Marathon Oil Corporation

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 117.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while COP trades at $95.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 12.60. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check COP's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while EOG trades at $119.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check EOG's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check PXD's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 62.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CNQ trades at $29.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 10.41. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CNQ's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CEO's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check HES's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while OXY-WT trades at $22.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check OXY-WT's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 43.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while OXY trades at $44.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check OXY's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 40.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while FANG trades at $140.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check FANG's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 32.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while WDS trades at $17.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check WDS's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while EQT trades at $52.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 26.57. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check EQT's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while EXE trades at $94.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is -3101.00. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check EXE's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while DVN trades at $33.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 7.56. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check DVN's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while TPL trades at $912.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 44.64. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check TPL's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CTRA trades at $24.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 11.11. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CTRA's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check COG's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CHK trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CHK's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while OVV trades at $39.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 17.24. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check OVV's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO and CHKEW have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHKEW's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while PR trades at $13.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check PR's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while AR trades at $32.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check AR's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO and CHKEZ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check CHKEZ's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CHKEL's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while RRC trades at $34.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check RRC's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check SWN's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while APA trades at $20.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check APA's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while MTDR trades at $47.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check MTDR's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CHRD trades at $102.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 24.10. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CHRD's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CPG's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check OAS's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check DEN's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CRK trades at $15.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is -60.08. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CRK's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check BCEI's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while MGY trades at $23.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check MGY's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CDEV's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while ERF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check ERF's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CRC trades at $48.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CRC's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CNX trades at $28.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 33.46. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CNX's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while VIST trades at $41.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 7.60. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check VIST's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check VRN's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while MUR trades at $23.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check MUR's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CIVI trades at $33.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CIVI's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while SM trades at $26.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.67. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check SM's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check ESTE's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while GPOR trades at $167.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -24.05. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPOR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check GPOR's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while NEXT trades at $9.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check NEXT's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while BSM trades at $12.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check BSM's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CPE's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CRGY trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -27.41. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CRGY's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while NOG trades at $24.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check NOG's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check STRDW's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while BKV trades at $21.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is -9.92. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKV's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check BKV's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while MNR trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 7.24. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check MNR's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while BTE trades at $2.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check BTE's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while KRP trades at $14.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is -231.83. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check KRP's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check HHRS's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while TALO trades at $8.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -8.78. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check TALO's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while FLMN trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check FLMN's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while DMLP trades at $25.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check DMLP's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CLMT trades at $13.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CLMT's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while VET trades at $7.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas VET's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check VET's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while SBR trades at $71.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 13.82. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBR's ROE of +8.67%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check SBR's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 976.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while HPK trades at $7.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check HPK's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 970M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while VTS trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check VTS's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check SBOW's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check TELL's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 834.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while KOS trades at $1.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -5.13. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check KOS's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 757.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while TXO trades at $14.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 47.71. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check TXO's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check ROCC's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while GRNT trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 21.24. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check GRNT's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 602.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while VTLE trades at $15.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.78. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check VTLE's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 586.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while REPX trades at $27.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 5.90. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check REPX's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check PVAC's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 403.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while SD trades at $10.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 5.41. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check SD's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 385.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while EGY trades at $3.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 9.99. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check EGY's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 381.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while OBE trades at $5.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBE's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check OBE's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 341.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while GPRK trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 8.02. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check GPRK's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 330.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while HUSA trades at $9.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check HUSA's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 323.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while GFR trades at $4.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 2.23. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check GFR's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 263.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while SJT trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is 282.65. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SJT's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check SJT's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 259.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while WTI trades at $1.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WTI's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check WTI's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while PNRG trades at $163.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check PNRG's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 218.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while BRY trades at $2.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is 35.25. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check BRY's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 205.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while INR trades at $13.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check INR's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 200.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while KGEI trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 10.46. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check KGEI's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 198.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while REI trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to REI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check REI's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 174.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while EPM trades at $5.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -126.87. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check EPM's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 167.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while EP trades at $4.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -9.61. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check EP's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO and PHX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check PHX's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 162M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while AMPY trades at $3.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 10.53. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check AMPY's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while GTE trades at $3.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -1.99. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check GTE's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while EPSN trades at $5.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check EPSN's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while IMPP trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.52. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check IMPP's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 103.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while IMPPP trades at $25.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.68. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO and IMPPP have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check IMPPP's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, MVO has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while MVO trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas MVO's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MVO's ROE of +3.75%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to MVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check MVO's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, PVL has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while PVL trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas PVL's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PVL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to PVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check PVL's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 54.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while PED trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 4.22. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check PED's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, CRT has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while CRT trades at $8.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas CRT's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRT's ROE of +2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to CRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check CRT's competition here

MRO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MRO stands at 16B. In comparison, PRT has a market cap of 48.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MRO is priced at $28.55, while PRT trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MRO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.31, whereas PRT's P/E ratio is 8.98. In terms of profitability, MRO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MRO is less volatile compared to PRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MRO.Check PRT's competition here