Gamer Pakistan Inc. Common Stock
Gamer Pakistan Inc. Common Stock (GPAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GPAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPAK | $0.00 | +400.00% | 12.8K | N/A | -$0.15 | N/A |
| CTAS | $197.97 | -1.02% | 79.7B | 43.02 | $4.61 | +0.88% |
| TRI | $85.16 | +2.36% | 36B | 24.58 | $3.29 | +3.01% |
| CPRT | $37.65 | +3.21% | 34.2B | 21.69 | $1.63 | N/A |
| GPN | $80.25 | -2.69% | 18.8B | 12.07 | $6.59 | +1.25% |
| RBA | $103.69 | +0.31% | 18.3B | 48.72 | $2.02 | +1.22% |
| RTO | $31.33 | -2.09% | 15.9B | 49.73 | $0.63 | +1.78% |
| ULS | $82.64 | +3.08% | 15.7B | 46.88 | $1.67 | +0.66% |
| BIPI | $17.13 | +0.47% | 13.5B | N/A | N/A | +7.53% |
| ARMK | $40.53 | -0.95% | 10.7B | 34.11 | $1.19 | +1.11% |
Stock Comparison
GPAK vs CTAS Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 79.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CTAS trades at $197.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 43.02. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check CTAS's competition here
GPAK vs TRI Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while TRI trades at $85.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check TRI's competition here
GPAK vs CPRT Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, CPRT has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CPRT trades at $37.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CPRT's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CPRT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to CPRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check CPRT's competition here
GPAK vs GPN Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while GPN trades at $80.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check GPN's competition here
GPAK vs RBA Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while RBA trades at $103.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 48.72. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check RBA's competition here
GPAK vs RTO Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while RTO trades at $31.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 49.73. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check RTO's competition here
GPAK vs ULS Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ULS trades at $82.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 46.88. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check ULS's competition here
GPAK vs BIPI Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while BIPI trades at $17.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check BIPI's competition here
GPAK vs ARMK Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ARMK trades at $40.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 34.11. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check ARMK's competition here
GPAK vs IAA Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check IAA's competition here
GPAK vs UNF Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while UNF trades at $235.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 30.99. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check UNF's competition here
GPAK vs MMS Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while MMS trades at $74.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check MMS's competition here
GPAK vs ABM Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ABM trades at $45.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 17.02. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check ABM's competition here
GPAK vs TIC Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, TIC has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while TIC trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TIC's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to TIC's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to TIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check TIC's competition here
GPAK vs RHLD Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while RHLD trades at $188.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check RHLD's competition here
GPAK vs FA Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while FA trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -10.06. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check FA's competition here
GPAK vs CBZ Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CBZ trades at $29.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 22.70. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check CBZ's competition here
GPAK vs BV Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while BV trades at $13.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BV's P/E ratio is 193.86. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check BV's competition here
GPAK vs VVI Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to VVI's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check VVI's competition here
GPAK vs LZ Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while LZ trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 51.92. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check LZ's competition here
GPAK vs SP Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check SP's competition here
GPAK vs TDCX Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check TDCX's competition here
GPAK vs PRSU Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PRSU trades at $36.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -42.90. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check PRSU's competition here
GPAK vs TH Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 652.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while TH trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TH's P/E ratio is -65.40. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to TH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check TH's competition here
GPAK vs KODK Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 625M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while KODK trades at $7.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is -23.55. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check KODK's competition here
GPAK vs CASS Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 569.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CASS trades at $44.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 18.84. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check CASS's competition here
GPAK vs ACTG Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 389.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ACTG trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is 67.33. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ACTG's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check ACTG's competition here
GPAK vs QUAD Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 359.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while QUAD trades at $6.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is 16.44. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to QUAD's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check QUAD's competition here
GPAK vs PPHC Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, PPHC has a market cap of 350.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PPHC trades at $12.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PPHC's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PPHC's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to PPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check PPHC's competition here
GPAK vs CVEO Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 348.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CVEO trades at $28.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -13.29. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check CVEO's competition here
GPAK vs PFMT Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check PFMT's competition here
GPAK vs SPIR Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 278.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SPIR trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is 24.03. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SPIR's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check SPIR's competition here
GPAK vs RHLDV Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, RHLDV has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while RHLDV trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHLDV's P/E ratio is -3.60. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to RHLDV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to RHLDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check RHLDV's competition here
GPAK vs BUUU Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, BUUU has a market cap of 181M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while BUUU trades at $15.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BUUU's P/E ratio is 221.43. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to BUUU's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to BUUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check BUUU's competition here
GPAK vs PFSW Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check PFSW's competition here
GPAK vs ARC Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK and ARC have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ARC's competition here
GPAK vs ANPA Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, ANPA has a market cap of 102.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ANPA trades at $11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ANPA's P/E ratio is 818.00. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ANPA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to ANPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check ANPA's competition here
GPAK vs SMX Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SMX trades at $41.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check SMX's competition here
GPAK vs DLHC Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 83.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while DLHC trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is -72.00. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to DLHC's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check DLHC's competition here
GPAK vs TISI Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 62.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while TISI trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to TISI's ROE of +13.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check TISI's competition here
GPAK vs OMEX Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 44.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while OMEX trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to OMEX's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check OMEX's competition here
GPAK vs NTIP Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while NTIP trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -13.27. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check NTIP's competition here
GPAK vs SST Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 31.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SST trades at $3.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SST's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check SST's competition here
GPAK vs THH Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, THH has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while THH trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THH's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to THH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to THH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check THH's competition here
GPAK vs PMEC Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 26.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PMEC trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -14.00. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check PMEC's competition here
GPAK vs YSXT Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while YSXT trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check YSXT's competition here
GPAK vs ZGM Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, ZGM has a market cap of 21.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ZGM trades at $2.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZGM's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ZGM's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to ZGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check ZGM's competition here
GPAK vs SGRP Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 19.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SGRP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SGRP's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check SGRP's competition here
GPAK vs WHLM Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while WHLM trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK and WHLM have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check WHLM's competition here
GPAK vs SFHG Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SFHG trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check SFHG's competition here
GPAK vs MSGY Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, MSGY has a market cap of 8.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while MSGY trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MSGY's P/E ratio is 6.67. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to MSGY's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to MSGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check MSGY's competition here
GPAK vs ATTO Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check ATTO's competition here
GPAK vs CRE Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, CRE has a market cap of 4.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CRE trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRE's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CRE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to CRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check CRE's competition here
GPAK vs PMAX Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, PMAX has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PMAX trades at $2.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMAX's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PMAX's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to PMAX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check PMAX's competition here
GPAK vs LICN Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while LICN trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK and LICN have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check LICN's competition here
GPAK vs THWWW Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to THWWW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check THWWW's competition here
GPAK vs BLMZ Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, BLMZ has a market cap of 40.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while BLMZ trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BLMZ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to BLMZ's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to BLMZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check BLMZ's competition here
GPAK vs INTX Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, INTX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while INTX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas INTX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to INTX's ROE of -2.96%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK and INTX have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check INTX's competition here
GPAK vs RRD Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check RRD's competition here
GPAK vs PAEWW Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check PAEWW's competition here
GPAK vs ALJJ Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK and ALJJ have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALJJ's competition here
GPAK vs PAE Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check PAE's competition here
GPAK vs CRN Comparison February 2026
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 12.8K. In comparison, CRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CRN trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.02%, compared to CRN's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is less volatile compared to CRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.Check CRN's competition here