MSA Safety Incorporated
MSA Safety Incorporated MSA Peers
See (MSA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSA | $165.07 | -0.11% | 6.5B | 22.77 | $7.25 | +1.24% |
| ALLE | $139.17 | +0.68% | 12B | 19.68 | $7.07 | +1.40% |
| ADT | $8.43 | +2.12% | 6.6B | 12.96 | $0.65 | +2.62% |
| GEO | $26.96 | +2.90% | 3.8B | 122.55 | $0.22 | N/A |
| BCO | $83.92 | +0.65% | 3.5B | 22.62 | $3.71 | +1.17% |
| BRC | $69.99 | +0.63% | 3.3B | 17.28 | $4.05 | +1.37% |
| REZI | $21.15 | +1.15% | 3.1B | 70.50 | $0.30 | N/A |
| VVNT | $12.00 | N/A | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| ARLO | $16.78 | +3.52% | 1.7B | -76.27 | -$0.22 | N/A |
| NSSC | $28.84 | +0.56% | 1B | 23.64 | $1.22 | +1.30% |
Stock Comparison
MSA vs ALLE Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while ALLE trades at $139.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs ADT Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ADT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while ADT trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas ADT's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ADT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to ADT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs GEO Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while GEO trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 122.55. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs BCO Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while BCO trades at $83.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs BRC Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while BRC trades at $69.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs REZI Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while REZI trades at $21.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 70.50. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to REZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs VVNT Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs ARLO Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while ARLO trades at $16.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is -76.27. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to ARLO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs NSSC Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while NSSC trades at $28.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 23.64. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs EVLV Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 905.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while EVLV trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -19.71. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs NL Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 340M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while NL trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas NL's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs CIX Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 304.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while CIX trades at $24.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs MG Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 239.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while MG trades at $7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs BAER Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while BAER trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs SNT Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while SNT trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 21.00. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs EVLVW Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 72.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while EVLVW trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -3.97. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs NXTD Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs SPCB Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 53.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while SPCB trades at $11.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs KSCP Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 41.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while KSCP trades at $6.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs GFAI Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 24.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while GFAI trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs GFAIW Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, GFAIW has a market cap of 20.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while GFAIW trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas GFAIW's P/E ratio is -0.97. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to GFAIW's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to GFAIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs VRMEW Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while VRMEW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs SUGP Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 11.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while SUGP trades at $0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is 8.07. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to SUGP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs VRME Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 10.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while VRME trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs CIGL Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while CIGL trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to CIGL's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs IVDAW Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while IVDAW trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs UUU Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while UUU trades at $2.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs IVDA Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 6.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while IVDA trades at $2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -1.63. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs BKYI Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while BKYI trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs BAERW Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while BAERW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is more volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs DGLY Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while DGLY trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.
MSA vs LGMK Comparison
MSA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MSA stands at 6.5B. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MSA is priced at $165.07, while LGMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MSA currently has a P/E ratio of 22.77, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MSA's ROE is +0.26%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MSA is less volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MSA.