Harmonic Inc.
Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HLIT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLIT | $9.14 | +1.56% | 1B | 20.31 | $0.45 | N/A |
| CSCO | $67.92 | -1.12% | 269B | 27.72 | $2.45 | +2.39% |
| MSI | $429.97 | +0.46% | 71.8B | 35.90 | $11.98 | +0.99% |
| UI | $459.50 | +2.92% | 27.8B | 50.70 | $9.06 | +0.53% |
| HPE | $20.88 | +0.72% | 27.4B | 20.08 | $1.04 | +2.50% |
| ERIC | $7.41 | -1.07% | 24.7B | 13.47 | $0.55 | +0.36% |
| NOK | $4.26 | -1.62% | 22.9B | 22.45 | $0.19 | +3.30% |
| ASTS | $54.22 | -0.21% | 19B | -27.37 | -$1.98 | N/A |
| CRDO | $107.95 | +6.65% | 18.5B | 372.24 | $0.29 | N/A |
| ZBRA | $334.69 | -0.30% | 17B | 31.66 | $10.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
HLIT vs CSCO Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 269B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while CSCO trades at $67.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CSCO's competition here
HLIT vs MSI Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while MSI trades at $429.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 35.90. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MSI's competition here
HLIT vs UI Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while UI trades at $459.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 50.70. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UI's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check UI's competition here
HLIT vs HPE Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while HPE trades at $20.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check HPE's competition here
HLIT vs ERIC Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while ERIC trades at $7.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ERIC's competition here
HLIT vs NOK Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while NOK trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check NOK's competition here
HLIT vs ASTS Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while ASTS trades at $54.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -27.37. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ASTS's competition here
HLIT vs CRDO Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while CRDO trades at $107.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 372.24. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CRDO's competition here
HLIT vs ZBRA Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while ZBRA trades at $334.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ZBRA's competition here
HLIT vs JNPR Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check JNPR's competition here
HLIT vs CIEN Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while CIEN trades at $90.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 124.10. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CIEN's competition here
HLIT vs SATS Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while SATS trades at $29.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -39.69. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SATS's competition here
HLIT vs LITE Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while LITE trades at $107.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is -16.59. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LITE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check LITE's competition here
HLIT vs BDC Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while BDC trades at $129.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check BDC's competition here
HLIT vs MAXR Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MAXR's competition here
HLIT vs PI Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while PI trades at $126.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -2103.83. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check PI's competition here
HLIT vs EXTR Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while EXTR trades at $17.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check EXTR's competition here
HLIT vs VIAV Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while VIAV trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 509.50. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check VIAV's competition here
HLIT vs VSAT Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while VSAT trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check VSAT's competition here
HLIT vs KN Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while KN trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check KN's competition here
HLIT vs COMM Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while COMM trades at $8.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is -45.17. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check COMM's competition here
HLIT vs INFN Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check INFN's competition here
HLIT vs DGII Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while DGII trades at $34.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check DGII's competition here
HLIT vs SWIR Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SWIR's competition here
HLIT vs ITRN Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 805.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while ITRN trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ITRN's competition here
HLIT vs POLY Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check POLY's competition here
HLIT vs ADTN Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 773.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while ADTN trades at $9.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -6.01. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ADTN's competition here
HLIT vs NTGR Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 734.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while NTGR trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check NTGR's competition here
HLIT vs CLFD Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while CLFD trades at $45.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is -322.86. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CLFD's competition here
HLIT vs AIOT Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 597.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while AIOT trades at $4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AIOT's competition here
HLIT vs PWFL Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check PWFL's competition here
HLIT vs GILT Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 435.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while GILT trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check GILT's competition here
HLIT vs TSAT Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while TSAT trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -5.48. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check TSAT's competition here
HLIT vs ONDS Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 349.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while ONDS trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ONDS's competition here
HLIT vs AUDC Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while AUDC trades at $10.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AUDC's competition here
HLIT vs ITI Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ITI's competition here
HLIT vs AVNW Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 296.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while AVNW trades at $23.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -122.47. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AVNW's competition here
HLIT vs FEIM Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 271.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while FEIM trades at $27.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check FEIM's competition here
HLIT vs SATX Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SATX's competition here
HLIT vs CRNT Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 208.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while CRNT trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CRNT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CRNT's competition here
HLIT vs BKTI Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 148.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while BKTI trades at $40.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check BKTI's competition here
HLIT vs PCTI Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check PCTI's competition here
HLIT vs LTRX Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while LTRX trades at $3.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check LTRX's competition here
HLIT vs INSG Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while INSG trades at $7.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check INSG's competition here
HLIT vs KVHI Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while KVHI trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check KVHI's competition here
HLIT vs SILC Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while SILC trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SILC's competition here
HLIT vs TESS Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check TESS's competition here
HLIT vs JCS Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check JCS's competition here
HLIT vs CMTL Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while CMTL trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CMTL's competition here
HLIT vs AMPG Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while AMPG trades at $3.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AMPG's competition here
HLIT vs AMPGW Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while AMPGW trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AMPGW's competition here
HLIT vs AIRG Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while AIRG trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AIRG's competition here
HLIT vs FKWL Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 47.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while FKWL trades at $4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -28.64. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check FKWL's competition here
HLIT vs WTT Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check WTT's competition here
HLIT vs OCC Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while OCC trades at $4.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check OCC's competition here
HLIT vs SYTAW Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while SYTAW trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SYTAW's competition here
HLIT vs SYTA Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while SYTA trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SYTA's competition here
HLIT vs BOSC Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while BOSC trades at $4.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check BOSC's competition here
HLIT vs CMBM Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while CMBM trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CMBM's competition here
HLIT vs MOB Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while MOB trades at $3.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MOB's competition here
HLIT vs UTSI Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while UTSI trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check UTSI's competition here
HLIT vs MINM Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MINM's competition here
HLIT vs IOTR Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while IOTR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -51.60. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check IOTR's competition here
HLIT vs SONM Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while SONM trades at $0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SONM's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SONM's competition here
HLIT vs SYNX Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while SYNX trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SYNX's competition here
HLIT vs CLRO Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while CLRO trades at $5.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CLRO's competition here
HLIT vs MITQ Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while MITQ trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MITQ's competition here
HLIT vs AKTS Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while AKTS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +23.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AKTS's competition here
HLIT vs BOXL Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while BOXL trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check BOXL's competition here
HLIT vs VISL Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while VISL trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check VISL's competition here
HLIT vs ASNS Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while ASNS trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ASNS's competition here
HLIT vs CASA Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CASA's competition here
HLIT vs MOBBW Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while MOBBW trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MOBBW's competition here
HLIT vs MYNA Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MYNA's competition here
HLIT vs DZSI Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check DZSI's competition here
HLIT vs VCRA Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check VCRA's competition here
HLIT vs BDR Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check BDR's competition here
HLIT vs EXFO Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check EXFO's competition here
HLIT vs ORBC Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ORBC's competition here
HLIT vs SATX-WTA Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SATX-WTA's competition here
HLIT vs ZXZZT Comparison July 2025
HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.14, while ZXZZT trades at $12.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ZXZZT's competition here