PowerFleet, Inc.

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 312.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CSCO trades at $78.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 28.49. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check CSCO's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MSI trades at $453.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 36.23. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check MSI's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 47.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while LITE trades at $635.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 195.25. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check LITE's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CIEN trades at $318.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 389.63. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check CIEN's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 45.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while UI trades at $718.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 51.20. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UI's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check UI's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 41.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while NOK trades at $7.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 59.73. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check NOK's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ERIC trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check ERIC's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 31.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SATS trades at $114.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check SATS's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while HPE trades at $21.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is -534.00. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check HPE's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 24B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ASTS trades at $86.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -70.35. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check ASTS's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CRDO trades at $130.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 104.25. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check CRDO's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while JNPR trades at $39.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check JNPR's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ZBRA trades at $251.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 31.22. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check ZBRA's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while VIAV trades at $26.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is -144.89. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VIAV's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check VIAV's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while VSAT trades at $45.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -17.88. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check VSAT's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while BDC trades at $144.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 24.65. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check BDC's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ONDS trades at $11.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -27.86. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check ONDS's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, VISN has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while VISN trades at $18.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas VISN's P/E ratio is 16.21. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VISN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to VISN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check VISN's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while COMM trades at $18.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 15.85. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check COMM's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MAXR trades at $52.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check MAXR's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while PI trades at $123.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -345.73. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check PI's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while KN trades at $27.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 47.48. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check KN's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while DGII trades at $51.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check DGII's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while EXTR trades at $14.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is 234.17. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXTR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check EXTR's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while INFN trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INFN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check INFN's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while HLIT trades at $10.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 25.95. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to HLIT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check HLIT's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SWIR trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check SWIR's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 970M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ITRN trades at $48.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 17.11. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check ITRN's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 878.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while GILT trades at $14.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 43.50. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check GILT's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 806.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ADTN trades at $9.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check ADTN's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while POLY trades at $39.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check POLY's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 592.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while NTGR trades at $20.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is -33.13. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to NTGR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check NTGR's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 508.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AIOT trades at $3.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -16.48. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check AIOT's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 474.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while FEIM trades at $50.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check FEIM's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 450.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CLFD trades at $32.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 72.27. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check CLFD's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 442.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while TSAT trades at $29.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -3.69. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check TSAT's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 320.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while BKTI trades at $83.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check BKTI's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 318.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AVNW trades at $24.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AVNW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check AVNW's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ITI trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check ITI's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SATX trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check SATX's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 237.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while LTRX trades at $5.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check LTRX's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 207.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AUDC trades at $7.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check AUDC's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 206.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CRNT trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 115.00. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CRNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check CRNT's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 193.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while INSG trades at $10.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -8.43. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to INSG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check INSG's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 165.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CMTL trades at $5.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -2.39. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check CMTL's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while PCTI trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check PCTI's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 117.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while KVHI trades at $6.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check KVHI's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SILC trades at $19.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -10.08. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check SILC's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while TESS trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check TESS's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while JCS trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to JCS's ROE of -1.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check JCS's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 62.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AIRG trades at $5.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check AIRG's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 59.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MOB trades at $5.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -4.81. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check MOB's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 54.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AMPG trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -5.20. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check AMPG's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while OCC trades at $6.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -32.61. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check OCC's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while FKWL trades at $4.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -395.00. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FKWL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check FKWL's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while WTT trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check WTT's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 38M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SYTA trades at $3.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check SYTA's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 33.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CMBM trades at $1.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check CMBM's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 29M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while BOSC trades at $4.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check BOSC's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, FIEE has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while FIEE trades at $7.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas FIEE's P/E ratio is -59.17. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to FIEE's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to FIEE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check FIEE's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 25.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MOBBW trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check MOBBW's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while UTSI trades at $2.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check UTSI's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MINM trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MINM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check MINM's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CLRO trades at $6.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -1.58%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check CLRO's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SYNX trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check SYNX's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MITQ trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -20.68. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check MITQ's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while IOTR trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -11.60. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check IOTR's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 5.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SONM trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SONM's ROE of +15.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check SONM's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while VISL trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VISL's ROE of -1.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check VISL's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CASA trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check CASA's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MYNA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check MYNA's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AMPGW trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check AMPGW's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while DZSI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -1.64%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check DZSI's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 184K. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ASNS trades at $0.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -3.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check ASNS's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 55.8K. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SYTAW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -2.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check SYTAW's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, GIMO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while GIMO trades at $38.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas GIMO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to GIMO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to GIMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check GIMO's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while VCRA trades at $79.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check VCRA's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, RKUS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while RKUS trades at $12.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas RKUS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to RKUS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to RKUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check RKUS's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ORBC trades at $11.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check ORBC's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ZXZZT trades at $12.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check ZXZZT's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check SATX-WTA's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while BDR trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check BDR's competition here

PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while EXFO trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.07%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.Check EXFO's competition here