Flutter Entertainment plc

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, LVS has a market cap of 36.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while LVS trades at $54.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas LVS's P/E ratio is 27.11. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LVS's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to LVS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LVS's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, DKNG has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while DKNG trades at $43.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas DKNG's P/E ratio is -69.14. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to DKNG's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to DKNG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check DKNG's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, WYNN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while WYNN trades at $111.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas WYNN's P/E ratio is 32.38. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to WYNN's ROE of -1.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to WYNN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check WYNN's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, MGM has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while MGM trades at $36.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas MGM's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MGM's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to MGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MGM's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, LNW has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while LNW trades at $88.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas LNW's P/E ratio is 22.33. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LNW's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to LNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LNW's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, CHDN has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while CHDN trades at $103.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas CHDN's P/E ratio is 17.72. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CHDN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CHDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CHDN's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, BYD has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while BYD trades at $83.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas BYD's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BYD's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to BYD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check BYD's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, SGHC has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while SGHC trades at $11.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas SGHC's P/E ratio is 44.46. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGHC's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SGHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SGHC's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, MTN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while MTN trades at $152.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas MTN's P/E ratio is 19.54. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MTN's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, RSI has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while RSI trades at $18.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas RSI's P/E ratio is 92.86. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RSI's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to RSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check RSI's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, SGMS has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while SGMS trades at $58.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas SGMS's P/E ratio is 30.71. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SGMS's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SGMS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SGMS's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, CZR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while CZR trades at $25.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas CZR's P/E ratio is -27.23. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CZR's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CZR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CZR's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, HGV has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while HGV trades at $45.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas HGV's P/E ratio is 80.71. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to HGV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to HGV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check HGV's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, RRR has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while RRR trades at $60.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas RRR's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to RRR's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to RRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check RRR's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, IGT has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while IGT trades at $16.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas IGT's P/E ratio is 148.09. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to IGT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to IGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check IGT's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, SBET has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while SBET trades at $23.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas SBET's P/E ratio is 0.42. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SBET's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SBET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SBET's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, PENN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while PENN trades at $17.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas PENN's P/E ratio is -34.42. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PENN's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to PENN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check PENN's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, VAC has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while VAC trades at $75.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas VAC's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to VAC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to VAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check VAC's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, MCRI has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while MCRI trades at $101.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas MCRI's P/E ratio is 23.79. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MCRI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MCRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MCRI's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, PLYA has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while PLYA trades at $13.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas PLYA's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to PLYA's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to PLYA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check PLYA's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, EVRI has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while EVRI trades at $14.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas EVRI's P/E ratio is 89.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EVRI's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to EVRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check EVRI's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, MLCO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while MLCO trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas MLCO's P/E ratio is 61.21. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MLCO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to MLCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MLCO's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, BVH has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while BVH trades at $75.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas BVH's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BVH's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to BVH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check BVH's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, NGMS has a market cap of 998.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while NGMS trades at $29.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas NGMS's P/E ratio is -81.81. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to NGMS's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to NGMS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check NGMS's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, ACEL has a market cap of 943.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while ACEL trades at $11.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas ACEL's P/E ratio is 27.98. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to ACEL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to ACEL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check ACEL's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, GDEN has a market cap of 650.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while GDEN trades at $25.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas GDEN's P/E ratio is 43.65. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GDEN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GDEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GDEN's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, TPGH-UN has a market cap of 580.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while TPGH-UN trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas TPGH-UN's P/E ratio is -1000.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to TPGH-UN's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to TPGH-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check TPGH-UN's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, AGS has a market cap of 518.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while AGS trades at $12.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas AGS's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to AGS's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to AGS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check AGS's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, BALY has a market cap of 385.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while BALY trades at $9.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas BALY's P/E ratio is -0.95. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to BALY's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to BALY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check BALY's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, CDRO has a market cap of 370.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while CDRO trades at $8.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas CDRO's P/E ratio is 90.11. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CDRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CDRO's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, GAMB has a market cap of 306.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while GAMB trades at $10.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas GAMB's P/E ratio is 8.97. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GAMB's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GAMB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GAMB's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, INSE has a market cap of 224M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while INSE trades at $8.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas INSE's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to INSE's ROE of -2.60%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to INSE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check INSE's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, MSC has a market cap of 219.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while MSC trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas MSC's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to MSC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to MSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check MSC's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, FLL has a market cap of 128.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while FLL trades at $3.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas FLL's P/E ratio is -3.09. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to FLL's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to FLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check FLL's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, GAN has a market cap of 91.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while GAN trades at $1.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas GAN's P/E ratio is -8.21. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GAN's ROE of +0.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GAN's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, CPHC has a market cap of 85.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while CPHC trades at $16.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas CPHC's P/E ratio is 563.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CPHC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to CPHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CPHC's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, CNTY has a market cap of 71.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while CNTY trades at $2.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas CNTY's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CNTY's ROE of +18.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CNTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CNTY's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, CDROW has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while CDROW trades at $1.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas CDROW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to CDROW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to CDROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check CDROW's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, LTRY has a market cap of 36.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while LTRY trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas LTRY's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRY's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to LTRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LTRY's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, LTRYW has a market cap of 23.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while LTRYW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas LTRYW's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to LTRYW's ROE of -0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to LTRYW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check LTRYW's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, SLNA has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while SLNA trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas SLNA's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLNA's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SLNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SLNA's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, SLNAW has a market cap of 526.4K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while SLNAW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas SLNAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to SLNAW's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to SLNAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check SLNAW's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, GMBL has a market cap of 381.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while GMBL trades at $0.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas GMBL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBL's ROE of -7.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GMBL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBL's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, GMBLP has a market cap of 69.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while GMBLP trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas GMBLP's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBLP's ROE of -7.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to GMBLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBLP's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, GMBLW has a market cap of 31.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while GMBLW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas GMBLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBLW's ROE of -7.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GMBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBLW's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, EBET has a market cap of 15K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while EBET trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas EBET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to EBET's ROE of +6.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is more volatile compared to EBET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check EBET's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, GMBLZ has a market cap of 1.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while GMBLZ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas GMBLZ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GMBLZ's ROE of -7.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GMBLZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GMBLZ's competition here

FLUT plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, FLUT stands at 51.6B. In comparison, GNOG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLUT is priced at $288.77, while GNOG trades at $5.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

FLUT currently has a P/E ratio of 142.36, whereas GNOG's P/E ratio is -3.90. In terms of profitability, FLUT's ROE is +0.06%, compared to GNOG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLUT is less volatile compared to GNOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLUT.Check GNOG's competition here