PowerFleet, Inc.
PowerFleet, Inc. PWFL Peers
See (PWFL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWFL | $4.57 | +0.22% | 490.6M | -9.33 | -$0.49 | N/A |
| CSCO | $66.06 | +2.23% | 261.6B | 26.96 | $2.45 | +2.44% |
| MSI | $417.83 | +0.41% | 69.7B | 34.85 | $11.99 | +0.99% |
| NOK | $5.41 | +0.28% | 29.1B | 21.62 | $0.25 | +2.66% |
| ERIC | $8.53 | +0.24% | 28.6B | 170.60 | $0.05 | +2.92% |
| UI | $407.90 | +1.36% | 24.7B | 44.97 | $9.07 | +0.59% |
| HPE | $18.10 | +1.91% | 23.8B | 17.40 | $1.04 | +2.88% |
| ZBRA | $295.36 | +1.41% | 15B | 27.94 | $10.57 | N/A |
| CRDO | $72.96 | -0.05% | 12.4B | 235.35 | $0.31 | N/A |
| JNPR | $35.90 | +0.25% | 12B | 34.19 | $1.05 | +2.45% |
Stock Comparison
PWFL vs CSCO Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 261.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CSCO trades at $66.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs MSI Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 69.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MSI trades at $417.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs NOK Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while NOK trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs ERIC Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ERIC trades at $8.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 170.60. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs UI Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while UI trades at $407.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 44.97. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to UI's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs HPE Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while HPE trades at $18.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 17.40. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs ZBRA Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ZBRA trades at $295.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 27.94. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs CRDO Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CRDO trades at $72.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 235.35. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs JNPR Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while JNPR trades at $35.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 34.19. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs CIEN Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CIEN trades at $72.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 99.60. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs ASTS Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ASTS trades at $31.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -15.75. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs LITE Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while LITE trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is -12.61. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LITE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs SATS Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SATS trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -23.31. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs BDC Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while BDC trades at $110.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs MAXR Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs PI Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while PI trades at $113.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -1890.83. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs EXTR Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while EXTR trades at $16.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -40.56. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs VIAV Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while VIAV trades at $9.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 472.00. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs INFN Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs KN Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while KN trades at $17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 63.70. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs COMM Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while COMM trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs DGII Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while DGII trades at $34.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs SWIR Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs VSAT Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while VSAT trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs HLIT Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while HLIT trades at $9.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to HLIT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs NTGR Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 869.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while NTGR trades at $30.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 35.97. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs POLY Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs ITRN Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 748.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ITRN trades at $37.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs ADTN Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 642.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ADTN trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -4.99. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs AIOT Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 622.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AIOT trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -10.22. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs CLFD Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 539.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CLFD trades at $39.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is -278.79. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs GILT Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 341M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while GILT trades at $5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 26.00. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs ITI Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs AUDC Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 287M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AUDC trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs AVNW Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 280M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AVNW trades at $22.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -116.11. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs SATX Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 250.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SATX trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs TSAT Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 235.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while TSAT trades at $16.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs ONDS Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 233.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ONDS trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -2.88. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs CRNT Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 216.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CRNT trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CRNT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs FEIM Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 184.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while FEIM trades at $19.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 7.93. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs BKTI Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 165.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while BKTI trades at $45.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs PCTI Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs INSG Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 115M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while INSG trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -7.51. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs KVHI Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while KVHI trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs LTRX Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 89.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while LTRX trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -10.45. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs TESS Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs SILC Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SILC trades at $14.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs JCS Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs CMTL Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 66.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CMTL trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs AMPGW Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AMPGW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs FKWL Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 49.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while FKWL trades at $4.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -30.07. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs AMPG Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AMPG trades at $2.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs AIRG Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 47.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AIRG trades at $4.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -5.83. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs WTT Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs BOSC Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while BOSC trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs UTSI Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while UTSI trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs OCC Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while OCC trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs SYTA Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 17.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SYTA trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs MOB Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 16.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MOB trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -1.71. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs SYTAW Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SYTAW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs MINM Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MINM trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs SYNX Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SYNX trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs SONM Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SONM trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SONM's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs IOTR Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while IOTR trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -41.10. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs CLRO Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CLRO trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs CMBM Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 10.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CMBM trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs ASNS Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ASNS trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs VISL Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while VISL trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs AKTS Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while AKTS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +23.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs MITQ Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MITQ trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs BOXL Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while BOXL trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs CASA Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs MOBBW Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MOBBW trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs MYNA Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs DZSI Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs BDR Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs SATX-WTA Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs ORBC Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs EXFO Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs VCRA Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.
PWFL vs ZXZZT Comparison
PWFL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PWFL stands at 490.6M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PWFL is priced at $4.57, while ZXZZT trades at $9.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PWFL currently has a P/E ratio of -9.33, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PWFL's ROE is -0.16%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, PWFL is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PWFL.