Guardforce AI Co., Limited

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, ASAZY has a market cap of 34.59B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while ASAZY trades at $15.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ASAZY's P/E ratio is 22.79. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ASAZY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to ASAZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, ASAZF has a market cap of 32.52B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while ASAZF trades at $29.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ASAZF's P/E ratio is 21.53. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ASAZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to ASAZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SOMLY has a market cap of 15.51B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SOMLY trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SOMLY's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SOMLY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SOMLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SOMLF has a market cap of 14.02B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SOMLF trades at $33.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SOMLF's P/E ratio is 19.32. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SOMLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SOMLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 12.13B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while ALLE trades at $140.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 19.79. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SCTBY has a market cap of 8.92B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SCTBY trades at $16.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SCTBY's P/E ratio is 17.43. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SCTBY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SCTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SCTBF has a market cap of 8.38B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SCTBF trades at $15.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SCTBF's P/E ratio is 16.51. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SCTBF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SCTBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, ADT has a market cap of 6.48B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while ADT trades at $8.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ADT's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ADT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to ADT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.19B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while MSA trades at $157.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 21.73. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 4.03B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while BCO trades at $93.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 25.82. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while GEO trades at $26.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 119.52. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while BRC trades at $73.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 2.97B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while REZI trades at $20.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 66.72. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to REZI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, LOIMF has a market cap of 2.71B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while LOIMF trades at $39.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LOIMF's P/E ratio is 16.13. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LOIMF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and LOIMF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.58B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while VVNT trades at $12.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SOHGF has a market cap of 2.57B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SOHGF trades at $5.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SOHGF's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SOHGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SOHGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.11B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while ARLO trades at $10.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is -34.39. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ARLO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 953.72M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while NSSC trades at $26.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 21.48. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 668.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while EVLV trades at $4.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -12.03. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 408.61M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while NL trades at $8.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NL's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, MRLWF has a market cap of 367.49M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while MRLWF trades at $4.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MRLWF's P/E ratio is -156.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MRLWF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and MRLWF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 328.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while CIX trades at $26.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 19.73. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 244.50M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while MG trades at $7.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 13.02. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, CRFQF has a market cap of 223.79M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while CRFQF trades at $2.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CRFQF's P/E ratio is 233.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CRFQF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to CRFQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, ICTSF has a market cap of 132.51M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while ICTSF trades at $3.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ICTSF's P/E ratio is 32.18. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ICTSF's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to ICTSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 78.14M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SNT trades at $3.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 30.45. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 77.19M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while BAER trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, RSKIA has a market cap of 76.57M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while RSKIA trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas RSKIA's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to RSKIA's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to RSKIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, WPNNF has a market cap of 66.83M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while WPNNF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WPNNF's P/E ratio is -0.81. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WPNNF's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to WPNNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.75M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while NXTD trades at $2.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 36.80M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while EVLVW trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -2.07. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and EVLVW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 34.59M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while KSCP trades at $5.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SECUF has a market cap of 33.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SECUF trades at $1.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SECUF's P/E ratio is 179.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SECUF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and SECUF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, GKPRF has a market cap of 28.12M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while GKPRF trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GKPRF's P/E ratio is -30.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GKPRF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and GKPRF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, PRBCF has a market cap of 27.86M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while PRBCF trades at $0.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PRBCF's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PRBCF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to PRBCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, ALXXF has a market cap of 27.71M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while ALXXF trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ALXXF's P/E ratio is -9.45. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ALXXF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and ALXXF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 22.80M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SPCB trades at $6.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 20.34M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while GFAI trades at $1.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -1.96. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, LDDFF has a market cap of 14.21M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while LDDFF trades at $0.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LDDFF's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LDDFF's ROE of +4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to LDDFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, CSTI has a market cap of 9.74M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while CSTI trades at $4.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CSTI's P/E ratio is 16.57. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CSTI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to CSTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 9.42M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SUGP trades at $0.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is 6.18. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SUGP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 8.90M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while VRME trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -1.95. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 8.90M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while VRMEW trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and VRMEW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 8.34M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while CIGL trades at $6.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CIGL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, VOTDF has a market cap of 6.48M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while VOTDF trades at $0.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VOTDF's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VOTDF's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to VOTDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 6.32M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while IVDA trades at $2.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 6.01M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while IVDAW trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.42. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and IVDAW have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 5.07M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while UUU trades at $2.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -3.98. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 4.47M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while BKYI trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -5.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, DIGTF has a market cap of 3.47M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while DIGTF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DIGTF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DIGTF's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to DIGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, DADTF has a market cap of 3.28M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while DADTF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DADTF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DADTF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and DADTF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 3.09M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while BAERW trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, IWAL has a market cap of 2.45M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while IWAL trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas IWAL's P/E ratio is -3.15. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IWAL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and IWAL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, PLRTF has a market cap of 2.27M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while PLRTF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PLRTF's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PLRTF's ROE of +5.10%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to PLRTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SSECF has a market cap of 1.08M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SSECF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SSECF's P/E ratio is -2.40. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SSECF's ROE of +0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and SSECF have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, MACE has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while MACE trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MACE's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MACE's ROE of -1.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to MACE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 672529.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while LGMK trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, VCON has a market cap of 570440.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while VCON trades at $65.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VCON's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VCON's ROE of -4.62%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to VCON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, DRNG has a market cap of 522352.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while DRNG trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DRNG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DRNG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and DRNG have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, DTII has a market cap of 478071.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while DTII trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DTII's P/E ratio is 1.40. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DTII's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and DTII have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, BLPG has a market cap of 459780.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while BLPG trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas BLPG's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BLPG's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BLPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, ATWT has a market cap of 411670.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while ATWT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ATWT's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ATWT's ROE of -1.37%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to ATWT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, LGTT has a market cap of 384210.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while LGTT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas LGTT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LGTT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to LGTT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, WCCP has a market cap of 351525.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while WCCP trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WCCP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WCCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to WCCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 347960.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while DGLY trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -4.25%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, VSYS has a market cap of 171810.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while VSYS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VSYS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VSYS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to VSYS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, PSGI has a market cap of 138029.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while PSGI trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PSGI's P/E ratio is 1.64. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PSGI's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and PSGI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, PTEFF has a market cap of 117688.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while PTEFF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PTEFF's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PTEFF's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to PTEFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SCTY has a market cap of 112500.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SCTY trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SCTY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SCTY's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and SCTY have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, MGNT has a market cap of 100000.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while MGNT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MGNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MGNT's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to MGNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, GDSI has a market cap of 95353.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while GDSI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GDSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GDSI's ROE of +0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and GDSI have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, HCGS has a market cap of 77203.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while HCGS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HCGS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to HCGS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to HCGS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, MIHL has a market cap of 75588.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while MIHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas MIHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MIHL's ROE of +2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to MIHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, SKVY has a market cap of 60372.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while SKVY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas SKVY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SKVY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SKVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, ABPR has a market cap of 49298.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while ABPR trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ABPR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ABPR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and ABPR have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, WOAM has a market cap of 32814.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while WOAM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas WOAM's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to WOAM's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to WOAM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, PERL has a market cap of 28340.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while PERL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PERL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PERL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and PERL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, EKCS has a market cap of 21258.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while EKCS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EKCS's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EKCS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to EKCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, EBWK has a market cap of 13659.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while EBWK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas EBWK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EBWK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to EBWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, HWSY has a market cap of 9087.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while HWSY trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HWSY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to HWSY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to HWSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, CVAS has a market cap of 7498.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while CVAS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas CVAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CVAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to CVAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, ARGL has a market cap of 741.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while ARGL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas ARGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ARGL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and ARGL have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, DIRV has a market cap of 224.00. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while DIRV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas DIRV's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DIRV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and DIRV have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, PWLK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while PWLK trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas PWLK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to PWLK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to PWLK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, GTKP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while GTKP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas GTKP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GTKP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and GTKP have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, HLCN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while HLCN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas HLCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to HLCN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and HLCN have similar daily volatility (0.00).

GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 15.55M. In comparison, VSYM comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.18, while VSYM trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.00, whereas VSYM's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VSYM's ROE of +1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW and VSYM have similar daily volatility (0.00).