Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd.
Foremost Lithium Resource & Technology Ltd. (FMST) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FMST) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMST | $3.02 | -1.31% | 36.1M | -15.10 | -$0.20 | N/A |
| SHLM | $44.00 | +0.00% | 26.1B | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| DOW | $23.69 | -1.64% | 16.8B | -16.92 | -$1.40 | +11.77% |
| UNVR | $36.14 | +0.47% | 5.7B | 13.29 | $2.72 | N/A |
| CE | $44.68 | -1.56% | 4.9B | -3.06 | -$14.64 | +1.77% |
| MEOH | $33.85 | +0.39% | 2.3B | 9.73 | $3.48 | +2.18% |
| HUN | $10.19 | -1.55% | 1.8B | -5.69 | -$1.79 | +9.73% |
| BAK | $3.03 | +4.66% | 1.2B | -1.13 | -$2.67 | N/A |
| ASPI | $9.03 | +0.67% | 830M | -6.45 | -$1.40 | N/A |
| WLKP | $22.01 | -0.42% | 774.9M | 14.76 | $1.49 | +8.58% |
Stock Comparison
FMST vs SHLM Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, SHLM has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while SHLM trades at $44.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas SHLM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SHLM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to SHLM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check SHLM's competition here
FMST vs DOW Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, DOW has a market cap of 16.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while DOW trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas DOW's P/E ratio is -16.92. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to DOW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to DOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check DOW's competition here
FMST vs UNVR Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, UNVR has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while UNVR trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas UNVR's P/E ratio is 13.29. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to UNVR's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to UNVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check UNVR's competition here
FMST vs CE Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, CE has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while CE trades at $44.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas CE's P/E ratio is -3.06. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to CE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check CE's competition here
FMST vs MEOH Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, MEOH has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while MEOH trades at $33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas MEOH's P/E ratio is 9.73. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MEOH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to MEOH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check MEOH's competition here
FMST vs HUN Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, HUN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while HUN trades at $10.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas HUN's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to HUN's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to HUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check HUN's competition here
FMST vs BAK Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, BAK has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while BAK trades at $3.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas BAK's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to BAK's ROE of +1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to BAK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check BAK's competition here
FMST vs ASPI Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, ASPI has a market cap of 830M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while ASPI trades at $9.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas ASPI's P/E ratio is -6.45. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASPI's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to ASPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ASPI's competition here
FMST vs WLKP Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, WLKP has a market cap of 774.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while WLKP trades at $22.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas WLKP's P/E ratio is 14.76. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to WLKP's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to WLKP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check WLKP's competition here
FMST vs TROX Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, TROX has a market cap of 581M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while TROX trades at $3.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas TROX's P/E ratio is -2.32. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to TROX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to TROX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check TROX's competition here
FMST vs LXU Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, LXU has a market cap of 561.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while LXU trades at $7.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas LXU's P/E ratio is -16.97. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to LXU's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to LXU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check LXU's competition here
FMST vs ASIX Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, ASIX has a market cap of 529.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while ASIX trades at $19.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas ASIX's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ASIX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to ASIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ASIX's competition here
FMST vs SIRE Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, SIRE has a market cap of 501.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while SIRE trades at $25.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas SIRE's P/E ratio is 7.58. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to SIRE's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to SIRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check SIRE's competition here
FMST vs VHI Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, VHI has a market cap of 465.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while VHI trades at $16.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas VHI's P/E ratio is 4.78. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to VHI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to VHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check VHI's competition here
FMST vs CINR Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, CINR has a market cap of 402.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while CINR trades at $20.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas CINR's P/E ratio is 21.93. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to CINR's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to CINR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check CINR's competition here
FMST vs RYAM Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, RYAM has a market cap of 339.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while RYAM trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas RYAM's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to RYAM's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to RYAM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check RYAM's competition here
FMST vs FF Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, FF has a market cap of 162.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while FF trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas FF's P/E ratio is -6.10. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to FF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check FF's competition here
FMST vs ORGN Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, ORGN has a market cap of 85.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while ORGN trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas ORGN's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ORGN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to ORGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ORGN's competition here
FMST vs FMSTW Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, FMSTW has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while FMSTW trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas FMSTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to FMSTW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to FMSTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check FMSTW's competition here
FMST vs ORGNW Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, ORGNW has a market cap of 3M. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while ORGNW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas ORGNW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to ORGNW's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is more volatile compared to ORGNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check ORGNW's competition here
FMST vs MKD Comparison August 2025
FMST plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FMST stands at 36.1M. In comparison, MKD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FMST is priced at $3.02, while MKD trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FMST currently has a P/E ratio of -15.10, whereas MKD's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FMST's ROE is -0.10%, compared to MKD's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FMST is less volatile compared to MKD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FMST.Check MKD's competition here