Huttig Building Products, Inc.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, HD has a market cap of 351.8B. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while HD trades at $353.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HD's P/E ratio is 24.52. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to HD's ROE of +2.36%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to HD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, LOW has a market cap of 121.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while LOW trades at $216.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LOW's P/E ratio is 17.89. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LOW's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to LOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, FND has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while FND trades at $74.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas FND's P/E ratio is 39.59. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to FND's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to FND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, MLHR has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while MLHR trades at $38.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas MLHR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to MLHR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to MLHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, ARHS has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while ARHS trades at $8.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas ARHS's P/E ratio is 21.46. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to ARHS's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to ARHS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, HVT has a market cap of 324.4M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while HVT trades at $20.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HVT's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to HVT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to HVT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, HVT-A has a market cap of 303.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while HVT-A trades at $19.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas HVT-A's P/E ratio is 15.22. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to HVT-A's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to HVT-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, TTSH has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while TTSH trades at $6.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas TTSH's P/E ratio is 607.00. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to TTSH's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to TTSH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, LESL has a market cap of 92.7M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while LESL trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LESL's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LESL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to LESL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, LIVE has a market cap of 34.8M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while LIVE trades at $11.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LIVE's P/E ratio is -5.57. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LIVE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to LIVE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, PFAI has a market cap of 27.1M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while PFAI trades at $2.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas PFAI's P/E ratio is 46.40. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to PFAI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to PFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.

HBP plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, HBP stands at 0. In comparison, LL has a market cap of 25.9M. Regarding current trading prices, HBP is priced at $10.70, while LL trades at $0.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

HBP currently has a P/E ratio of 6.07, whereas LL's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, HBP's ROE is +0.72%, compared to LL's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, HBP is less volatile compared to LL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for HBP.