Flutter Entertainment plc
Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLUT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUT | $304.97 | +1.64% | 53.9B | 104.81 | $2.91 | N/A |
| LVS | $52.41 | +3.19% | 37.1B | 26.48 | $1.98 | +1.72% |
| DKNG | $44.86 | +1.86% | 22.3B | -54.71 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $109.44 | +0.91% | 11.4B | 29.25 | $3.74 | +0.92% |
| MGM | $38.44 | +2.89% | 10.5B | 17.16 | $2.24 | N/A |
| LNW | $97.80 | +0.27% | 8.2B | 26.12 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CHDN | $113.53 | -0.19% | 8B | 19.61 | $5.79 | +0.36% |
| BYD | $85.94 | +4.40% | 7B | 13.30 | $6.46 | +0.82% |
| CZR | $29.56 | +3.14% | 6.1B | -26.87 | -$1.10 | N/A |
| MTN | $160.56 | +1.88% | 6B | 20.41 | $7.85 | +5.54% |
Stock Comparison
FLUT vs LVS Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 37.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while LVS trades at $52.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LVS's competition here
FLUT vs DKNG Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while DKNG trades at $44.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -54.71. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check DKNG's competition here
FLUT vs WYNN Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while WYNN trades at $109.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 29.25. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check WYNN's competition here
FLUT vs MGM Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while MGM trades at $38.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MGM's competition here
FLUT vs LNW Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while LNW trades at $97.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 26.12. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LNW's competition here
FLUT vs CHDN Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while CHDN trades at $113.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 19.61. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CHDN's competition here
FLUT vs BYD Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while BYD trades at $85.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check BYD's competition here
FLUT vs CZR Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while CZR trades at $29.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -26.87. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CZR's competition here
FLUT vs MTN Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while MTN trades at $160.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 20.41. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MTN's competition here
FLUT vs SGHC Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while SGHC trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 42.33. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SGHC's competition here
FLUT vs SGMS Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SGMS's competition here
FLUT vs HGV Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while HGV trades at $51.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 161.31. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check HGV's competition here
FLUT vs RSI Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while RSI trades at $15.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 169.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check RSI's competition here
FLUT vs IGT Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while IGT trades at $16.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check IGT's competition here
FLUT vs RRR Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while RRR trades at $54.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 20.85. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check RRR's competition here
FLUT vs VAC Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while VAC trades at $84.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check VAC's competition here
FLUT vs PENN Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while PENN trades at $19.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -31.52. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check PENN's competition here
FLUT vs SBET Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while SBET trades at $21.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SBET's competition here
FLUT vs MCRI Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while MCRI trades at $104.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MCRI's competition here
FLUT vs PLYA Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check PLYA's competition here
FLUT vs EVRI Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check EVRI's competition here
FLUT vs MLCO Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while MLCO trades at $8.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 64.07. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MLCO's competition here
FLUT vs ACEL Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while ACEL trades at $12.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 26.01. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check ACEL's competition here
FLUT vs BVH Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check BVH's competition here
FLUT vs NGMS Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check NGMS's competition here
FLUT vs GDEN Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 775.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while GDEN trades at $29.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 68.23. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GDEN's competition here
FLUT vs TPGH-UN Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check TPGH-UN's competition here
FLUT vs AGS Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check AGS's competition here
FLUT vs BALY Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 408.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while BALY trades at $9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check BALY's competition here
FLUT vs GAMB Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 388.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while GAMB trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GAMB's competition here
FLUT vs CDRO Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 385.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while CDRO trades at $8.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 93.89. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CDRO's competition here
FLUT vs INSE Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 252.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while INSE trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check INSE's competition here
FLUT vs MSC Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 219.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while MSC trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -9.14. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MSC's competition here
FLUT vs FLL Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 173.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while FLL trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -4.38. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check FLL's competition here
FLUT vs CPHC Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 91.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while CPHC trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 113.56. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CPHC's competition here
FLUT vs GAN Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GAN's competition here
FLUT vs CNTY Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 78.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while CNTY trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CNTY's competition here
FLUT vs CDROW Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 44.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while CDROW trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CDROW's competition here
FLUT vs LTRY Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while LTRY trades at $1.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LTRY's competition here
FLUT vs LTRYW Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LTRYW's competition here
FLUT vs SLNA Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SLNA's competition here
FLUT vs SLNAW Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SLNAW's competition here
FLUT vs GMBLP Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 389.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while GMBLP trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBLP's competition here
FLUT vs GMBL Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 389.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while GMBL trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBL's competition here
FLUT vs GMBLW Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBLW's competition here
FLUT vs EBET Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check EBET's competition here
FLUT vs GMBLZ Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBLZ's competition here
FLUT vs GNOG Comparison July 2025
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 53.9B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $304.97, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 104.81, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GNOG's competition here