Vail Resorts, Inc.
Vail Resorts, Inc. MTN Peers
See (MTN) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTN | $155.73 | +3.52% | 5.8B | 19.84 | $7.85 | +5.71% |
| FLUT | $263.57 | +5.60% | 46.6B | 90.57 | $2.91 | N/A |
| LVS | $41.90 | +4.18% | 29.6B | 23.41 | $1.79 | +2.15% |
| DKNG | $36.20 | +1.09% | 18B | -44.15 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $84.70 | +1.68% | 8.9B | 22.65 | $3.74 | +1.18% |
| MGM | $32.46 | +1.87% | 8.8B | 14.49 | $2.24 | N/A |
| LNW | $88.38 | +1.57% | 7.5B | 23.63 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CHDN | $99.59 | +1.54% | 7.2B | 17.72 | $5.62 | +0.41% |
| BYD | $73.92 | -0.22% | 6B | 12.12 | $6.10 | +0.93% |
| CZR | $26.74 | +3.93% | 5.6B | -24.31 | -$1.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MTN vs FLUT Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 46.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while FLUT trades at $263.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 90.57. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs LVS Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while LVS trades at $41.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 23.41. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs DKNG Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 18B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while DKNG trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -44.15. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs WYNN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while WYNN trades at $84.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs MGM Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while MGM trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs LNW Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while LNW trades at $88.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CHDN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while CHDN trades at $99.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs BYD Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while BYD trades at $73.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CZR Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while CZR trades at $26.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -24.31. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs SGMS Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs SGHC Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while SGHC trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 35.48. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs HGV Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while HGV trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 125.03. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs RSI Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while RSI trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 150.44. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs IGT Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while IGT trades at $14.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 133.86. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs RRR Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while RRR trades at $49.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs PENN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while PENN trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -27.02. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs VAC Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while VAC trades at $66.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 11.38. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs SBET Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while SBET trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.62. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs PLYA Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs MCRI Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while MCRI trades at $84.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 21.42. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs EVRI Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while EVRI trades at $14.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 88.63. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs BVH Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs NGMS Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs ACEL Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 967.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while ACEL trades at $11.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs MLCO Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 843M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while MLCO trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 43.93. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GDEN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 725.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while GDEN trades at $27.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 63.84. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs TPGH-UN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs AGS Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 513M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while AGS trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.66. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GAMB Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 429M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while GAMB trades at $12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs BALY Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 405M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while BALY trades at $9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CDROW Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 374.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while CDROW trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CDRO Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 340.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while CDRO trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 83.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs INSE Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 214.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while INSE trades at $7.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.27. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs MSC Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 133.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while MSC trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs FLL Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 119.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while FLL trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GAN Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CPHC Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 87.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while CPHC trades at $17.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 108.19. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs CNTY Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 68.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while CNTY trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs LTRY Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 38.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while LTRY trades at $1.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs LTRYW Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs SLNA Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs SLNAW Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GMBLZ Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 270.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GMBL Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 269.9K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while GMBL trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GMBLP Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 118K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while GMBLP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs EBET Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 10.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GMBLW Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 1.3K. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while GMBLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is more volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.
MTN vs GNOG Comparison
MTN plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTN stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTN is priced at $155.73, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTN currently has a P/E ratio of 19.84, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, MTN's ROE is +0.38%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTN is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTN.