Las Vegas Sands Corp.
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LVS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | $58.09 | +0.00% | 39.2B | 24.68 | $2.35 | +1.82% |
| FLUT | $122.16 | +0.00% | 21.2B | -95.26 | -$1.27 | N/A |
| WYNN | $115.35 | +0.00% | 11.9B | 36.58 | $3.14 | +0.87% |
| DKNG | $22.49 | +0.00% | 11.1B | -2231.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| MGM | $36.46 | +0.00% | 10.1B | 48.41 | $0.76 | N/A |
| LNW | $99.75 | +0.25% | 8.4B | 21.78 | $4.58 | N/A |
| BYD | $85.06 | +0.00% | 6.7B | 3.82 | $22.56 | +0.83% |
| CHDN | $92.21 | +0.00% | 6.5B | 17.04 | $5.50 | +0.47% |
| SGMS | $58.07 | +2.33% | 5.3B | 30.71 | $1.89 | N/A |
| RSI | $18.66 | +0.00% | 5.2B | 68.56 | $0.27 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LVS vs FLUT Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 21.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while FLUT trades at $122.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is -95.26. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to FLUT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check FLUT's competition here
LVS vs WYNN Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while WYNN trades at $115.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 36.58. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check WYNN's competition here
LVS vs DKNG Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while DKNG trades at $22.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -2231.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to DKNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check DKNG's competition here
LVS vs MGM Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while MGM trades at $36.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 48.41. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MGM's competition here
LVS vs LNW Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while LNW trades at $99.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LNW's competition here
LVS vs BYD Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while BYD trades at $85.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 3.82. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BYD's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BYD's competition here
LVS vs CHDN Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while CHDN trades at $92.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 17.04. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CHDN's competition here
LVS vs SGMS Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SGMS's competition here
LVS vs RSI Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while RSI trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 68.56. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check RSI's competition here
LVS vs MTN Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while MTN trades at $143.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MTN's competition here
LVS vs SGHC Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while SGHC trades at $9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 23.05. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SGHC's competition here
LVS vs CZR Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while CZR trades at $21.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -17.99. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CZR's competition here
LVS vs HGV Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while HGV trades at $48.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 88.29. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check HGV's competition here
LVS vs RRR Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while RRR trades at $66.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 20.52. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check RRR's competition here
LVS vs IGT Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check IGT's competition here
LVS vs BRSL Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BRSL has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while BRSL trades at $13.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas BRSL's P/E ratio is 149.61. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BRSL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to BRSL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BRSL's competition here
LVS vs VAC Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while VAC trades at $58.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check VAC's competition here
LVS vs PENN Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while PENN trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check PENN's competition here
LVS vs MCRI Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while MCRI trades at $96.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MCRI's competition here
LVS vs PLYA Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check PLYA's competition here
LVS vs EVRI Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check EVRI's competition here
LVS vs BVH Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BVH's competition here
LVS vs SBET Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while SBET trades at $6.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SBET's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SBET's competition here
LVS vs NGMS Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check NGMS's competition here
LVS vs ACEL Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 961.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while ACEL trades at $11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check ACEL's competition here
LVS vs MLCO Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 789.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while MLCO trades at $5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 13.17. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MLCO's competition here
LVS vs GDEN Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 763.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while GDEN trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 132.55. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GDEN's competition here
LVS vs BALY Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 596.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while BALY trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.96. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check BALY's competition here
LVS vs TPGH-UN Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
LVS vs AGS Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check AGS's competition here
LVS vs CDRO Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 367M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while CDRO trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 402.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CDRO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CDRO's competition here
LVS vs INSE Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 224.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while INSE trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 4.25. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to INSE's ROE of -9.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check INSE's competition here
LVS vs GAMB Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 152.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while GAMB trades at $4.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 86.60. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GAMB's competition here
LVS vs MSC Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 140.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while MSC trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -9.73. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check MSC's competition here
LVS vs GAN Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GAN's competition here
LVS vs FLL Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 81.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while FLL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -2.03. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check FLL's competition here
LVS vs CPHC Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 79.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while CPHC trades at $15.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is -55.61. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CPHC's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CPHC's competition here
LVS vs CNTY Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 49.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while CNTY trades at $1.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.45. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +2.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CNTY's competition here
LVS vs ROLR Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, ROLR has a market cap of 39.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while ROLR trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas ROLR's P/E ratio is -12.62. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to ROLR's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to ROLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check ROLR's competition here
LVS vs LTRY Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LTRY's competition here
LVS vs CDROW Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 30.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while CDROW trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to CDROW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check CDROW's competition here
LVS vs SLNA Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SLNA's competition here
LVS vs SLNAW Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check SLNAW's competition here
LVS vs GMBL Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 201.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while GMBL trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBL's competition here
LVS vs LTRYW Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 37K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while LTRYW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check LTRYW's competition here
LVS vs GMBLP Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 31.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while GMBLP trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLP's competition here
LVS vs GMBLW Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLW's competition here
LVS vs EBET Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 3K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to EBET's ROE of +6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check EBET's competition here
LVS vs GMBLZ Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GMBLZ's competition here
LVS vs GNOG Comparison February 2026
LVS plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LVS stands at 39.2B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LVS is priced at $58.09, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LVS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.68, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LVS's ROE is +0.83%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LVS is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LVS.Check GNOG's competition here