PENN Entertainment, Inc.
PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (PENN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PENN | $18.35 | -2.65% | 2.8B | -30.58 | -$0.60 | N/A |
| FLUT | $305.24 | -0.33% | 53.9B | 104.89 | $2.91 | N/A |
| LVS | $52.34 | -0.29% | 37B | 26.43 | $1.98 | +1.72% |
| DKNG | $43.60 | -1.54% | 21.6B | -53.17 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $109.38 | -1.70% | 11.4B | 29.25 | $3.74 | +0.92% |
| MGM | $37.41 | -2.98% | 10.2B | 16.71 | $2.24 | N/A |
| LNW | $97.87 | -0.89% | 8.3B | 26.17 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CHDN | $110.60 | -0.58% | 7.8B | 19.10 | $5.79 | +0.37% |
| BYD | $85.74 | -0.72% | 7B | 13.27 | $6.46 | +0.82% |
| CZR | $28.47 | -3.23% | 5.9B | -25.85 | -$1.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
PENN vs FLUT Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while FLUT trades at $305.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 104.89. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check FLUT's competition here
PENN vs LVS Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 37B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while LVS trades at $52.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check LVS's competition here
PENN vs DKNG Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while DKNG trades at $43.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -53.17. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check DKNG's competition here
PENN vs WYNN Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while WYNN trades at $109.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check WYNN's competition here
PENN vs MGM Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while MGM trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check MGM's competition here
PENN vs LNW Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while LNW trades at $97.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check LNW's competition here
PENN vs CHDN Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while CHDN trades at $110.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CHDN's competition here
PENN vs BYD Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while BYD trades at $85.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check BYD's competition here
PENN vs CZR Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while CZR trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -25.85. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CZR's competition here
PENN vs MTN Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while MTN trades at $155.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check MTN's competition here
PENN vs SGHC Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while SGHC trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 41.79. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check SGHC's competition here
PENN vs SGMS Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check SGMS's competition here
PENN vs HGV Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while HGV trades at $51.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 159.53. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check HGV's competition here
PENN vs RSI Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while RSI trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 173.56. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check RSI's competition here
PENN vs IGT Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check IGT's competition here
PENN vs RRR Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while RRR trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check RRR's competition here
PENN vs VAC Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while VAC trades at $81.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check VAC's competition here
PENN vs SBET Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while SBET trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check SBET's competition here
PENN vs MCRI Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while MCRI trades at $102.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check MCRI's competition here
PENN vs PLYA Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check PLYA's competition here
PENN vs EVRI Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check EVRI's competition here
PENN vs MLCO Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while MLCO trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 61.93. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check MLCO's competition here
PENN vs ACEL Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while ACEL trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check ACEL's competition here
PENN vs BVH Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check BVH's competition here
PENN vs NGMS Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check NGMS's competition here
PENN vs GDEN Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 763.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while GDEN trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 67.16. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GDEN's competition here
PENN vs TPGH-UN Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
PENN vs AGS Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check AGS's competition here
PENN vs BALY Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 383.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while BALY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check BALY's competition here
PENN vs CDRO Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 383.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while CDRO trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CDRO's competition here
PENN vs GAMB Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 374.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while GAMB trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GAMB's competition here
PENN vs INSE Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 251.4M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while INSE trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check INSE's competition here
PENN vs MSC Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 213.2M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while MSC trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check MSC's competition here
PENN vs FLL Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while FLL trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check FLL's competition here
PENN vs CPHC Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while CPHC trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 115.75. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CPHC's competition here
PENN vs GAN Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GAN's competition here
PENN vs CNTY Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while CNTY trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CNTY's competition here
PENN vs CDROW Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while CDROW trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check CDROW's competition here
PENN vs LTRY Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check LTRY's competition here
PENN vs LTRYW Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check LTRYW's competition here
PENN vs SLNA Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check SLNA's competition here
PENN vs SLNAW Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check SLNAW's competition here
PENN vs GMBLP Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 387.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while GMBLP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GMBLP's competition here
PENN vs GMBL Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 366.7K. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while GMBL trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GMBL's competition here
PENN vs GMBLW Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GMBLW's competition here
PENN vs EBET Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check EBET's competition here
PENN vs GMBLZ Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GMBLZ's competition here
PENN vs GNOG Comparison July 2025
PENN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, PENN stands at 2.8B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, PENN is priced at $18.35, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
PENN currently has a P/E ratio of -30.58, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, PENN's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, PENN is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for PENN.Check GNOG's competition here