Brazil Potash Corp. (GRO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GRO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRO | $2.21 | -1.78% | 90.1M | -1.98 | -$1.13 | N/A |
| BHP | $81.37 | -3.53% | 217.1B | 19.60 | $4.36 | +3.11% |
| RIO | $90.49 | -3.00% | 152B | 14.36 | $6.52 | +4.30% |
| VALE | $14.23 | -2.47% | 62.6B | 21.90 | $0.67 | +6.92% |
| TECK | $56.18 | -6.52% | 27.9B | 19.31 | $3.00 | +0.62% |
| MP | $44.54 | -12.32% | 8.8B | -449.82 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| MTRN | $240.14 | -5.18% | 5.2B | 45.06 | $5.58 | +0.22% |
| EMAT | $5.11 | -7.04% | 4.2B | -266.00 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SKE | $25.12 | -6.79% | 3.4B | -33.29 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| NEXA | $12.69 | -12.60% | 1.9B | 10.41 | $1.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GRO vs BHP Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 217.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while BHP trades at $81.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 19.60. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check BHP's competition here
GRO vs RIO Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 152B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while RIO trades at $90.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check RIO's competition here
GRO vs VALE Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 62.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while VALE trades at $14.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check VALE's competition here
GRO vs TECK Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while TECK trades at $56.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 19.31. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TECK's competition here
GRO vs MP Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while MP trades at $44.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -449.82. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check MP's competition here
GRO vs MTRN Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while MTRN trades at $240.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 45.06. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check MTRN's competition here
GRO vs EMAT Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, EMAT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while EMAT trades at $5.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas EMAT's P/E ratio is -266.00. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EMAT's ROE of +37.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to EMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check EMAT's competition here
GRO vs SKE Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while SKE trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -33.29. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SKE's competition here
GRO vs NEXA Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while NEXA trades at $12.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NEXA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NEXA's competition here
GRO vs TMC Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while TMC trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -12.09. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TMC's ROE of +65.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TMC's competition here
GRO vs USAR Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while USAR trades at $15.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -27.05. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to USAR's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USAR's competition here
GRO vs STR-WT Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check STR-WT's competition here
GRO vs STR Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check STR's competition here
GRO vs CMP Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while CMP trades at $29.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is 60.04. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CMP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check CMP's competition here
GRO vs SGML Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while SGML trades at $10.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -28.95. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SGML's competition here
GRO vs LAR Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while LAR trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -2051.43. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LAR's competition here
GRO vs USAS Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while USAS trades at $3.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -26.70. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USAS's competition here
GRO vs VZLA Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while VZLA trades at $3.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -64.20. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check VZLA's competition here
GRO vs NAK Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 946.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while NAK trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -19.15. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NAK's competition here
GRO vs UAMY Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 876.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while UAMY trades at $5.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -100.99. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check UAMY's competition here
GRO vs IPX Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 827.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while IPX trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -154.19. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check IPX's competition here
GRO vs CRML Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 698M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while CRML trades at $6.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -13.55. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CRML's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check CRML's competition here
GRO vs LAC Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 696.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while LAC trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -6.91. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LAC's competition here
GRO vs NB Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 691.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while NB trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NB's competition here
GRO vs GSM Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 627.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while GSM trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -14.61. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GSM's competition here
GRO vs CRMLW Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 572.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while CRMLW trades at $2.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is -21.74. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check CRMLW's competition here
GRO vs TMQ Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 544.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while TMQ trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -17.50. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TMQ's competition here
GRO vs WRN Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 491.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while WRN trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -72.59. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check WRN's competition here
GRO vs SLI Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 466.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while SLI trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is -20.77. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SLI's competition here
GRO vs EMX Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while EMX trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check EMX's competition here
GRO vs LAAC Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LAAC's competition here
GRO vs PLM Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check PLM's competition here
GRO vs GRFX Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GRFX's competition here
GRO vs TMCR Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, TMCR has a market cap of 353M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while TMCR trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas TMCR's P/E ratio is -17.78. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TMCR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to TMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TMCR's competition here
GRO vs LZM Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 310.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while LZM trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -12.78. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LZM's competition here
GRO vs ABAT Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 267.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while ABAT trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check ABAT's competition here
GRO vs NMG Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 239.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while NMG trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -7.84. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NMG's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NMG's competition here
GRO vs IONR Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while IONR trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -46.95. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check IONR's competition here
GRO vs TII Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, TII has a market cap of 215.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while TII trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas TII's P/E ratio is -14.63. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TII's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to TII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TII's competition here
GRO vs PLL Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while PLL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check PLL's competition here
GRO vs NICM Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, NICM has a market cap of 113.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while NICM trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas NICM's P/E ratio is -475.40. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NICM's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NICM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NICM's competition here
GRO vs USARW Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while USARW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to USARW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USARW's competition here
GRO vs USGO Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 104.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while USGO trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -12.87. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to USGO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USGO's competition here
GRO vs FURY Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 100.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while FURY trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -5.30. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FURY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check FURY's competition here
GRO vs YDDL Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 87.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while YDDL trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 8.68. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check YDDL's competition here
GRO vs NVA Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 85M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while NVA trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NVA's competition here
GRO vs AEC Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, AEC has a market cap of 80.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while AEC trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas AEC's P/E ratio is -11.07. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to AEC's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to AEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check AEC's competition here
GRO vs XPL Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 72.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while XPL trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -15.60. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check XPL's competition here
GRO vs ELBM Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 60.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while ELBM trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.49. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check ELBM's competition here
GRO vs LGO Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while LGO trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LGO's competition here
GRO vs FEAM Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, FEAM has a market cap of 29.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while FEAM trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas FEAM's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FEAM's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to FEAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check FEAM's competition here
GRO vs BYU Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BYU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check BYU's competition here
GRO vs GTI Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while GTI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GTI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GTI's competition here
GRO vs GLG Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GLG's competition here
GRO vs KMCM Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. GRO has daily volatility of 2.71 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
GRO vs VEDL Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check VEDL's competition here
GRO vs EXN Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check EXN's competition here
GRO vs SMTS Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SMTS's competition here
GRO vs IFFT Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check IFFT's competition here
GRO vs BBL Comparison July 2026
GRO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 90.1M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.21, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.98, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check BBL's competition here