Guardforce AI Co., Limited
Guardforce AI Co., Limited GFAIW Peers
See (GFAIW) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Security & Protection Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GFAIW | $0.29 | +15.76% | 34.6M | -1.60 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| ALLE | $143.39 | +0.40% | 12.3B | 20.14 | $7.12 | +1.38% |
| MSA | $169.16 | +0.65% | 6.7B | 23.34 | $7.25 | +1.22% |
| ADT | $8.40 | +0.48% | 6.6B | 12.92 | $0.65 | +2.62% |
| BCO | $89.94 | +1.36% | 3.8B | 24.25 | $3.71 | +1.09% |
| REZI | $22.31 | +1.92% | 3.3B | 74.40 | $0.30 | N/A |
| GEO | $23.41 | +1.30% | 3.3B | 106.36 | $0.22 | N/A |
| BRC | $68.70 | +2.51% | 3.3B | 16.96 | $4.05 | +1.39% |
| VVNT | $12.00 | +0.00% | 2.6B | -50.00 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| ARLO | $17.36 | +3.58% | 1.8B | -78.93 | -$0.22 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
GFAIW vs ALLE Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, ALLE has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while ALLE trades at $143.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas ALLE's P/E ratio is 20.14. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ALLE's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to ALLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs MSA Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, MSA has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while MSA trades at $169.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas MSA's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MSA's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to MSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs ADT Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, ADT has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while ADT trades at $8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas ADT's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ADT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to ADT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs BCO Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, BCO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while BCO trades at $89.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas BCO's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BCO's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs REZI Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, REZI has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while REZI trades at $22.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas REZI's P/E ratio is 74.40. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to REZI's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to REZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs GEO Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, GEO has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while GEO trades at $23.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas GEO's P/E ratio is 106.36. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GEO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to GEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs BRC Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, BRC has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while BRC trades at $68.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas BRC's P/E ratio is 16.96. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BRC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs VVNT Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, VVNT has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while VVNT trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas VVNT's P/E ratio is -50.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VVNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to VVNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs ARLO Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, ARLO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while ARLO trades at $17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas ARLO's P/E ratio is -78.93. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to ARLO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to ARLO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs NSSC Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, NSSC has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while NSSC trades at $29.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas NSSC's P/E ratio is 24.44. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NSSC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to NSSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs EVLV Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, EVLV has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while EVLV trades at $6.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas EVLV's P/E ratio is -22.04. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EVLV's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to EVLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs CIX Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, CIX has a market cap of 308M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while CIX trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas CIX's P/E ratio is 17.12. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CIX's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to CIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs NL Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, NL has a market cap of 305.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while NL trades at $6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas NL's P/E ratio is 5.00. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NL's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to NL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs MG Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, MG has a market cap of 250.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while MG trades at $8.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas MG's P/E ratio is 16.99. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to MG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to MG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs SNT Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, SNT has a market cap of 108.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while SNT trades at $4.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas SNT's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SNT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs BAER Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, BAER has a market cap of 90.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while BAER trades at $1.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas BAER's P/E ratio is -2.48. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BAER's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs EVLVW Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, EVLVW has a market cap of 77.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while EVLVW trades at $0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas EVLVW's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to EVLVW's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to EVLVW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs NXTD Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, NXTD has a market cap of 57.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while NXTD trades at $2.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas NXTD's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to NXTD's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to NXTD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs SPCB Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, SPCB has a market cap of 46.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while SPCB trades at $10.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas SPCB's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SPCB's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SPCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs KSCP Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, KSCP has a market cap of 33.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while KSCP trades at $5.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas KSCP's P/E ratio is -0.61. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to KSCP's ROE of -2.28%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to KSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs GFAI Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, GFAI has a market cap of 24.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while GFAI trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas GFAI's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to GFAI's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to GFAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs CIGL Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, CIGL has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while CIGL trades at $8.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas CIGL's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to CIGL's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to CIGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs VRME Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, VRME has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while VRME trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas VRME's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VRME's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to VRME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs UUU Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, UUU has a market cap of 7M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while UUU trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas UUU's P/E ratio is -5.51. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to UUU's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to UUU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs SUGP Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, SUGP has a market cap of 6.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while SUGP trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas SUGP's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to SUGP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to SUGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs IVDAW Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, IVDAW has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while IVDAW trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas IVDAW's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IVDAW's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to IVDAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs VRMEW Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, VRMEW has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while VRMEW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas VRMEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to VRMEW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to VRMEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs IVDA Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, IVDA has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while IVDA trades at $1.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas IVDA's P/E ratio is -1.26. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to IVDA's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to IVDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs BKYI Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, BKYI has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while BKYI trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas BKYI's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BKYI's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BKYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs BAERW Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, BAERW has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while BAERW trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas BAERW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to BAERW's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to BAERW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs DGLY Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, DGLY has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while DGLY trades at $2.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas DGLY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to DGLY's ROE of -9.53%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is less volatile compared to DGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.
GFAIW vs LGMK Comparison
GFAIW plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, GFAIW stands at 34.6M. In comparison, LGMK has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GFAIW is priced at $0.29, while LGMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
GFAIW currently has a P/E ratio of -1.60, whereas LGMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GFAIW's ROE is -0.63%, compared to LGMK's ROE of -0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, GFAIW is more volatile compared to LGMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GFAIW.