Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LVS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | $52.34 | -0.29% | 37B | 26.43 | $1.98 | +1.72% |
| FLUT | $305.24 | -0.33% | 53.9B | 104.89 | $2.91 | N/A |
| DKNG | $43.60 | -1.54% | 21.6B | -53.17 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $109.38 | -1.70% | 11.4B | 29.25 | $3.74 | +0.92% |
| MGM | $37.41 | -2.98% | 10.2B | 16.71 | $2.24 | N/A |
| LNW | $97.87 | -0.89% | 8.3B | 26.17 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CHDN | $110.60 | -0.58% | 7.8B | 19.10 | $5.79 | +0.37% |
| BYD | $85.74 | -0.72% | 7B | 13.27 | $6.46 | +0.82% |
| CZR | $28.47 | -3.23% | 5.9B | -25.85 | -$1.10 | N/A |
| MTN | $155.64 | -1.93% | 5.8B | 19.84 | $7.85 | +5.70% |
Stock Comparison
LVS vs FLUT Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while FLUT trades at $305.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 104.89. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check FLUT's competition here
LVS vs DKNG Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while DKNG trades at $43.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -53.17. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check DKNG's competition here
LVS vs WYNN Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while WYNN trades at $109.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check WYNN's competition here
LVS vs MGM Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while MGM trades at $37.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 16.71. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MGM's competition here
LVS vs LNW Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while LNW trades at $97.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LNW's competition here
LVS vs CHDN Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while CHDN trades at $110.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CHDN's competition here
LVS vs BYD Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while BYD trades at $85.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BYD's competition here
LVS vs CZR Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while CZR trades at $28.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -25.85. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CZR's competition here
LVS vs MTN Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while MTN trades at $155.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 19.84. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MTN's competition here
LVS vs SGHC Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while SGHC trades at $10.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 41.79. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SGHC's competition here
LVS vs SGMS Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SGMS's competition here
LVS vs HGV Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while HGV trades at $51.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 159.53. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check HGV's competition here
LVS vs RSI Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while RSI trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 173.56. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check RSI's competition here
LVS vs IGT Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check IGT's competition here
LVS vs RRR Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while RRR trades at $55.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 21.16. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check RRR's competition here
LVS vs VAC Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while VAC trades at $81.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check VAC's competition here
LVS vs PENN Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while PENN trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -30.58. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check PENN's competition here
LVS vs SBET Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while SBET trades at $19.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.40. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SBET's competition here
LVS vs MCRI Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while MCRI trades at $102.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 24.38. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MCRI's competition here
LVS vs PLYA Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check PLYA's competition here
LVS vs EVRI Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check EVRI's competition here
LVS vs MLCO Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while MLCO trades at $8.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 61.93. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MLCO's competition here
LVS vs ACEL Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while ACEL trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check ACEL's competition here
LVS vs BVH Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BVH's competition here
LVS vs NGMS Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check NGMS's competition here
LVS vs GDEN Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 763.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while GDEN trades at $28.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 67.16. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GDEN's competition here
LVS vs TPGH-UN Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
LVS vs AGS Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check AGS's competition here
LVS vs BALY Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 383.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while BALY trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BALY's competition here
LVS vs CDRO Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 383.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while CDRO trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 93.33. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CDRO's competition here
LVS vs GAMB Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 374.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while GAMB trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GAMB's competition here
LVS vs INSE Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 251.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while INSE trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check INSE's competition here
LVS vs MSC Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 213.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while MSC trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -8.86. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MSC's competition here
LVS vs FLL Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while FLL trades at $4.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -4.31. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check FLL's competition here
LVS vs CPHC Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 93.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while CPHC trades at $18.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 115.75. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CPHC's competition here
LVS vs GAN Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GAN's competition here
LVS vs CNTY Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 73.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while CNTY trades at $2.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CNTY's competition here
LVS vs CDROW Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while CDROW trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CDROW's competition here
LVS vs LTRY Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LTRY's competition here
LVS vs LTRYW Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LTRYW's competition here
LVS vs SLNA Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SLNA's competition here
LVS vs SLNAW Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SLNAW's competition here
LVS vs GMBLP Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 387.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while GMBLP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLP's competition here
LVS vs GMBL Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 366.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while GMBL trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBL's competition here
LVS vs GMBLW Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLW's competition here
LVS vs EBET Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check EBET's competition here
LVS vs GMBLZ Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLZ's competition here
LVS vs GNOG Comparison July 2025
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 37B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $52.34, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 26.43, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.44%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GNOG's competition here