Enerplus Corporation

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COP has a market cap of 122.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while COP trades at $97.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas COP's P/E ratio is 12.30. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COP's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to COP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check COP's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CNQ has a market cap of 66.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CNQ trades at $31.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CNQ's P/E ratio is 12.19. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNQ's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CNQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CNQ's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EOG has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EOG trades at $121.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EOG's P/E ratio is 11.27. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EOG's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EOG's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PXD has a market cap of 63B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PXD trades at $269.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PXD's P/E ratio is 13.33. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PXD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to PXD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PXD's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CEO has a market cap of 53.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CEO trades at $121.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CEO's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CEO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CEO's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HES has a market cap of 46.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HES trades at $148.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HES's P/E ratio is 20.63. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HES's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to HES. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HES's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OXY-WT has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OXY-WT trades at $23.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OXY-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OXY-WT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OXY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OXY-WT's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OXY has a market cap of 44.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OXY trades at $45.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OXY's P/E ratio is 18.44. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to OXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OXY's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FANG has a market cap of 44B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while FANG trades at $150.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas FANG's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FANG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to FANG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check FANG's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WDS has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while WDS trades at $17.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas WDS's P/E ratio is 9.20. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WDS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to WDS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check WDS's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EQT has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EQT trades at $51.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EQT's P/E ratio is 27.33. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EQT's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EQT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EQT's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EXE has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EXE trades at $98.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EXE's P/E ratio is -16.89. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EXE's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to EXE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EXE's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TPL has a market cap of 22.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TPL trades at $976.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TPL's P/E ratio is 48.88. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TPL's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TPL's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DVN has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DVN trades at $34.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DVN's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DVN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to DVN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check DVN's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CTRA has a market cap of 18.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CTRA trades at $23.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CTRA's P/E ratio is 13.92. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CTRA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CTRA's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, COG has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while COG trades at $22.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas COG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to COG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to COG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check COG's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MRO has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MRO trades at $28.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MRO's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MRO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to MRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MRO's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OVV has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OVV trades at $42.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OVV's P/E ratio is 18.91. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OVV's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OVV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OVV's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHK has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHK trades at $81.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHK's P/E ratio is 26.88. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CHK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHK's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AR has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while AR trades at $32.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas AR's P/E ratio is 42.38. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AR's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to AR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check AR's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PR has a market cap of 10B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PR trades at $14.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PR's P/E ratio is 8.74. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PR's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKEW has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEW trades at $71.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHKEW's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHKEW's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, RRC has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while RRC trades at $35.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas RRC's P/E ratio is 17.87. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to RRC's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to RRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check RRC's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKEZ has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEZ trades at $64.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHKEZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHKEZ's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHKEL has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHKEL trades at $62.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHKEL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHKEL's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CHKEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHKEL's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SWN has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SWN trades at $7.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SWN's P/E ratio is -2.84. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SWN's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SWN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SWN's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, APA has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while APA trades at $19.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas APA's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to APA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to APA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check APA's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MTDR has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MTDR trades at $52.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MTDR's P/E ratio is 7.72. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTDR's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MTDR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MTDR's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CHRD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CHRD trades at $113.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CHRD's P/E ratio is 7.52. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CHRD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CHRD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CHRD's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRK has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRK trades at $20.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRK's P/E ratio is -18.29. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRK's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CRK's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPG has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CPG trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CPG's P/E ratio is 23.86. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CPG's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MGY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MGY trades at $24.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MGY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MGY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MGY's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OAS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OAS trades at $109.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OAS's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OAS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OAS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OAS's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRC has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRC trades at $50.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRC's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRC's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CRC's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DEN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DEN trades at $88.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DEN's P/E ratio is 9.94. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DEN's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to DEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check DEN's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BCEI has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BCEI trades at $54.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BCEI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BCEI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BCEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BCEI's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CNX has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CNX trades at $30.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CNX's P/E ratio is 36.40. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CNX's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CNX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CNX's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CDEV has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CDEV trades at $7.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CDEV's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CDEV's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CDEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CDEV's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VIST has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VIST trades at $43.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VIST's P/E ratio is 7.95. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VIST's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VIST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VIST's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MUR has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MUR trades at $27.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MUR's P/E ratio is 10.36. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MUR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MUR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MUR's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VRN has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VRN trades at $6.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VRN's P/E ratio is 18.21. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VRN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VRN's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SM has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SM trades at $28.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SM's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SM's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CIVI has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CIVI trades at $32.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CIVI's P/E ratio is 3.77. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CIVI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CIVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CIVI's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GPOR has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GPOR trades at $168.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GPOR's P/E ratio is -9.80. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPOR's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GPOR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GPOR's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ESTE has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while ESTE trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ESTE's P/E ratio is 4.64. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ESTE's ROE of +0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to ESTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check ESTE's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NEXT has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while NEXT trades at $11.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NEXT's P/E ratio is -16.51. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NEXT's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to NEXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check NEXT's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, NOG has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while NOG trades at $29.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas NOG's P/E ratio is 4.63. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NOG's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to NOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check NOG's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BSM has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BSM trades at $12.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BSM's P/E ratio is 13.58. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BSM's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to BSM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BSM's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRGY has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRGY trades at $9.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRGY's P/E ratio is -14.91. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRGY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CRGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CRGY's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CPE has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CPE trades at $35.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CPE's P/E ratio is 5.78. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CPE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CPE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CPE's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, STRDW has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while STRDW trades at $0.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas STRDW's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to STRDW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to STRDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check STRDW's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KRP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KRP trades at $14.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KRP's P/E ratio is 374.00. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KRP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to KRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check KRP's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MNR has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MNR trades at $15.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MNR's P/E ratio is 9.66. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MNR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MNR's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BKV has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BKV trades at $20.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BKV's P/E ratio is -9.51. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BKV's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BKV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BKV's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BTE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BTE trades at $2.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BTE's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BTE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BTE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BTE's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TALO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TALO trades at $9.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TALO's P/E ratio is 41.52. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TALO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to TALO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TALO's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HHRS has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HHRS trades at $15.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HHRS's P/E ratio is -46.42. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HHRS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to HHRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HHRS's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CLMT has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CLMT trades at $16.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CLMT's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CLMT's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to CLMT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CLMT's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VET has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VET trades at $8.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VET's P/E ratio is -57.27. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VET's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VET's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, DMLP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while DMLP trades at $27.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas DMLP's P/E ratio is 13.61. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to DMLP's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to DMLP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check DMLP's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, HPK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while HPK trades at $10.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas HPK's P/E ratio is 11.76. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to HPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check HPK's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, FLMN has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while FLMN trades at $7.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas FLMN's P/E ratio is 64.75. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to FLMN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to FLMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check FLMN's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KOS has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KOS trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KOS's P/E ratio is -79.83. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KOS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to KOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check KOS's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SBR has a market cap of 967.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SBR trades at $66.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SBR's P/E ratio is 12.45. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBR's ROE of +6.93%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to SBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SBR's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VTS has a market cap of 963.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VTS trades at $24.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VTS's P/E ratio is 31.58. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VTS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VTS's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SBOW has a market cap of 940.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SBOW trades at $36.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SBOW's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SBOW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SBOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SBOW's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TELL has a market cap of 893M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TELL trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TELL's P/E ratio is -4.34. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TELL's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to TELL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TELL's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, TXO has a market cap of 843.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while TXO trades at $15.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas TXO's P/E ratio is 40.53. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to TXO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to TXO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check TXO's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VTLE has a market cap of 768.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VTLE trades at $19.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VTLE's P/E ratio is -5.88. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VTLE's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VTLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VTLE's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, ROCC has a market cap of 712.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while ROCC trades at $37.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas ROCC's P/E ratio is 2.74. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ROCC's ROE of +1.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to ROCC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check ROCC's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GRNT has a market cap of 698.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GRNT trades at $5.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GRNT's P/E ratio is 59.22. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GRNT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GRNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GRNT's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REPX has a market cap of 619.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while REPX trades at $28.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas REPX's P/E ratio is 6.01. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REPX's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to REPX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check REPX's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PVAC has a market cap of 581.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PVAC trades at $30.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PVAC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PVAC's ROE of -0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PVAC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PVAC's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, OBE has a market cap of 417.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while OBE trades at $6.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas OBE's P/E ratio is -3.13. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to OBE's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to OBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check OBE's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EGY has a market cap of 402.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EGY trades at $3.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EGY's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EGY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EGY's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SD has a market cap of 388.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SD trades at $10.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SD's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SD's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to SD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SD's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GPRK has a market cap of 347.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GPRK trades at $6.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GPRK's P/E ratio is 3.68. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GPRK's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GPRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GPRK's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GFR has a market cap of 324.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GFR trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GFR's P/E ratio is 2.41. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GFR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to GFR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GFR's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PNRG has a market cap of 292.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PNRG trades at $176.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PNRG's P/E ratio is 8.29. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PNRG's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PNRG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PNRG's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, SJT has a market cap of 272.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while SJT trades at $5.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas SJT's P/E ratio is 292.50. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SJT's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to SJT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check SJT's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, WTI has a market cap of 269.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while WTI trades at $1.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas WTI's P/E ratio is -2.53. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WTI's ROE of +2.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to WTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check WTI's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, BRY has a market cap of 258.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while BRY trades at $3.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas BRY's P/E ratio is -7.09. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BRY's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to BRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check BRY's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, KGEI has a market cap of 218.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while KGEI trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas KGEI's P/E ratio is 10.82. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to KGEI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to KGEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check KGEI's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, INR has a market cap of 218M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while INR trades at $14.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas INR's P/E ratio is 7.57. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to INR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to INR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check INR's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EP has a market cap of 178.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EP trades at $5.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EP's P/E ratio is -10.25. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EP's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EP's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EPM has a market cap of 174.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EPM trades at $5.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EPM's P/E ratio is -127.12. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EPM's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to EPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EPM's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, REI has a market cap of 171.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while REI trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas REI's P/E ratio is 2.30. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to REI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to REI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check REI's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, GTE has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while GTE trades at $4.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas GTE's P/E ratio is -10.61. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GTE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to GTE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check GTE's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PHX has a market cap of 165M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PHX trades at $4.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PHX's P/E ratio is 22.89. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PHX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to PHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PHX's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, AMPY has a market cap of 158.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while AMPY trades at $3.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas AMPY's P/E ratio is 9.84. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AMPY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to AMPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check AMPY's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, EPSN has a market cap of 137.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while EPSN trades at $6.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas EPSN's P/E ratio is 31.20. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to EPSN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to EPSN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check EPSN's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IMPPP has a market cap of 109M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while IMPPP trades at $25.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas IMPPP's P/E ratio is -65.36. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMPPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to IMPPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check IMPPP's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, IMPP has a market cap of 108.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while IMPP trades at $3.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas IMPP's P/E ratio is 2.63. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to IMPP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to IMPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check IMPP's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, MVO has a market cap of 66.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while MVO trades at $5.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas MVO's P/E ratio is 4.41. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MVO's ROE of +3.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to MVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check MVO's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PED has a market cap of 60.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PED trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PED's P/E ratio is 3.49. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PED's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PED. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PED's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PVL has a market cap of 59.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PVL trades at $1.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PVL's P/E ratio is 19.89. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PVL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to PVL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PVL's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, VOC has a market cap of 58.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while VOC trades at $3.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas VOC's P/E ratio is 5.44. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to VOC's ROE of +0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is less volatile compared to VOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check VOC's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, CRT has a market cap of 57.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while CRT trades at $9.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas CRT's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to CRT's ROE of +2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to CRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check CRT's competition here

ERF plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ERF stands at 4.1B. In comparison, PRT has a market cap of 49.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ERF is priced at $20.09, while PRT trades at $4.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ERF currently has a P/E ratio of 11.22, whereas PRT's P/E ratio is 9.12. In terms of profitability, ERF's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PRT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ERF is more volatile compared to PRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ERF.Check PRT's competition here