GMM Pfaudler Limited (GMMPFAUDLR.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GMMPFAUDLR.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMMPFAUDLR.NS | ₹767.55 | -1.20% | 34.5B | 58.19 | ₹13.19 | +0.26% |
| CUMMINSIND.NS | ₹5,692.50 | -0.27% | 1.6T | 66.76 | ₹85.27 | +0.94% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹5,687.65 | -0.36% | 1.6T | 70.15 | ₹81.08 | +0.94% |
| ABB.NS | ₹7,196.00 | +0.70% | 1.5T | 98.23 | ₹73.26 | +0.55% |
| ABB.BO | ₹7,184.95 | +0.53% | 1.5T | 86.17 | ₹83.38 | +0.55% |
| BHEL.NS | ₹406.30 | -1.08% | 1.4T | 88.33 | ₹4.60 | +0.12% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹406.10 | -1.18% | 1.4T | 88.28 | ₹4.60 | +0.12% |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,709.60 | -0.54% | 1.3T | 78.10 | ₹47.50 | N/A |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,709.10 | -0.53% | 1.3T | 78.30 | ₹47.37 | N/A |
| THERMAX.BO | ₹4,787.10 | -3.63% | 539.3B | 79.27 | ₹60.39 | +0.29% |
Stock Comparison
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs CUMMINSIND.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while CUMMINSIND.NS trades at ₹5,692.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas CUMMINSIND.NS's P/E ratio is 66.76. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUMMINSIND.NS's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹5,687.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 70.15. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ABB.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ABB.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ABB.NS trades at ₹7,196.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ABB.NS's P/E ratio is 98.23. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABB.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ABB.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ABB.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ABB.BO trades at ₹7,184.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 86.17. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ABB.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs BHEL.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹406.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 88.33. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs BHEL.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹406.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 88.28. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,709.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 78.10. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,709.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 78.30. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs THERMAX.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 539.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹4,787.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 79.27. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs THERMAX.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 539B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹4,784.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 75.02. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs AIAENG.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 421.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹4,521.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 33.21. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs AIAENG.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 421.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹4,520.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 36.28. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 408.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,235.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 81.26. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 408.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,235.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 109.29. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs GET&D.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 325B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,580.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 61.80. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs BLUESTARCO.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.BO has a market cap of 324.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while BLUESTARCO.BO trades at ₹1,580.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas BLUESTARCO.BO's P/E ratio is 65.67. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLUESTARCO.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 275B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹1,892.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 48.34. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 274.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹1,889.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 48.46. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 229.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹7,468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 246.39. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 229.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹7,458.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 246.25. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KAYNES.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 215.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,214.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 58.92. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KAYNES.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 215.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,214.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 58.91. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 212.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹668.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 60.97. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹668.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 60.62. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 201.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹1,287.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 84.55. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 201B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹1,286.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 84.02. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 189.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹601.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 44.24. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 189.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹600.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LMW.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 170.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while LMW.BO trades at ₹15,927.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 130.45. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LMW.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LMW.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 169.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while LMW.NS trades at ₹15,899.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 130.33. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LMW.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TEGA.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 136.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,822.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 89.06. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TEGA.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 136.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,821.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 89.01. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs AZAD.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 135B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹2,090.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 101.50. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 134.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹592.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 134B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,476.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 52.14. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KSB.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 133.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KSB.NS trades at ₹769.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 51.78. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KSB.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KSB.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 133.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KSB.BO trades at ₹768.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 51.68. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KSB.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹1,614.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 32.66. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹1,614.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 34.27. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹3,754.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 44.83. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 118.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹3,752.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 46.17. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ELECON.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 113.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹506.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 33.34. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ELECON.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹504.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 33.60. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,580.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 102.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,579.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 40.03. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs DIACABS.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, DIACABS.NS has a market cap of 99.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while DIACABS.NS trades at ₹188.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas DIACABS.NS's P/E ratio is 62.89. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIACABS.NS's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to DIACABS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check DIACABS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs DIACABS.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, DIACABS.BO has a market cap of 99.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while DIACABS.BO trades at ₹188.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas DIACABS.BO's P/E ratio is 63.04. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIACABS.BO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to DIACABS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check DIACABS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 97.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹481.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 37.49. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 97.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹481.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 37.44. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹70.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 47.59. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 95.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹70.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 47.59. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ISGEC.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ISGEC.NS has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ISGEC.NS trades at ₹917.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ISGEC.NS's P/E ratio is 62.09. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISGEC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ISGEC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ISGEC.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ISGEC.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 67.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹915.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 61.66. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹510.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹510.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LSIL.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹183.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 41.33. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 42.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹183.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 40.20. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs WPIL.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹430.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 26.53. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹102.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹102.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.23. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ANUP.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹1,934.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 35.16. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ANUP.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹1,934.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹766.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 59.49. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹443.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 44.35. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹442.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 44.25. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SETL.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while SETL.NS trades at ₹138.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.48. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SETL.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SGLTL.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹391.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 54.47. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹391.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 54.39. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs JASH.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while JASH.NS trades at ₹414.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 34.49. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check JASH.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹492.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 25.93. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹281.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is 3124.44. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹279.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is 3109.44. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs GMM.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check GMM.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs HONDAPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,238.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs HONDAPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,230.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 35.26. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ADVAIT.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹2,064.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 43.52. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs NIBE.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, NIBE.BO has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while NIBE.BO trades at ₹1,503.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas NIBE.BO's P/E ratio is 443.64. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NIBE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to NIBE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check NIBE.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs NIBE.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, NIBE.NS has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while NIBE.NS trades at ₹1,502.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas NIBE.NS's P/E ratio is -299.22. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NIBE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to NIBE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check NIBE.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs PIXTRANS.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,632.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 20.35. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs PIXTRANS.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,627.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 20.29. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KMEW.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹1,799.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 52.04. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KMEW.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs PENIND.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹159.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check PENIND.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs PENIND.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹159.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check PENIND.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs JNKINDIA.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 21.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹383.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ADOR.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,141.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ADOR.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,123.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 23.88. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs THEJO.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,548.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 34.08. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check THEJO.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs DISAQ.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹11,450.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 31.09. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LXMIATO.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs JYOTISTRUC.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.BO has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while JYOTISTRUC.BO trades at ₹12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas JYOTISTRUC.BO's P/E ratio is 28.40. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check JYOTISTRUC.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs JYOTISTRUC.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, JYOTISTRUC.NS has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while JYOTISTRUC.NS trades at ₹12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas JYOTISTRUC.NS's P/E ratio is 27.15. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTISTRUC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check JYOTISTRUC.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ADORWELD.NS Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ADORWELD.BO Comparison June 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 34.5B. In comparison, ADORWELD.BO has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹767.55, while ADORWELD.BO trades at ₹852.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 58.19, whereas ADORWELD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADORWELD.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to ADORWELD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ADORWELD.BO's competition here