Critical Metals Corp. (CRML) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (CRML) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRML | $9.99 | +7.88% | 933.4M | -18.12 | -$0.55 | N/A |
| BHP | $81.02 | -0.17% | 206B | 18.60 | $4.36 | +3.28% |
| RIO | $93.74 | -1.44% | 152.2B | 14.37 | $6.52 | +4.24% |
| VALE | $15.07 | -0.33% | 64.3B | 22.51 | $0.67 | +6.72% |
| TECK | $58.22 | -1.32% | 28.1B | 19.42 | $3.00 | +0.61% |
| MP | $53.90 | -3.09% | 9.6B | -489.64 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| MTRN | $287.02 | +1.85% | 6B | 51.36 | $5.58 | +0.20% |
| EMAT | $7.06 | +2.77% | 5.6B | -353.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SKE | $26.90 | +3.38% | 3.3B | -32.56 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| USAR | $20.47 | -0.92% | 2B | -31.98 | -$0.64 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
CRML vs BHP Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 206B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while BHP trades at $81.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check BHP's competition here
CRML vs RIO Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 152.2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while RIO trades at $93.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check RIO's competition here
CRML vs VALE Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 64.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while VALE trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 22.51. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check VALE's competition here
CRML vs TECK Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while TECK trades at $58.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 19.42. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check TECK's competition here
CRML vs MP Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while MP trades at $53.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -489.64. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check MP's competition here
CRML vs MTRN Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while MTRN trades at $287.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 51.36. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check MTRN's competition here
CRML vs EMAT Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, EMAT has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while EMAT trades at $7.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas EMAT's P/E ratio is -353.00. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to EMAT's ROE of +37.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to EMAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check EMAT's competition here
CRML vs SKE Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while SKE trades at $26.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -32.56. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check SKE's competition here
CRML vs USAR Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while USAR trades at $20.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -31.98. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to USAR's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check USAR's competition here
CRML vs TMC Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while TMC trades at $4.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TMC's ROE of +65.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check TMC's competition here
CRML vs NEXA Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while NEXA trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NEXA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check NEXA's competition here
CRML vs TMCWW Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, TMCWW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while TMCWW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas TMCWW's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TMCWW's ROE of +65.43%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is less volatile compared to TMCWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check TMCWW's competition here
CRML vs STR-WT Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check STR-WT's competition here
CRML vs STR Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check STR's competition here
CRML vs USAS Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while USAS trades at $4.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -134.83. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check USAS's competition here
CRML vs CMP Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while CMP trades at $31.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is 62.20. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CMP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check CMP's competition here
CRML vs SGML Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while SGML trades at $11.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -30.03. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check SGML's competition here
CRML vs LAR Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while LAR trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -2225.71. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check LAR's competition here
CRML vs VZLA Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while VZLA trades at $3.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -65.80. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check VZLA's competition here
CRML vs NAK Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while NAK trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -21.47. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check NAK's competition here
CRML vs UAMY Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while UAMY trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -118.66. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check UAMY's competition here
CRML vs IPX Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 889.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while IPX trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -20.39. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check IPX's competition here
CRML vs LAC Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 846.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while LAC trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -8.39. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check LAC's competition here
CRML vs CRMLW Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 774.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while CRMLW trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is -29.39. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check CRMLW's competition here
CRML vs NB Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 662.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while NB trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -11.99. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check NB's competition here
CRML vs GSM Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 622.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while GSM trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -14.48. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check GSM's competition here
CRML vs TMQ Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 584.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while TMQ trades at $3.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -21.16. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check TMQ's competition here
CRML vs SLI Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 575.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while SLI trades at $2.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is -12.15. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check SLI's competition here
CRML vs WRN Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 497.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while WRN trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -73.43. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check WRN's competition here
CRML vs EMX Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while EMX trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check EMX's competition here
CRML vs LAAC Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check LAAC's competition here
CRML vs PLM Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check PLM's competition here
CRML vs GRFX Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check GRFX's competition here
CRML vs TMCR Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, TMCR has a market cap of 362.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while TMCR trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas TMCR's P/E ratio is -32.90. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TMCR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is less volatile compared to TMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check TMCR's competition here
CRML vs LZM Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 356M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while LZM trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check LZM's competition here
CRML vs ABAT Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 284.6M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while ABAT trades at $2.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check ABAT's competition here
CRML vs IONR Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 261.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while IONR trades at $4.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -52.07. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check IONR's competition here
CRML vs NMG Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 230.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while NMG trades at $1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -7.53. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NMG's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check NMG's competition here
CRML vs TII Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, TII has a market cap of 208.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while TII trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas TII's P/E ratio is -14.13. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to TII's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is less volatile compared to TII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check TII's competition here
CRML vs PLL Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while PLL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check PLL's competition here
CRML vs NICM Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, NICM has a market cap of 113.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while NICM trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas NICM's P/E ratio is -495.06. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to NICM's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to NICM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check NICM's competition here
CRML vs USGO Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 109.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while USGO trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -13.44. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check USGO's competition here
CRML vs USARW Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while USARW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to USARW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check USARW's competition here
CRML vs FURY Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while FURY trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FURY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check FURY's competition here
CRML vs GRO Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while GRO trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check GRO's competition here
CRML vs AEC Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, AEC has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while AEC trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas AEC's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to AEC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to AEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check AEC's competition here
CRML vs XPL Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 69.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while XPL trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -15.02. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check XPL's competition here
CRML vs ELBM Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 54.8M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while ELBM trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check ELBM's competition here
CRML vs LGO Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while LGO trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.28. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check LGO's competition here
CRML vs WWR Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while WWR trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -1.55. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check WWR's competition here
CRML vs FEAM Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while FEAM trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check FEAM's competition here
CRML vs BYU Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BYU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check BYU's competition here
CRML vs GTI Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while GTI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GTI's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check GTI's competition here
CRML vs GLG Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check GLG's competition here
CRML vs KMCM Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. CRML has daily volatility of 11.05 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
CRML vs SMTS Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check SMTS's competition here
CRML vs BBL Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check BBL's competition here
CRML vs IFFT Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check IFFT's competition here
CRML vs VEDL Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check VEDL's competition here
CRML vs EXN Comparison June 2026
CRML plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, CRML stands at 933.4M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, CRML is priced at $9.99, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
CRML currently has a P/E ratio of -18.12, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, CRML's ROE is -0.45%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, CRML is more volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for CRML.Check EXN's competition here