MSA Safety Incorporated
MSA Safety Incorporated MSA Peers
See (MSA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSA | $167.42 | -0.38% | 6.7B | 23.34 | $7.25 | +1.22% |
| ALLE | $143.72 | +0.63% | 12.3B | 20.14 | $7.12 | +1.38% |
| ADT | $8.44 | +0.90% | 6.6B | 12.92 | $0.65 | +2.62% |
| BCO | $89.55 | +0.92% | 3.8B | 24.25 | $3.71 | +1.09% |
| REZI | $22.66 | +3.49% | 3.3B | 74.40 | $0.30 | N/A |
| GEO | $24.00 | +3.85% | 3.3B | 106.36 | $0.22 | N/A |
| BRC | $68.68 | +2.48% | 3.3B | 16.96 | $4.05 | +1.39% |
| VVNT | $12.00 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| ARLO | $17.04 | +1.67% | 1.8B | -78.93 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| NSSC | $29.72 | +0.71% | 1.1B | 24.44 | $1.22 | +1.72% |
Stock Comparison
MSA vs ALLE Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while ALLE trades at $143.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs ADT Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ADT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while ADT trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas ADT's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ADT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to ADT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs BCO Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while BCO trades at $89.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs REZI Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while REZI trades at $22.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 74.40. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to REZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs GEO Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while GEO trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 106.36. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs BRC Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while BRC trades at $68.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs VVNT Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs ARLO Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while ARLO trades at $17.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is -78.93. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ARLO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs NSSC Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while NSSC trades at $29.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs EVLV Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while EVLV trades at $6.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs CIX Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 308M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while CIX trades at $26.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs NL Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 305.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while NL trades at $6.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas NL's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs MG Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 250.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while MG trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs SNT Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while SNT trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs BAER Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while BAER trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs EVLVW Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while EVLVW trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs NXTD Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs SPCB Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while SPCB trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs GFAIW Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 34.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while GFAIW trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs KSCP Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while KSCP trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs GFAI Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while GFAI trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs CIGL Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while CIGL trades at $9.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CIGL's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs VRME Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while VRME trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs UUU Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while UUU trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs SUGP Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while SUGP trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SUGP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs IVDAW Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while IVDAW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs VRMEW Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while VRMEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs IVDA Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while IVDA trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs BKYI Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while BKYI trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs BAERW Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while BAERW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs DGLY Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while DGLY trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs LGMK Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.7B. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $167.42, while LGMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 23.34, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.