Permian Resources Corporation

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 149B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while COP trades at $121.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 19.19. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check COP's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 101B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CNQ trades at $48.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CNQ's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 72.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while EOG trades at $133.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check EOG's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check PXD's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while OXY trades at $57.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 42.87. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check OXY's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 51.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while FANG trades at $182.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 31.88. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check FANG's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check HES's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while WDS trades at $22.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 15.62. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check WDS's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while EQT trades at $64.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 19.45. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check EQT's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 36.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while TPL trades at $531.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 76.06. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check TPL's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while OXY-WT trades at $35.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check OXY-WT's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while DVN trades at $46.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check DVN's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while EXE trades at $107.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check EXE's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CTRA trades at $32.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CTRA's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check COG's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while MRO trades at $28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check MRO's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while OVV trades at $55.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 11.58. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check OVV's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 12.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while AR trades at $40.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check AR's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while APA trades at $34.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check APA's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CHK trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CHK's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while RRC trades at $43.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check RRC's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CHKEW's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CHKEZ's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CHKEL's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check SWN's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while MTDR trades at $57.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check MTDR's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CHRD trades at $123.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 166.82. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CHRD's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while VIST trades at $64.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check VIST's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CRK trades at $20.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 14.56. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CRK's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CNX trades at $42.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CNX's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CEO's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CRC trades at $61.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 14.81. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CRC's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while MGY trades at $29.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 17.05. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check MGY's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CPG's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while MUR trades at $36.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 51.11. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check MUR's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check OAS's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check DEN's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check BCEI's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CDEV's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while ERF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check ERF's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CRGY trades at $11.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CRGY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CRGY's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while GPOR trades at $196.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check GPOR's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check VRN's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while BSM trades at $15.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check BSM's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while BTE trades at $4.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BTE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check BTE's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while SM trades at $26.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check SM's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check ESTE's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while BKV trades at $28.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 14.51. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check BKV's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while NOG trades at $27.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 70.49. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check NOG's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CLMT trades at $28.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -73.31. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CLMT's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CPE's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while TALO trades at $13.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -4.90. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check TALO's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while CIVI trades at $27.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check CIVI's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while MNR trades at $13.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check MNR's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check STRDW's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while VET trades at $11.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas VET's P/E ratio is 24.05. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check VET's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while KRP trades at $14.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 23.73. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check KRP's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while NEXT trades at $5.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -7.80. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check NEXT's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check HHRS's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while DMLP trades at $26.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 23.25. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check DMLP's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while FLMN trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check FLMN's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while KOS trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check KOS's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while SBR trades at $75.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check SBR's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check SBOW's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 912M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while IMPPP trades at $26.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -67.44. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check IMPPP's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check TELL's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 787.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while VTS trades at $19.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 30.92. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check VTS's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 754.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while HPK trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check HPK's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 727.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while REPX trades at $33.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 8.15. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check REPX's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check ROCC's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while VTLE trades at $17.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check VTLE's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 682.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while TXO trades at $12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is -28.74. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TXO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check TXO's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 677.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while GRNT trades at $5.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 17.81. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check GRNT's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 645.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while TBN trades at $28.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -15.02. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check TBN's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 621.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while SD trades at $16.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check SD's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check PVAC's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 572.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while OBE trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is 23.61. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check OBE's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 561.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while EGY trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EGY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check EGY's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 500.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while WTI trades at $3.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -3.40. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to WTI's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check WTI's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 454.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while GPRK trades at $8.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 9.16. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check GPRK's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 418.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while GFR trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 4.81. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check GFR's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 339.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while PNRG trades at $205.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check PNRG's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 310.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while REI trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -18.75. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check REI's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, BATL has a market cap of 308.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while BATL trades at $18.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas BATL's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BATL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to BATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check BATL's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 289.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while GTE trades at $8.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -1.51. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check GTE's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 284.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while INR trades at $18.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas INR's P/E ratio is -20.92. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check INR's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 264.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while AMPY trades at $6.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is -8.72. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check AMPY's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while BRY trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check BRY's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 228.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while SJT trades at $4.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -491.00. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SJT's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check SJT's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while KGEI trades at $4.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 9.85. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check KGEI's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 167.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while IMPP trades at $4.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check IMPP's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check PHX's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 164.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while EPM trades at $4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is 58.69. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check EPM's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 161M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while ANNA trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is -18.00. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to ANNA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check ANNA's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 123.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while EPSN trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 20.78. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check EPSN's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 108.8M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while EP trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check EP's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 87.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while PED trades at $18.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check PED's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, SAFX has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while SAFX trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas SAFX's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to SAFX's ROE of +14.25%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to SAFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check SAFX's competition here

PR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, PR stands at 13.8B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 82.7M. Regarding current trading prices, PR is priced at $19.35, while NRT trades at $9.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

PR currently has a P/E ratio of 15.12, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, PR's ROE is +0.10%, compared to NRT's ROE of +6.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PR is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PR.Check NRT's competition here