Houston American Energy Corp.

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 117.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while COP trades at $92.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check COP's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 64.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CNQ trades at $30.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.96. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CNQ's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 63.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while EOG trades at $116.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check EOG's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check PXD's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CEO's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check HES's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while OXY-WT trades at $21.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check OXY-WT's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while OXY trades at $43.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check OXY's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while FANG trades at $146.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 9.09. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check FANG's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while EQT trades at $52.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 27.55. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check EQT's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 32B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while WDS trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check WDS's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while EXE trades at $101.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is -3399.00. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check EXE's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while TPL trades at $934.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 46.70. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check TPL's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while DVN trades at $32.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 7.32. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check DVN's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CTRA trades at $23.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CTRA's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check COG's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while MRO trades at $28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check MRO's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CHK trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CHK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CHK's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while AR trades at $33.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 21.99. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check AR's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while OVV trades at $39.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check OVV's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while PR trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 8.32. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check PR's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CHKEW's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while RRC trades at $35.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check RRC's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CHKEZ's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CHKEL's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SWN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check SWN's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while APA trades at $18.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 6.62. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check APA's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CHRD trades at $105.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CHRD's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while MTDR trades at $47.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 7.02. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check MTDR's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CPG's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CRK trades at $16.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is -68.33. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CRK's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check OAS's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check DEN's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while MGY trades at $23.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check MGY's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check BCEI's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CDEV's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CRC trades at $46.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CRC's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while VIST trades at $43.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check VIST's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while ERF trades at $20.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check ERF's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CNX trades at $28.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 34.39. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CNX's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check VRN's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while MUR trades at $23.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 9.03. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check MUR's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while SM trades at $26.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check SM's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while GPOR trades at $168.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -9.79. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to GPOR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check GPOR's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check ESTE's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while NEXT trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -16.09. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check NEXT's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CIVI trades at $28.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.30. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CIVI's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while BSM trades at $12.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check BSM's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while NOG trades at $25.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check NOG's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CPE's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CRGY trades at $8.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CRGY's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check STRDW's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while KRP trades at $14.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 368.50. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check KRP's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while MNR trades at $14.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 9.19. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check MNR's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while BKV trades at $19.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to BKV's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check BKV's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while BTE trades at $2.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 7.22. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check BTE's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check HHRS's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while TALO trades at $7.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is 36.07. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to TALO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check TALO's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CLMT trades at $15.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -3.85. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CLMT's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while DMLP trades at $27.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 13.31. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check DMLP's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while VET trades at $7.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -53.07. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check VET's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while FLMN trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check FLMN's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while HPK trades at $8.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check HPK's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 960.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while SBR trades at $65.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SBR's ROE of +6.93%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check SBR's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check SBOW's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 929.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while KOS trades at $1.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -64.83. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check KOS's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 894.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while VTS trades at $23.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check VTS's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check TELL's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 820.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while TXO trades at $14.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 39.39. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check TXO's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check ROCC's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 655.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while VTLE trades at $16.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -5.02. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check VTLE's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 638.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while GRNT trades at $4.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 54.11. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check GRNT's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check PVAC's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 559.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while REPX trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check REPX's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 410.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while OBE trades at $5.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to OBE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check OBE's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 373.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while EGY trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 6.43. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check EGY's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 367.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while SD trades at $10.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check SD's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 327.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while GPRK trades at $6.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 3.55. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check GPRK's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 322.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while GFR trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check GFR's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 271.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while SJT trades at $5.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is 291.50. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to SJT's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check SJT's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 261.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while PNRG trades at $157.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 7.42. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check PNRG's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 251.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while WTI trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.37. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to WTI's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check WTI's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 221.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while BRY trades at $2.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check BRY's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 216.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while INR trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check INR's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 208.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while KGEI trades at $5.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 10.33. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check KGEI's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check PHX's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 159.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while EPM trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -116.25. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check EPM's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 150.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while EP trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -8.63. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check EP's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 149.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while REI trades at $0.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 2.01. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to REI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check REI's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 146.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while AMPY trades at $3.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check AMPY's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 140.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while GTE trades at $3.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -9.01. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check GTE's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 134.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while EPSN trades at $6.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check EPSN's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 105.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while IMPPP trades at $25.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.73. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check IMPPP's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 103.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while IMPP trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.50. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check IMPP's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, MVO has a market cap of 64.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while MVO trades at $5.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas MVO's P/E ratio is 4.28. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to MVO's ROE of +3.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to MVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check MVO's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, PVL has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while PVL trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PVL's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to PVL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to PVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check PVL's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 56.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while PED trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check PED's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, CRT has a market cap of 53.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while CRT trades at $8.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CRT's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to CRT's ROE of +2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is more volatile compared to CRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check CRT's competition here

HUSA plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HUSA stands at 328.8M. In comparison, VIVK has a market cap of 52.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HUSA is priced at $9.64, while VIVK trades at $1.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HUSA currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas VIVK's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, HUSA's ROE is -1.19%, compared to VIVK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, HUSA is less volatile compared to VIVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HUSA.Check VIVK's competition here