Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See GSM's competitors and their performance on the NASDAQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for GSM and its NASDAQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSM | $4.49 | +8.72% | 845.6M | -19.52 | -$0.23 | +1.26% |
| BHP | $90.41 | +2.86% | 229.7B | 20.74 | $4.36 | +2.94% |
| RIO | $101.10 | +1.46% | 164.3B | 15.51 | $6.52 | +3.68% |
| TECK | $66.47 | +0.53% | 32.1B | 22.16 | $3.00 | +0.54% |
| MP | $51.11 | +7.62% | 9.1B | -464.45 | -$0.11 | N/A |
| MTRN | $290.05 | +4.24% | 6B | 47.40 | $6.11 | +0.19% |
| SKE | $32.54 | +5.44% | 4B | -39.34 | -$0.83 | N/A |
| ALM | $14.18 | +5.66% | 4B | -141.80 | -$0.10 | N/A |
| USAR | $19.33 | +11.03% | 2.6B | -30.20 | -$0.64 | N/A |
| NEXA | $14.10 | -1.40% | 1.9B | 7.50 | $1.88 | +0.93% |
Stock Comparison
BHP Group Limited (NYSE: BHP)
GSM vs BHP Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, BHP has a market cap of 229.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while BHP trades at $90.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas BHP's P/E ratio is 20.74. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BHP's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to BHP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BHP's competition here
Rio Tinto Group (NYSE: RIO)
GSM vs RIO Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, RIO has a market cap of 164.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while RIO trades at $101.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas RIO's P/E ratio is 15.51. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to RIO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to RIO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check RIO's competition here
Teck Resources Limited (NYSE: TECK)
GSM vs TECK Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, TECK has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while TECK trades at $66.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas TECK's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TECK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to TECK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TECK's competition here
MP Materials Corp. (NYSE: MP)
GSM vs MP Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, MP has a market cap of 9.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while MP trades at $51.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas MP's P/E ratio is -464.45. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MP's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to MP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check MP's competition here
Materion Corporation (NYSE: MTRN)
GSM vs MTRN Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, MTRN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while MTRN trades at $290.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas MTRN's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to MTRN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to MTRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check MTRN's competition here
Skeena Resources Limited (NYSE: SKE)
GSM vs SKE Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, SKE has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while SKE trades at $32.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas SKE's P/E ratio is -39.34. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SKE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to SKE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SKE's competition here
Almonty Industries Inc. (NASDAQ: ALM)
GSM vs ALM Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, ALM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while ALM trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas ALM's P/E ratio is -141.80. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ALM's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to ALM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check ALM's competition here
USA Rare Earth Inc (NASDAQ: USAR)
GSM vs USAR Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, USAR has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while USAR trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas USAR's P/E ratio is -30.20. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USAR's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to USAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USAR's competition here
Nexa Resources S.A. (NYSE: NEXA)
GSM vs NEXA Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, NEXA has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while NEXA trades at $14.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas NEXA's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NEXA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to NEXA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NEXA's competition here
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (AMEX: USAS)
GSM vs USAS Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, USAS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while USAS trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas USAS's P/E ratio is -33.53. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USAS's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to USAS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USAS's competition here
Evolution Metals & Technologies Corp. Common Stock (NASDAQ: EMAT)
GSM vs EMAT Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, EMAT has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while EMAT trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas EMAT's P/E ratio is -140.50. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EMAT's ROE of +37.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to EMAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check EMAT's competition here
Sitio Royalties Corp. (NYSE: STR-WT)
GSM vs STR-WT Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, STR-WT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while STR-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas STR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STR-WT's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to STR-WT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check STR-WT's competition here
Sitio Royalties Corp. (NYSE: STR)
GSM vs STR Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, STR has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while STR trades at $18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas STR's P/E ratio is 41.18. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to STR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to STR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check STR's competition here
Vizsla Silver Corp. (AMEX: VZLA)
GSM vs VZLA Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, VZLA has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while VZLA trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas VZLA's P/E ratio is -74.70. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VZLA's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to VZLA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VZLA's competition here
Sigma Lithium Corporation (NASDAQ: SGML)
GSM vs SGML Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, SGML has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while SGML trades at $11.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas SGML's P/E ratio is -29.18. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SGML's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to SGML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SGML's competition here
Compass Minerals International, Inc. (NYSE: CMP)
GSM vs CMP Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, CMP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while CMP trades at $27.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas CMP's P/E ratio is 36.43. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CMP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to CMP. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CMP's competition here
Lithium Argentina AG (NYSE: LAR)
GSM vs LAR Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, LAR has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while LAR trades at $6.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas LAR's P/E ratio is -1985.71. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LAR's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to LAR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAR's competition here
United States Antimony Corporation (NYSE: UAMY)
GSM vs UAMY Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, UAMY has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while UAMY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas UAMY's P/E ratio is -116.78. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to UAMY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to UAMY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check UAMY's competition here
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (AMEX: NAK)
GSM vs NAK Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, NAK has a market cap of 952.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while NAK trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas NAK's P/E ratio is -19.26. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NAK's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to NAK. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NAK's competition here
IperionX Limited (NASDAQ: IPX)
GSM vs IPX Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, IPX has a market cap of 842M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while IPX trades at $25.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas IPX's P/E ratio is -156.81. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IPX's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to IPX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IPX's competition here
NioCorp Developments Ltd. (NASDAQ: NB)
GSM vs NB Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, NB has a market cap of 780.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while NB trades at $5.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas NB's P/E ratio is -14.11. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to NB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NB's competition here
IMC Rare Earths Ltd (AMEX: IMC)
GSM vs IMC Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, IMC has a market cap of 753.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while IMC trades at $7.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas IMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IMC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to IMC. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IMC's competition here
Lithium Americas Corp. (NYSE: LAC)
GSM vs LAC Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, LAC has a market cap of 719M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while LAC trades at $3.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas LAC's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LAC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to LAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAC's competition here
Critical Metals Corp. (NASDAQ: CRML)
GSM vs CRML Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, CRML has a market cap of 677.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while CRML trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas CRML's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to CRML's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to CRML. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check CRML's competition here
Trilogy Metals Inc. (AMEX: TMQ)
GSM vs TMQ Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, TMQ has a market cap of 657.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while TMQ trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas TMQ's P/E ratio is -21.14. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TMQ's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to TMQ. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TMQ's competition here
Standard Lithium Ltd. (AMEX: SLI)
GSM vs SLI Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, SLI has a market cap of 582.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while SLI trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas SLI's P/E ratio is -22.09. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SLI's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to SLI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SLI's competition here
Western Copper and Gold Corporation (AMEX: WRN)
GSM vs WRN Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, WRN has a market cap of 542.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while WRN trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas WRN's P/E ratio is -80.09. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WRN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to WRN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check WRN's competition here
Versamet Royalties Corporation Common Stock (NASDAQ: VMET)
GSM vs VMET Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, VMET has a market cap of 521.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while VMET trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas VMET's P/E ratio is 58.57. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VMET's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to VMET. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VMET's competition here
EMX Royalty Corporation (AMEX: EMX)
GSM vs EMX Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, EMX has a market cap of 454M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while EMX trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas EMX's P/E ratio is 83.20. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EMX's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to EMX. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check EMX's competition here
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Corp. (NYSE: LAAC)
GSM vs LAAC Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, LAAC has a market cap of 443.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while LAAC trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas LAAC's P/E ratio is -39.14. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to LAAC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to LAAC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check LAAC's competition here
PolyMet Mining Corp. (AMEX: PLM)
GSM vs PLM Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, PLM has a market cap of 408.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while PLM trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas PLM's P/E ratio is -11.05. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PLM's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to PLM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check PLM's competition here
Graphex Group Limited (AMEX: GRFX)
GSM vs GRFX Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, GRFX has a market cap of 401.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while GRFX trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas GRFX's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRFX's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GRFX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GRFX's competition here
The Metals Royalty Company Inc. (NASDAQ: TMCR)
GSM vs TMCR Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, TMCR has a market cap of 366.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while TMCR trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas TMCR's P/E ratio is -18.44. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TMCR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to TMCR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TMCR's competition here
American Battery Technology Company Common Stock (NASDAQ: ABAT)
GSM vs ABAT Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, ABAT has a market cap of 356M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while ABAT trades at $2.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas ABAT's P/E ratio is -5.12. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ABAT's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to ABAT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check ABAT's competition here
Tredegar Corporation (NYSE: TG)
GSM vs TG Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, TG has a market cap of 308.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while TG trades at $8.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas TG's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to TG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TG's competition here
Titan Mining Corporation (AMEX: TII)
GSM vs TII Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, TII has a market cap of 235.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while TII trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas TII's P/E ratio is -15.97. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to TII's ROE of -1.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to TII. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check TII's competition here
ioneer Ltd (NASDAQ: IONR)
GSM vs IONR Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, IONR has a market cap of 219.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while IONR trades at $3.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas IONR's P/E ratio is -43.71. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IONR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to IONR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IONR's competition here
Piedmont Lithium Inc. (NASDAQ: PLL)
GSM vs PLL Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, PLL has a market cap of 159.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while PLL trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas PLL's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to PLL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to PLL. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check PLL's competition here
Nicola Mining Inc. American Depositary Shares (NASDAQ: NICM)
GSM vs NICM Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, NICM has a market cap of 118.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while NICM trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas NICM's P/E ratio is -495.24. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NICM's ROE of +1.69%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to NICM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NICM's competition here
U.S. GoldMining Inc. (NASDAQ: USGO)
GSM vs USGO Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, USGO has a market cap of 115.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while USGO trades at $8.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas USGO's P/E ratio is -14.16. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USGO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to USGO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USGO's competition here
Fury Gold Mines Limited (AMEX: FURY)
GSM vs FURY Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, FURY has a market cap of 113.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while FURY trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas FURY's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to FURY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to FURY. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check FURY's competition here
USA Rare Earth Inc (NASDAQ: USARW)
GSM vs USARW Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, USARW has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while USARW trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas USARW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to USARW's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to USARW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check USARW's competition here
Nova Minerals Corp (AMEX: NVA)
GSM vs NVA Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, NVA has a market cap of 97.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while NVA trades at $5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas NVA's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to NVA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to NVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check NVA's competition here
Westwater Resources, Inc. (AMEX: WWR)
GSM vs WWR Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, WWR has a market cap of 96.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while WWR trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas WWR's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to WWR's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to WWR. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check WWR's competition here
Brazil Potash Corp. (AMEX: GRO)
GSM vs GRO Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, GRO has a market cap of 87.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while GRO trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas GRO's P/E ratio is -1.92. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GRO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to GRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GRO's competition here
One and one Green Technologies. Inc (NASDAQ: YDDL)
GSM vs YDDL Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, YDDL has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while YDDL trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas YDDL's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to YDDL's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to YDDL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check YDDL's competition here
Solitario Zinc Corp. (AMEX: XPL)
GSM vs XPL Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, XPL has a market cap of 71M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while XPL trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas XPL's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to XPL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to XPL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check XPL's competition here
Electra Battery Materials Corporation (NASDAQ: ELBM)
GSM vs ELBM Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, ELBM has a market cap of 63.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while ELBM trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas ELBM's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to ELBM's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to ELBM. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check ELBM's competition here
BAIYU Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: BYU)
GSM vs BYU Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, BYU has a market cap of 8.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while BYU trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas BYU's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BYU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to BYU. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BYU's competition here
Graphjet Technology (NASDAQ: GTI)
GSM vs GTI Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, GTI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while GTI trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas GTI's P/E ratio is 1.15. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GTI's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to GTI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GTI's competition here
TD Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: GLG)
GSM vs GLG Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, GLG has a market cap of 221.1K. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while GLG trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas GLG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to GLG's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is less volatile compared to GLG. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check GLG's competition here
Key Mining Corp. (AMEX: KMCM)
GSM vs KMCM Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, KMCM has a market cap of 238. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while KMCM trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas KMCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to KMCM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is not fully comparable compared to KMCM. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check KMCM's competition here
Excellon Resources Inc. (AMEX: EXN)
GSM vs EXN Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, EXN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while EXN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas EXN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to EXN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to EXN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check EXN's competition here
BHP Group Limited (NYSE: BBL)
GSM vs BBL Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, BBL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while BBL trades at $64.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas BBL's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to BBL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to BBL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check BBL's competition here
Sierra Metals Inc. (AMEX: SMTS)
GSM vs SMTS Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, SMTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while SMTS trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas SMTS's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to SMTS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to SMTS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check SMTS's competition here
International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. (NYSE: IFFT)
GSM vs IFFT Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, IFFT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while IFFT trades at $47.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas IFFT's P/E ratio is 34.00. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to IFFT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to IFFT. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check IFFT's competition here
Vedanta Limited (NYSE: VEDL)
GSM vs VEDL Comparison August 2026
Ferroglobe PLC (NASDAQ: GSM) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NASDAQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GSM stands at 845.6M. In comparison, VEDL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GSM is priced at $4.49 on the NASDAQ, while VEDL trades at $16.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GSM currently has a P/E ratio of -19.52, whereas VEDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GSM's ROE is -0.06%, compared to VEDL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GSM is more volatile compared to VEDL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GSM.Check VEDL's competition here