Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See GRO's competitors and their performance on the AMEX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for GRO and its AMEX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRO | $2.18 | +2.35% | 87.5M | -1.92 | -$1.13 | N/A |
| BHP | $90.41 | +2.86% | 229.7B | 20.74 | $4.36 | +2.94% |
| RIO | $101.10 | +1.46% | 164.3B | 15.51 | $6.52 | +3.68% |
| TECK | $66.47 | +0.53% | 32.1B | 22.16 | $3.00 | +0.54% |
| MP | $51.11 | +7.62% | 9.1B | -464.45 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| MTRN | $290.05 | +4.24% | 6B | 47.40 | $6.11 | +0.19% |
| SKE | $32.54 | +5.44% | 4B | -39.34 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| ALM | $14.18 | +5.66% | 4B | -141.80 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| USAR | $19.33 | +11.03% | 2.6B | -30.20 | -$0.64 | N/A |
| NEXA | $14.10 | -1.40% | 1.9B | 7.50 | $1.88 | +0.93% |
Stock Comparison
BHP Group Limited (NYSE: BHP)
GRO vs BHP Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 229.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while BHP trades at $90.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check BHP's competition here
Rio Tinto Group (NYSE: RIO)
GRO vs RIO Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 164.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while RIO trades at $101.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check RIO's competition here
Teck Resources Limited (NYSE: TECK)
GRO vs TECK Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while TECK trades at $66.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TECK's competition here
MP Materials Corp. (NYSE: MP)
GRO vs MP Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while MP trades at $51.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -464.45. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check MP's competition here
Materion Corporation (NYSE: MTRN)
GRO vs MTRN Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while MTRN trades at $290.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check MTRN's competition here
Skeena Resources Limited (NYSE: SKE)
GRO vs SKE Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while SKE trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -39.34. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SKE's competition here
Almonty Industries Inc. (NASDAQ: ALM)
GRO vs ALM Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while ALM trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -141.80. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ALM's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check ALM's competition here
USA Rare Earth Inc (NASDAQ: USAR)
GRO vs USAR Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while USAR trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to USAR's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USAR's competition here
Nexa Resources S.A. (NYSE: NEXA)
GRO vs NEXA Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while NEXA trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NEXA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NEXA's competition here
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (AMEX: USAS)
GRO vs USAS Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while USAS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -33.53. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USAS's competition here
Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. Common Stock (NASDAQ: EMAT)
GRO vs EMAT Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, EMAT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while EMAT trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas EMAT's P/E ratio is -140.50. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EMAT's ROE of +37.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to EMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check EMAT's competition here
Sitio Royalties Corp. (NYSE: STR-WT)
GRO vs STR-WT Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check STR-WT's competition here
Sitio Royalties Corp. (NYSE: STR)
GRO vs STR Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check STR's competition here
Vizsla Silver Corp. (AMEX: VZLA)
GRO vs VZLA Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while VZLA trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -74.70. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check VZLA's competition here
Sigma Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ: SGML)
GRO vs SGML Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while SGML trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -29.18. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SGML's competition here
Compass Minerals International, Inc. (NYSE: CMP)
GRO vs CMP Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while CMP trades at $27.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to CMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check CMP's competition here
Lithium Argentina AG (NYSE: LAR)
GRO vs LAR Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while LAR trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -1985.71. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LAR's competition here
United States Antimony Corporation (NYSE: UAMY)
GRO vs UAMY Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while UAMY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -116.78. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check UAMY's competition here
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (AMEX: NAK)
GRO vs NAK Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 952.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while NAK trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -19.26. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NAK's competition here
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM)
GRO vs GSM Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 845.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while GSM trades at $4.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -19.52. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to GSM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GSM's competition here
IperionX Limited (NASDAQ: IPX)
GRO vs IPX Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 842M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while IPX trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -156.81. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to IPX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check IPX's competition here
NioCorp Developments Ltd. (NASDAQ: NB)
GRO vs NB Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 780.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while NB trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -14.11. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NB's competition here
IMC Rare Earths Ltd (AMEX: IMC)
GRO vs IMC Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, IMC has a market cap of 753.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while IMC trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas IMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to IMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check IMC's competition here
Lithium Americas Corp. (NYSE: LAC)
GRO vs LAC Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 719M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while LAC trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LAC's competition here
Critical Metals Corp. (NASDAQ: CRML)
GRO vs CRML Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 677.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while CRML trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to CRML's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check CRML's competition here
Trilogy Metals Inc. (AMEX: TMQ)
GRO vs TMQ Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 657.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while TMQ trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -21.14. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TMQ's competition here
Standard Lithium Ltd. (AMEX: SLI)
GRO vs SLI Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 582.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while SLI trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is -22.09. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SLI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SLI's competition here
Western Copper and Gold Corporation (AMEX: WRN)
GRO vs WRN Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 542.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while WRN trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -80.09. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check WRN's competition here
Versamet Royalties Corporation Common Stock (NASDAQ: VMET)
GRO vs VMET Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, VMET has a market cap of 521.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while VMET trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas VMET's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VMET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to VMET. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check VMET's competition here
EMX Royalty Corporation (AMEX: EMX)
GRO vs EMX Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while EMX trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check EMX's competition here
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. (NYSE: LAAC)
GRO vs LAAC Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check LAAC's competition here
PolyMet Mining Corp. (AMEX: PLM)
GRO vs PLM Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check PLM's competition here
Graphex Group Limited (AMEX: GRFX)
GRO vs GRFX Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GRFX's competition here
The Metals Royalty Company Inc. (NASDAQ: TMCR)
GRO vs TMCR Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, TMCR has a market cap of 366.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while TMCR trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas TMCR's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TMCR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to TMCR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TMCR's competition here
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (NASDAQ: ABAT)
GRO vs ABAT Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 356M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while ABAT trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check ABAT's competition here
Tredegar Corporation (NYSE: TG)
GRO vs TG Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while TG trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas TG's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to TG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TG's competition here
Titan Mining Corporation (AMEX: TII)
GRO vs TII Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, TII has a market cap of 235.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while TII trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas TII's P/E ratio is -15.97. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to TII's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to TII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check TII's competition here
ioneer Ltd (NASDAQ: IONR)
GRO vs IONR Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 219.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while IONR trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -43.71. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check IONR's competition here
Piedmont Lithium Inc. (NASDAQ: PLL)
GRO vs PLL Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while PLL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check PLL's competition here
Nicola Mining Inc. American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: NICM)
GRO vs NICM Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, NICM has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while NICM trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas NICM's P/E ratio is -495.24. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NICM's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NICM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NICM's competition here
U.S. GoldMining Inc. (NASDAQ: USGO)
GRO vs USGO Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while USGO trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -14.16. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to USGO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to USGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USGO's competition here
Fury Gold Mines Limited (AMEX: FURY)
GRO vs FURY Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 113.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while FURY trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to FURY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check FURY's competition here
USA Rare Earth Inc (NASDAQ: USARW)
GRO vs USARW Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while USARW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to USARW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check USARW's competition here
Nova Minerals Corp (AMEX: NVA)
GRO vs NVA Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while NVA trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to NVA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check NVA's competition here
Westwater Resources, Inc. (AMEX: WWR)
GRO vs WWR Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while WWR trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check WWR's competition here
One and one Green Technologies. Inc (NASDAQ: YDDL)
GRO vs YDDL Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while YDDL trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check YDDL's competition here
Solitario Zinc Corp. (AMEX: XPL)
GRO vs XPL Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while XPL trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to XPL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check XPL's competition here
Electra Battery Materials Corporation (NASDAQ: ELBM)
GRO vs ELBM Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while ELBM trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check ELBM's competition here
BAIYU Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BYU)
GRO vs BYU Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BYU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check BYU's competition here
Graphjet Technology (NASDAQ: GTI)
GRO vs GTI Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while GTI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GTI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GTI's competition here
TD Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLG)
GRO vs GLG Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check GLG's competition here
Key Mining Corp. (AMEX: KMCM)
GRO vs KMCM Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is not fully comparable compared to KMCM. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check KMCM's competition here
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (NYSE: IFFT)
GRO vs IFFT Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check IFFT's competition here
BHP Group Limited (NYSE: BBL)
GRO vs BBL Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check BBL's competition here
Vedanta Limited (NYSE: VEDL)
GRO vs VEDL Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check VEDL's competition here
Excellon Resources Inc. (AMEX: EXN)
GRO vs EXN Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check EXN's competition here
Sierra Metals Inc. (AMEX: SMTS)
GRO vs SMTS Comparison August 2026
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the AMEX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GRO stands at 87.5M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GRO is priced at $2.18 on the AMEX, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GRO currently has a P/E ratio of -1.92, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GRO's ROE is -0.31%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GRO is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GRO.Check SMTS's competition here