Studio City International Holdings Limited
Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MSC) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSC | $2.92 | +0.00% | 140.6M | -9.73 | -$0.30 | N/A |
| LVS | $56.04 | -3.53% | 39.2B | 24.68 | $2.35 | +1.82% |
| FLUT | $116.04 | -5.01% | 21.2B | -95.26 | -$1.27 | N/A |
| WYNN | $106.99 | -7.25% | 11.9B | 36.58 | $3.14 | +0.87% |
| DKNG | $21.92 | -2.56% | 11.1B | -2231.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| MGM | $34.22 | -6.14% | 10.1B | 48.41 | $0.76 | N/A |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| BYD | $83.31 | -2.06% | 6.7B | 3.82 | $22.56 | +0.83% |
| CHDN | $93.40 | +1.29% | 6.5B | 17.04 | $5.50 | +0.47% |
| SGMS | $58.07 | +2.33% | 5.3B | 30.71 | $1.89 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MSC vs LVS Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 39.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while LVS trades at $56.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check LVS's competition here
MSC vs FLUT Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while FLUT trades at $116.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is -95.26. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check FLUT's competition here
MSC vs WYNN Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while WYNN trades at $106.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check WYNN's competition here
MSC vs DKNG Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while DKNG trades at $21.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -2231.00. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check DKNG's competition here
MSC vs MGM Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while MGM trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 48.41. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check MGM's competition here
MSC vs LNW Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check LNW's competition here
MSC vs BYD Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while BYD trades at $83.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BYD's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check BYD's competition here
MSC vs CHDN Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while CHDN trades at $93.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check CHDN's competition here
MSC vs SGMS Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check SGMS's competition here
MSC vs RSI Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while RSI trades at $18.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 68.56. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check RSI's competition here
MSC vs MTN Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while MTN trades at $138.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check MTN's competition here
MSC vs SGHC Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while SGHC trades at $9.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check SGHC's competition here
MSC vs CZR Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while CZR trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check CZR's competition here
MSC vs HGV Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while HGV trades at $47.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 88.29. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check HGV's competition here
MSC vs RRR Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while RRR trades at $60.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check RRR's competition here
MSC vs IGT Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check IGT's competition here
MSC vs BRSL Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while BRSL trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is 149.61. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check BRSL's competition here
MSC vs VAC Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while VAC trades at $55.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check VAC's competition here
MSC vs PENN Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while PENN trades at $12.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check PENN's competition here
MSC vs MCRI Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while MCRI trades at $94.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check MCRI's competition here
MSC vs PLYA Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check PLYA's competition here
MSC vs EVRI Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check EVRI's competition here
MSC vs BVH Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check BVH's competition here
MSC vs SBET Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while SBET trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check SBET's competition here
MSC vs NGMS Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check NGMS's competition here
MSC vs ACEL Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 961.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while ACEL trades at $10.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check ACEL's competition here
MSC vs MLCO Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 789.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while MLCO trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check MLCO's competition here
MSC vs GDEN Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 763.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while GDEN trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 132.55. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check GDEN's competition here
MSC vs BALY Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 596.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while BALY trades at $14.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check BALY's competition here
MSC vs TPGH-UN Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
MSC vs AGS Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check AGS's competition here
MSC vs CDRO Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 367M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while CDRO trades at $7.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 402.00. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check CDRO's competition here
MSC vs INSE Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 224.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while INSE trades at $8.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to INSE's ROE of -9.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check INSE's competition here
MSC vs GAMB Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while GAMB trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 86.60. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check GAMB's competition here
MSC vs GAN Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check GAN's competition here
MSC vs FLL Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 81.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while FLL trades at $2.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check FLL's competition here
MSC vs CPHC Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while CPHC trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -55.61. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check CPHC's competition here
MSC vs CNTY Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while CNTY trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check CNTY's competition here
MSC vs ROLR Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, ROLR has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while ROLR trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas ROLR's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to ROLR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to ROLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check ROLR's competition here
MSC vs LTRY Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check LTRY's competition here
MSC vs CDROW Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while CDROW trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check CDROW's competition here
MSC vs SLNA Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check SLNA's competition here
MSC vs SLNAW Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check SLNAW's competition here
MSC vs GMBL Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 201.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while GMBL trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check GMBL's competition here
MSC vs LTRYW Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 37K. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check LTRYW's competition here
MSC vs GMBLP Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 31.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while GMBLP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check GMBLP's competition here
MSC vs GMBLW Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check GMBLW's competition here
MSC vs EBET Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to EBET's ROE of +6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check EBET's competition here
MSC vs GMBLZ Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check GMBLZ's competition here
MSC vs GNOG Comparison February 2026
MSC plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSC stands at 140.6M. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MSC is priced at $2.92, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSC currently has a P/E ratio of -9.73, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, MSC's ROE is -0.11%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSC is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSC.Check GNOG's competition here