Light & Wonder, Inc.
Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LNW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNW | $98.75 | +0.97% | 8.3B | 26.40 | $3.74 | N/A |
| FLUT | $306.25 | +0.42% | 54.1B | 105.64 | $2.90 | N/A |
| LVS | $52.49 | +0.15% | 37.1B | 26.51 | $1.98 | +1.72% |
| DKNG | $44.28 | -1.29% | 22B | -54.00 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $111.27 | +1.67% | 11.6B | 29.75 | $3.74 | +0.92% |
| MGM | $38.56 | +0.31% | 10.5B | 17.22 | $2.24 | N/A |
| CHDN | $111.25 | -2.01% | 7.8B | 19.21 | $5.79 | +0.36% |
| BYD | $86.36 | +0.49% | 7B | 13.36 | $6.46 | +0.82% |
| CZR | $29.42 | -0.47% | 6.1B | -26.75 | -$1.10 | N/A |
| MTN | $158.70 | -1.16% | 5.9B | 20.20 | $7.85 | +5.54% |
Stock Comparison
LNW vs FLUT Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, FLUT has a market cap of 54.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while FLUT trades at $306.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas FLUT's P/E ratio is 105.64. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FLUT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to FLUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check FLUT's competition here
LNW vs LVS Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while LVS trades at $52.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 26.51. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check LVS's competition here
LNW vs DKNG Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while DKNG trades at $44.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -54.00. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check DKNG's competition here
LNW vs WYNN Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while WYNN trades at $111.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 29.75. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check WYNN's competition here
LNW vs MGM Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while MGM trades at $38.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check MGM's competition here
LNW vs CHDN Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while CHDN trades at $111.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 19.21. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check CHDN's competition here
LNW vs BYD Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while BYD trades at $86.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 13.36. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check BYD's competition here
LNW vs CZR Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while CZR trades at $29.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -26.75. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check CZR's competition here
LNW vs MTN Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while MTN trades at $158.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 20.20. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check MTN's competition here
LNW vs SGHC Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while SGHC trades at $10.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 41.40. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check SGHC's competition here
LNW vs SGMS Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check SGMS's competition here
LNW vs HGV Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while HGV trades at $51.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 161.66. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check HGV's competition here
LNW vs RSI Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while RSI trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 169.72. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check RSI's competition here
LNW vs IGT Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check IGT's competition here
LNW vs RRR Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while RRR trades at $54.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check RRR's competition here
LNW vs VAC Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while VAC trades at $82.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 14.14. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check VAC's competition here
LNW vs PENN Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while PENN trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -30.90. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check PENN's competition here
LNW vs SBET Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while SBET trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.44. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check SBET's competition here
LNW vs MCRI Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while MCRI trades at $104.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check MCRI's competition here
LNW vs PLYA Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check PLYA's competition here
LNW vs EVRI Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check EVRI's competition here
LNW vs MLCO Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while MLCO trades at $8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 63.71. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check MLCO's competition here
LNW vs ACEL Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while ACEL trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check ACEL's competition here
LNW vs BVH Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check BVH's competition here
LNW vs NGMS Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check NGMS's competition here
LNW vs GDEN Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 776.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while GDEN trades at $29.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 68.35. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check GDEN's competition here
LNW vs TPGH-UN Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
LNW vs AGS Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check AGS's competition here
LNW vs BALY Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 405.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while BALY trades at $9.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check BALY's competition here
LNW vs GAMB Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 390.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while GAMB trades at $10.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check GAMB's competition here
LNW vs CDRO Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 381.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while CDRO trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 92.78. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check CDRO's competition here
LNW vs INSE Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 251.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while INSE trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.83. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check INSE's competition here
LNW vs MSC Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 223M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while MSC trades at $4.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check MSC's competition here
LNW vs FLL Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 172.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while FLL trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -4.35. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check FLL's competition here
LNW vs CPHC Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 91.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while CPHC trades at $18.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 113.75. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check CPHC's competition here
LNW vs GAN Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check GAN's competition here
LNW vs CNTY Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 77.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while CNTY trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check CNTY's competition here
LNW vs CDROW Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 47.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while CDROW trades at $1.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check CDROW's competition here
LNW vs LTRY Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check LTRY's competition here
LNW vs LTRYW Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 29.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check LTRYW's competition here
LNW vs SLNA Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check SLNA's competition here
LNW vs SLNAW Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check SLNAW's competition here
LNW vs GMBLP Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 389.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while GMBLP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check GMBLP's competition here
LNW vs GMBL Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 355.3K. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while GMBL trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check GMBL's competition here
LNW vs GMBLW Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check GMBLW's competition here
LNW vs EBET Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check EBET's competition here
LNW vs GMBLZ Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check GMBLZ's competition here
LNW vs GNOG Comparison July 2025
LNW plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LNW stands at 8.3B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LNW is priced at $98.75, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LNW currently has a P/E ratio of 26.40, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, LNW's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LNW is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LNW.Check GNOG's competition here