Mister Car Wash, Inc.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while ROL trades at $60.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 56.28. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check ROL's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while SCI trades at $80.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check SCI's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while BFAM trades at $71.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 21.55. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check BFAM's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while FTDR trades at $55.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check FTDR's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while HRB trades at $30.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 7.10. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check HRB's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while DSEY trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check DSEY's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while ROVR trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to ROVR's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check ROVR's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 706.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while CSV trades at $44.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check CSV's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 227.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while WW trades at $22.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas WW's P/E ratio is 1.68. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to WW's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check WW's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 145.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while EM trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -115.00. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check EM's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 116.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while MED trades at $10.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas MED's P/E ratio is 531.50. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check MED's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 56.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while RGS trades at $22.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.50. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to RGS's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check RGS's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while XSPA trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XSPA's ROE of -5.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check XSPA's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while EJH trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to EJH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check EJH's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 7.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while YYGH trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is -0.54. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check YYGH's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while MRM trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 3.51. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to MRM's ROE of +1.55%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check MRM's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while XWEL trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to XWEL's ROE of +3.58%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check XWEL's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, BYAH has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while BYAH trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas BYAH's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to BYAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to BYAH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check BYAH's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 376.1K. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while TRNR trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check TRNR's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 8.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while IVP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to IVP's ROE of -5.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check IVP's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, STON has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while STON trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check STON's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, NEBCU has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check NEBCU's competition here

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.3B. In comparison, TMX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $6.97, while TMX trades at $37.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.04, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.09%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.Check TMX's competition here