Mister Car Wash, Inc.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, ROL has a market cap of 27.49B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while ROL trades at $56.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas ROL's P/E ratio is 57.29. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to ROL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, SCI has a market cap of 10.80B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while SCI trades at $75.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas SCI's P/E ratio is 20.95. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCI's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to SCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, HRB has a market cap of 7.72B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while HRB trades at $57.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas HRB's P/E ratio is 16.19. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HRB's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to HRB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, BFAM has a market cap of 7.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while BFAM trades at $121.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas BFAM's P/E ratio is 44.04. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BFAM's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to BFAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, FTDR has a market cap of 3.91B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while FTDR trades at $53.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas FTDR's P/E ratio is 17.30. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FTDR's ROE of +1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to FTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, BYDGF has a market cap of 3.20B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while BYDGF trades at $149.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas BYDGF's P/E ratio is 132.07. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYDGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to BYDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, DSEY has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while DSEY trades at $8.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas DSEY's P/E ratio is -14.47. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DSEY's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to DSEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, ROVR has a market cap of 2.00B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while ROVR trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas ROVR's P/E ratio is 183.25. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ROVR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to ROVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, CVSGF has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while CVSGF trades at $17.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas CVSGF's P/E ratio is 47.50. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVSGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to CVSGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, PRRWF has a market cap of 655.42M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while PRRWF trades at $19.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas PRRWF's P/E ratio is -91.33. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRRWF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to PRRWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, CSV has a market cap of 651.41M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while CSV trades at $41.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas CSV's P/E ratio is 13.88. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSV's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to CSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, CRLKP has a market cap of 456.62M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while CRLKP trades at $20.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas CRLKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRLKP's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to CRLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, MED has a market cap of 140.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while MED trades at $12.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas MED's P/E ratio is -19.95. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MED's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to MED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, EM has a market cap of 115.32M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while EM trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas EM's P/E ratio is -106.50. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to EM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, WOSSF has a market cap of 95.28M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while WOSSF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas WOSSF's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WOSSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to WOSSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, EDEMY has a market cap of 81.64M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while EDEMY trades at $68.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas EDEMY's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDEMY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to EDEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, MNLXF has a market cap of 75.84M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while MNLXF trades at $0.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas MNLXF's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNLXF's ROE of +1.98%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to MNLXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, XSPA has a market cap of 54.52M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while XSPA trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas XSPA's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XSPA's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to XSPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, YYGH has a market cap of 48.96M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while YYGH trades at $1.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas YYGH's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YYGH's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to YYGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, RGS has a market cap of 46.55M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while RGS trades at $19.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas RGS's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RGS's ROE of +2.66%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to RGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, WW has a market cap of 31.36M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while WW trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas WW's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WW's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to WW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, KVIL has a market cap of 30.53M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while KVIL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas KVIL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KVIL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to KVIL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, EJH has a market cap of 19.09M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while EJH trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas EJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EJH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to EJH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, GDDFF has a market cap of 10.31M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while GDDFF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas GDDFF's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GDDFF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to GDDFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, MRM has a market cap of 6.72M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while MRM trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas MRM's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRM's ROE of +1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to MRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, TRNR has a market cap of 6.15M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while TRNR trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas TRNR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRNR's ROE of -13.46%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to TRNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, XWEL has a market cap of 4.63M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while XWEL trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas XWEL's P/E ratio is -0.24. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to XWEL's ROE of -2.71%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to XWEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, IVP has a market cap of 3.39M. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while IVP trades at $1.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas IVP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IVP's ROE of -32.65%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to IVP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, GDET has a market cap of 89921.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while GDET trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas GDET's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GDET's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to GDET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, BZRT has a market cap of 53492.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while BZRT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas BZRT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BZRT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to BZRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, AIOM has a market cap of 34000.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while AIOM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas AIOM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AIOM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to AIOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, PTTL has a market cap of 25350.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while PTTL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas PTTL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTTL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to PTTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, AMIH has a market cap of 19500.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while AMIH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas AMIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AMIH's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to AMIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, PNGB has a market cap of 4902.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while PNGB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas PNGB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNGB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to PNGB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, OBDP has a market cap of 652.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while OBDP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas OBDP's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OBDP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to OBDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, PXRB has a market cap of 82.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while PXRB trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas PXRB's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PXRB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to PXRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, CVSC has a market cap of 17.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while CVSC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas CVSC's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVSC's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to CVSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, VLBI has a market cap of 11.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while VLBI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas VLBI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VLBI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to VLBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, CPLT has a market cap of 2.00. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while CPLT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas CPLT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPLT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to CPLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, STON comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while STON trades at $3.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas STON's P/E ratio is -6.64. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STON's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to STON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, SPRJ comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while SPRJ trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas SPRJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPRJ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to SPRJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, NEBCU comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while NEBCU trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas NEBCU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NEBCU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to NEBCU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, PLWN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while PLWN trades at $590.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas PLWN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PLWN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is more volatile compared to PLWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.

MCW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, MCW stands at 2.42B. In comparison, TMX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, MCW is priced at $7.45, while TMX trades at $37.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

MCW currently has a P/E ratio of 31.04, whereas TMX's P/E ratio is 70.13. In terms of profitability, MCW's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TMX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MCW is less volatile compared to TMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MCW.