Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (NAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAK | $1.60 | -4.76% | 899.3M | -18.18 | -$0.09 | N/A |
| BHP | $80.71 | -5.58% | 204.9B | 18.50 | $4.36 | +3.29% |
| RIO | $90.67 | -3.15% | 147.1B | 13.90 | $6.52 | +4.42% |
| VALE | $14.22 | -3.07% | 60.7B | 21.24 | $0.67 | +7.14% |
| TECK | $55.79 | -3.72% | 26.9B | 18.60 | $3.00 | +0.64% |
| MP | $45.46 | -8.09% | 8.1B | -413.45 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| MTRN | $242.90 | -3.23% | 5.1B | 43.54 | $5.58 | +0.23% |
| EMAT | $5.11 | -3.95% | 4.1B | -255.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SKE | $25.31 | -8.05% | 3.1B | -30.62 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| NEXA | $12.57 | -10.53% | 1.7B | 9.32 | $1.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
NAK vs BHP Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 204.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while BHP trades at $80.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check BHP's competition here
NAK vs RIO Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while RIO trades at $90.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check RIO's competition here
NAK vs VALE Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while VALE trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check VALE's competition here
NAK vs TECK Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while TECK trades at $55.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check TECK's competition here
NAK vs MP Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while MP trades at $45.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -413.45. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check MP's competition here
NAK vs MTRN Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while MTRN trades at $242.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 43.54. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check MTRN's competition here
NAK vs EMAT Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, EMAT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while EMAT trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas EMAT's P/E ratio is -255.50. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to EMAT's ROE of +37.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to EMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check EMAT's competition here
NAK vs SKE Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while SKE trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check SKE's competition here
NAK vs NEXA Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while NEXA trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to NEXA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check NEXA's competition here
NAK vs TMC Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while TMC trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -11.06. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to TMC's ROE of +65.43%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check TMC's competition here
NAK vs USAR Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while USAR trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -24.86. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to USAR's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check USAR's competition here
NAK vs STR-WT Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check STR-WT's competition here
NAK vs STR Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check STR's competition here
NAK vs CMP Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while CMP trades at $29.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is 58.72. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to CMP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check CMP's competition here
NAK vs SGML Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while SGML trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -26.38. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check SGML's competition here
NAK vs VZLA Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while VZLA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -61.60. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check VZLA's competition here
NAK vs USAS Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while USAS trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check USAS's competition here
NAK vs LAR Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while LAR trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -1845.71. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check LAR's competition here
NAK vs UAMY Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 789.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while UAMY trades at $5.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -90.92. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check UAMY's competition here
NAK vs IPX Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 780.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while IPX trades at $23.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -145.37. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check IPX's competition here
NAK vs LAC Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 655.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while LAC trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check LAC's competition here
NAK vs NB Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 636.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while NB trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to NB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check NB's competition here
NAK vs CRML Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 627M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while CRML trades at $6.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to CRML's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check CRML's competition here
NAK vs GSM Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 626M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while GSM trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check GSM's competition here
NAK vs TMQ Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while TMQ trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check TMQ's competition here
NAK vs CRMLW Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while CRMLW trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check CRMLW's competition here
NAK vs WRN Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 469.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while WRN trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -69.26. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check WRN's competition here
NAK vs EMX Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while EMX trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check EMX's competition here
NAK vs LAAC Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check LAAC's competition here
NAK vs SLI Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 441.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while SLI trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is -19.64. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check SLI's competition here
NAK vs PLM Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check PLM's competition here
NAK vs GRFX Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check GRFX's competition here
NAK vs TMCR Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, TMCR has a market cap of 328.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while TMCR trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas TMCR's P/E ratio is -16.56. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to TMCR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to TMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check TMCR's competition here
NAK vs LZM Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 294M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while LZM trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check LZM's competition here
NAK vs ABAT Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while ABAT trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check ABAT's competition here
NAK vs IONR Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while IONR trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -46.58. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check IONR's competition here
NAK vs NMG Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while NMG trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to NMG's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check NMG's competition here
NAK vs TII Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, TII has a market cap of 199.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while TII trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas TII's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to TII's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to TII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check TII's competition here
NAK vs PLL Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while PLL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check PLL's competition here
NAK vs NICM Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, NICM has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while NICM trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas NICM's P/E ratio is -474.60. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to NICM's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to NICM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check NICM's competition here
NAK vs USARW Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while USARW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to USARW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check USARW's competition here
NAK vs USGO Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while USGO trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -12.98. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to USGO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check USGO's competition here
NAK vs FURY Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while FURY trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to FURY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check FURY's competition here
NAK vs YDDL Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while YDDL trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check YDDL's competition here
NAK vs GRO Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 88.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while GRO trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check GRO's competition here
NAK vs NVA Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while NVA trades at $4.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check NVA's competition here
NAK vs AEC Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, AEC has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while AEC trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas AEC's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to AEC's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to AEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check AEC's competition here
NAK vs XPL Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while XPL trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -15.19. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check XPL's competition here
NAK vs ELBM Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while ELBM trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check ELBM's competition here
NAK vs LGO Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while LGO trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check LGO's competition here
NAK vs FEAM Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while FEAM trades at $1.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check FEAM's competition here
NAK vs BYU Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to BYU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check BYU's competition here
NAK vs GTI Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while GTI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GTI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check GTI's competition here
NAK vs GLG Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check GLG's competition here
NAK vs KMCM Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. NAK has daily volatility of 4.94 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
NAK vs BBL Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check BBL's competition here
NAK vs SMTS Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check SMTS's competition here
NAK vs IFFT Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check IFFT's competition here
NAK vs EXN Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check EXN's competition here
NAK vs VEDL Comparison July 2026
NAK plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, NAK stands at 899.3M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, NAK is priced at $1.60, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
NAK currently has a P/E ratio of -18.18, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, NAK's ROE is -0.99%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, NAK is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for NAK.Check VEDL's competition here