GMM Pfaudler Limited (GMMPFAUDLR.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GMMPFAUDLR.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMMPFAUDLR.NS | ₹789.55 | -0.40% | 35.5B | 151.25 | ₹5.22 | +0.25% |
| CUMMINSIND.BO | ₹5,656.30 | +2.09% | 1.6T | 65.13 | ₹86.84 | +0.95% |
| ABB.BO | ₹7,030.85 | -1.41% | 1.5T | 93.16 | ₹75.47 | +0.56% |
| BHEL.NS | ₹414.10 | +0.08% | 1.4T | 84.00 | ₹4.93 | +0.12% |
| BHEL.BO | ₹413.90 | +0.07% | 1.4T | 84.61 | ₹4.89 | +0.12% |
| SIEMENS.BO | ₹3,600.60 | +0.74% | 1.3T | 62.78 | ₹57.35 | N/A |
| SIEMENS.NS | ₹3,599.90 | +0.75% | 1.3T | 74.95 | ₹48.03 | N/A |
| THERMAX.NS | ₹5,159.50 | +0.67% | 581.2B | 87.54 | ₹58.94 | +0.27% |
| THERMAX.BO | ₹5,164.05 | +1.13% | 581.1B | 87.62 | ₹58.94 | +0.27% |
| AIAENG.BO | ₹5,083.05 | +2.64% | 474.3B | 37.28 | ₹136.34 | +0.31% |
Stock Comparison
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs CUMMINSIND.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, CUMMINSIND.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while CUMMINSIND.BO trades at ₹5,656.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas CUMMINSIND.BO's P/E ratio is 65.13. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CUMMINSIND.BO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to CUMMINSIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check CUMMINSIND.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ABB.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ABB.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ABB.BO trades at ₹7,030.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ABB.BO's P/E ratio is 93.16. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ABB.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to ABB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ABB.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs BHEL.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, BHEL.NS has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while BHEL.NS trades at ₹414.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas BHEL.NS's P/E ratio is 84.00. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHEL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check BHEL.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs BHEL.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, BHEL.BO has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while BHEL.BO trades at ₹413.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas BHEL.BO's P/E ratio is 84.61. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BHEL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to BHEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check BHEL.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SIEMENS.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, SIEMENS.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while SIEMENS.BO trades at ₹3,600.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas SIEMENS.BO's P/E ratio is 62.78. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIEMENS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SIEMENS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SIEMENS.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, SIEMENS.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while SIEMENS.NS trades at ₹3,599.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas SIEMENS.NS's P/E ratio is 74.95. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SIEMENS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SIEMENS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SIEMENS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs THERMAX.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, THERMAX.NS has a market cap of 581.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while THERMAX.NS trades at ₹5,159.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas THERMAX.NS's P/E ratio is 87.54. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THERMAX.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check THERMAX.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs THERMAX.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, THERMAX.BO has a market cap of 581.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while THERMAX.BO trades at ₹5,164.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas THERMAX.BO's P/E ratio is 87.62. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THERMAX.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to THERMAX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check THERMAX.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs AIAENG.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, AIAENG.BO has a market cap of 474.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while AIAENG.BO trades at ₹5,083.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas AIAENG.BO's P/E ratio is 37.28. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIAENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to AIAENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check AIAENG.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs AIAENG.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, AIAENG.NS has a market cap of 474.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while AIAENG.NS trades at ₹5,081.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas AIAENG.NS's P/E ratio is 37.26. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AIAENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to AIAENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check AIAENG.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs VOLTAS.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, VOLTAS.BO has a market cap of 423.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while VOLTAS.BO trades at ₹1,277.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas VOLTAS.BO's P/E ratio is 112.45. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VOLTAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS and VOLTAS.BO have similar daily volatility (2.35).Check VOLTAS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs VOLTAS.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, VOLTAS.NS has a market cap of 422.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while VOLTAS.NS trades at ₹1,277.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas VOLTAS.NS's P/E ratio is 112.46. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VOLTAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to VOLTAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check VOLTAS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs GET&D.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, GET&D.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while GET&D.NS trades at ₹1,552.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas GET&D.NS's P/E ratio is 100.73. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GET&D.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to GET&D.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check GET&D.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLOSENG.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.BO has a market cap of 345.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KIRLOSENG.BO trades at ₹2,363.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KIRLOSENG.BO's P/E ratio is 70.65. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLOSENG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLOSENG.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSENG.NS has a market cap of 343.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KIRLOSENG.NS trades at ₹2,364.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KIRLOSENG.NS's P/E ratio is 71.75. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLOSENG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSENG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLOSENG.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs BLUESTARCO.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.NS has a market cap of 334.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while BLUESTARCO.NS trades at ₹1,628.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas BLUESTARCO.NS's P/E ratio is 52.75. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLUESTARCO.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs BLUESTARCO.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, BLUESTARCO.BO has a market cap of 334.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while BLUESTARCO.BO trades at ₹1,627.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas BLUESTARCO.BO's P/E ratio is 61.98. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BLUESTARCO.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to BLUESTARCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check BLUESTARCO.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs MTARTECH.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, MTARTECH.BO has a market cap of 235.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while MTARTECH.BO trades at ₹7,617.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas MTARTECH.BO's P/E ratio is 248.95. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTARTECH.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check MTARTECH.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs MTARTECH.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, MTARTECH.NS has a market cap of 234.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while MTARTECH.NS trades at ₹7,620.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas MTARTECH.NS's P/E ratio is 249.04. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTARTECH.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to MTARTECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check MTARTECH.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TRITURBINE.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.NS has a market cap of 219.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while TRITURBINE.NS trades at ₹689.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas TRITURBINE.NS's P/E ratio is 60.45. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRITURBINE.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TRITURBINE.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TRITURBINE.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, TRITURBINE.BO has a market cap of 218.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while TRITURBINE.BO trades at ₹689.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas TRITURBINE.BO's P/E ratio is 60.51. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TRITURBINE.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to TRITURBINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TRITURBINE.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KAYNES.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KAYNES.NS has a market cap of 209.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KAYNES.NS trades at ₹3,121.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KAYNES.NS's P/E ratio is 56.73. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAYNES.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KAYNES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KAYNES.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KAYNES.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KAYNES.BO has a market cap of 209.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KAYNES.BO trades at ₹3,122.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KAYNES.BO's P/E ratio is 56.74. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KAYNES.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KAYNES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KAYNES.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.NS has a market cap of 193.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while TDPOWERSYS.NS trades at ₹1,238.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas TDPOWERSYS.NS's P/E ratio is 80.88. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TDPOWERSYS.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, TDPOWERSYS.BO has a market cap of 193.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while TDPOWERSYS.BO trades at ₹1,238.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas TDPOWERSYS.BO's P/E ratio is 81.13. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to TDPOWERSYS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TDPOWERSYS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.BO has a market cap of 188.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ELGIEQUIP.BO trades at ₹599.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ELGIEQUIP.BO's P/E ratio is 42.71. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ELGIEQUIP.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ELGIEQUIP.NS has a market cap of 188.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ELGIEQUIP.NS trades at ₹598.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ELGIEQUIP.NS's P/E ratio is 47.09. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ELGIEQUIP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ELGIEQUIP.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LAXMIMACH.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.BO has a market cap of 185.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while LAXMIMACH.BO trades at ₹17,338.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas LAXMIMACH.BO's P/E ratio is 63.86. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LAXMIMACH.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LAXMIMACH.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, LAXMIMACH.NS has a market cap of 185.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while LAXMIMACH.NS trades at ₹17,324.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas LAXMIMACH.NS's P/E ratio is 63.45. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LAXMIMACH.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LAXMIMACH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LAXMIMACH.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs INOXINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, INOXINDIA.NS has a market cap of 177.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while INOXINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,958.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas INOXINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 68.24. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INOXINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to INOXINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check INOXINDIA.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs JYOTICNC.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, JYOTICNC.NS has a market cap of 176.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while JYOTICNC.NS trades at ₹775.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas JYOTICNC.NS's P/E ratio is 52.37. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JYOTICNC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to JYOTICNC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check JYOTICNC.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LMW.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, LMW.BO has a market cap of 168.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while LMW.BO trades at ₹15,731.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas LMW.BO's P/E ratio is 185.35. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LMW.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to LMW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LMW.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LMW.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, LMW.NS has a market cap of 167.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while LMW.NS trades at ₹15,720.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas LMW.NS's P/E ratio is 177.49. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LMW.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LMW.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LMW.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KSB.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KSB.NS has a market cap of 166.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KSB.NS trades at ₹958.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KSB.NS's P/E ratio is 33.52. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSB.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KSB.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KSB.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KSB.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KSB.BO has a market cap of 166.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KSB.BO trades at ₹957.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KSB.BO's P/E ratio is 33.48. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KSB.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KSB.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KSB.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.BO has a market cap of 163.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KIRLOSBROS.BO trades at ₹2,052.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KIRLOSBROS.BO's P/E ratio is 43.64. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLOSBROS.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KIRLOSBROS.NS has a market cap of 163.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KIRLOSBROS.NS trades at ₹2,053.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KIRLOSBROS.NS's P/E ratio is 43.66. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLOSBROS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLOSBROS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs INGERRAND.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, INGERRAND.BO has a market cap of 142.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while INGERRAND.BO trades at ₹4,490.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas INGERRAND.BO's P/E ratio is 52.15. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INGERRAND.BO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check INGERRAND.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs INGERRAND.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, INGERRAND.NS has a market cap of 142.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while INGERRAND.NS trades at ₹4,500.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas INGERRAND.NS's P/E ratio is 52.27. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INGERRAND.NS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to INGERRAND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check INGERRAND.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs AZAD.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, AZAD.NS has a market cap of 132.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while AZAD.NS trades at ₹2,055.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas AZAD.NS's P/E ratio is 104.81. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AZAD.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to AZAD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check AZAD.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TEGA.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, TEGA.NS has a market cap of 127.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while TEGA.NS trades at ₹1,696.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas TEGA.NS's P/E ratio is 62.77. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEGA.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TEGA.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLPNU.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.BO has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KIRLPNU.BO trades at ₹1,955.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KIRLPNU.BO's P/E ratio is 48.68. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLPNU.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLPNU.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KIRLPNU.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KIRLPNU.NS has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KIRLPNU.NS trades at ₹1,953.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KIRLPNU.NS's P/E ratio is 48.07. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KIRLPNU.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KIRLPNU.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KIRLPNU.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TEGA.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, TEGA.BO has a market cap of 126.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while TEGA.BO trades at ₹1,694.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas TEGA.BO's P/E ratio is 62.63. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEGA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to TEGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TEGA.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ACE.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ACE.BO has a market cap of 121.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ACE.BO trades at ₹1,023.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ACE.BO's P/E ratio is 29.19. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACE.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ACE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ACE.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ELECON.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ELECON.NS has a market cap of 119.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ELECON.NS trades at ₹533.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ELECON.NS's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELECON.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ELECON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ELECON.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ELECON.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ELECON.BO has a market cap of 119.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ELECON.BO trades at ₹533.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ELECON.BO's P/E ratio is 27.08. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ELECON.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ELECON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ELECON.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.NS has a market cap of 116.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while LLOYDSENGG.NS trades at ₹86.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas LLOYDSENGG.NS's P/E ratio is 70.35. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LLOYDSENGG.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, LLOYDSENGG.BO has a market cap of 116.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while LLOYDSENGG.BO trades at ₹86.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas LLOYDSENGG.BO's P/E ratio is 72.08. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LLOYDSENGG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LLOYDSENGG.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs VESUVIUS.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.NS has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while VESUVIUS.NS trades at ₹457.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas VESUVIUS.NS's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VESUVIUS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check VESUVIUS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs VESUVIUS.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, VESUVIUS.BO has a market cap of 92.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while VESUVIUS.BO trades at ₹458.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas VESUVIUS.BO's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VESUVIUS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to VESUVIUS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check VESUVIUS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs BEML.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, BEML.BO has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while BEML.BO trades at ₹1,760.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas BEML.BO's P/E ratio is 27.56. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BEML.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to BEML.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check BEML.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs BEML.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, BEML.NS has a market cap of 73.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while BEML.NS trades at ₹1,760.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas BEML.NS's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BEML.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to BEML.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check BEML.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while SHAKTIPUMP.NS trades at ₹583.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.NS's P/E ratio is 25.46. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SHAKTIPUMP.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, SHAKTIPUMP.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while SHAKTIPUMP.BO trades at ₹583.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas SHAKTIPUMP.BO's P/E ratio is 27.67. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SHAKTIPUMP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SHAKTIPUMP.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ISGEC.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ISGEC.BO has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ISGEC.BO trades at ₹926.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ISGEC.BO's P/E ratio is 36.61. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ISGEC.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to ISGEC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ISGEC.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs DIAPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, DIAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 52.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while DIAPOWER.NS trades at ₹195.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas DIAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to DIAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check DIAPOWER.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LSIL.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, LSIL.NS has a market cap of 52.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while LSIL.NS trades at ₹48.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas LSIL.NS's P/E ratio is 130.41. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LSIL.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LSIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LSIL.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs GREAVESCOT.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.BO has a market cap of 51.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while GREAVESCOT.BO trades at ₹220.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas GREAVESCOT.BO's P/E ratio is 47.87. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GREAVESCOT.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs GREAVESCOT.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, GREAVESCOT.NS has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while GREAVESCOT.NS trades at ₹219.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas GREAVESCOT.NS's P/E ratio is 50.11. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GREAVESCOT.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to GREAVESCOT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check GREAVESCOT.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SETL.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, SETL.NS has a market cap of 51.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while SETL.NS trades at ₹256.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas SETL.NS's P/E ratio is 64.19. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SETL.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to SETL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SETL.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs WPIL.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, WPIL.BO has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while WPIL.BO trades at ₹488.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas WPIL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.26. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WPIL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to WPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check WPIL.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ANUP.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ANUP.BO has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ANUP.BO trades at ₹2,324.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ANUP.BO's P/E ratio is 42.25. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANUP.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ANUP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ANUP.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ANUP.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ANUP.NS has a market cap of 46.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ANUP.NS trades at ₹2,331.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ANUP.NS's P/E ratio is 42.60. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ANUP.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to ANUP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ANUP.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TEXRAIL.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.BO has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while TEXRAIL.BO trades at ₹107.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas TEXRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEXRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to TEXRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TEXRAIL.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs TEXRAIL.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, TEXRAIL.NS has a market cap of 43.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while TEXRAIL.NS trades at ₹107.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas TEXRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TEXRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to TEXRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check TEXRAIL.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs PITTIENG.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, PITTIENG.BO has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while PITTIENG.BO trades at ₹974.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas PITTIENG.BO's P/E ratio is 30.98. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PITTIENG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check PITTIENG.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs PITTIENG.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, PITTIENG.NS has a market cap of 35.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while PITTIENG.NS trades at ₹972.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas PITTIENG.NS's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PITTIENG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to PITTIENG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check PITTIENG.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs GMMPFAUDLR.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, GMMPFAUDLR.BO has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while GMMPFAUDLR.BO trades at ₹789.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas GMMPFAUDLR.BO's P/E ratio is 37.28. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to GMMPFAUDLR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check GMMPFAUDLR.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.NS has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while SHANTIGEAR.NS trades at ₹443.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas SHANTIGEAR.NS's P/E ratio is 44.59. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SHANTIGEAR.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, SHANTIGEAR.BO has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while SHANTIGEAR.BO trades at ₹444.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas SHANTIGEAR.BO's P/E ratio is 41.11. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SHANTIGEAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SHANTIGEAR.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs JASH.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, JASH.NS has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while JASH.NS trades at ₹507.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas JASH.NS's P/E ratio is 25.94. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JASH.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to JASH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check JASH.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs JNKINDIA.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, JNKINDIA.NS has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while JNKINDIA.NS trades at ₹504.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas JNKINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 55.15. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to JNKINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to JNKINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check JNKINDIA.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KMEW.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KMEW.BO has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KMEW.BO trades at ₹2,293.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KMEW.BO's P/E ratio is 99.82. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KMEW.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KMEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KMEW.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs WINDMACHIN.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.NS has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while WINDMACHIN.NS trades at ₹304.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas WINDMACHIN.NS's P/E ratio is -675.56. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WINDMACHIN.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SGLTL.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, SGLTL.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while SGLTL.NS trades at ₹137.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas SGLTL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.46. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGLTL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to SGLTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SGLTL.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs HLEGLAS.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.BO has a market cap of 26.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while HLEGLAS.BO trades at ₹382.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas HLEGLAS.BO's P/E ratio is 33.02. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLEGLAS.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to HLEGLAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check HLEGLAS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs HLEGLAS.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, HLEGLAS.NS has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while HLEGLAS.NS trades at ₹382.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas HLEGLAS.NS's P/E ratio is 34.22. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HLEGLAS.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to HLEGLAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check HLEGLAS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs WINDMACHIN.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, WINDMACHIN.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while WINDMACHIN.BO trades at ₹303.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas WINDMACHIN.BO's P/E ratio is -674.44. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WINDMACHIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to WINDMACHIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check WINDMACHIN.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KLBRENG-B.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KLBRENG-B.BO has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KLBRENG-B.BO trades at ₹494.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KLBRENG-B.BO's P/E ratio is 44.49. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KLBRENG-B.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KLBRENG-B.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KLBRENG-B.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ADVAIT.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ADVAIT.BO has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ADVAIT.BO trades at ₹2,293.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ADVAIT.BO's P/E ratio is 47.17. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADVAIT.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ADVAIT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ADVAIT.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs PIXTRANS.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.BO has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while PIXTRANS.BO trades at ₹1,829.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas PIXTRANS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.32. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIXTRANS.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check PIXTRANS.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs PIXTRANS.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, PIXTRANS.NS has a market cap of 25B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while PIXTRANS.NS trades at ₹1,835.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas PIXTRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 24.60. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PIXTRANS.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to PIXTRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check PIXTRANS.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs NIBE.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, NIBE.NS has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while NIBE.NS trades at ₹1,663.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas NIBE.NS's P/E ratio is 482.29. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NIBE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to NIBE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check NIBE.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs GMM.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, GMM.BO has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while GMM.BO trades at ₹1,563.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas GMM.BO's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to GMM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check GMM.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs PENIND.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, PENIND.BO has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while PENIND.BO trades at ₹167.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas PENIND.BO's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to PENIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check PENIND.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs PENIND.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, PENIND.NS has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while PENIND.NS trades at ₹167.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas PENIND.NS's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to PENIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check PENIND.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs HONDAPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while HONDAPOWER.NS trades at ₹2,181.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas HONDAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 24.33. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HONDAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ADOR.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ADOR.NS has a market cap of 22.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ADOR.NS trades at ₹1,269.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ADOR.NS's P/E ratio is 34.87. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADOR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ADOR.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ADOR.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ADOR.BO has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ADOR.BO trades at ₹1,266.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ADOR.BO's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADOR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ADOR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ADOR.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs HONDAPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, HONDAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while HONDAPOWER.BO trades at ₹2,175.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas HONDAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 34.35. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HONDAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to HONDAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check HONDAPOWER.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs THEJO.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, THEJO.NS has a market cap of 20.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while THEJO.NS trades at ₹1,918.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas THEJO.NS's P/E ratio is 37.80. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to THEJO.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to THEJO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check THEJO.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs KRISHNADEF.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, KRISHNADEF.NS has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while KRISHNADEF.NS trades at ₹1,207.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas KRISHNADEF.NS's P/E ratio is 59.47. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to KRISHNADEF.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to KRISHNADEF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check KRISHNADEF.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs DISAQ.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, DISAQ.BO has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while DISAQ.BO trades at ₹11,927.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas DISAQ.BO's P/E ratio is 59.91. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DISAQ.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is more volatile compared to DISAQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check DISAQ.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs LXMIATO.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, LXMIATO.BO has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while LXMIATO.BO trades at ₹2,483.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas LXMIATO.BO's P/E ratio is 584.15. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LXMIATO.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to LXMIATO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check LXMIATO.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs SATINDLTD.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, SATINDLTD.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while SATINDLTD.BO trades at ₹140.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas SATINDLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SATINDLTD.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to SATINDLTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check SATINDLTD.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs DIFFNKG.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, DIFFNKG.NS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while DIFFNKG.NS trades at ₹424.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas DIFFNKG.NS's P/E ratio is 31.28. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIFFNKG.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to DIFFNKG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check DIFFNKG.NS's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs DIFFNKG.BO Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, DIFFNKG.BO has a market cap of 15.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while DIFFNKG.BO trades at ₹424.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas DIFFNKG.BO's P/E ratio is 31.29. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DIFFNKG.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to DIFFNKG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check DIFFNKG.BO's competition here
GMMPFAUDLR.NS vs ADORWELD.NS Comparison July 2026
GMMPFAUDLR.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GMMPFAUDLR.NS stands at 35.5B. In comparison, ADORWELD.NS has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is priced at ₹789.55, while ADORWELD.NS trades at ₹852.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GMMPFAUDLR.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 151.25, whereas ADORWELD.NS's P/E ratio is 33.22. In terms of profitability, GMMPFAUDLR.NS's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ADORWELD.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GMMPFAUDLR.NS is less volatile compared to ADORWELD.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GMMPFAUDLR.NS.Check ADORWELD.NS's competition here