Franklin Wireless Corp.
Franklin Wireless Corp. (FKWL) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FKWL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Communication Equipment Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FKWL | $4.12 | +3.52% | 47.3M | -28.64 | -$0.14 | N/A |
| CSCO | $68.49 | -0.30% | 269B | 27.72 | $2.45 | +2.39% |
| MSI | $433.19 | +1.21% | 71.8B | 35.90 | $11.98 | +0.99% |
| UI | $470.94 | +5.48% | 27.8B | 50.70 | $9.06 | +0.53% |
| HPE | $20.99 | +1.23% | 27.4B | 20.08 | $1.04 | +2.50% |
| ERIC | $7.36 | -1.74% | 24.7B | 13.47 | $0.55 | +0.36% |
| NOK | $4.16 | -3.93% | 22.9B | 22.45 | $0.19 | +3.30% |
| ASTS | $53.22 | -2.06% | 19B | -27.37 | -$1.98 | N/A |
| CRDO | $111.13 | +9.79% | 18.5B | 372.24 | $0.29 | N/A |
| ZBRA | $336.80 | +0.33% | 17B | 31.66 | $10.57 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FKWL vs CSCO Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, CSCO has a market cap of 269B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while CSCO trades at $68.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas CSCO's P/E ratio is 27.72. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CSCO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to CSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CSCO's competition here
FKWL vs MSI Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, MSI has a market cap of 71.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while MSI trades at $433.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas MSI's P/E ratio is 35.90. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MSI's ROE of +1.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to MSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MSI's competition here
FKWL vs UI Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, UI has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while UI trades at $470.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas UI's P/E ratio is 50.70. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UI's ROE of +2.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to UI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check UI's competition here
FKWL vs HPE Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, HPE has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while HPE trades at $20.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas HPE's P/E ratio is 20.08. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HPE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to HPE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check HPE's competition here
FKWL vs ERIC Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, ERIC has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while ERIC trades at $7.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas ERIC's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ERIC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ERIC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ERIC's competition here
FKWL vs NOK Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, NOK has a market cap of 22.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while NOK trades at $4.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas NOK's P/E ratio is 22.45. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NOK's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to NOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check NOK's competition here
FKWL vs ASTS Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, ASTS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while ASTS trades at $53.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas ASTS's P/E ratio is -27.37. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASTS's ROE of -0.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to ASTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ASTS's competition here
FKWL vs CRDO Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, CRDO has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while CRDO trades at $111.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas CRDO's P/E ratio is 372.24. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRDO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to CRDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CRDO's competition here
FKWL vs ZBRA Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, ZBRA has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while ZBRA trades at $336.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas ZBRA's P/E ratio is 31.66. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZBRA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ZBRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ZBRA's competition here
FKWL vs JNPR Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, JNPR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while JNPR trades at $39.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas JNPR's P/E ratio is 38.05. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JNPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to JNPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check JNPR's competition here
FKWL vs CIEN Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, CIEN has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while CIEN trades at $92.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas CIEN's P/E ratio is 124.10. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CIEN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to CIEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CIEN's competition here
FKWL vs SATS Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, SATS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while SATS trades at $29.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas SATS's P/E ratio is -39.69. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SATS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to SATS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SATS's competition here
FKWL vs LITE Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, LITE has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while LITE trades at $111.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas LITE's P/E ratio is -16.59. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LITE's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to LITE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check LITE's competition here
FKWL vs BDC Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, BDC has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while BDC trades at $132.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas BDC's P/E ratio is 25.12. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BDC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to BDC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check BDC's competition here
FKWL vs MAXR Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, MAXR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while MAXR trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas MAXR's P/E ratio is -26.10. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MAXR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to MAXR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MAXR's competition here
FKWL vs PI Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, PI has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while PI trades at $126.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas PI's P/E ratio is -2103.83. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check PI's competition here
FKWL vs EXTR Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, EXTR has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while EXTR trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas EXTR's P/E ratio is -43.73. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EXTR's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to EXTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check EXTR's competition here
FKWL vs VIAV Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, VIAV has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while VIAV trades at $10.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas VIAV's P/E ratio is 509.50. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VIAV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to VIAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check VIAV's competition here
FKWL vs VSAT Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, VSAT has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while VSAT trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas VSAT's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VSAT's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to VSAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check VSAT's competition here
FKWL vs KN Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, KN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while KN trades at $21.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas KN's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to KN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check KN's competition here
FKWL vs COMM Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, COMM has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while COMM trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas COMM's P/E ratio is -45.17. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to COMM's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to COMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check COMM's competition here
FKWL vs INFN Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, INFN has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while INFN trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas INFN's P/E ratio is -10.38. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INFN's ROE of -1.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to INFN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check INFN's competition here
FKWL vs DGII Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, DGII has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while DGII trades at $34.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas DGII's P/E ratio is 30.36. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DGII's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to DGII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check DGII's competition here
FKWL vs SWIR Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, SWIR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while SWIR trades at $30.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas SWIR's P/E ratio is -22.82. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SWIR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to SWIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SWIR's competition here
FKWL vs HLIT Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, HLIT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while HLIT trades at $8.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas HLIT's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to HLIT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to HLIT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check HLIT's competition here
FKWL vs ITRN Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, ITRN has a market cap of 805.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while ITRN trades at $40.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas ITRN's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ITRN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ITRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ITRN's competition here
FKWL vs POLY Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, POLY has a market cap of 790.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while POLY trades at $39.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas POLY's P/E ratio is 75.13. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to POLY's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to POLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check POLY's competition here
FKWL vs ADTN Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, ADTN has a market cap of 773.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while ADTN trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas ADTN's P/E ratio is -6.01. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ADTN's ROE of -0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ADTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ADTN's competition here
FKWL vs NTGR Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, NTGR has a market cap of 734.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while NTGR trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas NTGR's P/E ratio is 30.38. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to NTGR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to NTGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check NTGR's competition here
FKWL vs CLFD Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, CLFD has a market cap of 625.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while CLFD trades at $45.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas CLFD's P/E ratio is -322.86. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLFD's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to CLFD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CLFD's competition here
FKWL vs AIOT Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, AIOT has a market cap of 597.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while AIOT trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas AIOT's P/E ratio is -10.42. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIOT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to AIOT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AIOT's competition here
FKWL vs PWFL Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, PWFL has a market cap of 490.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while PWFL trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas PWFL's P/E ratio is -9.33. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PWFL's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to PWFL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check PWFL's competition here
FKWL vs GILT Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, GILT has a market cap of 435.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while GILT trades at $7.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas GILT's P/E ratio is 31.83. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to GILT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to GILT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check GILT's competition here
FKWL vs TSAT Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, TSAT has a market cap of 371.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while TSAT trades at $24.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas TSAT's P/E ratio is -5.48. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TSAT's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to TSAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check TSAT's competition here
FKWL vs ONDS Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, ONDS has a market cap of 349.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while ONDS trades at $1.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas ONDS's P/E ratio is -3.39. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ONDS's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to ONDS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ONDS's competition here
FKWL vs AUDC Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, AUDC has a market cap of 311.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while AUDC trades at $10.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas AUDC's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AUDC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to AUDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AUDC's competition here
FKWL vs ITI Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, ITI has a market cap of 309.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while ITI trades at $7.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas ITI's P/E ratio is 239.67. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ITI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ITI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ITI's competition here
FKWL vs AVNW Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, AVNW has a market cap of 296.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while AVNW trades at $23.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas AVNW's P/E ratio is -122.47. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AVNW's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to AVNW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AVNW's competition here
FKWL vs FEIM Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, FEIM has a market cap of 271.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while FEIM trades at $26.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas FEIM's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to FEIM's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to FEIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check FEIM's competition here
FKWL vs SATX Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, SATX has a market cap of 256.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while SATX trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas SATX's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SATX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to SATX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SATX's competition here
FKWL vs CRNT Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, CRNT has a market cap of 208.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while CRNT trades at $2.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas CRNT's P/E ratio is 9.04. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CRNT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CRNT's competition here
FKWL vs BKTI Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, BKTI has a market cap of 148.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while BKTI trades at $40.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas BKTI's P/E ratio is 15.47. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BKTI's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to BKTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check BKTI's competition here
FKWL vs PCTI Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, PCTI has a market cap of 135.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while PCTI trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas PCTI's P/E ratio is 30.39. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to PCTI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to PCTI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check PCTI's competition here
FKWL vs LTRX Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, LTRX has a market cap of 129.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while LTRX trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas LTRX's P/E ratio is -15.14. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to LTRX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to LTRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check LTRX's competition here
FKWL vs INSG Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, INSG has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while INSG trades at $7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas INSG's P/E ratio is -7.27. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to INSG's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to INSG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check INSG's competition here
FKWL vs KVHI Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, KVHI has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while KVHI trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas KVHI's P/E ratio is -10.60. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to KVHI's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to KVHI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check KVHI's competition here
FKWL vs SILC Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, SILC has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while SILC trades at $15.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas SILC's P/E ratio is -7.12. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SILC's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to SILC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SILC's competition here
FKWL vs TESS Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, TESS has a market cap of 83.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while TESS trades at $8.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas TESS's P/E ratio is -19.13. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to TESS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to TESS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check TESS's competition here
FKWL vs JCS Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, JCS has a market cap of 77M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while JCS trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas JCS's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to JCS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to JCS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check JCS's competition here
FKWL vs CMTL Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, CMTL has a market cap of 67.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while CMTL trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas CMTL's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMTL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CMTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CMTL's competition here
FKWL vs AMPG Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, AMPG has a market cap of 65.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while AMPG trades at $3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas AMPG's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMPG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to AMPG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AMPG's competition here
FKWL vs AMPGW Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, AMPGW has a market cap of 58.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while AMPGW trades at $0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas AMPGW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AMPGW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to AMPGW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AMPGW's competition here
FKWL vs AIRG Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, AIRG has a market cap of 56.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while AIRG trades at $4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas AIRG's P/E ratio is -6.96. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AIRG's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to AIRG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AIRG's competition here
FKWL vs WTT Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, WTT has a market cap of 45.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while WTT trades at $2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas WTT's P/E ratio is -19.32. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to WTT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to WTT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check WTT's competition here
FKWL vs OCC Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, OCC has a market cap of 40.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while OCC trades at $5.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas OCC's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to OCC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to OCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check OCC's competition here
FKWL vs SYTAW Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, SYTAW has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while SYTAW trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas SYTAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYTAW's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to SYTAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SYTAW's competition here
FKWL vs SYTA Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, SYTA has a market cap of 30.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while SYTA trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas SYTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYTA's ROE of -5.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to SYTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SYTA's competition here
FKWL vs BOSC Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, BOSC has a market cap of 29.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while BOSC trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas BOSC's P/E ratio is 10.38. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BOSC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to BOSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check BOSC's competition here
FKWL vs CMBM Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, CMBM has a market cap of 26M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while CMBM trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas CMBM's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CMBM's ROE of -1.45%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CMBM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CMBM's competition here
FKWL vs MOB Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, MOB has a market cap of 24.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while MOB trades at $3.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas MOB's P/E ratio is -2.45. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOB's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to MOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MOB's competition here
FKWL vs UTSI Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, UTSI has a market cap of 24.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while UTSI trades at $2.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas UTSI's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to UTSI's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to UTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check UTSI's competition here
FKWL vs MINM Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, MINM has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while MINM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas MINM's P/E ratio is -13.88. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MINM's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to MINM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MINM's competition here
FKWL vs IOTR Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, IOTR has a market cap of 13.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while IOTR trades at $0.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas IOTR's P/E ratio is -51.60. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to IOTR's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to IOTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check IOTR's competition here
FKWL vs SONM Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, SONM has a market cap of 12.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while SONM trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas SONM's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SONM's ROE of -4.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to SONM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SONM's competition here
FKWL vs SYNX Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, SYNX has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while SYNX trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas SYNX's P/E ratio is -3.80. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SYNX's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to SYNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SYNX's competition here
FKWL vs CLRO Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, CLRO has a market cap of 9.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while CLRO trades at $5.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas CLRO's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CLRO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CLRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CLRO's competition here
FKWL vs MITQ Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, MITQ has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while MITQ trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas MITQ's P/E ratio is -6.42. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MITQ's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to MITQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MITQ's competition here
FKWL vs AKTS Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, AKTS has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while AKTS trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas AKTS's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to AKTS's ROE of +23.16%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to AKTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check AKTS's competition here
FKWL vs BOXL Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, BOXL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while BOXL trades at $2.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas BOXL's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BOXL's ROE of -1.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to BOXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check BOXL's competition here
FKWL vs VISL Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, VISL has a market cap of 5.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while VISL trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas VISL's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VISL's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to VISL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check VISL's competition here
FKWL vs ASNS Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, ASNS has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while ASNS trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas ASNS's P/E ratio is -0.92. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ASNS's ROE of -1.78%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ASNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ASNS's competition here
FKWL vs CASA Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, CASA has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while CASA trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas CASA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to CASA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to CASA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check CASA's competition here
FKWL vs MOBBW Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, MOBBW has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while MOBBW trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas MOBBW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MOBBW's ROE of -1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to MOBBW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MOBBW's competition here
FKWL vs MYNA Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, MYNA has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while MYNA trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas MYNA's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to MYNA's ROE of +8.70%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to MYNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check MYNA's competition here
FKWL vs DZSI Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, DZSI has a market cap of 810.7K. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while DZSI trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas DZSI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to DZSI's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to DZSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check DZSI's competition here
FKWL vs ZXZZT Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, ZXZZT has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while ZXZZT trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas ZXZZT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ZXZZT's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ZXZZT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ZXZZT's competition here
FKWL vs ORBC Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, ORBC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while ORBC trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas ORBC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to ORBC's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to ORBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check ORBC's competition here
FKWL vs BDR Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, BDR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while BDR trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas BDR's P/E ratio is -5.87. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to BDR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to BDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check BDR's competition here
FKWL vs VCRA Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, VCRA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while VCRA trades at $79.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas VCRA's P/E ratio is -316.52. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to VCRA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to VCRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check VCRA's competition here
FKWL vs EXFO Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, EXFO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while EXFO trades at $6.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas EXFO's P/E ratio is -56.31. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to EXFO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is more volatile compared to EXFO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check EXFO's competition here
FKWL vs SATX-WTA Comparison July 2025
FKWL plays a significant role within the Technology sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FKWL stands at 47.3M. In comparison, SATX-WTA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FKWL is priced at $4.12, while SATX-WTA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FKWL currently has a P/E ratio of -28.64, whereas SATX-WTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FKWL's ROE is -0.05%, compared to SATX-WTA's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FKWL is less volatile compared to SATX-WTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FKWL.Check SATX-WTA's competition here