Nalin Lease Finance Ltd.
Nalin Lease Finance Ltd. (NLFL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NLFL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Financial - Credit Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLFL.BO | ₹40.00 | +3.65% | 250.9M | 8.35 | ₹4.58 | N/A |
| BAJFINANCE.NS | ₹817.30 | -3.14% | 5T | 27.70 | ₹28.94 | +0.70% |
| BAJFINANCE.BO | ₹817.20 | -3.22% | 5T | 27.63 | ₹29.00 | +0.70% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.BO | ₹900.45 | -0.41% | 1.6T | 17.95 | ₹48.58 | +0.89% |
| SHRIRAMFIN.NS | ₹900.55 | -0.36% | 1.6T | 17.95 | ₹48.58 | +0.89% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.NS | ₹3,256.00 | -0.45% | 1.3T | 14.55 | ₹217.17 | +0.82% |
| MUTHOOTFIN.BO | ₹3,254.95 | -0.66% | 1.3T | 14.54 | ₹217.25 | +0.82% |
| PFC.BO | ₹397.50 | +0.38% | 1.3T | 4.97 | ₹76.42 | +4.20% |
| PFC.NS | ₹397.70 | +0.43% | 1.3T | 4.97 | ₹76.43 | +4.20% |
| CHOLAFIN.NS | ₹1,373.60 | -3.01% | 1.2T | 23.58 | ₹57.44 | +0.14% |
Stock Comparison
NLFL.BO vs BAJFINANCE.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while BAJFINANCE.NS trades at ₹817.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas BAJFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 27.70. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAJFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs BAJFINANCE.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, BAJFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while BAJFINANCE.BO trades at ₹817.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas BAJFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 27.63. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAJFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to BAJFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check BAJFINANCE.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SHRIRAMFIN.BO trades at ₹900.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SHRIRAMFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SHRIRAMFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.6T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SHRIRAMFIN.NS trades at ₹900.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SHRIRAMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 17.95. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to SHRIRAMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SHRIRAMFIN.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MUTHOOTFIN.NS trades at ₹3,256.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.55. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MUTHOOTFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MUTHOOTFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MUTHOOTFIN.BO trades at ₹3,254.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MUTHOOTFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.54. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTFIN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs PFC.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, PFC.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while PFC.BO trades at ₹397.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PFC.BO's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFC.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check PFC.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs PFC.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, PFC.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while PFC.NS trades at ₹397.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PFC.NS's P/E ratio is 4.97. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFC.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to PFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check PFC.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CHOLAFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CHOLAFIN.NS trades at ₹1,373.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CHOLAFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.58. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHOLAFIN.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CHOLAFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CHOLAFIN.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CHOLAFIN.BO trades at ₹1,372.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CHOLAFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHOLAFIN.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CHOLAFIN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs IRFC.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, IRFC.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while IRFC.BO trades at ₹91.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IRFC.BO's P/E ratio is 16.28. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check IRFC.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs IRFC.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, IRFC.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while IRFC.NS trades at ₹91.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IRFC.NS's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to IRFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check IRFC.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs RECLTD.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, RECLTD.BO has a market cap of 803.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while RECLTD.BO trades at ₹321.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas RECLTD.BO's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RECLTD.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check RECLTD.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs RECLTD.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, RECLTD.NS has a market cap of 803.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while RECLTD.NS trades at ₹322.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas RECLTD.NS's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RECLTD.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to RECLTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check RECLTD.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SBICARD.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SBICARD.NS has a market cap of 604.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SBICARD.NS trades at ₹637.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SBICARD.NS's P/E ratio is 28.92. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBICARD.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SBICARD.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SBICARD.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SBICARD.BO has a market cap of 604.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SBICARD.BO trades at ₹637.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SBICARD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.90. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBICARD.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBICARD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SBICARD.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs LTF.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, LTF.NS has a market cap of 601.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while LTF.NS trades at ₹244.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas LTF.NS's P/E ratio is 21.45. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LTF.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to LTF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check LTF.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.BO has a market cap of 486.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SUNDARMFIN.BO trades at ₹4,589.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SUNDARMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 23.45. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SUNDARMFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SUNDARMFIN.NS has a market cap of 482.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SUNDARMFIN.NS trades at ₹4,593.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SUNDARMFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to SUNDARMFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SUNDARMFIN.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs L&TFH.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, L&TFH.NS has a market cap of 410.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while L&TFH.NS trades at ₹164.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas L&TFH.NS's P/E ratio is 39.65. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to L&TFH.NS's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to L&TFH.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check L&TFH.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs M&MFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, M&MFIN.NS has a market cap of 397.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while M&MFIN.NS trades at ₹289.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas M&MFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 16.15. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to M&MFIN.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to M&MFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check M&MFIN.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MMFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MMFIN.BO has a market cap of 392.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MMFIN.BO trades at ₹282.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MMFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMFIN.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MMFIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MMFIN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs HUDCO.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, HUDCO.NS has a market cap of 319.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while HUDCO.NS trades at ₹168.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas HUDCO.NS's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUDCO.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check HUDCO.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs HUDCO.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, HUDCO.BO has a market cap of 319.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while HUDCO.BO trades at ₹168.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas HUDCO.BO's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUDCO.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to HUDCO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check HUDCO.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs IREDA.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, IREDA.BO has a market cap of 306.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while IREDA.BO trades at ₹113.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IREDA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IREDA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to IREDA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check IREDA.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs IREDA.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, IREDA.NS has a market cap of 306.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while IREDA.NS trades at ₹113.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IREDA.NS's P/E ratio is 15.93. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IREDA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to IREDA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check IREDA.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs POONAWALLA.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, POONAWALLA.BO has a market cap of 297.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while POONAWALLA.BO trades at ₹382.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas POONAWALLA.BO's P/E ratio is 82.42. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POONAWALLA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check POONAWALLA.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs POONAWALLA.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, POONAWALLA.NS has a market cap of 297.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while POONAWALLA.NS trades at ₹382.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas POONAWALLA.NS's P/E ratio is 82.60. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to POONAWALLA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to POONAWALLA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check POONAWALLA.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.BO has a market cap of 256.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CHOLAHLDNG.BO trades at ₹1,391.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.BO's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CHOLAHLDNG.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CHOLAHLDNG.NS has a market cap of 256.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CHOLAHLDNG.NS trades at ₹1,386.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CHOLAHLDNG.NS's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to CHOLAHLDNG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CHOLAHLDNG.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MANAPPURAM.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.NS has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MANAPPURAM.NS trades at ₹255.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MANAPPURAM.NS's P/E ratio is 53.43. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANAPPURAM.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MANAPPURAM.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MANAPPURAM.BO has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MANAPPURAM.BO trades at ₹255.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MANAPPURAM.BO's P/E ratio is 53.52. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANAPPURAM.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANAPPURAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MANAPPURAM.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CREDITACC.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CREDITACC.NS has a market cap of 185.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CREDITACC.NS trades at ₹1,192.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CREDITACC.NS's P/E ratio is 38.31. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CREDITACC.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CREDITACC.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CREDITACC.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CREDITACC.BO has a market cap of 184.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CREDITACC.BO trades at ₹1,190.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CREDITACC.BO's P/E ratio is 38.13. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CREDITACC.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to CREDITACC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CREDITACC.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs IIFL.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, IIFL.NS has a market cap of 183B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while IIFL.NS trades at ₹437.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 14.43. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IIFL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to IIFL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check IIFL.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs IIFL.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, IIFL.BO has a market cap of 182.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while IIFL.BO trades at ₹437.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IIFL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to IIFL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check IIFL.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CGCL.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CGCL.NS has a market cap of 160.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CGCL.NS trades at ₹175.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CGCL.NS's P/E ratio is 17.86. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGCL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to CGCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CGCL.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CGCL.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CGCL.BO has a market cap of 159.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CGCL.BO trades at ₹176.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CGCL.BO's P/E ratio is 17.78. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGCL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to CGCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CGCL.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SHRIRAMCIT.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SHRIRAMCIT.NS has a market cap of 148.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SHRIRAMCIT.NS trades at ₹2,210.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SHRIRAMCIT.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to SHRIRAMCIT.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SHRIRAMCIT.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs IFCI.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, IFCI.BO has a market cap of 129.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while IFCI.BO trades at ₹52.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IFCI.BO's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFCI.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check IFCI.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs IFCI.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, IFCI.NS has a market cap of 129B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while IFCI.NS trades at ₹52.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IFCI.NS's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFCI.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to IFCI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check IFCI.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs FIVESTAR.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, FIVESTAR.NS has a market cap of 104B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while FIVESTAR.NS trades at ₹360.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FIVESTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 9.38. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIVESTAR.NS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check FIVESTAR.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs FIVESTAR.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, FIVESTAR.BO has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while FIVESTAR.BO trades at ₹360.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FIVESTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FIVESTAR.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to FIVESTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check FIVESTAR.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SBFC.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SBFC.BO has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SBFC.BO trades at ₹83.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SBFC.BO's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBFC.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SBFC.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SBFC.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SBFC.NS has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SBFC.NS trades at ₹83.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SBFC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.14. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBFC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to SBFC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SBFC.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs UJJIVAN.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, UJJIVAN.NS has a market cap of 72B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while UJJIVAN.NS trades at ₹591.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas UJJIVAN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.88. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UJJIVAN.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check UJJIVAN.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs UJJIVAN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, UJJIVAN.BO has a market cap of 71.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while UJJIVAN.BO trades at ₹590.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas UJJIVAN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.87. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UJJIVAN.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to UJJIVAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check UJJIVAN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MASFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MASFIN.BO has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MASFIN.BO trades at ₹293.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MASFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MASFIN.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to MASFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MASFIN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MASFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MASFIN.NS has a market cap of 50.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MASFIN.NS trades at ₹293.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MASFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 14.48. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MASFIN.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MASFIN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MASFIN.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs FEDFINA.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, FEDFINA.BO has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while FEDFINA.BO trades at ₹130.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FEDFINA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEDFINA.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check FEDFINA.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs FEDFINA.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, FEDFINA.NS has a market cap of 46.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while FEDFINA.NS trades at ₹130.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FEDFINA.NS's P/E ratio is 14.84. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEDFINA.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to FEDFINA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check FEDFINA.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs EQUITAS.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, EQUITAS.NS has a market cap of 40.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while EQUITAS.NS trades at ₹118.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas EQUITAS.NS's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQUITAS.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to EQUITAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check EQUITAS.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs NORTHARC.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, NORTHARC.NS has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while NORTHARC.NS trades at ₹216.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas NORTHARC.NS's P/E ratio is 10.87. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NORTHARC.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to NORTHARC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check NORTHARC.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs DHANI.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, DHANI.BO has a market cap of 31.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while DHANI.BO trades at ₹51.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas DHANI.BO's P/E ratio is 86.78. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DHANI.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to DHANI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check DHANI.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs PAISALO.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, PAISALO.BO has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while PAISALO.BO trades at ₹35.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PAISALO.BO's P/E ratio is 14.42. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAISALO.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to PAISALO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check PAISALO.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs PAISALO.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, PAISALO.NS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while PAISALO.NS trades at ₹35.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PAISALO.NS's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAISALO.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to PAISALO.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check PAISALO.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs TFCILTD.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, TFCILTD.NS has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while TFCILTD.NS trades at ₹65.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas TFCILTD.NS's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFCILTD.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check TFCILTD.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs TFCILTD.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, TFCILTD.BO has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while TFCILTD.BO trades at ₹65.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas TFCILTD.BO's P/E ratio is 24.16. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TFCILTD.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to TFCILTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check TFCILTD.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs INDOSTAR.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, INDOSTAR.NS has a market cap of 25.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while INDOSTAR.NS trades at ₹195.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas INDOSTAR.NS's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDOSTAR.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check INDOSTAR.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs INDOSTAR.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, INDOSTAR.BO has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while INDOSTAR.BO trades at ₹195.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas INDOSTAR.BO's P/E ratio is 4.66. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INDOSTAR.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to INDOSTAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check INDOSTAR.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MUTHOOTMF.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MUTHOOTMF.NS has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MUTHOOTMF.NS trades at ₹150.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MUTHOOTMF.NS's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTMF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTMF.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs FUSION.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, FUSION.NS has a market cap of 17.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while FUSION.NS trades at ₹144.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FUSION.NS's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUSION.NS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to FUSION.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check FUSION.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs FUSION.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, FUSION.BO has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while FUSION.BO trades at ₹143.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FUSION.BO's P/E ratio is -6.07. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FUSION.BO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to FUSION.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check FUSION.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MUFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MUFIN.NS has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MUFIN.NS trades at ₹101.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MUFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 78.16. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUFIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to MUFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MUFIN.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MUFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MUFIN.BO has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MUFIN.BO trades at ₹102.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MUFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 77.95. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUFIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to MUFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MUFIN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SATIN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SATIN.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SATIN.BO trades at ₹147.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SATIN.BO's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SATIN.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to SATIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SATIN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs PFS.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, PFS.NS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while PFS.NS trades at ₹26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PFS.NS's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to PFS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check PFS.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs PFS.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, PFS.BO has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while PFS.BO trades at ₹26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas PFS.BO's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFS.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to PFS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check PFS.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SATIN.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SATIN.NS has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SATIN.NS trades at ₹146.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SATIN.NS's P/E ratio is 8.01. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SATIN.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to SATIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SATIN.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs ARMANFIN.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, ARMANFIN.NS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while ARMANFIN.NS trades at ₹1,484.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas ARMANFIN.NS's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARMANFIN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check ARMANFIN.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs ARMANFIN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, ARMANFIN.BO has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while ARMANFIN.BO trades at ₹1,491.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas ARMANFIN.BO's P/E ratio is 50.03. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARMANFIN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to ARMANFIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check ARMANFIN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SPANDANA.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SPANDANA.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SPANDANA.BO trades at ₹192.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SPANDANA.BO's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPANDANA.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to SPANDANA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SPANDANA.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs SPANDANA.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, SPANDANA.NS has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while SPANDANA.NS trades at ₹192.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas SPANDANA.NS's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPANDANA.NS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to SPANDANA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check SPANDANA.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MOBIKWIK.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.BO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MOBIKWIK.BO trades at ₹168.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MOBIKWIK.BO's P/E ratio is -9.40. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOBIKWIK.BO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MOBIKWIK.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MOBIKWIK.NS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MOBIKWIK.NS trades at ₹169.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MOBIKWIK.NS's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MOBIKWIK.NS's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to MOBIKWIK.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MOBIKWIK.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs VHL.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, VHL.NS has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while VHL.NS trades at ₹3,223.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas VHL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VHL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to VHL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check VHL.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs VHL.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, VHL.BO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while VHL.BO trades at ₹3,218.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas VHL.BO's P/E ratio is 3.88. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VHL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to VHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check VHL.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs UGROCAP.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, UGROCAP.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while UGROCAP.NS trades at ₹88.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas UGROCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UGROCAP.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check UGROCAP.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs UGROCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, UGROCAP.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while UGROCAP.BO trades at ₹88.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas UGROCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UGROCAP.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to UGROCAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check UGROCAP.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs HEXATRADEX.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.BO has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while HEXATRADEX.BO trades at ₹160.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas HEXATRADEX.BO's P/E ratio is -97.35. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HEXATRADEX.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs HEXATRADEX.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, HEXATRADEX.NS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while HEXATRADEX.NS trades at ₹158.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas HEXATRADEX.NS's P/E ratio is -94.09. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HEXATRADEX.NS's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to HEXATRADEX.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check HEXATRADEX.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CIFL.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CIFL.NS has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CIFL.NS trades at ₹21.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CIFL.NS's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIFL.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to CIFL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CIFL.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CIFL.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CIFL.BO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CIFL.BO trades at ₹21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CIFL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.93. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIFL.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to CIFL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CIFL.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs FINKURVE.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, FINKURVE.BO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while FINKURVE.BO trades at ₹56.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FINKURVE.BO's P/E ratio is 31.94. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FINKURVE.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to FINKURVE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check FINKURVE.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs FINKURVE.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, FINKURVE.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while FINKURVE.NS trades at ₹56.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FINKURVE.NS's P/E ratio is 31.92. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FINKURVE.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to FINKURVE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check FINKURVE.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs FEDDERSHOL.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, FEDDERSHOL.BO has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while FEDDERSHOL.BO trades at ₹34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas FEDDERSHOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to FEDDERSHOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check FEDDERSHOL.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs IFINSEC.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, IFINSEC.BO has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while IFINSEC.BO trades at ₹183.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas IFINSEC.BO's P/E ratio is 24.59. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFINSEC.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to IFINSEC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check IFINSEC.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MANBA.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MANBA.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MANBA.NS trades at ₹102.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MANBA.NS's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANBA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to MANBA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MANBA.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CSLFINANCE.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.BO has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CSLFINANCE.BO trades at ₹244.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CSLFINANCE.BO's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSLFINANCE.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs CSLFINANCE.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, CSLFINANCE.NS has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while CSLFINANCE.NS trades at ₹244.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas CSLFINANCE.NS's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSLFINANCE.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to CSLFINANCE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check CSLFINANCE.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs NIYOGIN.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, NIYOGIN.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while NIYOGIN.BO trades at ₹42.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas NIYOGIN.BO's P/E ratio is -355.00. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NIYOGIN.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to NIYOGIN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check NIYOGIN.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs LAXMIINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, LAXMIINDIA.NS has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while LAXMIINDIA.NS trades at ₹79.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas LAXMIINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to LAXMIINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check LAXMIINDIA.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MANCREDIT.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MANCREDIT.NS has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MANCREDIT.NS trades at ₹171.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MANCREDIT.NS's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANCREDIT.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MANCREDIT.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MANCREDIT.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MANCREDIT.BO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MANCREDIT.BO trades at ₹172.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MANCREDIT.BO's P/E ratio is 27.95. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MANCREDIT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MANCREDIT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MANCREDIT.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs AFIL.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, AFIL.NS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while AFIL.NS trades at ₹7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas AFIL.NS's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFIL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to AFIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check AFIL.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MUTHOOTCAP.NS Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MUTHOOTCAP.NS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MUTHOOTCAP.NS trades at ₹181.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MUTHOOTCAP.NS's P/E ratio is 24.08. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUTHOOTCAP.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is less volatile compared to MUTHOOTCAP.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTCAP.NS's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MUTHOOTCAP.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MUTHOOTCAP.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MUTHOOTCAP.BO trades at ₹180.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MUTHOOTCAP.BO's P/E ratio is 23.99. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUTHOOTCAP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MUTHOOTCAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MUTHOOTCAP.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs BOMOXY-B1.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, BOMOXY-B1.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while BOMOXY-B1.BO trades at ₹19,625.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas BOMOXY-B1.BO's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOMOXY-B1.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to BOMOXY-B1.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check BOMOXY-B1.BO's competition here
NLFL.BO vs MKVENTURES.BO Comparison April 2026
NLFL.BO plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NLFL.BO stands at 250.9M. In comparison, MKVENTURES.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NLFL.BO is priced at ₹40.00, while MKVENTURES.BO trades at ₹819.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NLFL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 8.35, whereas MKVENTURES.BO's P/E ratio is 59.51. In terms of profitability, NLFL.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MKVENTURES.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NLFL.BO is more volatile compared to MKVENTURES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NLFL.BO.Check MKVENTURES.BO's competition here