MP Materials Corp. (MP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MP | $45.51 | -7.99% | 8.1B | -413.45 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| BHP | $80.91 | -5.35% | 204.9B | 18.50 | $4.36 | +3.29% |
| RIO | $90.23 | -3.62% | 147.1B | 13.90 | $6.52 | +4.42% |
| VALE | $14.18 | -3.34% | 60.7B | 21.24 | $0.67 | +7.14% |
| TECK | $55.07 | -4.96% | 26.9B | 18.60 | $3.00 | +0.64% |
| MTRN | $244.06 | -2.76% | 5.1B | 43.54 | $5.58 | +0.23% |
| EMAT | $4.93 | -7.33% | 4.1B | -255.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SKE | $25.13 | -8.72% | 3.1B | -30.62 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| NEXA | $12.20 | -13.20% | 1.7B | 9.32 | $1.35 | N/A |
| TMC | $3.76 | -8.64% | 1.6B | -11.06 | -$0.34 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MP vs BHP Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 204.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while BHP trades at $80.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 18.50. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check BHP's competition here
MP vs RIO Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 147.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while RIO trades at $90.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check RIO's competition here
MP vs VALE Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while VALE trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check VALE's competition here
MP vs TECK Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while TECK trades at $55.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check TECK's competition here
MP vs MTRN Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while MTRN trades at $244.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 43.54. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check MTRN's competition here
MP vs EMAT Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, EMAT has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while EMAT trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas EMAT's P/E ratio is -255.50. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EMAT's ROE of +37.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to EMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check EMAT's competition here
MP vs SKE Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while SKE trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -30.62. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check SKE's competition here
MP vs NEXA Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while NEXA trades at $12.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is 9.32. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NEXA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check NEXA's competition here
MP vs TMC Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while TMC trades at $3.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -11.06. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMC's ROE of +65.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check TMC's competition here
MP vs USAR Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while USAR trades at $15.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -24.86. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USAR's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check USAR's competition here
MP vs STR-WT Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check STR-WT's competition here
MP vs STR Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check STR's competition here
MP vs CMP Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while CMP trades at $29.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is 58.72. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CMP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check CMP's competition here
MP vs SGML Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while SGML trades at $10.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -26.38. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check SGML's competition here
MP vs VZLA Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while VZLA trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -61.60. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check VZLA's competition here
MP vs USAS Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while USAS trades at $3.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -25.00. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check USAS's competition here
MP vs LAR Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while LAR trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -1845.71. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check LAR's competition here
MP vs NAK Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 899.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while NAK trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -18.18. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check NAK's competition here
MP vs UAMY Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 789.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while UAMY trades at $5.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -90.92. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check UAMY's competition here
MP vs IPX Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 780.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while IPX trades at $22.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -145.37. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check IPX's competition here
MP vs LAC Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 655.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while LAC trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check LAC's competition here
MP vs NB Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 636.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while NB trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check NB's competition here
MP vs CRML Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 627M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while CRML trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -12.17. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRML's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check CRML's competition here
MP vs GSM Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 626M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while GSM trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check GSM's competition here
MP vs TMQ Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while TMQ trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check TMQ's competition here
MP vs CRMLW Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 501.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while CRMLW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check CRMLW's competition here
MP vs WRN Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 469.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while WRN trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -69.26. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check WRN's competition here
MP vs EMX Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while EMX trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check EMX's competition here
MP vs LAAC Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check LAAC's competition here
MP vs SLI Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 441.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while SLI trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is -19.64. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check SLI's competition here
MP vs PLM Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check PLM's competition here
MP vs GRFX Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check GRFX's competition here
MP vs TMCR Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, TMCR has a market cap of 328.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while TMCR trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas TMCR's P/E ratio is -16.56. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TMCR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to TMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check TMCR's competition here
MP vs LZM Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 294M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while LZM trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -12.11. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check LZM's competition here
MP vs ABAT Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 254.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while ABAT trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -4.75. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check ABAT's competition here
MP vs IONR Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while IONR trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -46.58. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check IONR's competition here
MP vs NMG Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while NMG trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NMG's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check NMG's competition here
MP vs TII Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, TII has a market cap of 199.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while TII trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas TII's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to TII's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to TII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check TII's competition here
MP vs PLL Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while PLL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check PLL's competition here
MP vs NICM Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NICM has a market cap of 113.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while NICM trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas NICM's P/E ratio is -474.60. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NICM's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to NICM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check NICM's competition here
MP vs USARW Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while USARW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USARW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check USARW's competition here
MP vs USGO Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 105.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while USGO trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -12.98. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to USGO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check USGO's competition here
MP vs FURY Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 98.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while FURY trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -5.19. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FURY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check FURY's competition here
MP vs YDDL Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 90.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while YDDL trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check YDDL's competition here
MP vs GRO Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 88.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while GRO trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check GRO's competition here
MP vs NVA Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 80.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while NVA trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check NVA's competition here
MP vs AEC Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, AEC has a market cap of 79.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while AEC trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas AEC's P/E ratio is -10.90. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to AEC's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to AEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check AEC's competition here
MP vs XPL Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 70.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while XPL trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -15.19. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check XPL's competition here
MP vs ELBM Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 56.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while ELBM trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check ELBM's competition here
MP vs LGO Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while LGO trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check LGO's competition here
MP vs FEAM Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 27.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while FEAM trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check FEAM's competition here
MP vs BYU Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BYU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check BYU's competition here
MP vs GTI Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while GTI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GTI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check GTI's competition here
MP vs GLG Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check GLG's competition here
MP vs KMCM Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. MP has daily volatility of 5.96 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
MP vs IFFT Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check IFFT's competition here
MP vs VEDL Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check VEDL's competition here
MP vs EXN Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check EXN's competition here
MP vs BBL Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check BBL's competition here
MP vs SMTS Comparison July 2026
MP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MP stands at 8.1B. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MP is priced at $45.51, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MP currently has a P/E ratio of -413.45, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, MP's ROE is -0.03%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MP is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MP.Check SMTS's competition here