Hammerhead Energy Inc.
Hammerhead Energy Inc. (HHRS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (HHRS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HHRS | $15.32 | -0.13% | 1.5B | -46.42 | -$0.33 | N/A |
| COP | $111.59 | +0.00% | 136.6B | 17.41 | $6.35 | +2.93% |
| CNQ | $42.50 | +0.00% | 88.3B | 18.19 | $2.33 | +4.02% |
| EOG | $123.87 | +0.00% | 67.2B | 12.22 | $10.07 | +3.26% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $51.53 | +0.00% | 51.1B | 38.11 | $1.36 | +1.87% |
| FANG | $174.72 | +0.00% | 50.4B | 12.32 | $14.29 | +2.27% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.67% |
| EQT | $59.77 | +0.00% | 37.8B | 19.33 | $3.13 | +1.07% |
| WDS | $19.06 | +0.00% | 36.9B | 12.64 | $1.54 | +5.25% |
Stock Comparison
HHRS vs COP Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 136.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while COP trades at $111.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check COP's competition here
HHRS vs CNQ Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CNQ trades at $42.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CNQ's competition here
HHRS vs EOG Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while EOG trades at $123.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check EOG's competition here
HHRS vs PXD Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check PXD's competition here
HHRS vs OXY Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while OXY trades at $51.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check OXY's competition here
HHRS vs FANG Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while FANG trades at $174.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check FANG's competition here
HHRS vs HES Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check HES's competition here
HHRS vs EQT Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while EQT trades at $59.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check EQT's competition here
HHRS vs WDS Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while WDS trades at $19.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check WDS's competition here
HHRS vs TPL Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while TPL trades at $486.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 72.29. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check TPL's competition here
HHRS vs OXY-WT Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while OXY-WT trades at $29.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check OXY-WT's competition here
HHRS vs DVN Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while DVN trades at $44.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check DVN's competition here
HHRS vs EXE Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while EXE trades at $103.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check EXE's competition here
HHRS vs CTRA Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CTRA trades at $31.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CTRA's competition here
HHRS vs COG Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check COG's competition here
HHRS vs MRO Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check MRO's competition here
HHRS vs PR Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while PR trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check PR's competition here
HHRS vs OVV Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while OVV trades at $50.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 54.35. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check OVV's competition here
HHRS vs AR Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while AR trades at $35.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check AR's competition here
HHRS vs CHK Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CHK's competition here
HHRS vs APA Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while APA trades at $29.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check APA's competition here
HHRS vs CHKEW Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CHKEW's competition here
HHRS vs RRC Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while RRC trades at $39.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check RRC's competition here
HHRS vs CHKEZ Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CHKEZ's competition here
HHRS vs CHKEL Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CHKEL's competition here
HHRS vs SWN Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check SWN's competition here
HHRS vs MTDR Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while MTDR trades at $52.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check MTDR's competition here
HHRS vs VIST Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while VIST trades at $59.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check VIST's competition here
HHRS vs CHRD Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CHRD trades at $104.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CHRD's competition here
HHRS vs CEO Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CEO's competition here
HHRS vs CRK Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CRK trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CRK's competition here
HHRS vs CNX Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CNX trades at $40.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CNX's competition here
HHRS vs CPG Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CPG's competition here
HHRS vs CRC Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CRC trades at $59.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CRC's competition here
HHRS vs MGY Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while MGY trades at $27.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check MGY's competition here
HHRS vs MUR Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while MUR trades at $34.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 46.85. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check MUR's competition here
HHRS vs OAS Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check OAS's competition here
HHRS vs DEN Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check DEN's competition here
HHRS vs BCEI Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check BCEI's competition here
HHRS vs CDEV Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CDEV's competition here
HHRS vs ERF Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check ERF's competition here
HHRS vs GPOR Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while GPOR trades at $201.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -372.67. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check GPOR's competition here
HHRS vs VRN Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check VRN's competition here
HHRS vs BSM Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while BSM trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check BSM's competition here
HHRS vs BKV Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while BKV trades at $31.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 65.31. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check BKV's competition here
HHRS vs ESTE Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check ESTE's competition here
HHRS vs BTE Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while BTE trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check BTE's competition here
HHRS vs NOG Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while NOG trades at $27.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check NOG's competition here
HHRS vs SM Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while SM trades at $23.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check SM's competition here
HHRS vs CRGY Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CRGY trades at $10.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -34.56. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CRGY's competition here
HHRS vs CLMT Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CLMT trades at $29.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CLMT's competition here
HHRS vs CPE Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CPE's competition here
HHRS vs TALO Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while TALO trades at $13.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check TALO's competition here
HHRS vs CIVI Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check CIVI's competition here
HHRS vs STRDW Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check STRDW's competition here
HHRS vs VET Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while VET trades at $10.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas VET's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check VET's competition here
HHRS vs MNR Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while MNR trades at $13.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check MNR's competition here
HHRS vs KRP Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while KRP trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is -159.50. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check KRP's competition here
HHRS vs NEXT Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while NEXT trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check NEXT's competition here
HHRS vs DMLP Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while DMLP trades at $25.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check DMLP's competition here
HHRS vs FLMN Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check FLMN's competition here
HHRS vs KOS Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while KOS trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check KOS's competition here
HHRS vs SBR Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while SBR trades at $71.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.62%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check SBR's competition here
HHRS vs SBOW Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check SBOW's competition here
HHRS vs TELL Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check TELL's competition here
HHRS vs VTS Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 879.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while VTS trades at $22.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 44.57. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check VTS's competition here
HHRS vs IMPPP Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 855.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while IMPPP trades at $25.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.80. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check IMPPP's competition here
HHRS vs ROCC Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check ROCC's competition here
HHRS vs TXO Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 695.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while TXO trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check TXO's competition here
HHRS vs VTLE Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check VTLE's competition here
HHRS vs GRNT Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 686.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while GRNT trades at $5.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check GRNT's competition here
HHRS vs TBN Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 674.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while TBN trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check TBN's competition here
HHRS vs HPK Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 665.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while HPK trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check HPK's competition here
HHRS vs SD Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 647.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while SD trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check SD's competition here
HHRS vs REPX Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while REPX trades at $28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check REPX's competition here
HHRS vs PVAC Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check PVAC's competition here
HHRS vs EGY Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 537.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while EGY trades at $5.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check EGY's competition here
HHRS vs OBE Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 534.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while OBE trades at $7.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check OBE's competition here
HHRS vs GPRK Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 444.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while GPRK trades at $8.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check GPRK's competition here
HHRS vs GFR Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 426.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while GFR trades at $6.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check GFR's competition here
HHRS vs WTI Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 398.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while WTI trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to WTI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check WTI's competition here
HHRS vs PNRG Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 310.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while PNRG trades at $182.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check PNRG's competition here
HHRS vs REI Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while REI trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check REI's competition here
HHRS vs INR Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while INR trades at $16.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas INR's P/E ratio is -19.52. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check INR's competition here
HHRS vs SJT Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 256.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while SJT trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -550.00. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to SJT's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check SJT's competition here
HHRS vs BRY Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check BRY's competition here
HHRS vs GTE Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while GTE trades at $6.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check GTE's competition here
HHRS vs AMPY Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while AMPY trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to AMPY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check AMPY's competition here
HHRS vs PHX Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check PHX's competition here
HHRS vs EPM Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 154.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while EPM trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EPM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check EPM's competition here
HHRS vs IMPP Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while IMPP trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check IMPP's competition here
HHRS vs KGEI Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while KGEI trades at $3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check KGEI's competition here
HHRS vs EPSN Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 110M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while EPSN trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check EPSN's competition here
HHRS vs ANNA Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while ANNA trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to ANNA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check ANNA's competition here
HHRS vs EP Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while EP trades at $2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check EP's competition here
HHRS vs NRT Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while NRT trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to NRT's ROE of +4.58%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check NRT's competition here
HHRS vs HUSA Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while HUSA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check HUSA's competition here
HHRS vs BATL Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BATL has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while BATL trades at $4.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas BATL's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to BATL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to BATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check BATL's competition here
HHRS vs INDO Comparison February 2026
HHRS plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, HHRS stands at 1.5B. In comparison, INDO has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, HHRS is priced at $15.32, while INDO trades at $4.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
HHRS currently has a P/E ratio of -46.42, whereas INDO's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, HHRS's ROE is +0.19%, compared to INDO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, HHRS is less volatile compared to INDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HHRS.Check INDO's competition here