Harmonic Inc.

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 266.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while CSCO trades at $67.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 25.79. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CSCO's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 76.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while MSI trades at $461.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 37.10. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.28%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MSI's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 30.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while UI trades at $510.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 56.34. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UI's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check UI's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 29.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while HPE trades at $22.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check HPE's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while ERIC trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 14.69. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ERIC's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while NOK trades at $4.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check NOK's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while CRDO trades at $114.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 393.24. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CRDO's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while ZBRA trades at $322.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ZBRA's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 14.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while ASTS trades at $47.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -25.31. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ASTS's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while JNPR trades at $39.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check JNPR's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while CIEN trades at $89.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 122.99. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CIEN's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while SATS trades at $29.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -27.94. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SATS's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while LITE trades at $119.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is 314.05. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LITE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check LITE's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while BDC trades at $131.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 23.85. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check BDC's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while PI trades at $176.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -2947.00. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check PI's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while MAXR trades at $52.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MAXR's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while VSAT trades at $27.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -6.01. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check VSAT's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while COMM trades at $15.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is 57.81. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check COMM's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while EXTR trades at $20.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -344.50. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check EXTR's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while VIAV trades at $11.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 74.00. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check VIAV's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while KN trades at $21.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 71.87. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check KN's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while INFN trades at $6.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check INFN's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while DGII trades at $34.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 30.23. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check DGII's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while SWIR trades at $30.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SWIR's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 797.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while NTGR trades at $27.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 12.61. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check NTGR's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while POLY trades at $39.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check POLY's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 784.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while ONDS trades at $4.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -8.80. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ONDS's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 738.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while ITRN trades at $37.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ITRN's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 734.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while ADTN trades at $9.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -7.52. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ADTN's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 629.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while AIOT trades at $4.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -15.73. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AIOT's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 535.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while GILT trades at $9.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check GILT's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while PWFL trades at $4.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check PWFL's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 454.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while CLFD trades at $32.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is 3291.00. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CLFD's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while ITI trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ITI's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 307.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while TSAT trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check TSAT's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 295.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while AVNW trades at $23.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -122.05. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AVNW's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 282.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while FEIM trades at $29.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check FEIM's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 275.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while AUDC trades at $9.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 20.02. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AUDC's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 271.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while BKTI trades at $72.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 23.49. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check BKTI's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while SATX trades at $2.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SATX's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 176.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while CRNT trades at $1.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRNT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CRNT's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while INSG trades at $11.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check INSG's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while PCTI trades at $6.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check PCTI's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 134.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while LTRX trades at $3.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -15.77. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check LTRX's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 105.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while KVHI trades at $5.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -16.84. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check KVHI's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while SILC trades at $15.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -6.02. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SILC's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while TESS trades at $8.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check TESS's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while JCS trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check JCS's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 66M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while AMPG trades at $3.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -5.18. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AMPG's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 60.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while CMTL trades at $2.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CMTL's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 55.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while AMPGW trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AMPGW's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 51.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while AIRG trades at $4.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -7.31. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AIRG's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, FKWL has a market cap of 50.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while FKWL trades at $4.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas FKWL's P/E ratio is -30.57. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FKWL's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to FKWL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check FKWL's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 46.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while OCC trades at $5.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -14.87. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check OCC's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while WTT trades at $2.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check WTT's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 35.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while MOB trades at $4.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MOB's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 28.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while BOSC trades at $4.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check BOSC's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while SYTA trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SYTA's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 21.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while CMBM trades at $0.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CMBM's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 21M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while SYTAW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SYTAW's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while UTSI trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -4.60. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check UTSI's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while MINM trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MINM's ROE of -3.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MINM's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while SYNX trades at $1.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -3.58. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SYNX's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 10M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while IOTR trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -39.02. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check IOTR's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 9.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while SONM trades at $0.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SONM's ROE of -17.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SONM's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while CLRO trades at $4.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CLRO's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while MITQ trades at $0.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -5.94. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MITQ's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while VISL trades at $2.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check VISL's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while AKTS trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +5.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check AKTS's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while MOBBW trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MOBBW's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while BOXL trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -3.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check BOXL's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while ASNS trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ASNS's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while CASA trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check CASA's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while MYNA trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check MYNA's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while DZSI trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check DZSI's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check SATX-WTA's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while ORBC trades at $11.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ORBC's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while EXFO trades at $6.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check EXFO's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while ZXZZT trades at $12.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check ZXZZT's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while VCRA trades at $79.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check VCRA's competition here

HLIT plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HLIT stands at 1B. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, HLIT is priced at $9.19, while BDR trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HLIT currently has a P/E ratio of 15.58, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, HLIT's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HLIT is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HLIT.Check BDR's competition here