Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See GRO's competitors and their performance on the AMEX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for GRO and its AMEX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRO | $1.78 | +0.00% | 109M | -2.12 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| AMRO | $5.84 | +7.75% | 222.7B | -8441.87 | -$0.00 | N/A |
| BHP | $77.85 | +0.35% | 197.9B | 20.06 | $3.88 | +4.41% |
| RIO | $83.42 | -0.86% | 135.7B | 11.22 | $7.43 | +5.55% |
| VALE | $12.40 | +1.64% | 52.8B | 18.51 | $0.67 | +8.59% |
| MP | $38.30 | -0.67% | 6.8B | -348.27 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| MTRN | $221.06 | +0.89% | 4.6B | 36.10 | $6.11 | +0.26% |
| SKE | $28.02 | -2.51% | 3.5B | -18.77 | -$1.49 | N/A |
| ALM | $8.86 | +1.26% | 2.5B | 46.47 | $0.19 | N/A |
| NEXA | $11.48 | +2.87% | 1.5B | 6.11 | $1.88 | +1.15% |
Stock Comparison
Amaero Inc. CDI (NASDAQ: AMRO)
GRO vs AMRO Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, AMRO has a market cap of 222.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while AMRO trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas AMRO's P/E ratio is -8441.87. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AMRO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to AMRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check AMRO's competition here
BHP Group Limited (NYSE: BHP)
GRO vs BHP Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 197.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while BHP trades at $77.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check BHP's competition here
Rio Tinto Group (NYSE: RIO)
GRO vs RIO Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 135.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while RIO trades at $83.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check RIO's competition here
Vale S.A. (NYSE: VALE)
GRO vs VALE Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 52.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while VALE trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check VALE's competition here
MP Materials Corp. (NYSE: MP)
GRO vs MP Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while MP trades at $38.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -348.27. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check MP's competition here
Materion Corporation (NYSE: MTRN)
GRO vs MTRN Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while MTRN trades at $221.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 36.10. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check MTRN's competition here
Skeena Resources Limited (NYSE: SKE)
GRO vs SKE Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while SKE trades at $28.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -18.77. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SKE's competition here
Almonty Industries Inc. (NASDAQ: ALM)
GRO vs ALM Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while ALM trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is 46.47. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to ALM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check ALM's competition here
Nexa Resources S.A. (NYSE: NEXA)
GRO vs NEXA Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while NEXA trades at $11.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is 6.11. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NEXA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NEXA's competition here
Sitio Royalties Corp. (NYSE: STR-WT)
GRO vs STR-WT Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check STR-WT's competition here
Sitio Royalties Corp. (NYSE: STR)
GRO vs STR Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check STR's competition here
USA Rare Earth Inc (NASDAQ: USAR)
GRO vs USAR Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while USAR trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -14.58. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to USAR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USAR's competition here
Vizsla Silver Corp. (AMEX: VZLA)
GRO vs VZLA Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while VZLA trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -61.50. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check VZLA's competition here
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (AMEX: USAS)
GRO vs USAS Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while USAS trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -20.47. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USAS's competition here
IMC Rare Earths Ltd (AMEX: IMC)
GRO vs IMC Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, IMC has a market cap of 940.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while IMC trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas IMC's P/E ratio is -296.50. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to IMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check IMC's competition here
Critical Metals Corp. (NASDAQ: CRML)
GRO vs CRML Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 934.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while CRML trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CRML's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check CRML's competition here
Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. Common Stock (NASDAQ: EMAT)
GRO vs EMAT Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, EMAT has a market cap of 896.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while EMAT trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas EMAT's P/E ratio is -3.18. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EMAT's ROE of +32.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to EMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check EMAT's competition here
Compass Minerals International, Inc. (NYSE: CMP)
GRO vs CMP Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 892.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while CMP trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is 28.34. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check CMP's competition here
Sigma Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ: SGML)
GRO vs SGML Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 881.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while SGML trades at $7.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -32.62. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SGML's competition here
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM)
GRO vs GSM Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 745.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while GSM trades at $3.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -17.35. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GSM's competition here
Lithium Argentina AG (NYSE: LAR)
GRO vs LAR Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 696.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while LAR trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -12.73. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LAR's competition here
Lithium Americas Corp. (NYSE: LAC)
GRO vs LAC Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 463.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while LAC trades at $2.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LAC's competition here
United States Antimony Corporation (NYSE: UAMY)
GRO vs UAMY Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 457.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while UAMY trades at $3.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -23.65. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check UAMY's competition here
EMX Royalty Corporation (AMEX: EMX)
GRO vs EMX Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while EMX trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EMX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check EMX's competition here
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (AMEX: NAK)
GRO vs NAK Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 446.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while NAK trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NAK's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NAK's competition here
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. (NYSE: LAAC)
GRO vs LAAC Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LAAC's competition here
Critical Metals Corp. (NASDAQ: CRMLW)
GRO vs CRMLW Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 431.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while CRMLW trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is -1.01. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check CRMLW's competition here
NioCorp Developments Ltd. (NASDAQ: NB)
GRO vs NB Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 430.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while NB trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NB's competition here
PolyMet Mining Corp. (AMEX: PLM)
GRO vs PLM Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check PLM's competition here
Graphex Group Limited (AMEX: GRFX)
GRO vs GRFX Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GRFX's competition here
Western Copper and Gold Corporation (AMEX: WRN)
GRO vs WRN Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 382.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while WRN trades at $1.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -56.28. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check WRN's competition here
Trilogy Metals Inc. (AMEX: TMQ)
GRO vs TMQ Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while TMQ trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TMQ's competition here
Standard Lithium Ltd. (AMEX: SLI)
GRO vs SLI Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 354.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while SLI trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is -13.26. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SLI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SLI's competition here
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc (NYSE: NMG)
GRO vs NMG Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 310.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while NMG trades at $0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NMG's competition here
Titan Mining Corporation (AMEX: TII)
GRO vs TII Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, TII has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while TII trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas TII's P/E ratio is -19.36. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TII's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to TII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TII's competition here
ioneer Ltd (NASDAQ: IONR)
GRO vs IONR Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 159.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while IONR trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -31.84. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check IONR's competition here
Piedmont Lithium Inc. (NASDAQ: PLL)
GRO vs PLL Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while PLL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check PLL's competition here
The Metals Royalty Company Inc. (NASDAQ: TMCR)
GRO vs TMCR Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, TMCR has a market cap of 133.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while TMCR trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas TMCR's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TMCR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to TMCR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TMCR's competition here
USA Rare Earth Inc (NASDAQ: USARW)
GRO vs USARW Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while USARW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to USARW's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USARW's competition here
Nicola Mining Inc. American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: NICM)
GRO vs NICM Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, NICM has a market cap of 89.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while NICM trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas NICM's P/E ratio is -376.19. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NICM's ROE of -113.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to NICM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NICM's competition here
U.S. GoldMining Inc. (NASDAQ: USGO)
GRO vs USGO Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 63.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while USGO trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to USGO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USGO's competition here
Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ: ATLX)
GRO vs ATLX Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while ATLX trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check ATLX's competition here
Westwater Resources, Inc. (AMEX: WWR)
GRO vs WWR Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 53.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while WWR trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to WWR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check WWR's competition here
Electra Battery Materials Corporation (NASDAQ: ELBM)
GRO vs ELBM Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 47.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while ELBM trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check ELBM's competition here
Solitario Zinc Corp. (AMEX: XPL)
GRO vs XPL Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while XPL trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -8.12. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check XPL's competition here
Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. (NASDAQ: OMEX)
GRO vs OMEX Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while OMEX trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check OMEX's competition here
Largo Inc. (NASDAQ: LGO)
GRO vs LGO Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while LGO trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to LGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LGO's competition here
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc. (NASDAQ: FNUC)
GRO vs FNUC Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 23M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while FNUC trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check FNUC's competition here
Tactical Resources Corp. (NASDAQ: TREO)
GRO vs TREO Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, TREO has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while TREO trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas TREO's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TREO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to TREO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TREO's competition here
BAIYU Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BYU)
GRO vs BYU Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BYU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check BYU's competition here
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. (NASDAQ: FMST)
GRO vs FMST Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while FMST trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -1.25. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check FMST's competition here
Graphjet Technology (NASDAQ: GTI)
GRO vs GTI Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while GTI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GTI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GTI's competition here
China Natural Resources, Inc. (NASDAQ: CHNR)
GRO vs CHNR Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, CHNR has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while CHNR trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CHNR's P/E ratio is -30.77. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHNR's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to CHNR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check CHNR's competition here
Chilwa Minerals Limited (NASDAQ: CHWM)
GRO vs CHWM Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, CHWM has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while CHWM trades at $5.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas CHWM's P/E ratio is -106.17. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CHWM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to CHWM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check CHWM's competition here
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. (NASDAQ: FMSTW)
GRO vs FMSTW Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while FMSTW trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check FMSTW's competition here
TD Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLG)
GRO vs GLG Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GLG's competition here
Key Mining Corp. (AMEX: KMCM)
GRO vs KMCM Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is not fully comparable compared to KMCM. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check KMCM's competition here
BHP Group Limited (NYSE: BBL)
GRO vs BBL Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check BBL's competition here
Excellon Resources Inc. (AMEX: EXN)
GRO vs EXN Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check EXN's competition here
Vedanta Limited (NYSE: VEDL)
GRO vs VEDL Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check VEDL's competition here
Sierra Metals Inc. (AMEX: SMTS)
GRO vs SMTS Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SMTS's competition here
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (NYSE: IFFT)
GRO vs IFFT Comparison October 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 109M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $1.78 on the AMEX, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.12, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.15%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check IFFT's competition here