Greenfire Resources Ltd.
Greenfire Resources Ltd. (GFR) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFR) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFR | $4.71 | +1.29% | 328M | 2.43 | $1.92 | N/A |
| COP | $97.99 | +1.00% | 123.7B | 12.42 | $7.89 | +3.20% |
| CNQ | $32.23 | +0.91% | 67.4B | 12.11 | $2.66 | +5.03% |
| EOG | $123.15 | +1.23% | 67.2B | 11.40 | $10.80 | +3.12% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | N/A |
| CEO | $121.76 | +0.00% | 53.2B | 10.59 | $11.50 | N/A |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.63 | $7.22 | +1.34% |
| OXY-WT | $23.61 | -0.13% | 44.8B | N/A | N/A | +2.02% |
| OXY | $45.46 | -0.20% | 44.8B | 18.41 | $2.47 | +2.02% |
| FANG | $152.50 | +1.32% | 44.6B | 9.48 | $16.08 | +3.44% |
Stock Comparison
GFR vs COP Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 123.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while COP trades at $97.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check COP's competition here
GFR vs CNQ Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CNQ trades at $32.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CNQ's competition here
GFR vs EOG Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while EOG trades at $123.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 11.40. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check EOG's competition here
GFR vs PXD Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check PXD's competition here
GFR vs CEO Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CEO's competition here
GFR vs HES Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check HES's competition here
GFR vs OXY-WT Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while OXY-WT trades at $23.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check OXY-WT's competition here
GFR vs OXY Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while OXY trades at $45.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 18.41. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check OXY's competition here
GFR vs FANG Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 44.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while FANG trades at $152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check FANG's competition here
GFR vs WDS Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while WDS trades at $17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check WDS's competition here
GFR vs EQT Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while EQT trades at $53.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check EQT's competition here
GFR vs EXE Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while EXE trades at $99.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is -17.10. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EXE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check EXE's competition here
GFR vs TPL Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while TPL trades at $993.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 49.88. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check TPL's competition here
GFR vs DVN Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while DVN trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 7.80. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check DVN's competition here
GFR vs CTRA Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CTRA trades at $24.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.16. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CTRA's competition here
GFR vs COG Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check COG's competition here
GFR vs MRO Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check MRO's competition here
GFR vs OVV Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while OVV trades at $42.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check OVV's competition here
GFR vs CHK Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CHK's competition here
GFR vs AR Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while AR trades at $33.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 43.83. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check AR's competition here
GFR vs PR Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while PR trades at $14.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check PR's competition here
GFR vs CHKEW Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CHKEW's competition here
GFR vs RRC Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while RRC trades at $36.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 18.35. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check RRC's competition here
GFR vs CHKEZ Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CHKEZ's competition here
GFR vs CHKEL Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CHKEL's competition here
GFR vs SWN Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SWN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check SWN's competition here
GFR vs APA Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while APA trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check APA's competition here
GFR vs CHRD Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CHRD trades at $114.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CHRD's competition here
GFR vs MTDR Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while MTDR trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 7.69. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check MTDR's competition here
GFR vs CRK Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CRK trades at $21.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CRK's competition here
GFR vs CPG Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CPG's competition here
GFR vs MGY Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while MGY trades at $24.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 12.20. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check MGY's competition here
GFR vs OAS Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check OAS's competition here
GFR vs DEN Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check DEN's competition here
GFR vs CRC Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CRC trades at $50.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 8.35. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CRC's competition here
GFR vs VIST Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while VIST trades at $46.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check VIST's competition here
GFR vs BCEI Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check BCEI's competition here
GFR vs CNX Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CNX trades at $30.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 36.11. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CNX's competition here
GFR vs CDEV Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CDEV's competition here
GFR vs ERF Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, ERF has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while ERF trades at $20.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas ERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ERF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to ERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check ERF's competition here
GFR vs MUR Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while MUR trades at $26.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 10.29. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check MUR's competition here
GFR vs VRN Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check VRN's competition here
GFR vs SM Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while SM trades at $28.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 4.05. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check SM's competition here
GFR vs GPOR Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while GPOR trades at $172.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -10.02. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPOR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check GPOR's competition here
GFR vs CIVI Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CIVI trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.76. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CIVI's competition here
GFR vs NEXT Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while NEXT trades at $11.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -16.57. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check NEXT's competition here
GFR vs ESTE Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check ESTE's competition here
GFR vs NOG Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while NOG trades at $29.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 4.60. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check NOG's competition here
GFR vs BSM Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while BSM trades at $12.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 13.52. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check BSM's competition here
GFR vs CRGY Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CRGY trades at $9.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -14.62. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CRGY's competition here
GFR vs CPE Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CPE's competition here
GFR vs STRDW Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check STRDW's competition here
GFR vs KRP Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while KRP trades at $15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 376.50. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check KRP's competition here
GFR vs MNR Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while MNR trades at $15.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check MNR's competition here
GFR vs BKV Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while BKV trades at $20.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is -9.30. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BKV's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check BKV's competition here
GFR vs BTE Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while BTE trades at $2.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check BTE's competition here
GFR vs TALO Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while TALO trades at $9.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is 41.70. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TALO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check TALO's competition here
GFR vs HHRS Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check HHRS's competition here
GFR vs CLMT Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CLMT trades at $16.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -4.09. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CLMT's competition here
GFR vs VET Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while VET trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -57.23. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check VET's competition here
GFR vs DMLP Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while DMLP trades at $27.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check DMLP's competition here
GFR vs HPK Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while HPK trades at $10.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check HPK's competition here
GFR vs FLMN Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check FLMN's competition here
GFR vs KOS Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while KOS trades at $2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -77.33. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check KOS's competition here
GFR vs SBR Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 975.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while SBR trades at $66.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBR's ROE of +6.93%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check SBR's competition here
GFR vs VTS Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 951.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while VTS trades at $24.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 31.19. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check VTS's competition here
GFR vs SBOW Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check SBOW's competition here
GFR vs TELL Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check TELL's competition here
GFR vs TXO Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 842.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while TXO trades at $15.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 40.47. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check TXO's competition here
GFR vs VTLE Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while VTLE trades at $20.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -6.05. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check VTLE's competition here
GFR vs ROCC Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check ROCC's competition here
GFR vs GRNT Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while GRNT trades at $5.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check GRNT's competition here
GFR vs REPX Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 614.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while REPX trades at $27.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 5.96. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check REPX's competition here
GFR vs PVAC Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check PVAC's competition here
GFR vs OBE Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 431.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while OBE trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OBE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check OBE's competition here
GFR vs EGY Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 407M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while EGY trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 7.00. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check EGY's competition here
GFR vs SD Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 393.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while SD trades at $10.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 6.16. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check SD's competition here
GFR vs GPRK Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 347.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while GPRK trades at $6.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check GPRK's competition here
GFR vs PNRG Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 302.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while PNRG trades at $182.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check PNRG's competition here
GFR vs WTI Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 275.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while WTI trades at $1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WTI's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check WTI's competition here
GFR vs SJT Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 273.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while SJT trades at $5.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is 293.75. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SJT's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check SJT's competition here
GFR vs BRY Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 248.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while BRY trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -6.81. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check BRY's competition here
GFR vs INR Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 227.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while INR trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check INR's competition here
GFR vs KGEI Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 225.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while KGEI trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check KGEI's competition here
GFR vs EPM Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 172.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while EPM trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -125.37. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check EPM's competition here
GFR vs REI Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 169.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while REI trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 2.29. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to REI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check REI's competition here
GFR vs EP Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 168.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while EP trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -9.69. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check EP's competition here
GFR vs PHX Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check PHX's competition here
GFR vs GTE Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 159.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while GTE trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -10.27. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check GTE's competition here
GFR vs AMPY Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 155.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while AMPY trades at $3.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 9.15. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check AMPY's competition here
GFR vs EPSN Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 140.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while EPSN trades at $6.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 31.95. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check EPSN's competition here
GFR vs IMPP Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while IMPP trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check IMPP's competition here
GFR vs IMPPP Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 108.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while IMPPP trades at $25.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -64.97. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check IMPPP's competition here
GFR vs MVO Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, MVO has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while MVO trades at $5.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas MVO's P/E ratio is 4.39. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MVO's ROE of +3.75%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to MVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check MVO's competition here
GFR vs PED Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while PED trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check PED's competition here
GFR vs PVL Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, PVL has a market cap of 59.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while PVL trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas PVL's P/E ratio is 20.00. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to PVL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to PVL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check PVL's competition here
GFR vs VOC Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, VOC has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while VOC trades at $3.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas VOC's P/E ratio is 5.45. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VOC's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to VOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check VOC's competition here
GFR vs CRT Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, CRT has a market cap of 56.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while CRT trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas CRT's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRT's ROE of +2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is more volatile compared to CRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check CRT's competition here
GFR vs VIVK Comparison July 2025
GFR plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFR stands at 328M. In comparison, VIVK has a market cap of 53.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFR is priced at $4.71, while VIVK trades at $1.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFR currently has a P/E ratio of 2.43, whereas VIVK's P/E ratio is -1.27. In terms of profitability, GFR's ROE is +0.24%, compared to VIVK's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GFR is less volatile compared to VIVK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFR.Check VIVK's competition here