LL Flooring Holdings, Inc.
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LL
Get $10 bonus on your first $100 deposit for LL
LL Flooring Holdings, Inc. (LL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Home Improvement Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | $0.84 | +0.45% | 25.9M | -0.20 | -$4.22 | N/A |
| HD | $318.77 | -2.41% | 317.5B | 22.42 | $14.22 | +2.92% |
| LOW | $231.61 | -1.53% | 129.9B | 19.55 | $11.85 | +2.06% |
| FND | $47.65 | -3.50% | 5.1B | 24.81 | $1.92 | N/A |
| MLHR | $38.66 | +0.08% | 2.9B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| ARHS | $6.27 | -3.39% | 884.7M | 13.06 | $0.48 | +5.62% |
| HVT-A | $21.55 | -9.15% | 349.6M | 18.11 | $1.19 | +6.23% |
| HVT | $20.97 | -0.29% | 340.5M | 17.65 | $1.19 | +6.23% |
| EMPG | $17.36 | +0.00% | 143M | 192.89 | $0.09 | N/A |
| TTSH | $3.19 | +5.28% | 142.6M | -31.90 | -$0.10 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LL vs HD Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 317.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HD trades at $318.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 22.42. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HD's ROE of +1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HD's competition here
LL vs LOW Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 129.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LOW trades at $231.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LOW's competition here
LL vs FND Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while FND trades at $47.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 24.81. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check FND's competition here
LL vs MLHR Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while MLHR trades at $38.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check MLHR's competition here
LL vs ARHS Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 884.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while ARHS trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 13.06. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check ARHS's competition here
LL vs HVT-A Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 349.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HVT-A trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 18.11. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HVT-A's competition here
LL vs HVT Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 340.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HVT trades at $20.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HVT's competition here
LL vs EMPG Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, EMPG has a market cap of 143M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while EMPG trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas EMPG's P/E ratio is 192.89. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to EMPG's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to EMPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check EMPG's competition here
LL vs TTSH Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 142.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while TTSH trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is -31.90. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to TTSH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check TTSH's competition here
LL vs PFAI Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 44.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while PFAI trades at $3.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is -191.00. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check PFAI's competition here
LL vs LIVE Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LIVE trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LIVE's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LIVE's competition here
LL vs LESL Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 12M. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while LESL trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check LESL's competition here
LL vs CAA Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, CAA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while CAA trades at $53.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas CAA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to CAA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to CAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check CAA's competition here
LL vs HBP Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, HBP has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while HBP trades at $10.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas HBP's P/E ratio is 6.07. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to HBP's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to HBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check HBP's competition here
LL vs FLE Comparison April 2026
LL plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LL stands at 25.9M. In comparison, FLE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LL is priced at $0.84, while FLE trades at $15,400.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.20, whereas FLE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LL's ROE is -0.50%, compared to FLE's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LL is more volatile compared to FLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LL.Check FLE's competition here