Enerplus Corporation
Enerplus Corporation (ERF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ERF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERF | $20.09 | +0.66% | 4.1B | 11.22 | $1.79 | +2.40% |
| COP | $110.44 | -1.03% | 136.6B | 17.41 | $6.35 | +2.93% |
| CNQ | $42.65 | +0.34% | 88.3B | 18.19 | $2.33 | +4.02% |
| EOG | $122.59 | -1.03% | 67.2B | 12.22 | $10.07 | +3.26% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63B | 13.33 | $20.22 | +4.06% |
| OXY | $52.82 | +2.50% | 51.1B | 38.11 | $1.36 | +1.87% |
| FANG | $174.54 | -0.10% | 50.4B | 12.32 | $14.29 | +2.27% |
| HES | $148.97 | +0.00% | 46.1B | 20.66 | $7.21 | +0.67% |
| EQT | $59.97 | +0.33% | 37.8B | 19.33 | $3.13 | +1.07% |
| WDS | $19.41 | +1.81% | 36.9B | 12.64 | $1.54 | +5.25% |
Stock Comparison
ERF vs COP Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 136.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while COP trades at $110.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 17.41. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check COP's competition here
ERF vs CNQ Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 88.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CNQ trades at $42.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CNQ's competition here
ERF vs EOG Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EOG trades at $122.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EOG's competition here
ERF vs PXD Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PXD's competition here
ERF vs OXY Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OXY trades at $52.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 38.11. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OXY's competition here
ERF vs FANG Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 50.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while FANG trades at $174.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 12.32. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check FANG's competition here
ERF vs HES Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HES trades at $148.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.66. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HES's competition here
ERF vs EQT Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EQT trades at $59.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 19.33. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EQT's competition here
ERF vs WDS Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while WDS trades at $19.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check WDS's competition here
ERF vs TPL Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TPL trades at $526.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 72.29. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TPL's competition here
ERF vs OXY-WT Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 29.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OXY-WT trades at $30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OXY-WT's competition here
ERF vs DVN Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 27.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DVN trades at $44.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check DVN's competition here
ERF vs EXE Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EXE trades at $106.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is 33.25. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EXE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EXE's competition here
ERF vs CTRA Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 23.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CTRA trades at $31.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.35. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CTRA's competition here
ERF vs COG Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check COG's competition here
ERF vs MRO Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MRO's competition here
ERF vs PR Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PR trades at $17.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PR's competition here
ERF vs OVV Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OVV trades at $50.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 54.35. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OVV's competition here
ERF vs AR Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while AR trades at $34.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 17.51. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check AR's competition here
ERF vs CHK Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHK's competition here
ERF vs APA Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while APA trades at $28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 6.95. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check APA's competition here
ERF vs CHKEW Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHKEW's competition here
ERF vs RRC Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while RRC trades at $39.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 16.68. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check RRC's competition here
ERF vs CHKEZ Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHKEZ's competition here
ERF vs CHKEL Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHKEL's competition here
ERF vs SWN Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SWN's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SWN's competition here
ERF vs MTDR Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MTDR trades at $51.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 8.39. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MTDR's competition here
ERF vs VIST Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VIST trades at $57.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 8.72. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VIST's competition here
ERF vs CHRD Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHRD trades at $104.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 35.60. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHRD's competition here
ERF vs CEO Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CEO's competition here
ERF vs CRK Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRK trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CRK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CRK's competition here
ERF vs CNX Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CNX trades at $39.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CNX's competition here
ERF vs CPG Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CPG's competition here
ERF vs CRC Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRC trades at $58.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 14.19. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CRC's competition here
ERF vs MGY Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MGY trades at $27.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MGY's competition here
ERF vs MUR Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MUR trades at $33.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 46.85. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MUR's competition here
ERF vs OAS Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OAS's competition here
ERF vs DEN Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check DEN's competition here
ERF vs BCEI Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BCEI's competition here
ERF vs CDEV Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CDEV's competition here
ERF vs GPOR Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GPOR trades at $199.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -372.67. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GPOR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GPOR's competition here
ERF vs VRN Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VRN's competition here
ERF vs BSM Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BSM trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BSM's competition here
ERF vs BKV Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BKV trades at $30.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is 65.31. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BKV's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BKV's competition here
ERF vs ESTE Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check ESTE's competition here
ERF vs BTE Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BTE trades at $3.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BTE's competition here
ERF vs NOG Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while NOG trades at $27.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 15.48. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check NOG's competition here
ERF vs SM Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SM trades at $23.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.74. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SM's competition here
ERF vs CRGY Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRGY trades at $10.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -34.56. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CRGY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CRGY's competition here
ERF vs CLMT Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CLMT trades at $28.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -67.00. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CLMT's competition here
ERF vs CPE Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CPE's competition here
ERF vs TALO Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TALO trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is -6.69. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TALO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TALO's competition here
ERF vs CIVI Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CIVI trades at $27.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.97. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CIVI's competition here
ERF vs STRDW Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check STRDW's competition here
ERF vs VET Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VET trades at $10.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VET's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VET's competition here
ERF vs MNR Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MNR trades at $13.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 14.50. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MNR's competition here
ERF vs KRP Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KRP trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is -159.50. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check KRP's competition here
ERF vs HHRS Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HHRS's competition here
ERF vs NEXT Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while NEXT trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check NEXT's competition here
ERF vs DMLP Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DMLP trades at $25.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 23.48. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check DMLP's competition here
ERF vs FLMN Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check FLMN's competition here
ERF vs KOS Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KOS trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -3.07. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check KOS's competition here
ERF vs SBR Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SBR trades at $70.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SBR's ROE of +9.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SBR's competition here
ERF vs SBOW Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SBOW's competition here
ERF vs TELL Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TELL's competition here
ERF vs VTS Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 879.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VTS trades at $22.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 44.57. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VTS's competition here
ERF vs IMPPP Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 855.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while IMPPP trades at $25.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.80. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check IMPPP's competition here
ERF vs ROCC Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check ROCC's competition here
ERF vs TXO Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 695.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TXO trades at $12.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 31.73. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TXO's competition here
ERF vs VTLE Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 693.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VTLE trades at $17.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VTLE's competition here
ERF vs GRNT Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 686.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GRNT trades at $5.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GRNT's competition here
ERF vs TBN Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TBN has a market cap of 674.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TBN trades at $30.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TBN's P/E ratio is -15.67. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to TBN's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TBN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TBN's competition here
ERF vs HPK Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 665.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HPK trades at $5.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HPK's competition here
ERF vs SD Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 647.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SD trades at $17.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SD's competition here
ERF vs REPX Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 621.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while REPX trades at $27.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 6.77. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check REPX's competition here
ERF vs PVAC Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PVAC's competition here
ERF vs EGY Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 537.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EGY trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EGY's competition here
ERF vs OBE Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 534.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OBE trades at $7.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to OBE's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OBE's competition here
ERF vs GPRK Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 444.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GPRK trades at $8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GPRK's competition here
ERF vs GFR Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 426.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GFR trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 4.75. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GFR's competition here
ERF vs WTI Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 398.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while WTI trades at $2.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to WTI's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check WTI's competition here
ERF vs PNRG Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 310.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PNRG trades at $187.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 17.98. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PNRG's competition here
ERF vs REI Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 283.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while REI trades at $1.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas REI's P/E ratio is -17.12. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to REI's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check REI's competition here
ERF vs INR Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 265.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while INR trades at $16.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas INR's P/E ratio is -19.52. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check INR's competition here
ERF vs SJT Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 256.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SJT trades at $5.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is -550.00. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to SJT's ROE of -2.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SJT's competition here
ERF vs BRY Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 253M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BRY trades at $3.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -2.79. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BRY's competition here
ERF vs GTE Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 238.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GTE trades at $6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -2.62. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GTE's competition here
ERF vs AMPY Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 230.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while AMPY trades at $5.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is -8.27. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to AMPY's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check AMPY's competition here
ERF vs PHX Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PHX trades at $4.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PHX's competition here
ERF vs EPM Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 154.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EPM trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is 55.25. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EPM's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EPM's competition here
ERF vs IMPP Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 143.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while IMPP trades at $3.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 3.93. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check IMPP's competition here
ERF vs KGEI Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 139.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KGEI trades at $3.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 8.04. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check KGEI's competition here
ERF vs EPSN Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 110M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EPSN trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 18.48. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EPSN's competition here
ERF vs ANNA Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ANNA has a market cap of 106.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while ANNA trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ANNA's P/E ratio is -13.74. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to ANNA's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to ANNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check ANNA's competition here
ERF vs EP Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EP trades at $2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -5.65. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EP's competition here
ERF vs NRT Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NRT has a market cap of 77.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while NRT trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NRT's P/E ratio is 9.78. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to NRT's ROE of +4.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to NRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check NRT's competition here
ERF vs HUSA Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HUSA has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HUSA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HUSA's P/E ratio is -0.29. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to HUSA's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to HUSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HUSA's competition here
ERF vs BATL Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BATL has a market cap of 73.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BATL trades at $4.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BATL's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to BATL's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BATL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BATL's competition here
ERF vs INDO Comparison February 2026
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INDO has a market cap of 71.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while INDO trades at $4.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas INDO's P/E ratio is -9.90. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.40%, compared to INDO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to INDO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check INDO's competition here