Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd.
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd. LSE Peers
See (LSE) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSE | $6.67 | +30.78% | 113.6M | 13.90 | $0.48 | N/A |
| SLB | $35.92 | -1.05% | 48.9B | 12.18 | $2.95 | +3.12% |
| BKR | $38.99 | -0.13% | 38.6B | 13.31 | $2.93 | +2.27% |
| HAL | $22.92 | -1.16% | 19.7B | 9.59 | $2.39 | +2.97% |
| TS | $36.24 | +0.68% | 19.4B | 11.05 | $3.28 | +4.59% |
| FTI | $34.68 | +0.45% | 14.5B | 17.69 | $1.96 | +0.58% |
| NOV | $13.70 | +0.29% | 5.1B | 9.19 | $1.49 | +3.72% |
| CHX | $26.40 | -1.01% | 5.1B | 17.48 | $1.51 | +1.44% |
| AROC | $24.58 | -0.97% | 4.3B | 20.66 | $1.19 | +2.93% |
| WFRD | $51.86 | -2.20% | 3.8B | 8.26 | $6.28 | +1.93% |
Stock Comparison
LSE vs SLB Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, SLB has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while SLB trades at $35.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas SLB's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLB's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs BKR Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, BKR has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while BKR trades at $38.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas BKR's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BKR's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to BKR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs HAL Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, HAL has a market cap of 19.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while HAL trades at $22.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas HAL's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HAL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to HAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs TS Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, TS has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while TS trades at $36.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas TS's P/E ratio is 11.05. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to TS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs FTI Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, FTI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while FTI trades at $34.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas FTI's P/E ratio is 17.69. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FTI's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to FTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs NOV Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, NOV has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while NOV trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NOV's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NOV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs CHX Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, CHX has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while CHX trades at $26.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CHX's P/E ratio is 17.48. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to CHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs AROC Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, AROC has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while AROC trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas AROC's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AROC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to AROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs WFRD Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, WFRD has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while WFRD trades at $51.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas WFRD's P/E ratio is 8.26. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WFRD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to WFRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs VAL Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, VAL has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while VAL trades at $46.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas VAL's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VAL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to VAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs WHD Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, WHD has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while WHD trades at $45.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas WHD's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WHD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to WHD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs VAL-WT Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, VAL-WT has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while VAL-WT trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas VAL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VAL-WT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to VAL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs KGS Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, KGS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while KGS trades at $33.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas KGS's P/E ratio is 67.30. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KGS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to KGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs USAC Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, USAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while USAC trades at $24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas USAC's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USAC's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to USAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs TDW-WT Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, TDW-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while TDW-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas TDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TDW-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to TDW-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs NEX Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, NEX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while NEX trades at $10.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NEX's P/E ratio is 3.94. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs TDW Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, TDW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while TDW trades at $47.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas TDW's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TDW's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to TDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs LBRT Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, LBRT has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while LBRT trades at $13.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas LBRT's P/E ratio is 8.53. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LBRT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to LBRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs OII Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, OII has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while OII trades at $21.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas OII's P/E ratio is 11.77. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OII's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to OII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs SEI Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, SEI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while SEI trades at $28.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas SEI's P/E ratio is 56.67. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SEI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs AESI Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, AESI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while AESI trades at $14.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas AESI's P/E ratio is 48.13. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AESI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to AESI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs LB Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, LB has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while LB trades at $70.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas LB's P/E ratio is -24.37. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LB's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to LB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs DNOW Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, DNOW has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while DNOW trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas DNOW's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DNOW's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to DNOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs ACDC Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, ACDC has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while ACDC trades at $9.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas ACDC's P/E ratio is -6.54. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACDC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to ACDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs SLCA Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, SLCA has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while SLCA trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas SLCA's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SLCA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SLCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs PFHC Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, PFHC has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while PFHC trades at $22.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas PFHC's P/E ratio is 105.14. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PFHC's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to PFHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs INVX Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, INVX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while INVX trades at $16.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas INVX's P/E ratio is 8.22. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to INVX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to INVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs RES Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, RES has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while RES trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas RES's P/E ratio is 13.68. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RES's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to RES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs MRC Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, MRC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while MRC trades at $12.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas MRC's P/E ratio is 25.73. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MRC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to MRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs XPRO Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, XPRO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while XPRO trades at $9.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas XPRO's P/E ratio is 16.14. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XPRO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to XPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs HLX Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, HLX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while HLX trades at $7.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas HLX's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HLX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to HLX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs VTOL Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, VTOL has a market cap of 982.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while VTOL trades at $34.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas VTOL's P/E ratio is 8.75. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VTOL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to VTOL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs EFXT Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, EFXT has a market cap of 970.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while EFXT trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas EFXT's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFXT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to EFXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs WTTR Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, WTTR has a market cap of 954.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while WTTR trades at $9.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas WTTR's P/E ratio is 26.99. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WTTR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to WTTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs NPKI Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, NPKI has a market cap of 738.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while NPKI trades at $8.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NPKI's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NPKI's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NPKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs PUMP Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, PUMP has a market cap of 669.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while PUMP trades at $6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas PUMP's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PUMP's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to PUMP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs NR Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, NR has a market cap of 627.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while NR trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NR's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NR's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs NESRW Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, NESRW has a market cap of 593.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while NESRW trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NESRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NESRW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NESRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs NESR Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, NESR has a market cap of 579.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while NESR trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NESR's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NESR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NESR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs CLB Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, CLB has a market cap of 567.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while CLB trades at $12.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CLB's P/E ratio is 20.18. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CLB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to CLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs DRQ Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, DRQ has a market cap of 530.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while DRQ trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas DRQ's P/E ratio is -19.76. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DRQ's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to DRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs NOA Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, NOA has a market cap of 520.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while NOA trades at $17.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NOA's P/E ratio is 18.05. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NOA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NOA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs SOI Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, SOI has a market cap of 498.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while SOI trades at $11.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas SOI's P/E ratio is 17.15. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SOI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SOI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs FTK Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, FTK has a market cap of 478.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while FTK trades at $16.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas FTK's P/E ratio is 34.85. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FTK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to FTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs TTI Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, TTI has a market cap of 472.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while TTI trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas TTI's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TTI's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to TTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs FLOC Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, FLOC has a market cap of 465.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while FLOC trades at $18.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas FLOC's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FLOC's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to FLOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs CCLP Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, CCLP has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while CCLP trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CCLP's P/E ratio is -34.57. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CCLP's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to CCLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs OIS Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, OIS has a market cap of 336.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while OIS trades at $5.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas OIS's P/E ratio is 67.94. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OIS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to OIS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs NGS Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, NGS has a market cap of 329.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while NGS trades at $26.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NGS's P/E ratio is 19.62. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NGS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs RNGR Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, RNGR has a market cap of 289.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while RNGR trades at $12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas RNGR's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNGR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to RNGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs FET Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, FET has a market cap of 244.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while FET trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas FET's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FET's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to FET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs BOOM Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, BOOM has a market cap of 166M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while BOOM trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas BOOM's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BOOM's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to BOOM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs DTI Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, DTI has a market cap of 120.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while DTI trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas DTI's P/E ratio is -48.50. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DTI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to DTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs PFIE Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, PFIE has a market cap of 117.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while PFIE trades at $2.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas PFIE's P/E ratio is 13.37. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PFIE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to PFIE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs SND Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, SND has a market cap of 93M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while SND trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas SND's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SND's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs GEOS Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, GEOS has a market cap of 88.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while GEOS trades at $6.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas GEOS's P/E ratio is -5.56. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GEOS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to GEOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs DWSN Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, DWSN has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while DWSN trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas DWSN's P/E ratio is -9.76. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DWSN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to DWSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs NCSM Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, NCSM has a market cap of 78M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while NCSM trades at $30.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NCSM's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NCSM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NCSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs RCON Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, RCON has a market cap of 58.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while RCON trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas RCON's P/E ratio is -1.54. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RCON's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to RCON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs KLXE Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, KLXE has a market cap of 45M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while KLXE trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas KLXE's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KLXE's ROE of +9.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to KLXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs SDPI Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, SDPI has a market cap of 30.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while SDPI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas SDPI's P/E ratio is 7.21. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SDPI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to SDPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs NINE Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, NINE has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while NINE trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas NINE's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NINE's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to NINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs ENSV Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, ENSV has a market cap of 919.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while ENSV trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas ENSV's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENSV's ROE of -4.70%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to ENSV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs EXTN Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, EXTN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while EXTN trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas EXTN's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXTN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to EXTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs FTSI Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, FTSI has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while FTSI trades at $26.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas FTSI's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FTSI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to FTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs CELP Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, CELP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while CELP trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas CELP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CELP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to CELP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs USWS Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, USWS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while USWS trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas USWS's P/E ratio is -3.94. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USWS's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to USWS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs IO Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, IO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while IO trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas IO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IO's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is more volatile compared to IO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.
LSE vs ACDCW Comparison
LSE plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LSE stands at 113.6M. In comparison, ACDCW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LSE is priced at $6.67, while ACDCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LSE currently has a P/E ratio of 13.90, whereas ACDCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LSE's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ACDCW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LSE is less volatile compared to ACDCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LSE.