ACE.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ACE.BO has a market cap of 119.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ACE.BO trades at ₹1,006.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ACE.BO's P/E ratio is 28.71. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ACE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ACE.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs ELECON.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 119.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹531.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 33.03. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs ELECON.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹531.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 26.93. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs BANCOINDIA.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, BANCOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 96.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while BANCOINDIA.BO trades at ₹676.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas BANCOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BANCOINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to BANCOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check BANCOINDIA.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 95.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹471.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 36.21. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹471.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs BEML.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, BEML.BO has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while BEML.BO trades at ₹1,855.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas BEML.BO's P/E ratio is 29.04. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BEML.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to BEML.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check BEML.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs BEML.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, BEML.NS has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while BEML.NS trades at ₹1,855.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas BEML.NS's P/E ratio is 42.72. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BEML.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to BEML.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check BEML.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹599.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 28.45. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 74B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹599.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 26.16. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs DYNAMATECH.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.NS has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while DYNAMATECH.NS trades at ₹10,793.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas DYNAMATECH.NS's P/E ratio is 226.13. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DYNAMATECH.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs DYNAMATECH.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, DYNAMATECH.BO has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while DYNAMATECH.BO trades at ₹10,765.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas DYNAMATECH.BO's P/E ratio is 225.56. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DYNAMATECH.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to DYNAMATECH.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check DYNAMATECH.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs ISGEC.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹924.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 36.54. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs SETL.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while SETL.NS trades at ₹267.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 66.93. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check SETL.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 52.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹224.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 51.06. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs LSIL.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹224.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 48.71. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 49.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹121.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 25.81. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹121.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 25.43. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs WPIL.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 47.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹487.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.15. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs ANUP.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹2,308.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 42.18. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs ANUP.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 46.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹2,306.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 41.92. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹953.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 30.31. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹952.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹770.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 36.38. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while GMMPFAUDLR.NS trades at ₹769.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.NS's P/E ratio is 147.45. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 34.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹447.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 44.75. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹447.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.47. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs JASH.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while JASH.NS trades at ₹500.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 25.58. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check JASH.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹320.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -712.67. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs JNKINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹511.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 55.87. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹320.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -711.89. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs KMEW.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹2,260.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 98.36. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KMEW.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs SGLTL.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹387.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 34.65. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 26.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹387.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.45. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹484.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 43.57. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs PIXTRANS.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,788.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.97. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs PIXTRANS.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,786.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 22.77. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs NIBE.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, NIBE.NS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while NIBE.NS trades at ₹1,609.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas NIBE.NS's P/E ratio is 466.49. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NIBE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to NIBE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check NIBE.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs ADVAIT.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 23.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹2,182.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 44.90. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs PENIND.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹172.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check PENIND.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs PENIND.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹171.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check PENIND.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs ADOR.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,320.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 36.27. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs ADOR.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,322.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 33.66. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs GMM.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check GMM.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs HONDAPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,178.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 34.41. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here
KRN.NS vs HONDAPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,176.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs THEJO.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,862.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 36.69. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check THEJO.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs KRISHNADEF.NS Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, KRISHNADEF.NS has a market cap of 19.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while KRISHNADEF.NS trades at ₹1,321.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas KRISHNADEF.NS's P/E ratio is 64.49. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KRISHNADEF.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is less volatile compared to KRISHNADEF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check KRISHNADEF.NS's competition here
KRN.NS vs DISAQ.BO Comparison July 2026
KRN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KRN.NS stands at 80.5B. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KRN.NS is priced at ₹1,230.50, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹12,270.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KRN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 113.41, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 61.63. In terms of profitability, KRN.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KRN.NS is more volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KRN.NS.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here