Flutter Entertainment plc
Flutter Entertainment plc FLUT Peers
See (FLUT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUT | $285.76 | +2.54% | 50.5B | 97.89 | $2.92 | N/A |
| LVS | $43.51 | -1.38% | 30.7B | 24.31 | $1.79 | +2.07% |
| DKNG | $42.89 | +0.00% | 21.3B | -52.30 | -$0.82 | N/A |
| WYNN | $93.67 | -1.07% | 9.8B | 25.03 | $3.74 | +1.07% |
| MGM | $34.39 | +0.06% | 9.4B | 15.35 | $2.24 | N/A |
| LNW | $96.26 | +0.46% | 8.1B | 25.74 | $3.74 | N/A |
| CHDN | $101.00 | +0.05% | 7.3B | 17.97 | $5.62 | +0.40% |
| BYD | $78.23 | -1.00% | 6.4B | 12.62 | $6.20 | +0.90% |
| CZR | $28.39 | -1.63% | 5.9B | -25.81 | -$1.10 | N/A |
| MTN | $157.13 | -0.06% | 5.8B | 20.06 | $7.84 | +5.68% |
Stock Comparison
FLUT vs LVS Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 30.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while LVS trades at $43.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 24.31. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs DKNG Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 21.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while DKNG trades at $42.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -52.30. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs WYNN Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while WYNN trades at $93.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 25.03. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.76%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs MGM Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while MGM trades at $34.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 15.35. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs LNW Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while LNW trades at $96.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs CHDN Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while CHDN trades at $101.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 17.97. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs BYD Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while BYD trades at $78.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.62. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs CZR Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while CZR trades at $28.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -25.81. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs MTN Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while MTN trades at $157.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 20.06. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs SGHC Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while SGHC trades at $10.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs SGMS Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while SGMS trades at $58.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs RSI Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while RSI trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 165.67. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs HGV Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while HGV trades at $41.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 129.84. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs IGT Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while IGT trades at $15.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 143.73. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs RRR Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while RRR trades at $52.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs PENN Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while PENN trades at $17.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -29.30. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs VAC Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while VAC trades at $72.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs PLYA Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while PLYA trades at $13.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs MCRI Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while MCRI trades at $86.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs EVRI Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while EVRI trades at $14.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.06. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs BVH Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while BVH trades at $75.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs NGMS Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while NGMS trades at $29.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs ACEL Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 996.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while ACEL trades at $11.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs MLCO Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 991M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while MLCO trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 51.64. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs GDEN Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 778M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while GDEN trades at $29.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 68.44. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs SBET Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 604.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while SBET trades at $9.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.21. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs TPGH-UN Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs AGS Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while AGS trades at $12.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs GAMB Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 423.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while GAMB trades at $11.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 12.39. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs BALY Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 390.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while BALY trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs CDRO Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 387.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while CDRO trades at $8.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 94.33. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs INSE Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 219.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while INSE trades at $8.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.35. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSE's ROE of -1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs MSC Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 152.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while MSC trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -6.35. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs FLL Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 131.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while FLL trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -3.33. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs CPHC Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 95.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while CPHC trades at $18.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 117.81. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs GAN Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while GAN trades at $1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs CNTY Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while CNTY trades at $2.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNTY's ROE of -6.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs CDROW Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 46.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while CDROW trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs LTRYW Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 37.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs LTRY Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while LTRY trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs SLNA Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while SLNA trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs SLNAW Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs GMBL Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 339.2K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while GMBL trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBL's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs GMBLP Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 41K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while GMBLP trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs GMBLW Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs EBET Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 12K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while EBET trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBET's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs GMBLZ Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of +1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.
FLUT vs GNOG Comparison
FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 50.5B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $285.76, while GNOG trades at $5.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 97.89, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.