Vail Resorts, Inc.
Vail Resorts, Inc. MTN Peers
See (MTN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTN | $152.38 | -0.08% | 5.69B | 22.21 | $6.86 | +5.85% |
| FLUT | $249.36 | +0.14% | 44.06B | 85.69 | $2.91 | N/A |
| LVS | $42.30 | -0.30% | 29.89B | 23.63 | $1.79 | +2.13% |
| DKNG | $37.20 | +0.81% | 18.46B | -45.37 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $96.55 | -0.22% | 10.09B | 25.82 | $3.74 | +1.04% |
| MGM | $33.68 | -0.85% | 9.17B | 15.04 | $2.24 | N/A |
| CHDN | $98.04 | -0.23% | 7.08B | 17.44 | $5.62 | +0.42% |
| LNW | $82.88 | -1.95% | 6.99B | 22.16 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CZR | $29.57 | -3.68% | 6.15B | -26.88 | -$1.10 | N/A |
| BYD | $74.70 | -1.59% | 6.08B | 12.25 | $6.10 | +0.93% |
Stock Comparison
MTN vs FLUT Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 44.06B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while FLUT trades at $249.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 85.69. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs LVS Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 29.89B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while LVS trades at $42.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs DKNG Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 18.46B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while DKNG trades at $37.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -45.37. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs WYNN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 10.09B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while WYNN trades at $96.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs MGM Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 9.17B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while MGM trades at $33.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 15.04. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CHDN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.08B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while CHDN trades at $98.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 17.44. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs LNW Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 6.99B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while LNW trades at $82.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 22.16. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CZR Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while CZR trades at $29.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -26.88. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs BYD Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.08B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while BYD trades at $74.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs SGMS Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs SGHC Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while SGHC trades at $8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 32.69. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs HGV Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 3.81B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while HGV trades at $41.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 129.73. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs IGT Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while IGT trades at $16.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 146.09. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs RSI Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 2.87B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while RSI trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 139.06. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs RRR Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while RRR trades at $46.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RRR's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs VAC Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.44B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while VAC trades at $70.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs PENN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.33B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while PENN trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -25.33. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs PLYA Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.65B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while PLYA trades at $13.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs MCRI Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while MCRI trades at $82.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs EVRI Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while EVRI trades at $14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 88.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs BVH Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs NGMS Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.21M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs ACEL Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 968.30M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while ACEL trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 23.35. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs MLCO Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 879.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while MLCO trades at $6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 45.86. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GDEN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 756.84M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while GDEN trades at $28.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 66.58. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs TPGH-UN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.34M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs AGS Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 505.95M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while AGS trades at $12.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.51. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs BALY Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 449.37M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while BALY trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GAMB Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 429.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while GAMB trades at $12.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 12.86. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CDRO Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 358.74M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while CDRO trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is -157.20. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs INSE Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 223.10M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while INSE trades at $8.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.40. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs MSC Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 143.48M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while MSC trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs FLL Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 123.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while FLL trades at $3.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CPHC Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 87.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while CPHC trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 108.75. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GAN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 87.35M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while GAN trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -7.83. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CNTY Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 51.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while CNTY trades at $1.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.38. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CDROW Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 32.40M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while CDROW trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs SLNA Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs LTRY Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 13.67M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while LTRY trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs LTRYW Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 12.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs SBET Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.93M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while SBET trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs SLNAW Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526449.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GMBL Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 346659.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while GMBL trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GMBLP Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 39497.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while GMBLP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs EBET Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 1498.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GMBLZ Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1338.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GMBLW Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.69B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 1259.00. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $152.38, while GMBLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 22.21, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.