National Bank Holdings Corporation

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while USB-PA trades at $772.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 219.94. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check USB-PA's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while HDB trades at $24.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check HDB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while MFG trades at $9.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 14.73. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check MFG's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 92.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while IBN trades at $25.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 16.60. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check IBN's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 88.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while ITUB trades at $8.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check ITUB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while PNC trades at $218.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check PNC's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while LYG trades at $5.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 13.51. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check LYG's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while USB-PS trades at $17.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check USB-PS's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 62.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while DB trades at $32.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check DB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while TFC trades at $47.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check TFC's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while BSBR trades at $5.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.38. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check BSBR's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HBANZ has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while HBANZ trades at $20.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas HBANZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBANZ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to HBANZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check HBANZ's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while HBANL trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check HBANL's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 37.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while BBD trades at $3.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check BBD's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 37.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while KB trades at $104.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check KB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while HBANM trades at $22.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 28.35. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check HBANM's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 34.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FITB trades at $49.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 16.12. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FITB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 33.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while BBDO trades at $3.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 7.48. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check BBDO's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while MTB trades at $212.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check MTB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 30.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while SHG trades at $64.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 9.39. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check SHG's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 27.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while KEY-PL trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check KEY-PL's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CFG trades at $62.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CFG's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while TFC-PO trades at $20.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check TFC-PO's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while HBANP trades at $16.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 21.27. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check HBANP's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 25.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while HBAN trades at $15.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check HBAN's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 24.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while TFC-PI trades at $19.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.34. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check TFC-PI's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while RF trades at $27.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 11.21. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check RF's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FITBM has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FITBM trades at $25.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FITBM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FITBM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to FITBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FITBM's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while KEY trades at $21.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check KEY's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while TFC-PR trades at $18.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.06. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check TFC-PR's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 23.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FCNCA trades at $1,989.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FCNCA's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FCNCN has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FCNCN trades at $25.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FCNCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FCNCN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to FCNCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FCNCN's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while RF-PF trades at $25.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check RF-PF's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 21.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while KEY-PJ trades at $21.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check KEY-PJ's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while RF-PC trades at $24.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check RF-PC's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while KEY-PI trades at $25.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 10.21. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check KEY-PI's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while BCH trades at $37.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check BCH's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FHN-PC trades at $36.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 22.40. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FHN-PC's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while KEY-PK trades at $20.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 14.86. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check KEY-PK's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FITBI trades at $25.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.34. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FITBI's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FITBP trades at $23.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FITBP's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CIB trades at $66.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CIB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while WF trades at $62.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 7.62. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check WF's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CFG-PD's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BSAC has a market cap of 14.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while BSAC trades at $31.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BSAC's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSAC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to BSAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check BSAC's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while RF-PE trades at $16.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 6.79. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check RF-PE's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while VLYPN trades at $25.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check VLYPN's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FITBO trades at $18.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FITBO's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FHN-PB trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FHN-PB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CFG-PH trades at $25.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CFG-PH's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FHN-PE trades at $24.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FHN-PE's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while WBS trades at $72.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.90. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check WBS's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FHN trades at $24.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FHN's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CMA trades at $88.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 16.79. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CMA's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while WTFC trades at $149.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check WTFC's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while UMBF trades at $130.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check UMBF's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while BPOP trades at $149.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check BPOP's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while ONBPO trades at $24.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.87. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check ONBPO's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while ONBPP trades at $24.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check ONBPP's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while ONB trades at $23.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check ONB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while SSB trades at $93.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 10.12. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check SSB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while ZION trades at $61.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check ZION's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FHN-PD's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CFR trades at $139.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CFR's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FHN-PF trades at $17.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FHN-PF's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while WAL trades at $78.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check WAL's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CFG-PE trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 3.92. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CFG-PE's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while BOKF trades at $129.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 13.12. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check BOKF's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CADE trades at $42.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 15.20. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CADE's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CBSH trades at $52.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 12.82. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CBSH's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while PNFP trades at $97.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check PNFP's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while VLY trades at $13.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check VLY's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while BSMX trades at $5.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check BSMX's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while GGAL trades at $44.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 115.82. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check GGAL's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while COLB trades at $29.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 11.62. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check COLB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while PB trades at $69.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check PB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while SNV trades at $50.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 9.37. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check SNV's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CHYM has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CHYM trades at $18.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CHYM's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CHYM's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to CHYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CHYM's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CBC has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CBC trades at $28.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CBC's P/E ratio is 713.25. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CBC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to CBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CBC's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while SNV-PD trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.25. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check SNV-PD's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, CUBI-PE has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while CUBI-PE trades at $205.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas CUBI-PE's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUBI-PE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to CUBI-PE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check CUBI-PE's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FNB trades at $17.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.79. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FNB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while GBCI trades at $47.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check GBCI's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while UBSI trades at $43.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check UBSI's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while ABCB trades at $84.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check ABCB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while FLG trades at $13.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -64.71. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check FLG's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, IFS has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while IFS trades at $50.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas IFS's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IFS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to IFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check IFS's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while VLYPO trades at $25.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.52. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check VLYPO's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while VLYPP trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check VLYPP's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while HWC trades at $66.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 13.72. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check HWC's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while AUB trades at $37.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 16.09. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check AUB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while HOMB trades at $26.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 10.95. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check HOMB's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while OZK trades at $48.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.83. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check OZK's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while BXS trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check BXS's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AVAL has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while AVAL trades at $4.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas AVAL's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AVAL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to AVAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check AVAL's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while BMA trades at $78.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 24.24. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check BMA's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, NYCB-PA has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while NYCB-PA trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas NYCB-PA's P/E ratio is 17.46. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NYCB-PA's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to NYCB-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check NYCB-PA's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, AX has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while AX trades at $85.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas AX's P/E ratio is 10.47. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to AX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check AX's competition here

NBHC plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, NBHC stands at 1.6B. In comparison, ASB has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NBHC is priced at $41.92, while ASB trades at $28.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

NBHC currently has a P/E ratio of 15.64, whereas ASB's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, NBHC's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NBHC is less volatile compared to ASB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NBHC.Check ASB's competition here