NL Industries, Inc.

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 12.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while ALLE trades at $145.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check ALLE's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while MSA trades at $177.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check MSA's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while REZI trades at $33.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is -8.90. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to REZI's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check REZI's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, ADT has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while ADT trades at $6.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ADT's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ADT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is more volatile compared to ADT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check ADT's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while BCO trades at $107.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check BCO's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while BRC trades at $85.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 19.94. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is more volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check BRC's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while VVNT trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check VVNT's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while GEO trades at $14.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 8.00. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check GEO's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while NSSC trades at $42.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is more volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check NSSC's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while ARLO trades at $13.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is 97.14. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ARLO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check ARLO's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 892.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while EVLV trades at $5.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -14.60. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check EVLV's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 445.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while MG trades at $14.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 24.77. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check MG's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while CIX trades at $24.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 15.16. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is more volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check CIX's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 111.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while BAER trades at $2.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -4.76. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BAER's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check BAER's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while SNT trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 14.71. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check SNT's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while SUGP trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SUGP's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check SUGP's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while NXTD trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check NXTD's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while SPCB trades at $7.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check SPCB's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while KSCP trades at $3.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check KSCP's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 23.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while BAERW trades at $0.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BAERW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check BAERW's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 14M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while UUU trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -86.71. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check UUU's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while EVLVW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -0.66. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check EVLVW's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while GFAI trades at $0.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check GFAI's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while VRME trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -2.34. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check VRME's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while IVDAW trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is more volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check IVDAW's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while BKYI trades at $0.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check BKYI's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while CIGL trades at $1.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CIGL's ROE of -35.79%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check CIGL's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while GFAIW trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check GFAIW's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 839.2K. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while IVDA trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check IVDA's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 334.4K. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while LGMK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NL has daily volatility of 2.85 and LGMK has daily volatility of N/A.Check LGMK's competition here

NL plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NL stands at 290.3M. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 172.8K. Regarding current trading prices, NL is priced at $5.95, while VRMEW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NL currently has a P/E ratio of 29.71, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NL's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, NL is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NL.Check VRMEW's competition here