Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See GSM's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for GSM and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSM | $4.24 | -1.97% | 789.1M | -18.22 | -$0.23 | +1.42% |
| BHP | $86.74 | +1.78% | 215.5B | 21.85 | $3.88 | +4.07% |
| RIO | $94.78 | +1.74% | 151.8B | 12.56 | $7.43 | +4.99% |
| VALE | $13.62 | +0.07% | 57.3B | 20.05 | $0.67 | +7.91% |
| MP | $46.14 | -0.37% | 8.2B | -419.64 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| MTRN | $280.45 | -3.53% | 5.8B | 45.40 | $6.11 | +0.21% |
| SKE | $32.59 | +6.96% | 3.9B | -21.06 | -$1.49 | N/A |
| ALM | $11.87 | -1.90% | 3.3B | -115.70 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| USAR | $12.56 | -5.06% | 1.7B | -19.73 | -$0.64 | N/A |
| NEXA | $13.20 | +4.76% | 1.7B | 6.66 | $1.88 | +1.06% |
Stock Comparison
BHP Group Limited (NYSE: BHP)
GSM vs BHP Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 215.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while BHP trades at $86.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 21.85. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is similarly volatile compared to BHP. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BHP's competition here
Rio Tinto Group (NYSE: RIO)
GSM vs RIO Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 151.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while RIO trades at $94.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 12.56. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check RIO's competition here
Vale S.A. (NYSE: VALE)
GSM vs VALE Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, VALE has a market cap of 57.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while VALE trades at $13.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas VALE's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VALE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to VALE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VALE's competition here
MP Materials Corp. (NYSE: MP)
GSM vs MP Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while MP trades at $46.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -419.64. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to MP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check MP's competition here
Materion Corporation (NYSE: MTRN)
GSM vs MTRN Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while MTRN trades at $280.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 45.40. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check MTRN's competition here
Skeena Resources Limited (NYSE: SKE)
GSM vs SKE Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while SKE trades at $32.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -21.06. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to SKE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SKE's competition here
Almonty Industries Inc. (NASDAQ: ALM)
GSM vs ALM Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while ALM trades at $11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -115.70. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ALM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to ALM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check ALM's competition here
USA Rare Earth Inc (NASDAQ: USAR)
GSM vs USAR Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while USAR trades at $12.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -19.73. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USAR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USAR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USAR's competition here
Nexa Resources S.A. (NYSE: NEXA)
GSM vs NEXA Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while NEXA trades at $13.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is 6.66. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NEXA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NEXA's competition here
Sitio Royalties Corp. (NYSE: STR-WT)
GSM vs STR-WT Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check STR-WT's competition here
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (AMEX: USAS)
GSM vs USAS Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while USAS trades at $4.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -28.17. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USAS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USAS's competition here
Sitio Royalties Corp. (NYSE: STR)
GSM vs STR Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to STR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check STR's competition here
Vizsla Silver Corp. (AMEX: VZLA)
GSM vs VZLA Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while VZLA trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -69.60. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VZLA's competition here
Sigma Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ: SGML)
GSM vs SGML Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while SGML trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -39.83. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to SGML. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SGML's competition here
Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. Common Stock (NASDAQ: EMAT)
GSM vs EMAT Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, EMAT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while EMAT trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas EMAT's P/E ratio is -3.78. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EMAT's ROE of +32.78%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to EMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check EMAT's competition here
Critical Metals Corp. (NASDAQ: CRML)
GSM vs CRML Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while CRML trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -3.66. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRML's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to CRML. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CRML's competition here
Compass Minerals International, Inc. (NYSE: CMP)
GSM vs CMP Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 968M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while CMP trades at $22.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is 30.76. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to CMP. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CMP's competition here
Lithium Argentina AG (NYSE: LAR)
GSM vs LAR Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 860.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while LAR trades at $5.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -15.74. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAR's competition here
IMC Rare Earths Ltd (AMEX: IMC)
GSM vs IMC Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, IMC has a market cap of 763M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while IMC trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas IMC's P/E ratio is -242.00. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to IMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IMC's competition here
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (AMEX: NAK)
GSM vs NAK Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 647.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while NAK trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -14.18. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NAK's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to NAK. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NAK's competition here
United States Antimony Corporation (NYSE: UAMY)
GSM vs UAMY Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 550.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while UAMY trades at $3.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -28.75. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check UAMY's competition here
Lithium Americas Corp. (NYSE: LAC)
GSM vs LAC Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 524.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while LAC trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -4.56. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAC's competition here
Critical Metals Corp. (NASDAQ: CRMLW)
GSM vs CRMLW Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, CRMLW has a market cap of 515.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while CRMLW trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas CRMLW's P/E ratio is -1.21. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRMLW's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to CRMLW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CRMLW's competition here
NioCorp Developments Ltd. (NASDAQ: NB)
GSM vs NB Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 496.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while NB trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -8.97. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NB's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to NB. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NB's competition here
Trilogy Metals Inc. (AMEX: TMQ)
GSM vs TMQ Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 487.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while TMQ trades at $2.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -9.72. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TMQ's competition here
Western Copper and Gold Corporation (AMEX: WRN)
GSM vs WRN Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 463.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while WRN trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -68.43. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to WRN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check WRN's competition here
EMX Royalty Corporation (AMEX: EMX)
GSM vs EMX Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while EMX trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EMX's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check EMX's competition here
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. (NYSE: LAAC)
GSM vs LAAC Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAAC's competition here
PolyMet Mining Corp. (AMEX: PLM)
GSM vs PLM Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check PLM's competition here
Graphex Group Limited (AMEX: GRFX)
GSM vs GRFX Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GRFX's competition here
Standard Lithium Ltd. (AMEX: SLI)
GSM vs SLI Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 393.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while SLI trades at $1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is -14.93. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to SLI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SLI's competition here
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NYSE: NMG)
GSM vs NMG Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, NMG has a market cap of 352.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while NMG trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas NMG's P/E ratio is -3.36. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NMG's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to NMG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NMG's competition here
Titan Mining Corporation (AMEX: TII)
GSM vs TII Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, TII has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while TII trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas TII's P/E ratio is -21.73. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TII's ROE of -0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TII's competition here
ioneer Ltd (NASDAQ: IONR)
GSM vs IONR Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 186.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while IONR trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -37.09. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to IONR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IONR's competition here
The Metals Royalty Company Inc. (NASDAQ: TMCR)
GSM vs TMCR Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, TMCR has a market cap of 181.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while TMCR trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas TMCR's P/E ratio is -9.16. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TMCR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TMCR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TMCR's competition here
Piedmont Lithium Inc. (NASDAQ: PLL)
GSM vs PLL Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while PLL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check PLL's competition here
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO)
GSM vs GRO Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while GRO trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GRO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GRO's competition here
USA Rare Earth Inc (NASDAQ: USARW)
GSM vs USARW Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while USARW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USARW's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USARW's competition here
Nicola Mining Inc. American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: NICM)
GSM vs NICM Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, NICM has a market cap of 103.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while NICM trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas NICM's P/E ratio is -431.75. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NICM's ROE of -113.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to NICM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NICM's competition here
U.S. GoldMining Inc. (NASDAQ: USGO)
GSM vs USGO Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 80.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while USGO trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -6.93. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USGO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USGO's competition here
Atlas Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ: ATLX)
GSM vs ATLX Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, ATLX has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while ATLX trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas ATLX's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ATLX's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to ATLX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check ATLX's competition here
Westwater Resources, Inc. (AMEX: WWR)
GSM vs WWR Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 57.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while WWR trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check WWR's competition here
Electra Battery Materials Corporation (NASDAQ: ELBM)
GSM vs ELBM Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while ELBM trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check ELBM's competition here
Solitario Zinc Corp. (AMEX: XPL)
GSM vs XPL Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while XPL trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -9.37. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is similarly volatile compared to XPL. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check XPL's competition here
Odyssey Marine Exploration, Inc. (NASDAQ: OMEX)
GSM vs OMEX Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 38.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while OMEX trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check OMEX's competition here
Tactical Resources Corp. (NASDAQ: TREO)
GSM vs TREO Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, TREO has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while TREO trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas TREO's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TREO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TREO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TREO's competition here
Largo Inc. (NASDAQ: LGO)
GSM vs LGO Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, LGO has a market cap of 34.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while LGO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas LGO's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LGO's ROE of -0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to LGO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LGO's competition here
Frontier Nuclear and Minerals Inc. (NASDAQ: FNUC)
GSM vs FNUC Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, FNUC has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while FNUC trades at $1.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas FNUC's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FNUC's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to FNUC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check FNUC's competition here
BAIYU Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BYU)
GSM vs BYU Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BYU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BYU's competition here
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. (NASDAQ: FMST)
GSM vs FMST Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, FMST has a market cap of 7.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while FMST trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas FMST's P/E ratio is -1.53. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FMST's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to FMST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check FMST's competition here
Graphjet Technology (NASDAQ: GTI)
GSM vs GTI Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while GTI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GTI's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GTI. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GTI's competition here
Chilwa Minerals Limited (NASDAQ: CHWM)
GSM vs CHWM Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, CHWM has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while CHWM trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas CHWM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CHWM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to CHWM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CHWM's competition here
Foremost Clean Energy Ltd. (NASDAQ: FMSTW)
GSM vs FMSTW Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while FMSTW trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check FMSTW's competition here
TD Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLG)
GSM vs GLG Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GLG's competition here
Key Mining Corp. (AMEX: KMCM)
GSM vs KMCM Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is not fully comparable compared to KMCM. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check KMCM's competition here
Excellon Resources Inc. (AMEX: EXN)
GSM vs EXN Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to EXN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check EXN's competition here
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (NYSE: IFFT)
GSM vs IFFT Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IFFT's competition here
Vedanta Limited (NYSE: VEDL)
GSM vs VEDL Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VEDL's competition here
Sierra Metals Inc. (AMEX: SMTS)
GSM vs SMTS Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SMTS's competition here
BHP Group Limited (NYSE: BBL)
GSM vs BBL Comparison October 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 789.1M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.24 on the NASDAQ, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -18.22, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to BBL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BBL's competition here