BHP Group Limited (BHP) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (BHP) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP | $80.64 | -0.09% | 204.9B | 18.50 | $4.36 | +3.29% |
| RIO | $90.15 | -0.57% | 146.4B | 13.83 | $6.52 | +4.46% |
| VALE | $14.19 | -0.21% | 60.5B | 21.19 | $0.67 | +7.17% |
| TECK | $55.05 | -1.33% | 26.5B | 18.35 | $3.00 | +0.66% |
| MP | $45.24 | -0.48% | 8.1B | -411.32 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| MTRN | $245.12 | +0.91% | 5.1B | 43.93 | $5.58 | +0.23% |
| EMAT | $4.99 | -2.35% | 4B | -249.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| SKE | $25.18 | -0.51% | 3.1B | -30.45 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| TMC | $3.74 | -0.53% | 1.6B | -11.00 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| NEXA | $12.19 | -3.02% | 1.6B | 9.04 | $1.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
BHP vs RIO Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 146.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while RIO trades at $90.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 13.83. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check RIO's competition here
BHP vs VALE Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 60.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while VALE trades at $14.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check VALE's competition here
BHP vs TECK Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 26.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while TECK trades at $55.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to TECK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check TECK's competition here
BHP vs MP Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while MP trades at $45.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -411.32. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check MP's competition here
BHP vs MTRN Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while MTRN trades at $245.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check MTRN's competition here
BHP vs EMAT Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, EMAT has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while EMAT trades at $4.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas EMAT's P/E ratio is -249.50. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EMAT's ROE of +37.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to EMAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check EMAT's competition here
BHP vs SKE Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while SKE trades at $25.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -30.45. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check SKE's competition here
BHP vs TMC Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, TMC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while TMC trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas TMC's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TMC's ROE of +65.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to TMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check TMC's competition here
BHP vs NEXA Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while NEXA trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEXA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check NEXA's competition here
BHP vs USAR Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while USAR trades at $15.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -24.45. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USAR's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check USAR's competition here
BHP vs STR-WT Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check STR-WT's competition here
BHP vs STR Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check STR's competition here
BHP vs CMP Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while CMP trades at $29.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is 58.90. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CMP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to CMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check CMP's competition here
BHP vs SGML Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while SGML trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -26.31. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check SGML's competition here
BHP vs USAS Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while USAS trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -25.23. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check USAS's competition here
BHP vs VZLA Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while VZLA trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -61.30. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check VZLA's competition here
BHP vs LAR Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while LAR trades at $6.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -1818.57. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check LAR's competition here
BHP vs NAK Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 916.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while NAK trades at $1.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -18.52. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check NAK's competition here
BHP vs UAMY Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 808.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while UAMY trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -93.14. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check UAMY's competition here
BHP vs IPX Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 780.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while IPX trades at $22.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -145.37. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to IPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check IPX's competition here
BHP vs LAC Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 660.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while LAC trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -6.55. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check LAC's competition here
BHP vs GSM Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, GSM has a market cap of 626M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while GSM trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GSM's P/E ratio is -14.57. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GSM's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to GSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check GSM's competition here
BHP vs NB Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 620.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while NB trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -11.21. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check NB's competition here
BHP vs CRML Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 598M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while CRML trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -11.61. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRML's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check CRML's competition here
BHP vs TMQ Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 513.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while TMQ trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -16.53. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check TMQ's competition here
BHP vs WRN Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 480.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while WRN trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -70.93. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check WRN's competition here
BHP vs CRMLW Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 461.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while CRMLW trades at $1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is -17.52. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check CRMLW's competition here
BHP vs SLI Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 459.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while SLI trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is -20.45. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check SLI's competition here
BHP vs EMX Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while EMX trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check EMX's competition here
BHP vs LAAC Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check LAAC's competition here
BHP vs PLM Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check PLM's competition here
BHP vs GRFX Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check GRFX's competition here
BHP vs TMCR Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, TMCR has a market cap of 322.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while TMCR trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas TMCR's P/E ratio is -16.25. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TMCR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to TMCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check TMCR's competition here
BHP vs LZM Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, LZM has a market cap of 285.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while LZM trades at $3.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas LZM's P/E ratio is -11.78. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LZM's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LZM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check LZM's competition here
BHP vs ABAT Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while ABAT trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -4.63. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check ABAT's competition here
BHP vs IONR Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 233.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while IONR trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -46.58. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check IONR's competition here
BHP vs NMG Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 228.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while NMG trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -7.47. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NMG's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to NMG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check NMG's competition here
BHP vs TII Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, TII has a market cap of 202.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while TII trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas TII's P/E ratio is -13.73. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TII's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to TII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check TII's competition here
BHP vs PLL Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while PLL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check PLL's competition here
BHP vs NICM Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, NICM has a market cap of 114.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while NICM trades at $6.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas NICM's P/E ratio is -480.95. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NICM's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to NICM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check NICM's competition here
BHP vs USGO Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while USGO trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USGO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to USGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check USGO's competition here
BHP vs USARW Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while USARW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USARW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check USARW's competition here
BHP vs FURY Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 101.7M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while FURY trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -5.35. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FURY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to FURY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check FURY's competition here
BHP vs GRO Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 86.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while GRO trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check GRO's competition here
BHP vs AEC Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, AEC has a market cap of 78.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while AEC trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas AEC's P/E ratio is -10.81. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AEC's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to AEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check AEC's competition here
BHP vs NVA Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 74.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while NVA trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to NVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check NVA's competition here
BHP vs XPL Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 69.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while XPL trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -14.99. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to XPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check XPL's competition here
BHP vs ELBM Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 52.8M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while ELBM trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check ELBM's competition here
BHP vs LGO Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 46.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while LGO trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check LGO's competition here
BHP vs BYU Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BYU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check BYU's competition here
BHP vs GTI Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while GTI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GTI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check GTI's competition here
BHP vs GLG Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check GLG's competition here
BHP vs KMCM Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. BHP has daily volatility of 3.13 and KMCM has daily volatility of N/A.Check KMCM's competition here
BHP vs SMTS Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check SMTS's competition here
BHP vs IFFT Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check IFFT's competition here
BHP vs VEDL Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check VEDL's competition here
BHP vs BBL Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check BBL's competition here
BHP vs EXN Comparison July 2026
BHP plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BHP stands at 204.9B. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, BHP is priced at $80.64, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BHP currently has a P/E ratio of 18.50, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, BHP's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BHP is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BHP.Check EXN's competition here