MV Oil Trust

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 119.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while COP trades at $94.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 12.03. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check COP's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CNQ trades at $31.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.98. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CNQ's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 64.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while EOG trades at $118.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check EOG's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check PXD's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CEO's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check HES's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 44.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while OXY-WT trades at $22.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check OXY-WT's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while OXY trades at $44.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check OXY's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 42.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while FANG trades at $144.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check FANG's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while EQT trades at $52.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check EQT's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 32.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while WDS trades at $17.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 9.17. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check WDS's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while EXE trades at $98.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is -16.90. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to EXE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check EXE's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while TPL trades at $979.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 49.08. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check TPL's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while DVN trades at $32.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check DVN's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CTRA trades at $23.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CTRA's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check COG's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while MRO trades at $28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check MRO's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while OVV trades at $41.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 18.25. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check OVV's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CHK trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CHK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CHK's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while AR trades at $32.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 42.21. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check AR's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while PR trades at $13.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check PR's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CHKEW's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while RRC trades at $35.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 17.79. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check RRC's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CHKEZ's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CHKEL's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to SWN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check SWN's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 6.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while APA trades at $19.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check APA's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while MTDR trades at $50.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check MTDR's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CHRD trades at $108.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 7.23. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CHRD's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CRK trades at $20.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is -18.35. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CRK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CRK's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CPG's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check OAS's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check DEN's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CNX trades at $31.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 36.98. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CNX's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while MGY trades at $23.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 11.75. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check MGY's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CRC trades at $49.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 8.21. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CRC's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check BCEI's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while VIST trades at $44.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check VIST's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CDEV's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while ERF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check ERF's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while MUR trades at $26.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check MUR's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check VRN's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while SM trades at $27.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.87. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check SM's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while GPOR trades at $168.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -9.78. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to GPOR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check GPOR's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check ESTE's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while NEXT trades at $11.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -16.41. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check NEXT's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CRGY trades at $9.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -14.38. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CRGY's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CIVI trades at $31.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.57. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CIVI's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while NOG trades at $28.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check NOG's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while BSM trades at $12.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 13.44. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check BSM's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CPE's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check STRDW's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while KRP trades at $14.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 368.25. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check KRP's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while MNR trades at $15.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check MNR's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while BKV trades at $19.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is -9.12. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to BKV's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check BKV's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while BTE trades at $2.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check BTE's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while TALO trades at $8.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is 39.98. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to TALO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check TALO's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check HHRS's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CLMT trades at $16.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -4.18. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CLMT's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while DMLP trades at $27.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check DMLP's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while VET trades at $8.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -55.50. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check VET's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while FLMN trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check FLMN's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while HPK trades at $9.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 10.69. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check HPK's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while KOS trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -74.00. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check KOS's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 965.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while SBR trades at $66.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to SBR's ROE of +6.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check SBR's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check SBOW's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 938.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while VTS trades at $24.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 30.77. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check VTS's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check TELL's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 845M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while TXO trades at $15.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 40.59. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check TXO's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while VTLE trades at $18.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check VTLE's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check ROCC's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 698.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while GRNT trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 59.17. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check GRNT's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 586.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while REPX trades at $26.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check REPX's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check PVAC's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 403.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while OBE trades at $5.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to OBE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check OBE's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 389.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while EGY trades at $3.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 6.71. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check EGY's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 379M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while SD trades at $10.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check SD's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 345.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while GPRK trades at $6.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check GPRK's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 323.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while GFR trades at $4.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check GFR's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 293.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while PNRG trades at $176.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check PNRG's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 264.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while SJT trades at $5.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is 284.15. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to SJT's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check SJT's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 257.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while WTI trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.42. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to WTI's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check WTI's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 232.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while BRY trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -6.38. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check BRY's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 215.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while KGEI trades at $6.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 10.67. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check KGEI's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 214.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while INR trades at $14.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 7.46. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check INR's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while EPM trades at $5.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -126.37. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check EPM's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 169.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while EP trades at $4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check EP's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check PHX's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 163.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while GTE trades at $4.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check GTE's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 163.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while REI trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 2.20. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to REI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check REI's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 152.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while AMPY trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 9.42. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check AMPY's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 136.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while EPSN trades at $6.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 31.05. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check EPSN's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 112.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while IMPPP trades at $25.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -64.82. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check IMPPP's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while IMPP trades at $3.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.60. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check IMPP's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, PVL has a market cap of 58.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while PVL trades at $1.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas PVL's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to PVL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to PVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check PVL's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, CRT has a market cap of 57.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while CRT trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas CRT's P/E ratio is 9.52. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to CRT's ROE of +2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to CRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check CRT's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 57M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while PED trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check PED's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, VOC has a market cap of 56M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while VOC trades at $3.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas VOC's P/E ratio is 5.23. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to VOC's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is less volatile compared to VOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check VOC's competition here

MVO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MVO stands at 68M. In comparison, PRT has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MVO is priced at $5.91, while PRT trades at $4.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MVO currently has a P/E ratio of 4.52, whereas PRT's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, MVO's ROE is +3.75%, compared to PRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MVO is more volatile compared to PRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MVO.Check PRT's competition here