Gamer Pakistan Inc. Common Stock
Gamer Pakistan Inc. Common Stock GPAK Peers
See (GPAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Specialty Business Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPAK | $0.00 | +0.00% | 2.6K | N/A | -$0.15 | N/A |
| TRI | $198.68 | -1.48% | 89.5B | 41.73 | $4.76 | +1.12% |
| CTAS | $215.66 | -3.86% | 87.1B | 50.02 | $4.31 | +0.95% |
| GPN | $81.99 | +0.02% | 20B | 13.26 | $6.18 | +1.22% |
| RBA | $105.42 | -0.43% | 19.5B | 51.94 | $2.03 | +1.36% |
| ULS | $70.87 | +1.66% | 14.2B | 42.44 | $1.67 | +0.72% |
| BIPI | $16.51 | +0.79% | 13.1B | N/A | N/A | +5.84% |
| RTO | $23.99 | -1.19% | 12.2B | 29.24 | $0.82 | +2.42% |
| ARMK | $42.98 | +1.34% | 11.3B | 33.05 | $1.30 | +0.97% |
| IAA | $39.89 | -0.10% | 5.3B | 18.55 | $2.15 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GPAK vs TRI Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TRI has a market cap of 89.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while TRI trades at $198.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TRI's P/E ratio is 41.73. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to TRI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to TRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs CTAS Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, CTAS has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CTAS trades at $215.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CTAS's P/E ratio is 50.02. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to CTAS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to CTAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs GPN Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, GPN has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while GPN trades at $81.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GPN's P/E ratio is 13.26. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to GPN's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to GPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs RBA Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, RBA has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while RBA trades at $105.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RBA's P/E ratio is 51.94. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to RBA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to RBA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs ULS Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ULS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ULS trades at $70.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ULS's P/E ratio is 42.44. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to ULS's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to ULS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs BIPI Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, BIPI has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while BIPI trades at $16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BIPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to BIPI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to BIPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs RTO Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, RTO has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while RTO trades at $23.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTO's P/E ratio is 29.24. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to RTO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to RTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs ARMK Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ARMK has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ARMK trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARMK's P/E ratio is 33.05. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to ARMK's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to ARMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs IAA Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, IAA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while IAA trades at $39.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IAA's P/E ratio is 18.55. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to IAA's ROE of +0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to IAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs MMS Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, MMS has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while MMS trades at $72.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MMS's P/E ratio is 14.52. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to MMS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to MMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs CBZ Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, CBZ has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CBZ trades at $72.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CBZ's P/E ratio is 62.41. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to CBZ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to CBZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs UNF Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, UNF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while UNF trades at $171.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas UNF's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to UNF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to UNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs ABM Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ABM has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ABM trades at $48.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ABM's P/E ratio is 38.63. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to ABM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to ABM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs FA Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, FA has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while FA trades at $16.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FA's P/E ratio is -17.67. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to FA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to FA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs LZ Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, LZ has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while LZ trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LZ's P/E ratio is 53.12. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to LZ's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to LZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs BV Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, BV has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while BV trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BV's P/E ratio is -757.50. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to BV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to BV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs VVI Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, VVI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while VVI trades at $42.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VVI's P/E ratio is 41.68. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to VVI's ROE of +1.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to VVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs SP Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SP has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SP trades at $53.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SP's P/E ratio is 35.29. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to SP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to SP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs TDCX Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TDCX has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while TDCX trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TDCX's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to TDCX's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to TDCX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs PRSU Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, PRSU has a market cap of 868.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PRSU trades at $30.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRSU's P/E ratio is -15.76. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to PRSU's ROE of +2.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to PRSU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs TH Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TH has a market cap of 714.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while TH trades at $7.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TH's P/E ratio is 16.73. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to TH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to TH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs CASS Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, CASS has a market cap of 608.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CASS trades at $45.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CASS's P/E ratio is 30.16. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to CASS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to CASS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs KODK Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, KODK has a market cap of 488.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while KODK trades at $6.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas KODK's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to KODK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to KODK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs ACTG Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ACTG has a market cap of 359.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ACTG trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ACTG's P/E ratio is -33.95. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to ACTG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to ACTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs SPIR Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SPIR has a market cap of 352.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SPIR trades at $11.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SPIR's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to SPIR's ROE of -6.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to SPIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs CVEO Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, CVEO has a market cap of 316.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while CVEO trades at $23.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CVEO's P/E ratio is -15.09. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to CVEO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to CVEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs RHLD Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, RHLD has a market cap of 294.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while RHLD trades at $34.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RHLD's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to RHLD's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to RHLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs QUAD Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, QUAD has a market cap of 290.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while QUAD trades at $5.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas QUAD's P/E ratio is -15.94. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to QUAD's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to QUAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs PFMT Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, PFMT has a market cap of 278.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PFMT trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFMT's P/E ratio is -35.60. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to PFMT's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to PFMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs PFSW Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, PFSW has a market cap of 170.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PFSW trades at $7.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PFSW's P/E ratio is -17.43. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to PFSW's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to PFSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs ARC Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ARC has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ARC trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARC's P/E ratio is 30.82. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to ARC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to ARC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs YSXT Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, YSXT has a market cap of 119.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while YSXT trades at $5.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas YSXT's P/E ratio is 31.91. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to YSXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to YSXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs TISI Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, TISI has a market cap of 86.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while TISI trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TISI's P/E ratio is -1.69. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to TISI's ROE of -11.58%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to TISI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs DLHC Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, DLHC has a market cap of 83.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while DLHC trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas DLHC's P/E ratio is 15.30. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to DLHC's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to DLHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs SST Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SST has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SST trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SST's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to SST's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to SST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs PMEC Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, PMEC has a market cap of 56.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PMEC trades at $1.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMEC's P/E ratio is -10.43. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to PMEC's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to PMEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs OMEX Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, OMEX has a market cap of 37.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while OMEX trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OMEX's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to OMEX's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to OMEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs NTIP Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, NTIP has a market cap of 28.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while NTIP trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NTIP's P/E ratio is -11.27. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to NTIP's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to NTIP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs SGRP Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SGRP has a market cap of 22.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SGRP trades at $0.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SGRP's P/E ratio is -7.46. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to SGRP's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to SGRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs SFHG Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SFHG has a market cap of 15.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SFHG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFHG's P/E ratio is -38.05. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to SFHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to SFHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs WHLM Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, WHLM has a market cap of 15M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while WHLM trades at $3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHLM's P/E ratio is 23.46. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to WHLM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to WHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs ATTO Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ATTO has a market cap of 6.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ATTO trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ATTO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to ATTO's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to ATTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs SMX Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, SMX has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while SMX trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to SMX's ROE of -3.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to SMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs LICN Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, LICN has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while LICN trades at $4.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LICN's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to LICN's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to LICN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs THWWW Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, THWWW has a market cap of 252.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while THWWW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas THWWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to THWWW's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to THWWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs PAE Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, PAE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PAE trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAE's P/E ratio is 19.74. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to PAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to PAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs PAEWW Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, PAEWW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while PAEWW trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PAEWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to PAEWW's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to PAEWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs RRD Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, RRD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while RRD trades at $10.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RRD's P/E ratio is 225.83. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to RRD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to RRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.
GPAK vs ALJJ Comparison
GPAK plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GPAK stands at 2.6K. In comparison, ALJJ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GPAK is priced at $0.00, while ALJJ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GPAK currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALJJ's P/E ratio is 1.06. In terms of profitability, GPAK's ROE is -1.36%, compared to ALJJ's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, GPAK is more volatile compared to ALJJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GPAK.