LegalZoom.com, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LZ
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LZ
LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LZ) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LZ | $5.93 | -1.00% | 1.1B | 74.13 | $0.08 | N/A |
| CTAS | $174.59 | +2.53% | 69.8B | 36.91 | $4.73 | +1.00% |
| TRI | $86.11 | -2.65% | 38.3B | 26.17 | $3.29 | +2.83% |
| CPRT | $33.17 | +0.18% | 32.1B | 20.86 | $1.59 | N/A |
| RBA | $99.81 | +2.09% | 18.6B | 48.92 | $2.04 | +1.22% |
| ULS | $85.23 | +3.84% | 17.2B | 53.33 | $1.60 | +0.63% |
| RTO | $33.70 | +3.18% | 17B | 59.10 | $0.57 | +1.66% |
| GPN | $65.07 | +3.78% | 15.4B | 14.68 | $4.43 | +1.54% |
| BIPI | $16.49 | +1.29% | 13.1B | N/A | N/A | +7.76% |
| ARMK | $43.31 | +3.12% | 11.4B | 36.39 | $1.19 | +1.03% |
Stock Comparison
LZ vs CTAS Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while CTAS trades at $174.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 36.91. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CTAS's competition here
LZ vs TRI Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while TRI trades at $86.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TRI's competition here
LZ vs CPRT Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 32.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while CPRT trades at $33.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 20.86. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CPRT's competition here
LZ vs RBA Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while RBA trades at $99.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 48.92. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RBA's competition here
LZ vs ULS Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while ULS trades at $85.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 53.33. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ULS's competition here
LZ vs RTO Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while RTO trades at $33.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 59.10. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RTO's competition here
LZ vs GPN Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 15.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while GPN trades at $65.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 14.68. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check GPN's competition here
LZ vs BIPI Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while BIPI trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BIPI's competition here
LZ vs ARMK Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while ARMK trades at $43.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 36.39. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ARMK's competition here
LZ vs IAA Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check IAA's competition here
LZ vs UNF Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while UNF trades at $258.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 35.01. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check UNF's competition here
LZ vs MMS Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while MMS trades at $65.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check MMS's competition here
LZ vs ABM Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while ABM trades at $39.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ABM's competition here
LZ vs FA Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while FA trades at $11.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -56.45. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check FA's competition here
LZ vs TIC Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while TIC trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -12.31. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TIC's competition here
LZ vs CBZ Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while CBZ trades at $27.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 15.09. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CBZ's competition here
LZ vs TH Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while TH trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -38.76. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TH's competition here
LZ vs RHLD Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while RHLD trades at $156.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -230.09. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RHLD's ROE of +7.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RHLD's competition here
LZ vs VVI Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check VVI's competition here
LZ vs PRSU Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while PRSU trades at $41.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is 46.77. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PRSU's competition here
LZ vs BV Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while BV trades at $11.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 168.93. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BV's competition here
LZ vs KODK Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while KODK trades at $11.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KODK's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check KODK's competition here
LZ vs SP Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SP's competition here
LZ vs TDCX Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TDCX's competition here
LZ vs SPIR Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 686.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while SPIR trades at $20.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SPIR's competition here
LZ vs CASS Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 600.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while CASS trades at $45.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CASS's competition here
LZ vs ACTG Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 482.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while ACTG trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ACTG's competition here
LZ vs PPHC Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 408.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while PPHC trades at $14.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is -5.96. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PPHC's competition here
LZ vs QUAD Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 379.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while QUAD trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check QUAD's competition here
LZ vs CVEO Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 347.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while CVEO trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -17.29. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CVEO's competition here
LZ vs SPIR-WT Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SPIR-WT has a market cap of 346.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while SPIR-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas SPIR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPIR-WT's ROE of -249.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to SPIR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SPIR-WT's competition here
LZ vs PFMT Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFMT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PFMT's competition here
LZ vs RHLDV Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RHLDV's competition here
LZ vs BUUU Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 181.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while BUUU trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 222.57. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BUUU's competition here
LZ vs PFSW Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PFSW's competition here
LZ vs ARC Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ARC's competition here
LZ vs ANPA Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while ANPA trades at $9.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 882.00. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ANPA's competition here
LZ vs DLHC Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 85.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while DLHC trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -73.87. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check DLHC's competition here
LZ vs TISI Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while TISI trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.49. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TISI's ROE of -18.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check TISI's competition here
LZ vs SST-WT Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SST-WT has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while SST-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas SST-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SST-WT's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to SST-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SST-WT's competition here
LZ vs OMEX Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 38.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while OMEX trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -1.14. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check OMEX's competition here
LZ vs NTIP Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 33.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while NTIP trades at $1.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.32. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check NTIP's competition here
LZ vs SST Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while SST trades at $3.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SST's competition here
LZ vs PMEC Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while PMEC trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -14.74. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PMEC's competition here
LZ vs YSXT Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 27.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while YSXT trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check YSXT's competition here
LZ vs THH Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 19.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while THH trades at $0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 19.66. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check THH's competition here
LZ vs WHLM Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 17.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while WHLM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 35.50. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check WHLM's competition here
LZ vs SMX Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while SMX trades at $6.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMX's ROE of -22.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SMX's competition here
LZ vs ZGM Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while ZGM trades at $1.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ZGM's competition here
LZ vs SGRP Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 14.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while SGRP trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -1.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SGRP's competition here
LZ vs ATTO Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ATTO's competition here
LZ vs MSGY Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 6.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while MSGY trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check MSGY's competition here
LZ vs CRE Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while CRE trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 3.66. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CRE's competition here
LZ vs LICN Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while LICN trades at $4.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check LICN's competition here
LZ vs SFHG Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while SFHG trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -3.79. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check SFHG's competition here
LZ vs VSA Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, VSA has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while VSA trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas VSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VSA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to VSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check VSA's competition here
LZ vs PMAX Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 586.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while PMAX trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.15. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PMAX's competition here
LZ vs THWWW Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check THWWW's competition here
LZ vs BLMZ Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check BLMZ's competition here
LZ vs GPAK Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, GPAK has a market cap of 20.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while GPAK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas GPAK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GPAK's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to GPAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check GPAK's competition here
LZ vs CRN Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check CRN's competition here
LZ vs EPIQ Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, EPIQ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while EPIQ trades at $16.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas EPIQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EPIQ's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to EPIQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check EPIQ's competition here
LZ vs INTX Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to INTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check INTX's competition here
LZ vs PAEWW Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PAEWW's competition here
LZ vs ALJJ Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check ALJJ's competition here
LZ vs RRD Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check RRD's competition here
LZ vs PAE Comparison April 2026
LZ plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LZ stands at 1.1B. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LZ is priced at $5.93, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LZ currently has a P/E ratio of 74.13, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, LZ's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LZ is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LZ.Check PAE's competition here