MillerKnoll, Inc.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 365.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while HD trades at $368.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HD's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while LOW trades at $225.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while FND trades at $71.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 37.92. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while ARHS trades at $8.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 21.90. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 339.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while HVT trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 16.41. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 337.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while HVT-A trades at $20.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 284.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while TTSH trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is 637.00. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TTSH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 139.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while LESL trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while LIVE trades at $21.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is -11.35. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIVE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 32.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while PFAI trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while LL trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.

MLHR plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MLHR stands at 2.9B. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHR is priced at $38.66, while HBP trades at $10.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MLHR currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, MLHR's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHR is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHR.