Enerplus Corporation
Enerplus Corporation ERF Peers
See (ERF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERF | $20.09 | +0.66% | 4.10B | 11.22 | $1.79 | +1.48% |
| COP | $90.40 | -2.20% | 114.12B | 11.46 | $7.89 | +3.46% |
| CNQ | $30.57 | -0.42% | 64.17B | 11.99 | $2.55 | +5.16% |
| PXD | $269.62 | +0.73% | 63.00B | 13.33 | $20.22 | N/A |
| EOG | $113.98 | -1.32% | 62.21B | 10.55 | $10.80 | +3.32% |
| CEO | $121.76 | N/A | 53.21B | 10.59 | $11.50 | N/A |
| OXY | $42.33 | -1.66% | 41.65B | 17.14 | $2.47 | +2.13% |
| HES | $132.79 | -1.59% | 41.07B | 18.42 | $7.21 | +1.46% |
| FANG | $139.35 | -1.26% | 40.71B | 8.67 | $16.07 | +3.78% |
| OXY-WT | $21.19 | -4.37% | 40.51B | N/A | N/A | +2.13% |
Stock Comparison
ERF vs COP Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 114.12B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while COP trades at $90.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 11.46. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CNQ Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 64.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CNQ trades at $30.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs PXD Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PXD trades at $269.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs EOG Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 62.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EOG trades at $113.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CEO Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 53.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CEO trades at $121.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs OXY Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 41.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OXY trades at $42.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 17.14. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs HES Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 41.07B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HES trades at $132.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 18.42. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs FANG Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 40.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while FANG trades at $139.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 8.67. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs OXY-WT Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 40.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OXY-WT trades at $21.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs EQT Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 33.26B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EQT trades at $55.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 91.08. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs TPL Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 32.56B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TPL trades at $1,416.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 70.88. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs EXE Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 27.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EXE trades at $113.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is -19.50. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EXE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs WDS Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 26.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while WDS trades at $14.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 7.51. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs DVN Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 20.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DVN trades at $32.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CTRA Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 18.71B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CTRA trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 14.33. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs COG Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while COG trades at $22.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs MRO Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 15.97B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MRO trades at $28.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs AR Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 12.23B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while AR trades at $39.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 51.15. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CHK Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHK trades at $81.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs OVV Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 9.63B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OVV trades at $37.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 15.71. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CHKEW Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.44B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs RRC Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 9.42B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while RRC trades at $39.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 35.52. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs PR Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 9.33B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PR trades at $13.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CHKEZ Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CHKEL Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs SWN Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.84B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SWN trades at $7.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SWN's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CRK Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 6.94B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRK trades at $23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is -20.98. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs APA Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 6.25B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while APA trades at $17.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs MTDR Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 5.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MTDR trades at $44.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 5.94. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CHRD Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 5.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHRD trades at $95.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CPG Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.31B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CPG trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CPG's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs VIST Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 4.89B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VIST trades at $51.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CNX Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CNX trades at $32.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is -16.39. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CNX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs OAS Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OAS trades at $109.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs DEN Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.51B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DEN trades at $88.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs BCEI Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BCEI trades at $54.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CDEV Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CDEV trades at $7.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs MGY Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MGY trades at $22.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 11.07. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CRC Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 3.85B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRC trades at $43.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs VRN Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VRN trades at $6.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs GPOR Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GPOR trades at $194.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GPOR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs MUR Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MUR trades at $21.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs ESTE Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while ESTE trades at $21.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs BSM Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BSM trades at $13.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 14.77. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CRGY Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.86B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRGY trades at $8.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -14.02. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs NOG Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while NOG trades at $28.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 4.40. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CIVI Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 2.67B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CIVI trades at $28.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.31. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs SM Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 2.55B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SM trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 3.34. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CPE Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CPE trades at $35.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs NEXT Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 2.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while NEXT trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -11.25. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs STRDW Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.93B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while STRDW trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs BKV Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BKV trades at $22.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BKV's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs MNR Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.68B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MNR trades at $14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs KRP Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.66B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KRP trades at $13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 338.75. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs HHRS Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.47B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HHRS trades at $15.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs TALO Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 1.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TALO trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is 37.16. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TALO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs DMLP Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.34B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DMLP trades at $28.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs BTE Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BTE trades at $1.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs FLMN Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while FLMN trades at $7.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs HPK Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HPK trades at $9.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 10.80. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CLMT Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CLMT trades at $13.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -3.43. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs VET Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VET trades at $6.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -43.37. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs SBR Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 960.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SBR trades at $65.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.37. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SBR's ROE of +6.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs SBOW Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.37M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SBOW trades at $36.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs TELL Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 892.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TELL trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs VTS Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 861.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VTS trades at $22.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF and VTS have similar daily volatility (1.76).
ERF vs KOS Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 831.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KOS trades at $1.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -57.95. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs GRNT Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 730.95M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GRNT trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 61.94. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs ROCC Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while ROCC trades at $37.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs TXO Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 629.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TXO trades at $15.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 40.03. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs VTLE Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 600.13M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VTLE trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -4.59. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs REPX Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 595.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while REPX trades at $27.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs PVAC Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PVAC trades at $30.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs SD Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 364.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SD trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 5.71. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs EGY Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 355.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EGY trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 6.12. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs OBE Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 345.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OBE trades at $4.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -2.51. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to OBE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs GPRK Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 343.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GPRK trades at $6.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 3.56. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs GFR Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 316.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GFR trades at $4.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs PNRG Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 305.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PNRG trades at $182.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 8.33. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs INR Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 267.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while INR trades at $17.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs SJT Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 260.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SJT trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is 50.73. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to SJT's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs KGEI Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 229.26M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KGEI trades at $6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 12.92. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs WTI Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 214.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while WTI trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.01. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to WTI's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs BRY Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 211.84M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BRY trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs REI Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 171.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while REI trades at $0.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to REI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs GTE Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 170.82M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GTE trades at $4.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -10.99. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to GTE's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs PHX Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 164.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PHX trades at $4.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs EPSN Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 155.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EPSN trades at $7.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 78.67. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs EPM Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 152.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EPM trades at $4.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -110.87. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs EP Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 134.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EP trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -7.41. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs AMPY Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 108.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while AMPY trades at $2.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs HPKEW Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, HPKEW has a market cap of 106.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HPKEW trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HPKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to HPKEW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to HPKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs IMPPP Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 86.35M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while IMPPP trades at $24.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -63.21. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs IMPP Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 85.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while IMPP trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 1.78. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs MVO Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, MVO has a market cap of 67.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MVO trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MVO's P/E ratio is 4.51. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to MVO's ROE of +4.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to MVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs CRT Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, CRT has a market cap of 62.64M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRT trades at $10.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRT's P/E ratio is 10.99. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to CRT's ROE of +2.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs PED Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 56.22M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PED trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 3.08. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs VOC Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, VOC has a market cap of 54.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VOC trades at $3.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VOC's P/E ratio is 5.19. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to VOC's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.
ERF vs PVL Comparison
ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.10B. In comparison, PVL has a market cap of 50.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PVL trades at $1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PVL's P/E ratio is 17.00. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.32%, compared to PVL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.