Maximus, Inc.
Maximus, Inc. MMS Peers
See (MMS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMS | $72.42 | -1.72% | 4.08B | 14.51 | $4.99 | +1.62% |
| CTAS | $222.29 | +0.28% | 89.76B | 51.70 | $4.30 | +0.96% |
| TRI | $195.12 | +0.49% | 87.90B | 40.99 | $4.76 | +1.17% |
| RBA | $107.17 | -1.26% | 19.85B | 52.79 | $2.03 | +1.05% |
| GPN | $74.09 | -2.15% | 18.07B | 11.99 | $6.18 | +1.31% |
| ULS | $71.79 | +1.11% | 14.39B | 42.99 | $1.67 | +0.71% |
| BIPI | $16.10 | +0.37% | 12.80B | N/A | N/A | +5.99% |
| RTO | $23.86 | +2.21% | 12.13B | 29.45 | $0.81 | +2.50% |
| ARMK | $39.13 | +0.64% | 10.25B | 30.10 | $1.30 | +1.05% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.34B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MMS vs CTAS Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 89.76B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while CTAS trades at $222.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 51.70. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs TRI Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 87.90B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while TRI trades at $195.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 40.99. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs RBA Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.85B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while RBA trades at $107.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 52.79. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs GPN Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 18.07B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while GPN trades at $74.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs ULS Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 14.39B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while ULS trades at $71.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 42.99. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs BIPI Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 12.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while BIPI trades at $16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs RTO Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 12.13B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while RTO trades at $23.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 29.45. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs ARMK Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.25B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while ARMK trades at $39.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 30.10. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs IAA Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.34B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs CBZ Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while CBZ trades at $71.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 62.02. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs UNF Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 3.28B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while UNF trades at $183.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 22.88. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs ABM Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while ABM trades at $51.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 40.21. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs FA Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while FA trades at $16.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -17.58. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs LZ Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while LZ trades at $9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 54.59. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs BV Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.52B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while BV trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas BV's P/E ratio is -798.75. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs VVI Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.19B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VVI's ROE of +1.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs SP Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.07B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs TDCX Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs PRSU Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 769.41M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while PRSU trades at $27.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -13.96. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs TH Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 732.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while TH trades at $7.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TH's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TH's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs CASS Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 567.53M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while CASS trades at $42.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 28.13. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs KODK Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 475.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while KODK trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs ACTG Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 359.68M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while ACTG trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -34.00. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs SPIR Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 330.97M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while SPIR trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -2.76. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -6.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs RHLD Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 301.65M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while RHLD trades at $35.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs CVEO Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 280.57M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while CVEO trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -13.37. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs PFMT Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs QUAD Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 262.43M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while QUAD trades at $5.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QUAD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs PFSW Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.59M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs ARC Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.66M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs YSXT Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 113.90M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while YSXT trades at $5.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 30.35. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs TISI Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 87.98M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while TISI trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.72. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TISI's ROE of -11.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs DLHC Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 72.51M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while DLHC trades at $5.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DLHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs PMEC Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 44.76M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while PMEC trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs SST Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 33.80M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while SST trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SST's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs NTIP Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 28.33M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while NTIP trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs OMEX Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 28.02M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while OMEX trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is 3.44. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OMEX's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs SGRP Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 26.73M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while SGRP trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -8.77. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SGRP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs SFHG Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 18.27M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while SFHG trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -45.00. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs WHLM Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 16.04M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while WHLM trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs ATTO Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.84M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs SMX Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 6.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while SMX trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs LICN Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 4.23M. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while LICN trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LICN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs THWWW Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252316.00. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to THWWW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs GPAK Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 7674.00. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs PAEWW Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs PAE Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs RRD Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.
MMS vs ALJJ Comparison
MMS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MMS stands at 4.08B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of N/A. Regarding current trading prices, MMS is priced at $72.42, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MMS currently has a P/E ratio of 14.51, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, MMS's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, MMS is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MMS.