Guardforce AI Co., Limited
Guardforce AI Co., Limited (GFAIW) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (GFAIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFAIW | $0.26 | -2.22% | 24.3M | -1.22 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| ALLE | $165.39 | +1.05% | 14.2B | 22.98 | $7.20 | +1.20% |
| MSA | $180.03 | +1.79% | 7.1B | 24.88 | $7.24 | +1.15% |
| ADT | $8.44 | -2.65% | 6.6B | 11.91 | $0.71 | +2.59% |
| BCO | $91.77 | -1.63% | 3.9B | 24.74 | $3.71 | +1.07% |
| GEO | $26.10 | +6.31% | 3.7B | 118.73 | $0.22 | N/A |
| REZI | $24.43 | +0.41% | 3.6B | 81.47 | $0.30 | N/A |
| BRC | $70.07 | -0.34% | 3.3B | 17.28 | $4.05 | +1.37% |
| VVNT | $12.00 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| ARLO | $16.23 | -1.10% | 1.7B | -73.75 | -$0.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFAIW vs ALLE Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while ALLE trades at $165.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 22.98. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check ALLE's competition here
GFAIW vs MSA Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while MSA trades at $180.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 24.88. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check MSA's competition here
GFAIW vs ADT Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, ADT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while ADT trades at $8.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ADT's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ADT's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to ADT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check ADT's competition here
GFAIW vs BCO Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while BCO trades at $91.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 24.74. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check BCO's competition here
GFAIW vs GEO Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while GEO trades at $26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 118.73. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check GEO's competition here
GFAIW vs REZI Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while REZI trades at $24.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 81.47. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to REZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check REZI's competition here
GFAIW vs BRC Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while BRC trades at $70.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check BRC's competition here
GFAIW vs VVNT Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check VVNT's competition here
GFAIW vs ARLO Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while ARLO trades at $16.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is -73.75. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ARLO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check ARLO's competition here
GFAIW vs EVLV Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while EVLV trades at $6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -24.29. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check EVLV's competition here
GFAIW vs NSSC Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while NSSC trades at $30.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 24.93. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check NSSC's competition here
GFAIW vs NL Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 318.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while NL trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas NL's P/E ratio is 5.22. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check NL's competition here
GFAIW vs CIX Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 301.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while CIX trades at $24.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 16.78. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check CIX's competition here
GFAIW vs MG Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 257.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while MG trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 17.49. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check MG's competition here
GFAIW vs SNT Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while SNT trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 24.67. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check SNT's competition here
GFAIW vs BAER Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 100.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while BAER trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check BAER's competition here
GFAIW vs EVLVW Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 98.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while EVLVW trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -5.41. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check EVLVW's competition here
GFAIW vs KSCP Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 59.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while KSCP trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check KSCP's competition here
GFAIW vs NXTD Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check NXTD's competition here
GFAIW vs SPCB Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while SPCB trades at $9.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check SPCB's competition here
GFAIW vs GFAI Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 27.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while GFAI trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -2.49. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check GFAI's competition here
GFAIW vs SUGP Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while SUGP trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is -22.50. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SUGP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check SUGP's competition here
GFAIW vs VRME Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while VRME trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check VRME's competition here
GFAIW vs UUU Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while UUU trades at $3.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -6.33. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check UUU's competition here
GFAIW vs IVDAW Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while IVDAW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check IVDAW's competition here
GFAIW vs IVDA Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while IVDA trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check IVDA's competition here
GFAIW vs BKYI Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while BKYI trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check BKYI's competition here
GFAIW vs CIGL Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while CIGL trades at $2.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CIGL's ROE of -35.79%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check CIGL's competition here
GFAIW vs BAERW Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while BAERW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check BAERW's competition here
GFAIW vs DGLY Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while DGLY trades at $2.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check DGLY's competition here
GFAIW vs LGMK Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while LGMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check LGMK's competition here
GFAIW vs VRMEW Comparison July 2025
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 24.3M. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 162.6K. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.26, while VRMEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.22, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.Check VRMEW's competition here